Upper Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative Treatment in Trigeminal Neuropathy

Trigeminal neuralgia as a presentation of high cervical stenosis: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

An atypical presentation of cervical spondylopathy (CS), trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is attributable to the extension of trigeminal nuclei into the spinal cord and is frequently overlooked, leading to limited discussion with patients regarding potential anterior cervical surgery. Our systematic review assesses the effectiveness of cervical surgery for concurrent trigeminal neuralgia in cases of cervical spondylopathy.

METHODS

A systematic review exploring cases of trigeminal neuralgia related to cervical spondylopathy was conducted searching on PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases for article in English. The authors excluded literature reviews and paediatric studies. Abstracts from articles were initially screened, followed by a detailed review of full-text papers. We included studies that documented cases of trigeminal neuralgia unrelated to cranial pathologies in patients with cervical spondylopathy.

RESULTS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol, 6 studies were included covering 30 patients (20 male, 10 female) with a mean age of 60.75 years and average symptom duration was 18 months. The most affected branches were V2 (41%) and V3 (49%), evenly distributed between left and right sides (55% vs 45%). Motor weakness (60%) and paresthesia (27%) were common non-trigeminal symptoms. The predominant compression levels were C2-C3 (38%) and C3-C4 (34%). After anterior cervical surgery (30% of patients), 100% experienced immediate resolution of trigeminal neuralgia, with no recrudescence at an average 7-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Besides common manifestations, high cervical stenosis can cause trigeminal neuralgia. This case report and systematic review confirms spinal decompression and fusion surgery may be effective in select cases. Surgeons should raise the possibility of cervical spine involvement when counseling patients with this disease.

Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Sympathetically Mediated Orofacial Pain: Case Series and Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Sympathetically mediated orofacial pain is a rare form of craniofacial pain that may be refractory to conventional medical management. We report two cases of orofacial pain with sympathetic features treated with cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using burst waveform with passive recharge. In addition, we present a narrative review of cervical SCS use in the management of orofacial pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE (PubMed) data base was queried for studies of orofacial pain and cervical SCS by searching applicable keywords including "face," "facial pain," "trigeminal neuralgia," "complex regional pain syndrome," and "spinal cord stimulation." Studies in the English language published between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2023 were reviewed for relevance.

RESULTS

Our literature review identified eight studies of cervical SCS use for treating orofacial pain. Our case series and literature review indicate that cervical SCS is probably safe and promising in the treatment of orofacial pain unresponsive to conventional management. Prior studies report positive results in patients with trigeminal nerve-related pain but are retrospective, include a small sample size, and are heterogenous regarding the follow-up period. We report significant analgesia in two patients with sympathetically mediated orofacial pain treated with cervical SCS using burst waveform with passive recharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical SCS is a viable therapeutic option for patients with orofacial pain syndromes including those with sympathetic features, although further randomized clinical studies are warranted that should include a comprehensive set of outcomes measuring pain intensity, physical function, emotional function, quality of life, and general well-being.

Temporary Gasserian ganglion stimulation utilizing SNM electrode in subacute herpetic trigeminal neuralgia

Objective

Gasserian ganglion stimulation (GGS) is a neuromodulation technique that has been extensively applied in treating postherpetic trigeminal neuralgia. However, permanent implantation of GGS was preferred in most treatment approaches. Few studies have investigated temporary GGS for the treatment of acute/subacute herpetic trigeminal neuralgia. Moreover, previous research has reported lead dislocation when utilizing traditional electrodes, which was associated with poor pain relief. In GGS research, preventing the accidental displacement of lead following implantation has consistently been a primary objective.

Methods

We report a case of a 70-year-old woman with subacute herpetic trigeminal neuralgia who underwent temporary GGS for 14 days utilizing a sacral neuromodulation (SNM) quadripolar-tined lead. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous foramen ovale (FO) puncture and temporary SNM electrode implantation were performed during the surgery. A telephone interview was conducted to record a 12-month follow-up.

Results

At admission, zoster-related trigeminal pain severity was assessed to be 9/10 on the visual analog scale (VAS). After a 14-day GGS treatment, the pain assessed on the VAS score reduced to 1/10 at discharge but increased to 4/10 at the 12-month follow-up after surgery. Additionally, the anxiety level improved from 58 points to 35 points on the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the depression level improved from 62 points to 40 points on the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). The Physical Component Summary score of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) increased from 33.9 to 47.0, and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) score of the SF-12 increased from 27.4 to 41.9.

Conclusion

Temporary GGS might be a potentially effective treatment for subacute herpetic trigeminal neuralgia, and an SNM electrode might be a good choice for reducing the risk of dislocation.

Trigeminal Postherpetic Neuralgia: From Pathophysiology to Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia (TG-PHN) is a neuropathic pain condition complicating herpes zoster (HZ) attributed to the trigeminal nerve. It poses significant challenges due to its persistent and debilitating nature. This review explores the clinical characteristics of TG-PHN, analyzes its pathophysiological underpinnings, and addresses existent and potential therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

TG-PHN is one of the most common and complex PHN locations. It has distinguishing clinical and pathophysiological characteristics, starting with viral triggered injuries to the trigeminal ganglion (TG) and peripheral tissue and involving the ascending and descending brain modulation pathways. Current therapies include vaccines, oral and topical medications, and interventional approaches, like nerve blocks and neurostimulation. This review covers TG-PHN's clinical and physiological components, treatment options, and potential future targets for improved management. By exploring the complexities of this condition, we aim to contribute to developing more effective and targeted therapies for patients suffering from trigeminal PHN.

Surgical Interventions Targeting the Nucleus Caudalis for Craniofacial Pain: A Systematic and Historical Review

INTRODUCTION

Craniofacial pain is a prevalent group of conditions, and when refractory to conventional treatments, it poses a significant burden. The last decade has seen a renewed interest in the multimodal management of pain. Interventions targeting the nucleus caudalis (NC) of the trigeminocervical complex have been available as a treatment option since the 1930s, yet evidence for efficacy remains limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present a systematic review of the literature providing a historical perspective on interventions targeting the NC leading up to the present. We examine the various intervention techniques, clinical indications, and procedural efficacy. A novel outcome-reporting scheme was devised to enable comparison among studies owing to historically variable reporting methods.

RESULTS

A review of the literature revealed 33 retrospective studies published over the last 80 years, reporting on 827 patients. The most common technique was the open NC dorsal root entry zone nucleotomy/tractotomy; however, there has been an emergence of novel approaches such as endoscopic and spinal cord stimulation in the last ten years. Regardless of intervention technique or preoperative diagnosis, 87% of patients showed improvement with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature surrounding NC intervention techniques is reviewed. Recent advancements and the wide range of craniofacial pain syndromes for which these interventions show potential efficacy are discussed. New and less invasive techniques continue to emerge as putative therapeutic options. However, prospective studies are lacking. Furthermore, the evidence supporting even well-established techniques remains of poor quality. Future work should be prospective, use standard outcome reporting, and address efficacy comparisons between intervention type and preoperative diagnosis.

Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Headache Disorders: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Chronic headache remains a major cause of disability and pain worldwide. Although the literature has extensively described pharmacologic options for headache treatment and prophylaxis, there remains a paucity of data on the efficacy of neuromodulation interventions for treatment of headache unresponsive to conventional pharmacologic therapy. The primary aim of this review was to appraise the literature for the efficacy of cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) in treating any intractable chronic headache, including migraine headaches (with or without aura), cluster headache, tension headache, and other types of headaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic review by identifying studies in PubMed, Embase (Scopus), Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials that assessed cSCS to treat chronic headache. Data were synthesized qualitatively, with primary outcomes of headache intensity and frequency. The secondary outcome was adverse effects.

RESULTS

In total, 16 studies comprising 107 patients met the inclusion criteria. Findings were presented based on type of headache, which included migraine headache with or without aura, cluster headache, trigeminal neuropathy, occipital neuralgia, posttraumatic headache, cervicogenic headache, short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with autonomic symptoms, and poststroke facial pain. Per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria, there was very low-quality evidence that cSCS is associated with a decrease in migraine headache frequency, migraine headache intensity, and trigeminal neuropathy intensity. Placement for cSCS leads ranged from C1 to C4.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests promising data from observational studies that cSCS may be helpful in decreasing frequency and intensity of chronic intractable headache. Future well-powered, randomized controlled trials are needed.

Incidence of Neuraxial and Non-Neuraxial Hematoma Complications From Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgery: Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this meta-analysis was to estimate the incidence of total hematomas, neuraxial hematomas, and non-neuraxial hematomas in patients who underwent temporary spinal cord stimulator (SCS) lead trial placement and permanent implantation of SCS leads and internal pulse generator (IPG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted of databases of any publications before October 21, 2021. Eligible study designs included randomized control trials and prospective or retrospective observational studies with more than ten patients. The primary outcome variables were the incidences of total hematomas, neuraxial hematomas, and non-neuraxial hematomas in patients with SCS. These dichotomous categorical outcomes were abstracted from studies after Freeman-Tukey arcsine square root transformation using random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian and Laird method). Pooled incidence rates and 95% CIs were calculated for each outcome variable.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies met the inclusion criteria. Included in the neuraxial and non-neuraxial hematoma analyses were 4751 patients and 3862 patients, respectively. The pooled incidence of any hematoma in patients with SCS was 0.81% (95% CI, 0.45%-1.27%). The pooled incidence of neuraxial hematoma in patients with SCS was 0.32% (95% CI, 0.18%-0.50%). This included primarily epidural hematomas (11/4751) but also comprised an intracranial hemorrhage in a patient on enoxaparin bridge therapy from warfarin and one patient not on anticoagulation with an intracranial subdural hematoma that resulted in death. The pooled incidence of non-neuraxial hematomas in patients with SCS was 0.59% (95% CI, 0.29%-1.00%).

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of hematomas in patients with temporary SCS trial lead placement and permanent SCS/IPG implantations is less than 1%. Furthermore, the incidence of neuraxial hematomas is less than 0.5%, which is of particular interest given the potential devastating consequences of this complication. The results of this study can be used to inform patients and implanting physicians on hematoma complications from SCS and highlight that the benefits of SCS outweigh the hematoma risks if anticoagulation is appropriately managed perioperatively.

Percutaneous high cervical spinal cord stimulation for refractory trigeminal neuralgia

Background

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating pain that affects the dermatomes associated with the trigeminal nerve (V1, V2, and V3). Unfortunately, many medical treatments and surgical procedures fail to sufficiently modulate the pain associated with this condition.

Case Description

This study presents two extreme cases of refractory TN (RTN) that progressed to atypical facial pain and describes successful mitigation of the neuralgia of said cases by percutaneous implantation of upper cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS). The SCS was designed to target the descending spinal trigeminal tract.

Conclusion

Together, these cases collaborate with the limited literature and further delineate the use and potential advantages of SCS in the treatment of RTN.

Outcome of Surgical Treatments of Chronic Pain Caused by Trigeminal Neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Trigeminal neuropathy represents a subset of several facial pain syndromes that are difficult to diagnose and treat. Although many surgical modalities are available, outcomes remain suboptimal. The aim of this study is to present our experience in management of trigeminal neuropathy with a focus on the effectiveness and long-term efficacy of the different surgical procedures.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from December 2012 until February 2020.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (19 females, 9 males) were included in this study. They had 40 surgical interventions. At last follow-up, 1 patient (33.3%) treated by spinal cord stimulation (SCS) had no pain recurrence and 2 patients (66.6%) had their devices removed because of therapeutic failure. Median time to pain recurrence after SCS was 19.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 29.79 months). Six patients were treated with peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). At last follow-up, 2 patients had satisfactory pain relief, whereas half of the patients had no improvement. For the 17 patients treated with computed tomography-guided trigeminal tractotomy/nucleotomy, true failure occurred 7 times in 6 patients. Median time to pain recurrence was 5.6 months (IQR, 6.2). Of the 6 patients treated with caudalis DREZ, 3 (50%) had satisfactory pain relief for >1 year and the median time to pain recurrence was 3.9 months (IQR, 29.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Trigeminal neuropathy is a difficult to treat entity of facial pain syndromes. The long-term efficacy of available interventions does not meet patients' satisfaction. More organized prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to define the patient population best served by each surgical modality.

Clinical outcomes and complications of peripheral nerve field stimulation in the management of refractory trigeminal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is a tool in the armamentarium of treatment options for trigeminal pain. The efficacy of this modality in mitigating trigeminal pain remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the existing literature on PNFS and elucidate pain score outcomes associated with its use in patients with trigeminal pain.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA framework. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were queried on June 10, 2020. Studies reporting pain outcomes in more than 5 adult patients treated with PNFS for facial pain were included. The primary outcome of the study was the mean difference in the visual analog scale (VAS) score from the last follow-up to baseline, and it was analyzed by an inverse-variance, random-effect model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and a funnel plot.

RESULTS

Of the 4597 studies screened for inclusion, 46 relevant full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Eleven observational cohort studies from the 46 articles were found to be eligible, and reported on a total of 109 patients. In 86% (94/109) of cases, trial stimulation was successful and followed by a permanent system implantation. VAS scores improved by 75% (mean difference 6.32/10 points, 95% CI 5.38-7.27 points) compared to baseline. Seventy-six percent (42/55) of patients became medication free or required lower doses of medications. The complication rate necessitating surgical revision was estimated at 32% per procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the belief that PNFS provides effective, long-term pain control for trigeminal pain. Statistical heterogeneity was considerable across all studies. Future work should be aimed at conducting double-blind randomized controlled trials to determine the utility of PNFS for treating various forms of trigeminal pain for which limited therapeutic options exist.

Spinal cord stimulation: Beyond pain management

INTRODUCTION

The gate control theory of pain was the starting point of the development of spinal cord stimulation (SCS). We describe the indications for the treatment in pain management and other uses not related to pain.

DEVELOPMENT

There are currently several paradigms for SCS: tonic, burst, and high frequency. The main difference lies in the presence of paraesthesias. SCS is most beneficial for treating neuropathic pain. Patients with failed back surgery syndrome show the best response rates, although a considerable reduction in pain is also observed in patients with complex regional pain syndrome, diabetic neuropathy, radiculopathy, and low back pain without previous surgery. Phantom pain or pain related to cardiovascular or peripheral vascular disease may improve, although there is a lack of robust evidence supporting generalisation of its use. SCS also improves cancer-related pain, although research on this issue is scarce. Non-pain-related indications for SCS are movement disorders, spasticity, and sequelae of spinal cord injury. The main limiting factors for the use of SCS are mechanical complications and the cost of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

In its 50-year history, SCS has progressed enormously. The perfection of hardware and software may improve its effectiveness and reduce the rate of complications. Indications for SCS could include other diseases, and its use could be expanded, if the costs of the technology are reduced.

Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Trigeminal Neuralgia: a Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic neuropathic pain condition affecting one or more divisions of the fifth cranial (trigeminal) nerve. TN is defined by recurrent unilateral electric shock-like pain that is abrupt in both onset and termination. The pain is triggered by innocuous sensory stimuli and is classified as either classic TN, related to vascular compression; secondary TN, due to a tumor along the trigeminal nerve or an underlying disease like multiple sclerosis; or idiopathic TN. Among the various therapies available for TN, carbamazepine remains the first-line treatment. Newer medications have demonstrated efficacy in patients who do not respond to or cannot tolerate carbamazepine. When medical management and neuroablative procedures fail, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) serves as a promising and popular option, with an estimated 34,000 SCS procedures performed annually worldwide. SCS employs the implantation of electrical leads in the epidural space to manage pain.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A review of literature was conducted to explore the use of cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

METHODS

A MEDLINE/PubMed search using the search terms "spinal cord stimulation" and "trigeminal neuralgia" was employed to find any case reports and research studies (retrospective studies, double-blinded studies, observational studies) on the topic. No date limiters were used for the search. The initial search resulted in 76 non-duplicate entries from the database. After application of the search criteria, 58 studies were excluded because they were not relevant to the study. A further detailed review of the included articles was conducted by all the reviewers. During this phase of the review, additional 6 studies were excluded. A total of 11 studies were included: 7 case reports and 4 retrospective review studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the review, we discuss 7 different case reports on the use of cervical SCS for trigeminal neuralgia and an additional 4 retrospective studies reviewing outcomes and pain relief in patients who underwent treatment. The case reports and retrospective studies reviewed demonstrated that TN patients realized > 50% pain relief following permanent electrode implantation. In all the cases discussed, complications from SCS were rare and/or not reported. Additionally, most of the cases report that patients who had adequate pain relief from SCS were able to wean off, or significantly reduce, oral medications given the vast improvement in pain reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a safe and effective procedure for patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) who have refractory pain despite the use of medications. In many cases, the procedure provides an adequate level of pain relief with very few complications or side effects. The vast majority of current research on the use of cervical SCS for TN currently consists of case reports and retrospective analysis. In order to further evaluate the efficacy of SCS for treatment, large-scale randomized controlled studies or observational studies need to be conducted to properly evaluate SCS as a treatment modality for trigeminal neuralgia.

Case Report: Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Trigeminal Postherpetic Neuralgia in Elderly Patients

Objective: We aimed to report on the use of short-term high cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) combined with peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to successfully treat trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia (TPHN) affecting the V2 and V3 divisions. We also sought to use a novel PNS approach to the maxillary nerve next to the external opening of the foramen rotundum (FR) to treat TPHN at the V2 division.

Method: Two elderly patients successfully treated with different neuromodulation methods for TPHN are presented in this case series.

Results: The first case referred to an 83-year-old Chinese female patient with V2 and V3 TPHN who experienced a significant pain relief using a combination of short-term high cervical SCS at the C1–C2 level and PNS on the infraorbital nerve (ION). Case 2 was a 68-year-old Chinese male patient with V1 and V2 TPHN that obtained an excellent pain relief after having received short-term PNS on the supraorbital nerve (SON), the supratrochlear nerve (STN), and the maxillary nerve. Both reported improvements in their quality of life and ability to perform daily tasks during a 3-month follow-up period.

Conclusions: Short-term high cervical SCS at the C1–C2 spinal segments may be a feasible method to treat recent-onset V3 TPHN in elderly patients. Additionally, by placing the stimulation lead next to the external FR opening, we demonstrated a novel PNS approach to the maxillary nerve not previously reported for TPHN therapy.

Peripheral nerve field stimulation in medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia attributed to multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Case reports and small patient series have suggested peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) as a treatment for refractory trigeminal neuralgia attributed to multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, the authors aimed to assess the effects of this technique on long-term pain severity.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected on patients with refractory trigeminal neuralgia attributed to MS who underwent PNFS between July 2013 and August 2017 at the authors' neurosurgical department. Patients were evaluated before and after the first treatment as well as at follow-up at least twice a year. Patients underwent assessment of their pain severity using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Scale before treatment and at follow-up and were questioned about adverse events following cranial MRI performed after implantation of a permanent PNFS system.

RESULTS

Eight patients (3 women) underwent PNFS trials and their median age was 61 years (IQR 73.75 - 46.5 years). Seven patients proceeded to permanent implantation of the stimulation system. At a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 42 - 24 months), pain severity decreased from baseline to the last follow-up (BNI score decrease from V [IQR V - V] to III [IQR V - III], p = 0.054). Four patients experienced long-lasting benefit (at 48, 33, 24, and 15 months' follow-up, respectively), while in 3 patients the treatment eventually failed after an initially successful period. One patient had an infection, requiring system removal and subsequent reimplantation. No other complications occurred. No adverse events were noted in the patients undergoing MRI postimplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis indicates a possibly beneficial long-term effect of PNFS on refractory trigeminal neuralgia attributed to MS in some patients.

Effectiveness of high-frequency cervical spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory trigeminal neuropathy: A case report

RATIONALE

Treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in the head and face regions presents a challenge for pain specialists due to the lack of reliable medical and surgical approaches.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 62-year-old patient came to our attention for an intense facial pain secondary to a lesion of the right trigeminal nerve (all branches) due to a petroclival meningioma.

DIAGNOSES

The patient also presented with gait impairment as well as a deficit of the right facial, auditory, trochlear and abducens cranial nerves.

INTERVENTIONS

Conventional medical management (CMM) as well as tonic SCS were already adopted but they all dramatically failed. We intervened with the use of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (HFSCS) at the cervicomedullary junction (CMJ). The patient was thus provided with HFSCS at the CMJ. Pain and quality of life (QoL) were assessed 1 and 3 months after implantation. We also tested the trigeminal-facial reflex responses.

OUTCOMES

HFSCS led to a full relief from the debilitating electric shocks like pain in the right hemiface, even though a background dull pain appeared. The gradual addition of pregabalin helped in fully relieving the painful symptomatology, with a significant improvement in QoL. Moreover, sensitivity amelioration on the inner portion of the mouth allowed the patient to start feeding again also using that side of the mouth. These findings were paralleled by a significant reshape of trigeminal-facial reflex responses suggesting an inhibition of nociceptive sensory inputs at brainstem level following HFSCS.

LESSONS

This is the first report suggesting the usefulness of HFSCS at the CMJ in neuropathic pain due to trigeminal nerve neuropathy non-responsive to tonic SCS and CMM.

Neuromodulation in headache and craniofacial neuralgia: guidelines from the Spanish Society of Neurology and the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery

INTRODUCTION

Numerous invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation devices have been developed and applied to patients with headache and neuralgia in recent years. However, no updated review addresses their safety and efficacy, and no healthcare institution has issued specific recommendations on their use for these 2 conditions.

METHODS

Neurologists from the Spanish Society of Neurology's (SEN) Headache Study Group and neurosurgeons specialising in functional neurosurgery, selected by the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (SENEC), performed a comprehensive review of articles on the MEDLINE database addressing the use of the technique in patients with headache and neuralgia.

RESULTS

We present an updated review and establish the first set of consensus recommendations of the SEN and SENC on the use of neuromodulation to treat headache and neuralgia, analysing the current levels of evidence on its effectiveness for each specific condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports the indication of neuromodulation techniques for patients with refractory headache and neuralgia (especially migraine, cluster headache, and trigeminal neuralgia) selected by neurologists and headache specialists, after pharmacological treatment options are exhausted. Furthermore, we recommend that invasive neuromodulation be debated by multidisciplinary committees, and that the procedure be performed by teams of neurosurgeons specialising in functional neurosurgery, with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality.

The Evolution of Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Forward-Looking Perspectives

Background

The field of neuromodulation is continually evolving, with the past decade showing significant advancement in the therapeutic efficacy of neuromodulation procedures. The continued evolution of neuromodulation technology brings with it the promise of addressing the needs of both patients and physicians, as current technology improves and clinical applications expand.

Design

This review highlights the current state of the art of neuromodulation for treating chronic pain, describes key areas of development including stimulation patterns and neural targets, expanding indications and applications, feedback-controlled systems, noninvasive approaches, and biomarkers for neuromodulation and technology miniaturization.

Results and Conclusions

The field of neuromodulation is undergoing a renaissance of technology development with potential for profoundly improving the care of chronic pain patients. New and emerging targets like the dorsal root ganglion, as well as high-frequency and patterned stimulation methodologies such as burst stimulation, are paving the way for better clinical outcomes. As we look forward to the future, neural sensing, novel target-specific stimulation patterns, and approaches combining neuromodulation therapies are likely to significantly impact how neuromodulation is used. Moreover, select biomarkers may influence and guide the use of neuromodulation and help objectively demonstrate efficacy and outcomes.