Surgery for Herniated Lumbar Disc in Daily Tobacco Smokers: A Multicenter Observational Study

Incidence and risk factors for five-year recurrent disc herniation after primary single-level lumbar discectomy

To identify the incidence and risk factors for five-year same-site recurrent disc herniation (sRDH) after primary single-level lumbar discectomy. Secondary outcome was the incidence and risk factors for five-year sRDH reoperation. A retrospective study was conducted using prospectively collected data and patient-reported outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), between 2008 and 2019. Postoperative sRDH was identified from clinical notes and the centre's MRI database, with all imaging providers in the region checked for missing events. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate five-year sRDH incidence. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent variables predictive of sRDH, with any variable not significant at the p < 0.1 level removed. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Complete baseline data capture was available for 733 of 754 (97.2%) consecutive patients. Median follow-up time for censored patients was 2.2 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.0 to 5.0). sRDH occurred in 63 patients at a median 0.8 years (IQR 0.5 to 1.7) after surgery. The five-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for sRDH was 12.1% (95% CI 9.5 to 15.4), sRDH reoperation was 7.5% (95% CI 5.5 to 10.2), and any-procedure reoperation was 14.1% (95% CI 11.1 to 17.5). Current smoker (HR 2.12 (95% CI 1.26 to 3.56)) and higher preoperative ODI (HR 1.02 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.03)) were independent risk factors associated with sRDH. Current smoker (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.12 to 4.09)) was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. This is one of the largest series to date which has identified current smoker and higher preoperative disability as independent risk factors for sRDH. Current smoker was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. These findings are important for spinal surgeons and rehabilitation specialists in risk assessment, consenting patients, and perioperative management.

The Impact of Smoking Cessation Therapy on Lumbar Fusion Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

While there are several reports on the impact of smoking tobacco on spinal fusion outcomes, there is minimal literature on the influence of modern smoking cessation therapies on such outcomes. Our study explores the outcomes of single-level lumbar fusion surgery in active smokers and in smokers undergoing recent cessation therapy.

METHODS

MARINER30, an all-payer claims database, was utilized to identify patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusions between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcomes were the rates of any complication, symptomatic pseudarthrosis, need for revision surgery, and all-cause readmission within 30 and 90 days.

RESULTS

The exact matched population analyzed in this study contained 31,935 patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion with 10,645 (33%) in each of the following groups: (1) active smokers; (2) patients on smoking cessation therapy; and (3) those without any smoking history. Patients undergoing smoking cessation therapy have reduced odds of developing any complication following surgery (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.80-0.93) when compared with actively smoking patients. Nonsmokers and patients on cessation therapy had a significantly lower rate of any complication compared with the smoking group (9.5% vs. 17% vs. 19%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with active smoking, preoperative smoking cessation therapy within 90 days of surgery decreases the likelihood of all-cause postoperative complications. However, there were no between-group differences in the likelihood of pseudarthrosis, revision surgery, or readmission within 90 days.

Pain During Sex Before and After Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Multicenter Observational Study

STUDY DESIGN

Observational multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in pain during sexual activity after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are limited data available on sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for LSS.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. The primary outcome was change in pain during sexual activity at 1 year, assessed by item number eight of the Oswestry disability index questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures included Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol-5D, and numeric rating scale scores for back and leg pain.

RESULTS

Among the 12,954 patients included, 9908 (76.5%) completed 1-year follow-up. At baseline 9579 patients (73.9%) provided information about pain during sexual activity, whereas 7424 (74.9%) among those with complete follow-up completed this item. Preoperatively 2528 of 9579 patients (26.4%) reported a normal sex-life without pain compared with 4294 of 7424 patients (57.8%) at 1 year. Preoperatively 1007 (10.5%) patients reported that pain prevented any sex-life, compared with 393 patients (5.3%) at 1 year. At baseline 7051 of 9579 patients (73.6%) reported that sexual activity caused pain, and among these 3145 of 4768 responders (66%) reported an improvement at 1 year. A multivariable regression analysis showed that having a life partner, college education, and working until time of surgery were predictors of improvement in pain during sexual activity. Current tobacco smoking, pain duration >12 months, previous spine surgery, and complications occurring within 3 months were negative predictors.

CONCLUSION

This study clearly demonstrates that a large proportion of patients undergoing surgery for LSS experienced an improvement in pain during sexual activity at 1 year.Level of Evidence: 2.

Pain During Sex Before and After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Multicenter Observational Study

STUDY DESIGN

Observational multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in pain during sexual activity after surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are limited data available on sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for LDH.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. The primary outcome was change in pain during sexual activity at one year, assessed by item number eight of the Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures included ODI, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for back and leg pain.

RESULTS

Among the 18,529 patients included, 12,103 (64.8%) completed 1-year follow-up. At baseline, 16,729 patients (90.3%) provided information about pain during sexual activity, whereas 11,130 (92.0%) among those with complete follow-up completed this item. Preoperatively 2586 of 16,729 patients (15.5%) reported that pain did not affect sexual activity and at 1 year, 7251 of 11,130 patients (65.1%) reported a normal sex-life without pain. Preoperatively, 2483 (14.8%) patients reported that pain prevented any sex-life, compared to 190 patients (1.7%) at 1 year. At baseline, 14,143 of 16,729 patients (84.5%) reported that sexual activity caused pain, and among these 7232 of 10,509 responders (68.8%) reported an improvement at 1 year. A multivariable regression analysis showed that having a life partner, college education, working until time of surgery, undergoing emergency surgery, and increasing ODI score were predictors of improvement in pain during sexual activity. Increasing age, tobacco smoking, increasing body mass index, comorbidity, back pain >12 months, previous spine surgery, surgery in two or more lumbar levels, and complications occurring within 3 months were negative predictors.

CONCLUSION

This study clearly demonstrates that a large proportion of patients undergoing surgery for LDH experienced an improvement in pain during sexual activity at 1 year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Surgery for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation: a single center comparative observational study

BACKGROUND

Surgery on extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation (ELDH) is a commonly performed procedure. Operating on this type of herniation is known to come with more difficulties than on the frequently seen paramedian lumbar disc herniation (PLDH). However, no comparative data are available on the effectiveness and safety of this operation. We sought out to compare clinical outcomes at 1 year following surgery for ELDH and PLDH.

METHODS

Data were collected through the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine). The primary outcome measure was change at 1 year in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were quality of life measured with EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D); and numeric rating scales (NRSs).

RESULTS

Data of a total of 1750 patients were evaluated in this study, including 72 ELDH patients (4.1%). One year after surgery, there were no differences in any of the patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) between the two groups. PLDH and ELDH patients experienced similar changes in ODI (- 30.92 vs. - 34.00, P = 0.325); EQ-5D (0.50 vs. 0.51, P = 0.859); NRS back (- 3.69 vs. - 3.83, P = 0.745); and NRS leg (- 4.69 vs. - 4.46, P = 0.607) after 1 year. The proportion of patients achieving a clinical success (defined as an ODI score of less than 20 points) at 1 year was similar in both groups (61.5% vs. 52.7%, P = 0.204).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients operated for ELDH reported similar improvement after 1 year compared with patients operated for PLDH.

Predictors of Treatment Success Following Limited Discectomy With Annular Closure for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated bone-anchored annular closure to significantly reduce reherniation and reoperation rates after lumbar discectomy in patients with large annular defects. It is important to identify the prognostic factors that may be associated with successful treatment. This study aimed to identify predictors of treatment success in patients with lumbar disc herniation treated with limited microdiscectomy supplemented by a bone-anchored annular closure device (ACD).

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of 133 consecutive patients with lumbar disc herniation treated with the ACD. Treatment success was defined as ≥24% improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, ≥39% improvement in VAS leg pain, and ≥33% in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), with the raw ODI score ≤48. Success was calculated at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Potentially predictive outcomes included patient characteristics, operative data, and imaging outcomes, such as disc, facet, and end plate morphology. Logistic regression was used to determine the significant predictive factors for treatment success.

Results

After 3, 6, and 12 months, 97 of 131 (74%), 104 of 129 (81%), and 112 of 126 (89%) patients, respectively, achieved the success criteria. At 3 months follow-up, a higher proportion of younger (17-40 years) versus older (41-65 years) patients met the success criteria (P = .025). On the basis of logistic regression, the following factors were significantly associated with treatment success at 1 or more of the follow-up time points: sex (male), lower body mass index, higher baseline pain and ODI scores, lower grade preoperative disc degeneration, and the absence of a postoperative complication. The rates of index-level recurrent herniation and reoperation were 1.5% and 3.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

This real-world evidence supports a promising benefit-risk profile for augmenting limited microdiscectomy with a bone-anchored ACD and provides some insights into the patient populations that may have a greater chance of realizing significant improvements in pain and function.

Level of Evidence

2 (Cohort study).

Surgery for herniated lumbar disc in private vs public hospitals: A pragmatic comparative effectiveness study

Background

There is limited evidence on the comparative performance of private and public healthcare. Our aim was to compare outcomes following surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in private versus public hospitals.

Methods

Data were obtained from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery. Primary outcome was change in Oswestry disability index (ODI) 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints were quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D), back and leg pain, complications, and duration of surgery and hospital stays.

Results

Among 5221 patients, 1728 in the private group and 3493 in the public group, 3624 (69.4%) completed 1-year follow-up. In the private group, mean improvement in ODI was 28.8 points vs 32.3 points in the public group (mean difference − 3.5, 95% CI − 5.0 to − 1.9; P for equivalence < 0.001). Equivalence was confirmed in a propensity-matched cohort and following mixed linear model analyses. There were differences in mean change between the groups for EQ-5D (mean difference − 0.05, 95% CI − 0.08 to − 0.02; P = 0.002) and back pain (mean difference − 0.2, 95% CI − 0.2, − 0.4 to − 0.004; P = 0.046), but after propensity matching, the groups did not differ. No difference was found between the two groups for leg pain. Complication rates was lower in the private group (4.5% vs 7.2%; P < 0.001), but after propensity matching, there was no difference. Patients operated in private clinics had shorter duration of surgery (48.4 vs 61.8 min) and hospital stay (0.7 vs 2.2 days).

Conclusion

At 1 year, the effectiveness of surgery for LDH was equivalent in private and public hospitals.

Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Single-Center Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine outcomes and complications following first-time lumbar microdiscectomy.

METHODS

Prospective data for patients operated on between May 2007 and July 2016 were obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. The primary outcome was change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were change in quality of life measured with EuroQol 5 Dimensions, back and leg pain measured with numeric rating scales, and perioperative complications within 3 months of surgery.

RESULTS

For all enrolled patients (N = 1219) enrolled, mean improvement in ODI at 1 year was 33.3 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.7 to 34.9, P < 0.001). Mean improvement in EuroQol 5 Dimensions at 1 year of 0.52 point (95% CI 0.49 to 0.55, P < 0.001) represents a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.6). Mean improvements in back pain and leg pain numeric rating scales were 3.9 points (95% CI 3.6 to 4.1, P < 0.001) and 5.0 points (95% CI 4.8 to 5.2, P < 0.001), respectively. There were 18 surgical complications in 1219 patients and 63 medical complications in 846 patients. The most common complication was micturition problems at 3 months following surgery (n = 25, 2.1%). In multivariate analysis, ODI scores of 21-40 (hazard ratio [HR] 14.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 27.9, P = 0.035), 41-60 (HR 27.5, 95% CI 13.4 to 41.7, P < 0.001), 61-80 (HR 47.4, 95% CI 33.4 to 61.4, P < 0.001) and >81 (HR 66.7, 95% CI 51.1 to 82.2, P < 0.001) were identified as positive predictors for ODI improvement at 1 year, whereas age ≥65 (HR -0.9, 95% CI -0.3 to -1.5, P = 0.004) was identified as a negative predictor for ODI improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation is an effective and safe treatment.

PHQ-9 Score Predicts Postoperative Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates if an association exists between preoperative depression and postoperative outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few studies have quantified preoperative depression symptoms using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to predict postoperative outcomes after lumbar fusion, especially MIS TLIF.

METHODS

A surgical database of patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by predefined preoperative PHQ-9 scores: no depression (<5), mild depression (5-9), and moderate to severe depression (≥10). Inpatient pain scores and narcotics use were recorded. Oswestry Disability Index, Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score and Physical Component Score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 6-week, 12-week, and 6-month follow-up. One-way analysis of variance and χ analysis determined if an association existed between PHQ-9 subgroups and baseline characteristics or perioperative outcomes. Multivariate linear regression assessed for an association between PHQ-9 and postoperative patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 94 patients were included. Patients with higher PHQ-9 scores were younger, obese, and carried workers' compensation insurance. Higher PHQ-9 scores were associated with worse preoperative Oswestry Disability Index, Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score and Physical Component Score, and VAS back and leg pain scores. Patients with higher PHQ-9 reported greater inpatient VAS pain scores on postoperative day 0 and 1 and demonstrated greater hourly narcotics consumption on postoperative day 0. Furthermore, higher PHQ-9 scores exhibited less improvement in all patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe depression symptoms reported greater pain, increased narcotics consumption, and less clinical improvement after MIS TLIF. Therefore, patients with greater PHQ-9 scores should be monitored more closely and may benefit from additional counseling with regard to postoperative outcomes to better manage pain control and expectations of recovery.

The importance of smoking in orthopedic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Tobacco use is related to augmented morbidity and mortality. People who smoke heavily before orthopedic surgery may have more nonmedical complications than nonsmokers. Therefore, all orthopedic surgery patients should be screened for tobacco use.

AIM

To investigate the musculoskeletal effects of perioperative smoking.

METHODS

A narrative review of the literature on the topic was performed.

RESULTS

Orthopedic perioperative complications of smoking include impaired wound healing, augmented infection, delayed and/or impaired fracture union and arthrodesis, and worst total knee and hip arthroplasty results. Orthopedic surgeons seldom postponed surgery or utilized smoking cessation methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of smoking cessation methods such as transdermal patches, chewing gum, lozenges, inhalers, sprays, bupropion, and varenicline in the perioperative period should be recommended. Perioperative smoking cessation appears to be an efficacious method to decrease postoperative complications even if it is implemented as late as 4 weeks before surgery.

Lumbar Microdiscectomy in Obese Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between obesity and outcomes after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

The primary outcome measure was change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 year after surgery. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥30. Prospective data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.

RESULTS

We enrolled 4932 patients, 4018 nonobese and 914 obese. For patients with complete 1-year follow-up (n = 3381) the mean improvement in ODI was 31.2 points (95% confidence interval 30.4-31.9, P < 0.001). Improvement in ODI was 31.4 points in nonobese and 30.1 points in obese patients (P = 0.182). Obese and nonobese patients were as likely to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (84.2 vs. 82.7%, P = 0.336) in ODI (≥10 points improvement). Obesity was identified as a negative predictor for ODI improvement in a multiple regression analysis (BMI 30-34.99; P < 0.001, BMI ≥35; P = 0.029). Obese and nonobese patients experienced similar improvement in Euro-Qol-5 scores (0.48 vs. 0.49 points, P = 0.441) as well as back pain (3.7 vs. 3.5 points, P = 0.167) and leg pain (4.7 vs. 4.8 points, P = 0.654), as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale. Duration of surgery was shorter for nonobese patients (55.7 vs. 65.3 minutes, P ≤ 0.001). Nonobese patients experienced fewer complications compared with obese patients (6.1% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.017). Obese patients had slightly longer hospital stays (2.0 vs. 1.8 days, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Although they had more minor complications, obese individuals experienced improvement after lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation similar to that of nonobese individuals.