The Management of Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma Treated with Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid: An International Survey of Practice

Management of Patients undergoing Elective Craniotomy under Antiplatelet or Anticoagulation Therapy: An International Survey of Practice

BACKGROUND

 The literature concerning the management of antiplatelet (AP) and anticoagulation (AC) medication in the perioperative phase of craniotomy remains scarce. The aim of this international survey was to investigate the current practice among neurosurgeons regarding their perioperative management of AP and AC medication.

METHODS

 We distributed an online survey to neurosurgeons worldwide with questions concerning their perioperative practice with AP and AC medication in patients undergoing craniotomy. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

 A total of 130 replies were registered. The majority of responders practice neurosurgery in Europe (79%) or high-income countries (79%). Responders reported in 58.9 and 48.8% to have institutional guidelines for the perioperative management of AP and AC medication. Preoperative interruption time was reported heterogeneously for the different types of AP and AC medication with 40.4% of responders interrupting aspirin (ASA) for 4 to 6 days and 45.7% interrupting clopidogrel for 6 to 8 days. Around half of the responders considered ASA safe to be continued or resumed within 3 days for bypass (55%) or vascular (49%) surgery, but only few for skull base or other tumor craniotomies in general (14 and 26%, respectively). Three quarters of the responders (74%) did not consider AC safe to be continued or resumed early (within 3 days) for any kind of craniotomy. ASA was considered to have the lowest risk of bleeding. Nearly all responders (93%) agreed that more evidence is needed concerning AP and AC management in neurosurgery.

CONCLUSION

 Worldwide, the perioperative management of AP and AC medication is very heterogeneous among neurosurgeons.

Risks and benefits of continuation and discontinuation of aspirin in elective craniotomies: a systematic review and pooled-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIM

Discontinuation of aspirin (ASA) prior to elective craniotomies is common practice. However, patients treated with ASA for secondary prevention bear a higher risk for thromboembolic complications. Aim of this systematic review is to investigate the risks and benefits of perioperative continuation and discontinuation of ASA in elective craniotomies.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were retro- and prospective studies, reporting hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications in patients in whom ASA was either continued or discontinued perioperatively in elective craniotomies. We excluded shunt operations and emergency cases. The MINORS (Methodological index for non-randomized studies) score was used to quantify the methodological quality of the eligible studies.

RESULTS

Out of 523 publications, 7 met the eligibility criteria (cumulative cohort of 646 patients). The mean MINORS score for the comparative studies was 18.7/24 (± SD 2.07, range: 17-22) and 9/16 for the unique non-comparative study, indicating an overall weak methodological quality of the included studies. 57.1% of the patients underwent craniotomy for intra- and extra-axial tumor removal, 39.0% for bypass surgery and 3.9% for neurovascular lesions (other than bypass). In 31.0% of the cases, ASA was prescribed for primary and in 69.0% for secondary prevention. ASA was continued perioperatively in 61.8% and discontinued in 38.2% of the cases. The hemorrhagic complication rate was 3% (95% CI [0.01-0.05]) in the ASA continuation group (Con-Group) and 3% (95% CI [0.01-0.09]) in the discontinuation group (Disc-Group) (p = 0.9). The rate of thromboembolic events in the Con-Group was 3% (95% CI [0.01-0.06]) in comparison to 6% (95% CI [0.02-0.14]) in the Disc-Group (p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative continuation of ASA in elective craniotomies does not seem to be associated with an increased hemorrhagic risk. The potential beneficial effect of ASA continuation on thromboembolic events needs to be further investigated in patients under ASA for secondary prevention.

Do statins reduce the rate of revision surgery after chronic subdural hematoma drain?

BACKGROUND

With chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), surgery is the therapeutic mainstay for large or symptomatic cases. Statins are reported to be effective as the primary therapy of CSDH to obviate the need for surgery. However, the effect of statins on the postoperative course of CSDH is largely unclear. We therefore sought to determine whether statins reduce the rate of repeat surgery after CSDH drain.

METHODS

We performed an analysis of all patients who underwent surgery for CSDH at our institution between 2012 and 2018. The patients were separated into those who received statins as part of their previous medication (statin group) and those who did not (control group). The medical records were reviewed for repeat surgeries and complications. Additionally, patients or their relatives were contacted via phone to obtain missing data and inquire about possible repeat surgeries at other institutions.

RESULTS

We identified 407 patients who received CSDH evacuation via burr hole craniotomy. In total, 123 patients were treated with statins as part of their daily medication. Repeat surgery was performed in 26 patients in the statin group (21.1%) and 57 patients in the non-statin group (20.1%, p = 0.81). Upon multivariate logistic regression analysis, neither of the variables statins, age, antithrombotic medication, Charlson comorbidity index, or Markwalder grading score yielded a statistically significant effect upon the revision rate.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence for the protective effect of statins in patients who underwent surgery for CSDH. We thus conclude that statin therapy is not warranted for CSDH perioperatively.

Does the discontinuation time of antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment affect hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing craniotomy for neurovascular lesions?

BACKGROUND

The number of patients treated with platelet inhibitors (PI) and/or anticoagulants (AC) in neurosurgery is increasing. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of PI/AC discontinuation time on hemorrhagic events after craniotomy for neurovascular pathologies.

METHODS

The 30-day postoperative bleeding rates were retrospectively compared between short (≤5 days) and long (>5 days) discontinuation time of PI/AC before and after surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis comparing time to postoperative bleeding and the effect of PI/AC discontinuation time on bleeding rates were analysed. Potential risk factors for postoperative bleeding were further analysed in uni- and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Out of 215 consecutive patients undergoing craniotomy for neurovascular lesions between January 2009 and April 2019, 23.3% were treated with PI/AC. Of these 36% (n = 18) and 20.8% (n = 10) were included in the short pre- and postoperative discontinuation group, respectively. Bleeding rates were comparable between the pre- and postoperative short and long discontinuation groups (preoperative 11.1% vs 10%, p = .659; postoperative 0% vs 13.2%, p = .566). In-hospital mortality rates and time to bleed of the groups were comparable as well. Similarly, the rate for thromboembolic events was not significantly affected by the pre- or postoperative discontinuation time of PI/AC. After multivariate analysis preoperative bleeding of the lesion was significantly associated with postoperative bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with short discontinuation time of PI/AC treatment undergoing craniotomy for the treatment of neurovascular lesions do not appear to have increased rates of postoperative bleeding.

Impact of acetylsalicylic acid in patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm surgery - should the neurosurgeon really worry about it?

There has been an increase in the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, Aspirin®) among patients with stroke and heart disease as well as in aging populations as a means of primary prevention. The potentially life-threatening consequences of a postoperative hemorrhagic complication after neurosurgical operative procedures are well known. In the present study, we evaluate the risk of continued ASA use as it relates to postoperative hemorrhage and cardiopulmonary complications in patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 200 consecutive clipping procedures performed between 2008 and 2018. Two different statistical models were applied. The first model consisted of two groups: (1) group with No ASA impact - patients who either did not use ASA at all as well as those who had stopped their use of the ASA medication in time (> = 7 days prior to operation); (2) group with ASA impact - all patients whose ASA use was not stopped in time. The second model consisted of three groups: (1) No ASA use; (2) Stopped ASA use (> = 7 days prior to operation); (3) Continued ASA use (did not stop or did not stop in time, <7 days prior to operation). Data collection included demographic information, surgical parameters, aneurysm characteristics, and all hemorrhagic/thromboembolic complications. A postoperative hemorrhage was defined as relevant if a consecutive operation for hematoma removal was necessary. An ASA effect has been assumed in 32 out of 200 performed operations. A postoperative hemorrhage occurred in one out these 32 patients (3.1%). A postoperative hemorrhage in patients without ASA impact was detected and treated in 5 out of 168 patients (3.0%). The difference was statistically not significant in either model (ASA impact group vs. No ASA impact group: OR = 1.0516 [0.1187; 9.3132], p = 1.000; RR = 1.0015 [0.9360; 1.0716]). Cardiopulmonary complications were significantly more frequent in the group with ASA impact than in the group without ASA impact (p = 0.030). In this study continued ASA use was not associated with an increased risk of a postoperative hemorrhage. However, cardiopulmonary complications were significantly more frequent in the ASA impact group than in the No ASA impact group. Thus, ASA might relatively safely be continued in patients with increased cardiovascular risk and cases of emergency cerebrovascular surgery.

Frailty and Outcomes after Craniotomy or Craniectomy for Atraumatic Chronic Subdural Hematoma

OBJECTIVE

Frailty is a measure of decreased physiologic reserve and has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in a variety of surgical disciplines. No data exist regarding the relationship of frailty with adverse outcomes in craniotomy for chronic subdural evacuation. We assessed the relationship between frailty and the incidence of major postoperative complication, discharge destination other than home, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality after craniotomy for atraumatic subdural evacuation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on a population of 1647 adult patients undergoing craniotomy for evacuation of atraumatic subdural hematoma in the 2005-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Frailty was assessed using the modified frailty index (mFI-5). Multivariable logistic regression was performed using all covariates deemed eligible through clinical relevance and statistical significance.

RESULTS

The overall rates of major complication (25.4%), discharge to destination other than home (49.8%), 30-day readmission (11.7%), and 30-day mortality (12.8%) in this analysis were high and rose with increasing frailty. In multivariable regression analyses, medium frailty (mFI-5 = 2) was associated with increased odds of major complication (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.63), discharge to destination other than home (aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.38-3.02), and 30-day mortality (aOR 2.27, 95% CI 1.08-4.78). High frailty (mFI-5 >2) was associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (aOR 2.85, 95% CI 1.13-7.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative frailty, as determined by mFI-5, is associated with increased odds of major postoperative complication, discharge to destination other than home, and 30-day mortality after craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma.

Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid in Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Neurosurgeon's Sword of Damocles

Background: The possible influence of different antithrombotic drugs on outcome after neurosurgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still unclear. Nowadays, no randomized clinical trials are available. A metanalysis including 24 studies for a total of 1,812 pooled patients concluded that antiplatelets and anticoagulations present higher risk of recurrences. On the other hand, several studies highlighted that antithrombotic suspension, timing of surgery, and resumption of these drugs are still debated, and patients taking these present higher risk of thromboembolic events with no excess risk of bleed recurrences or worse functional outcome. Our assumption is that the real hemorrhagic risk related to antithrombotic drug continuation in CSDH may be overrated and the thromboembolic risk for discontinuation underestimated, especially in patients with high cardiovascular risk.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review with the search terms “acetylsalicylic acid” and “chronic subdural x” was performed. Clinical status, treatment, time of drug discontinuation, complications (in particular, rebleeding or thromboembolic events), and clinical and radiological outcome at follow-up were evaluated.

Results: Five retrospective studies were selected for the review, three of them reporting specifically low-dose acetylsalicylic intake and two of them general antithrombotic drugs for a total of 1,226 patients. Only two papers reported the thromboembolic rate after surgery; in one paper, it is not even divided from other cardiac complications.

Conclusion: The literature review does not clarify the best management of low-dose acetylsalicylic in CSDH patients, in particular, concerning the balance between thromboembolic event rates and rebleeding risks. We do believe that CSDH precipitates the worsening of comorbidities with a resulting increased mortality. Further studies clearly evaluating the thromboembolic events are strongly needed to clarify this topic.

In this perspective paper, we discuss the difficult choice of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (LDAA) management in patients suffering from chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). The balance between hemorrhagic and thromboembolic risks often represents a sword of Damocles for neurosurgeons, especially when dealing with patients with high cardiovascular risk. No guidelines are currently available, and a survey by Kamenova et al. showed that most neurosurgeons discontinue LDAA treatment for at least 7 days in the perioperative period of surgical evacuation of CSDH, even though recent studies show that early LDAA resumption might be safe. Thrombosis prophylaxis is administered by only 60%, even though patients with CSDH are at high risk of developing thromboembolic complications. We would like to bring attention to this controversial issue.

Systematic review of current randomised control trials in chronic subdural haematoma and proposal for an international collaborative approach

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a pathology that is frequently encountered by neurosurgeons. Nevertheless, there is a lack of guidelines based on solid evidence. There has been a recent and considerable increase in the interest on management and outcomes for CSDH. Therefore, we systematically reviewed all currently running randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in chronic subdural haematoma to understand the areas under investigation and plan future collaborative trials.

METHODS

Clinical trials databases (Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, WHO ICTRP and clinical trials.gov) were searched for trials relevant to chronic subdural haematoma. It was then established which trials were currently running and fulfilled robust research methodology for a RCT.

RESULTS

There are 26 currently running RCTs in CSDH, with the most common topics covering application of steroids (7), surgical techniques (5) and tranexamic acid (5). Further to this, there are trials running on other pharmacological agents (4), middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolisation (2) and peri-operative management (3).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological agents are a particular focus of CSDH management currently, and a wealth of studies on steroids will hopefully lead to more harmonised, evidence-based practice regarding this in the near future. Surgical techniques and new procedures such as MMA embolisation are also important focuses for improving patient outcomes. There is an on-going need for future RCTs and evidence-based guidelines in CSDH, particularly including low- and middle-income countries, and it is hoped that the establishment of the iCORIC (International COllaborative Research Initiative on Chronic Subdural Haematoma) will help address this.

Influence of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Drug Use on Outcomes after Chronic Subdural Hematoma Drainage

We aim to describe the outcomes after chronic subdural hematoma drainage (CSDH) management in a large cohort of patients on antithrombotic drugs, either antiplatelets or anticoagulants, at presentation and to inform clinical decision making on the timing of surgery and recommencement of these drugs. We used data from a previous UK-based multi-center, prospective cohort study. Outcomes included recurrence within 60 days, functional outcome at discharge, and thromboembolic event during hospital stay. We performed Cox regression on recurrence and multiple logistic regression on functional outcome. There were 817 patients included in the analysis, of which 353 (43.2%) were on an antithrombotic drug at presentation. We observed a gradual reduction in risk of recurrence for patients during the 6 weeks post-CSDH surgery. Neither antiplatelet nor anticoagulant drug use influenced risk of CSDH recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–1.48; p = 0.76) or persistent/worse functional impairment (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76–1.55; p = 0.66). Delaying surgery after cessation of antiplatelet drug did not affect risk of bleed recurrence. There were 15 in-hospital thromboembolic events recorded. Events were more common in the group pre-treated with antithrombotic drugs (3.3%) compared to the non-antithrombotic group (0.9%). Patients on an antithrombotic drug pre-operatively were at higher risk of thromboembolic events with no excess risk of bleed recurrence or worse functional outcome after CSDH drainage. The data did not support delaying surgery in patients on antithrombotic therapy. In the absence of a randomized controlled trial, early surgery and early antithrombotic recommencement should be considered in those at high risk of thromboembolic events.

Low-dose aspirin and burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: study protocol for a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) represents a significant neurosurgical challenge. While continuation of ASA during the perioperative phase might increase recurrence and bleeding rates, discontinuation increases the risk of thromboembolic events. The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative recurrence and cardiovascular complication rates of patients undergoing burr-hole trepanation for cSDH with and without discontinuation of ASA.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study we include all patients undergoing burr-hole drainage of cSDH who are under ASA treatment. The patients are randomized into two groups, one receiving ASA and the other placebo perioperatively. The study primarily seeks to compare the rate of recurrent events under ASA to that under placebo treatment. Secondary objectives are thromboembolic event rate, perioperative blood loss, postoperative anemia, intra- and postoperative blood transfusion rate, and clinical outcome.

DISCUSSION

To date, there is no evidence-based consensus on how to manage patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH who are under ASA treatment. Therefore, the decision to maintain or interrupt ASA treatment is based mostly on the surgeons' preference. A randomized placebo-controlled study for this frequent question is urgently needed in order to provide class I evidence for the best possible treatment of this large group of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03120182 . Initial Release: 19.04.2017.

STUDY PROTOCOL

V2_23.02.2017.