An Examination of the Role of Supramaximal Resection of Temporal Lobe Glioblastoma Multiforme

The role of lobectomy in glioblastoma management: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Lobectomy has recently been employed in the management of glioblastoma (GB). Compared to subtotal, gross total and supramarginal resection, lobectomy provides maximum cytoreduction and improves overall survival (OS).

Research question

The primary aim of this study is to compare lobectomy to other techniques for managing GB in terms of OS and progression-free survival (PFS). This study evaluated the association of the available surgical techniques for GB management with the reported relevant seizure outcome, operation time, length of stay, complication incidence, and Karnofsky performance status.

Materials and methods

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2013 until April 2023. Random-effects models were employed. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and the GRADE approach were used for estimating risk of bias and quality of evidence.

Results

We included six studies. Lobectomy demonstrated a mean OS of 25 months, compared to 13.72 months for gross total resection (GTR), and a PFS of 16.13 months, compared to 8.77 months for GTR. Comparing lobectomy to GTR, no statistically significant differences were observed regarding seizure management, length of stay, operation time, complications, and KPS due to limited amount of data.

Discussion and conclusion

Our analysis demonstrated that lobectomy compared to GTR has a tremendous impact on the OS and the PFS, which seems to be improved almost by a year. Lobectomy, while demanding from a technical standpoint, constitutes a safe surgical procedure but further studies should assess its exact role in the management of GB patients.

Novel insights on genetics and epigenetics as clinical targets for paediatric astrocytoma

Paediatric and adult astrocytomas are notably different, where clinical treatments used for adults are not as effective on children with the same form of cancer and these treatments lead to adverse long-term health concerns. Integrative omics-based studies have shown the pathology and fundamental molecular characteristics differ significantly and cannot be extrapolated from the more widely studied adult disease. Recent clinical advances in our understanding of paediatric astrocytomas, with the aid of next-generation sequencing and epigenome-wide profiling, have led to the identification of key canonical mutations that vary based on the tumour location and age of onset. These driver mutations, in particular the identification of the recurrent histone H3 mutations in high-grade tumours, have confirmed the important role epigenetic dysregulations play in cancer progression. This review summarises the current updates of the classification, epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical management of paediatric astrocytoma based on their grades and the ongoing clinical trials. It also provides novel insights on genetic and epigenetic alterations as diagnostic biomarkers, highlighting the potential of targeting these pathways as therapeutics for this devastating childhood cancer.

Supratotal Resection: An Emerging Concept of Glioblastoma Multiforme Surgery-Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The severe neurologic tumor known as glioblastoma (GBM), also referred to as a grade IV astrocytoma, is rapidly progressive and debilitating. Supratotal resection (SpTR) is an emerging concept within glioma surgery, which aims to achieve a more extensive resection of the tumor than is possible with conventional techniques.

METHODS

We performed a language-independent search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify all available literature up to August 2022 of patients undergoing SpTR assessing survival outcomes in comparison to other surgical modalities.

RESULTS

After screening for exclusion, a total of 13 studies, all retrospective in design, were identified and included in our meta-analysis. SpTR was associated with significantly increased overall survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84; P < 0.01, I2 = 96%) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.07-0.56; P = 0.002, I2 = 88%).

CONCLUSION

SpTR is associated with greater overall survival and PFS when compared with other glioblastoma surgeries like GTR or SubTR.

Supramaximal Resection Can Prolong the Survival of Patients with Cortical Glioblastoma: A Volumetric Study

We aimed to retrospectively determine the resection rate of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) lesions to evaluate the clinical effects of supramaximal resection (SMR) on the survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Thirty-three adults with newly diagnosed GBM who underwent gross total tumor resection were enrolled. The tumors were classified into cortical and deep-seated groups according to their contact with the cortical gray matter. Pre- and postoperative FLAIR and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging tumor volumes were measured using a three-dimensional imaging volume analyzer, and the resection rate was calculated. To evaluate the association between SMR rate and outcome, we subdivided patients whose tumors were totally resected into the SMR and non-SMR groups by moving the threshold value of SMR in 10% increments from 0% and compared their overall survival (OS) change. An improvement in OS was observed when the threshold value of SMR was 30% or more. In the cortical group (n = 23), SMR (n = 8) tended to prolong OS compared with gross total resection (GTR) (n = 15), with the median OS of 69.6 and 22.1 months, respectively (p = 0.0945). Contrastingly, in the deep-seated group (n = 10), SMR (n = 4) significantly shortened OS compared with GTR (n = 6), with median OS of 10.2 and 27.9 months, respectively (p = 0.0221). SMR could help prolong OS in patients with cortical GBM when 30% or more volume reduction is achieved in FLAIR lesions, although the impact of SMR for deep-seated GBM must be validated in larger cohorts.

Supramaximal versus gross total resection in Glioblastoma, IDH wild-type and Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 4, effect on overall and progression free survival: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To synthesize the evidence on the impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of supramaximal resection (SMR) over gross total resection (GTR) in Glioblastoma, IDH wild-type and Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 4 (Glioblastoma).

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid and Cochrane databases were systematically searched (up to November 30, 2022). Studies reporting OS and PFS on adult humans with a suspected Glioblastoma, treated either with a SMR or GTR were included. Hazard ratios were estimated for each study and treatment effects were calculated through DerSimonian and Laird random effects models.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 14 studies published between 2013 and 2022, enrolling a total of 6779 patients. Analysis of the included studies reveals significantly better clinical outcomes favoring SMR over GTR in terms of PFS (HR 0.67; p = 0.0007), and OS (HR 0.7; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Glioblastoma, IDH wild-type and Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 4, are aggressive tumors with a very short long-term OS. SMR is an effective therapeutic approach contributing to increased PFS and OS in patients with this catastrophic disease.

Supramaximal Resection for Glioblastoma: Redefining the Extent of Resection Criteria and Its Impact on Survival

Glioblastomas (GBMs) are the most common and aggressive primary brain tumors, and despite advances in treatment, prognosis remains poor. The extent of resection has been widely recognized as a key factor affecting survival outcomes in GBM patients. The surgical principle of "maximal safe resection" has been widely applied to balance tumor removal and neurological function preservation. Historically, T1-contrast enhanced (T1CE) extent of resection has been the focus of research; however, the "supramaximal resection" concept has emerged, advocating for even greater tumor resection while maintaining neurological function. Recent studies have demonstrated potential survival benefits associated with resection beyond T1CE extent in GBMs. This review explores the developing consensus and newly established criteria for "supramaximal resection" in GBMs, with a focus on T2-extent of resection. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on supramaximal resection are summarized, and the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) resect group classification for extent of resection is introduced. The evolving understanding of the role of supramaximal resection in GBMs may lead to improved patient outcomes and more objective criteria for evaluating the extent of tumor resection.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Supramarginal Resection versus Gross Total Resection in Glioblastoma: Can We Enhance Progression-Free Survival Time and Preserve Postoperative Safety?

To date, gross total resection (GTR) of the contrast-enhancing area of glioblastoma (GB) is the benchmark treatment regarding surgical therapy. However, GB infiltrates beyond those margins, and most tumors recur in close proximity to the initial resection margin. It is unclear whether a supramarginal resection (SMR) enhances progression-free survival (PFS) time without increasing the incidence of postoperative surgical complications. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate SMR with regard to PFS and postoperative surgical complications. We searched for eligible studies comparing SMR techniques with conventional GTR in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline databases. From 3158 initially identified records, 11 articles met the criteria and were included in our meta-analysis. Our results illustrate significantly prolonged PFS time in SMR compared with GTR (HR: 11.16; 95% CI: 3.07–40.52, p = 0.0002). The median PFS of the SMR arm was 8.44 months (95% CI: 5.18–11.70, p < 0.00001) longer than the GTR arm. The rate of postoperative surgical complications (meningitis, intracranial hemorrhage, and CSF leaks) did not differ between the SMR group and the GTR group. SMR resulted in longer median progression-free survival without a negative postoperative surgical risk profile. Multicentric prospective randomized trials with a standardized definition of SMR and analysis of neurologic functioning and health-related quality of life are justified and needed to improve the level of evidence.

Update for astrocytomas: medical and surgical management considerations

Astrocytomas include a wide range of tumors with unique mutations and varying grades of malignancy. These tumors all originate from the astrocyte, a star-shaped glial cell that plays a major role in supporting functions of the central nervous system (CNS), including blood-brain barrier (BBB) development and maintenance, water and ion regulation, influencing neuronal synaptogenesis, and stimulating the immunological response. In terms of epidemiology, glioblastoma (GB), the most common and malignant astrocytoma, generally occur with higher rates in Australia, Western Europe, and Canada, with the lowest rates in Southeast Asia. Additionally, significantly higher rates of GB are observed in males and non-Hispanic whites. It has been suggested that higher levels of testosterone observed in biological males may account for the increased rates of GB. Hereditary syndromes such as Cowden, Lynch, Turcot, Li-Fraumeni, and neurofibromatosis type 1 have been linked to increased rates of astrocytoma development. While there are a number of specific gene mutations that may influence malignancy or be targeted in astrocytoma treatment, O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene function is an important predictor of astrocytoma response to chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide (TMZ). TMZ for primary and bevacizumab in the setting of recurrent tumor formation are two of the main chemotherapeutic agents currently approved in the treatment of astrocytomas. While stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has debatable implications for increased survival in comparison to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), SRS demonstrates increased precision with reduced radiation toxicity. When considering surgical resection of astrocytoma, the extent of resection (EoR) is taken into consideration. Subtotal resection (STR) spares the margins of the T1 enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) region, gross total resection (GTR) includes the margins, and supramaximal resection (SMR) extends beyond the margin of the T1 and into the T2 region. Surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy are integral components of astrocytoma treatment.

A consensus definition of supratotal resection for anatomically distinct primary glioblastoma: an AANS/CNS Section on Tumors survey of neurosurgical oncologists

INTRODUCTION

Supratotal resection (SpTR) of glioblastoma may be associated with improved survival, but published results have varied in part from lack of consensus on the definition and appropriate use of SpTR. A previous small survey of neurosurgical oncologists with expertise performing SpTR found resection 1-2 cm beyond contrast enhancement was an acceptable definition and glioblastoma involving the right frontal and bilateral anterior temporal lobes were considered most amenable to SpTR. The general neurosurgical oncology community has not yet confirmed the practicality of this definition.

METHODS

Seventy-six neurosurgical oncology members of the AANS/CNS Tumor Section were surveyed, representing 34.0% of the 223 members who were administered the survey. Participants were presented with 11 definitions of SpTR and rated each definition's appropriateness. Participants additionally reviewed magnetic resonance imaging for 10 anatomically distinct glioblastomas and assessed the tumor location's eloquence, perceived equipoise of enrolling patients in a randomized trial comparing gross total to SpTR, and their personal treatment plans.

RESULTS

Most neurosurgeons surveyed agree that gross total plus resection of some non-contrast enhancement (n = 57, 80.3%) or resection 1-2 cm beyond contrast enhancement (n = 52, 73.2%) are appropriate definitions for SpTR. Cases were divided into three anatomically distinct groups by perceived equipoise between gross total and SpTR. The best clinical trial candidates were thought to be right anterior temporal (n = 58, 76.3%) and right frontal (n = 55, 73.3%) glioblastomas.

CONCLUSION

Support exists among neurosurgical oncologists with varying familiarity performing SpTR to adopt the proposed consensus definition of SpTR of glioblastoma and to potentially investigate the utility of SpTR to treat right anterior temporal and right frontal glioblastomas in a clinical trial. A smaller proportion of general neurosurgical oncologists than SpTR experts would personally treat a left anterior temporal glioblastoma with SpTR.

Supratotal Resection of Gliomas With Awake Brain Mapping: Maximal Tumor Resection Preserving Motor, Language, and Neurocognitive Functions

Gliomas are a category of infiltrating glial neoplasms that are often located within or near the eloquent areas involved in motor, language, and neurocognitive functions. Surgical resection being the first-line treatment for gliomas, plays a crucial role in patient outcome. The role of the extent of resection (EOR) was evaluated, and we reported significant correlations between a higher EOR and better clinical prognosis of gliomas. However, recurrence is inevitable, even after aggressive tumor removal. Thus, efforts have been made to achieve extended tumor resection beyond contrast-enhanced mass lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined areas, a process known as supratotal resection. Since it has been reported that tumor cells invade beyond regions visible as abnormal areas on MRI, imaging underestimates the true spatial extent of tumors. Furthermore, tumor cells have the potential to spread 10–20 mm away from the MRI-verified tumor boundary. The primary goal of supratotal resection is to maximize EOR and prolong the progression-free and overall survival of patients with gliomas. The available data, as well as our own work, clearly show that supratotal resection of gliomas is a feasible technique that has improved with the aid of awake functional mapping using intraoperative direct electrical stimulation. Awake brain mapping has enabled neurosurgeons achieve supratotal resection with favorable motor, language, and neurocognitive outcomes, ensuring a better quality of life in patients with gliomas.

Survival Benefit of Supratotal Resection in a Long-term Survivor of IDH-wildtype Glioblastoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive cancer type, with fewer than 3–5% of patients surviving for more than 3 years. We describe a 48-year-old right-handed man who presented with generalized seizure attacks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a heterogeneous gadolinium-enhancing lesion in the left inferior parietal lobule. The patient underwent awake surgery, and tumor resection included abnormalities on T2-weighted MRI, with subcortical mapping used to identify the deep functional boundaries. After supratotal resection, the tumor was diagnosed as GBM without isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 mutations. At a follow-up evaluation, 9 years and 2 months after the surgery, the patient appeared healthy, and no relapse or recurrence was observed. We present the case of a long-term survivor of IDH-wildtype GBM. This case suggests that supratotal resection with intraoperative awake brain mapping can improve survival without impairing the patient’s neurological functions.

Effect of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Sodium Fluorescein on the Extent of Resection in High-Grade Gliomas and Brain Metastasis

Surgery is essential in the treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGG) and gross total resection (GTR) is known to increase the overall survival and progression-free survival. Several studies have shown that fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) increases GTR considerably compared to white light surgery (65% vs. 36%). In recent years, sodium fluorescein (SF) has become an increasingly popular agent for fluorescence-guided surgery due to numerous utility benefits compared to 5-ALA, including lower cost, non-toxicity, easy administration during surgery and a wide indication range covering all contrast-enhancing lesions with disruption of the blood-brain barrier in the CNS. However, currently, SF is an off-label agent and the level of evidence for use in HGG surgery is inferior compared to 5-ALA. Here, we give an update and review the latest literature on fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-ALA and SF for brain tumors with emphasis on fluorescence-guided surgery in HGG and brain metastases. Further, we assess the advantages and disadvantages of both fluorophores and discuss their future perspectives.

Multivariate analysis of associations between clinical sequencing and outcome in glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Many factors impact survival in patients with glioblastoma, including age, Karnofsky Performance Status, postoperative chemoradiation, IDH1/2 mutation status, MGMT promoter methylation status, and extent of resection. High-throughput next-generation sequencing is a widely available diagnostic tool, but the independent impact of tumors harboring specific mutant genes on survival and the efficacy of extent of resection are not clear.

METHODS

We utilized a widely available diagnostic platform (FoundationOne CDx) to perform high-throughput next-generation sequencing on 185 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma in our tertiary care center. We performed multivariate analysis to control for clinical parameters with known impact on survival to elucidate the independent prognostic value of prevalent mutant genes and the independent impact of gross total resection.

RESULTS

When controlling for factors with known prognostic significance including IDH1/2 mutation and after multiple comparisons analysis, CDKN2B and EGFR mutations were associated with reduced overall survival while PTEN mutation was associated with improved overall survival. Gross total resection, compared to other extent of resection, was associated with improved overall survival in patients with tumors harboring mutations in CDKN2A, CDKN2B, EGFR, PTEN, TERT promoter, and TP53. All patients possessed at least one of these 6 mutant genes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study verifies the independent prognostic value of several mutant genes in glioblastoma. Six commonly found mutant genes were associated with improved survival when gross total resection was achieved. Thus, even when accounting for known predictors of survival and multiple mutant gene comparisons, extent of resection continues to be strongly associated with survival.

A Crowdsourced Consensus on Supratotal Resection Versus Gross Total Resection for Anatomically Distinct Primary Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Gross total resection (GTR) of contrast-enhancing tumor is associated with increased survival in primary glioblastoma. Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing supratotal resections (SpTRs) for glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE

To address the published results, which have varied in part due to lack of consensus on the definition and appropriate use of SpTR.

METHODS

A crowdsourcing approach was used to survey 21 neurosurgical oncologists representing 14 health systems nationwide. Participants were presented with 11 definitions of SpTR and asked to rate the appropriateness of each definition. Participants reviewed T1-weighed postcontrast and fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery magnetic resonance imaging for 22 anatomically distinct glioblastomas. Participants were asked to assess the tumor location's eloquence, the perceived equipoise of enrolling patients in a randomized trial comparing gross total to SpTR, and their personal treatment plans.

RESULTS

Most neurosurgeons surveyed (n = 18, 85.7%) agree that GTR plus resection of some noncontrast enhancement is an appropriate definition for SpTR. Overall, moderate inter-rater agreement existed regarding eloquence, equipoise, and personal treatment plans. The 4 neurosurgeons who had performed >10 SpTRs for glioblastomas in the past year were more likely to recommend it as their treatment plan (P < .005). Cases were divided into 3 anatomically distinct groups based upon perceived eloquence. Anterior temporal and right frontal glioblastomas were considered the best randomization candidates.

CONCLUSION

We established a consensus definition for SpTR of glioblastoma and identified anatomically distinct locations deemed most amenable to SpTR. These results may be used to plan prospective trials investigating the potential clinical utility of SpTR for glioblastoma.

Rationale and Clinical Implications of Fluorescein-Guided Supramarginal Resection in Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Glioma

Current standard of care for glioblastoma is surgical resection followed by temozolomide chemotherapy and radiation. Recent studies have demonstrated that >95% extent of resection is associated with better outcomes, including prolonged progression-free and overall survival. The diffusely infiltrative pattern of growth in gliomas results in microscopic extension of tumor cells into surrounding brain parenchyma that makes complete resection unattainable. The historical goal of surgical management has therefore been maximal safe resection, traditionally guided by MRI and defined as removal of all contrast-enhancing tumor. Optimization of surgical resection has led to the concept of supramarginal resection, or removal beyond the contrast-enhancing region on MRI. This strategy of extending the cytoreductive goal targets a tumor region thought to be important in the recurrence or progression of disease as well as resistance to systemic and local treatment. This approach must be balanced against the risk of impacting eloquent regions of brain and causing permanent neurologic deficit, an important factor affecting overall survival. Over the years, fluorescent agents such as fluorescein sodium have been explored as a means of more reliably delineating the boundary between tumor core, tumor-infiltrated brain, and surrounding cortex. Here we examine the rationale behind extending resection into the infiltrative tumor margins, review the current literature surrounding the use of fluorescein in supramarginal resection of gliomas, discuss the experience of our own institution in utilizing fluorescein to maximize glioma extent of resection, and assess the clinical implications of this treatment strategy.

Current FDA-Approved Therapies for High-Grade Malignant Gliomas

The standard of care (SOC) for high-grade gliomas (HGG) is maximally safe surgical resection, followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for 6 weeks, then adjuvant TMZ for 6 months. Before this SOC was established, glioblastoma (GBM) patients typically lived for less than one year after diagnosis, and no adjuvant chemotherapy had demonstrated significant survival benefits compared with radiation alone. In 2005, the Stupp et al. randomized controlled trial (RCT) on newly diagnosed GBM patients concluded that RT plus TMZ compared to RT alone significantly improved overall survival (OS) (14.6 vs. 12.1 months) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (PFS6) (53.9% vs. 36.4%). Outside of TMZ, there are four drugs and one device FDA-approved for the treatment of HGGs: lomustine, intravenous carmustine, carmustine wafer implants, bevacizumab (BVZ), and tumor treatment fields (TTFields). These treatments are now mainly used to treat recurrent HGGs and symptoms. TTFields is the only treatment that has been shown to improve OS (20.5 vs. 15.6 months) and PFS6 (56% vs. 37%) in comparison to the current SOC. TTFields is the newest addition to this list of FDA-approved treatments, but has not been universally accepted yet as part of SOC.

Neuropsychological outcomes following supratotal resection for high-grade glioma: a review

PURPOSE

Supratotal resection (SpTR) of high-grade glioma (HGG), in which surgical removal of the tumor is extended outside the margins of the preoperative radiographic abnormality, has been suggested to improve overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients harboring tumors of non-eloquent cortex when compared to gross total resection (GTR). While current literature demonstrates these findings without an increase in post-operative complications or neurological deficits, there remains a paucity of data examining the neuropsychological outcomes of SpTR for HGG. As quality of life dramatically influences survival rates in these patients, it is crucial for neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, and neuropsychiatrists to understand the behavioral and cognitive outcomes following SpTR, such that optimal treatment strategies can be tailored for each patient.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive review of the available literature regarding survival, neuropsychological, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes following SpTR for HGG. We also review neuropsychological and QOL outcomes following GTR for HGG to serve as a framework for better understanding potential implications of SpTR.

RESULTS

While results are limited following SpTR for HGG, available data suggests similar outcomes to those seen in patients undergoing GTR of HGG, as well as low-grade glioma. These include a short-term decline in neuropsychological functioning post-surgically with a return to baseline across most neurocognitive domains occurring within several months. Memory and attention remain relatively diminished at long term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited data exist examining postoperative cognitive and behavioral outcomes following SpTR for HGG. While the available data suggests a return to baseline for many neurocognitive domains, attention and memory deficits may persist. However, sample sizes are relatively small and have not been examined in the context of QOL and OS/PFS. More rigorous pre- and post-surgical neuropsychological assessment will help shed light on the long-term cognitive and behavioral effects of SpTR in the setting of HGG and inform clinical care and counseling when SpTR is considered.

Comparison of Intraoperative Ultrasound B-Mode and Strain Elastography for the Differentiation of Glioblastomas From Solitary Brain Metastases. An Automated Deep Learning Approach for Image Analysis

Background

The differential diagnosis of glioblastomas (GBM) from solitary brain metastases (SBM) is essential because the surgical strategy varies according to the histopathological diagnosis. Intraoperative ultrasound elastography (IOUS-E) is a relatively novel technique implemented in the surgical management of brain tumors that provides additional information about the elasticity of tissues. This study compares the discriminative capacity of intraoperative ultrasound B-mode and strain elastography to differentiate GBM from SBM.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent craniotomy between March 2018 to June 2020 with glioblastoma (GBM) and solitary brain metastases (SBM) diagnoses. Cases with an intraoperative ultrasound study were included. Images were acquired before dural opening, first in B-mode, and then using the strain elastography module. After image pre-processing, an analysis based on deep learning was conducted using the open-source software Orange. We have trained an existing neural network to classify tumors into GBM and SBM via the transfer learning method using Inception V3. Then, logistic regression (LR) with LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regularization, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), neural network (NN), and k-nearest neighbor (kNN) were used as classification algorithms. After the models’ training, ten-fold stratified cross-validation was performed. The models were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), classification accuracy, and precision.

Results

A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis, 26 GBM and 10 SBM. Models were built using a total of 812 ultrasound images, 435 of B-mode, 265 (60.92%) corresponded to GBM and 170 (39.8%) to metastases. In addition, 377 elastograms, 232 (61.54%) GBM and 145 (38.46%) metastases were analyzed. For B-mode, AUC and accuracy values of the classification algorithms ranged from 0.790 to 0.943 and from 72 to 89%, respectively. For elastography, AUC and accuracy values ranged from 0.847 to 0.985 and from 79% to 95%, respectively.

Conclusion

Automated processing of ultrasound images through deep learning can generate high-precision classification algorithms that differentiate glioblastomas from metastases using intraoperative ultrasound. The best performance regarding AUC was achieved by the elastography-based model supporting the additional diagnostic value that this technique provides.

The Neurosurgeon's Armamentarium for Gliomas: An Update on Intraoperative Technologies to Improve Extent of Resection

Maximal safe resection is the standard of care in the neurosurgical treatment of high-grade gliomas. To aid surgeons in the operating room, adjuvant techniques and technologies centered around improving intraoperative visualization of tumor tissue have been developed. In this review, we will discuss the most advanced technologies, specifically fluorescence-guided surgery, intraoperative imaging, neuromonitoring modalities, and microscopic imaging techniques. The goal of these technologies is to improve detection of tumor tissue beyond what conventional microsurgery has permitted. We describe the various advances, the current state of the literature that have tested the utility of the different adjuvants in clinical practice, and future directions for improving intraoperative technologies.

Cytoreductive surgery in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline update

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adults with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

QUESTION

What is the effect of extent of surgical resection on patient outcome in the initial management of adult patients with suspected newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level II: Maximal cytoreductive surgery is recommended in adult patients with suspected newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma with gross total resection defined as removal of contrast enhancing tumor. Level III: Biopsy, subtotal resection, or gross total resection is suggested depending on medical comorbidities, functional status, and location of tumor if maximal resection may cause significant neurologic deficit.

QUESTION

What is the role of cytoreductive surgery in adults with newly diagnosed bi-frontal "butterfly" glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: Resection of newly diagnosed bi-frontal "butterfly" glioblastoma is suggested to improve overall survival over biopsy alone.

QUESTION

What is the goal of cytoreductive surgery in elderly adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: Elderly patients (> 65 years) show survival benefit with gross total resection and it is suggested they undergo cytoreductive surgery.

QUESTION

What is the role of advanced intraoperative guidance techniques in cytoreductive surgery in adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: The use of intraoperative guidance adjuncts such as intraoperative MRI (iMRI) or 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) are suggested to maximize extent of resection in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. There is insufficient evidence to make a suggestion on the use of fluorescein, indocyanine green, or intraoperative ultrasound.

Comparison of 5-aminolevulinic acid and sodium fluorescein for intraoperative tumor visualization in patients with high-grade gliomas: a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Maximal safe resection is an important surgical goal in the treatment for high-grade gliomas. Fluorescent dyes help the surgeon to distinguish malignant tissue from healthy. The aims of this study were 1) to compare the 2 fluorescent dyes 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and sodium fluorescein (fluorescein) regarding extent of resection, progression-free survival, and overall survival; and 2) to assess the influence of other risk factors on clinical outcome and screen for potential disadvantages of the dyes.

METHODS

A total of 209 patients with high-grade gliomas were included in this retrospective study. Resections were performed in the period from 2012 to 2017 using 5-ALA or fluorescein. Extent of resection was assessed as the difference in tumor volume between early postoperative and preoperative MRI studies. Tumor progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-eight patients were operated on with 5-ALA and 51 with fluorescein. The median duration of follow-up was 46.7 and 21.2 months, respectively. Covariables were evenly distributed. There was no statistically significant difference in volumetrically assessed median extent of resection (96.9% for 5-ALA vs 97.4% for fluorescein, p = 0.46) or the percentage of patients with residual tumor volume less than 0.175 cm3 (29.5% for 5-ALA vs 36.2% for fluorescein, p = 0.39). The median overall survival was 14.8 months for the 5-ALA group and 19.7 months for the fluorescein group (p = 0.06). The median adjusted progression-free survival was 8.7 months for the 5-ALA group and 9.2 months for the fluorescein group (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescein can be used as a viable alternative to 5-ALA for intraoperative fluorescent guidance in brain tumor surgery. Comparative, prospective, and randomized studies are much needed.

Importance and Evidence of Extent of Resection in Glioblastoma

Maximal safe resection is an essential part of the multidisciplinary care of patients with glioblastoma. A growing body of data shows that gross total resection is an independent prognostic factor associated with improved clinical outcome. The relationship between extent of glioblastoma (GB) resection and clinical benefit depends critically on the balance between cytoreduction and avoiding neurologic morbidity. The definition of the extent of tumor resection, how this is best measured pre- and postoperatively, and its relation to volume of residual tumor is still discussed. We review the literature supporting extent of resection in GB, highlighting the importance of a standardized definition and measurement of extent of resection to allow greater collaboration in research projects and trials. Recent developments in neurosurgical techniques and technologies focused on maximizing extent of resection and safety are discussed.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of supratotal versus gross total resection for glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Due to the infiltrative nature of glioblastoma (GBM) outside of the contrast-enhancing region on MRI, there is interest in exploring supratotal resections (SpTR) that extend beyond the contrast-enhancing portion of the tumor. However, there is currently no consensus on the potential survival benefit of SpTR in GBM compared to gross total resection (GTR). In this study, we compare the impact of SpTR versus GTR on overall survival (OS) of GBM patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature published on PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from inception to August 16, 2018, to identify articles comparing OS after SpTR versus GTR.

RESULTS

We identified 8902 unique citations, of which 11 articles met study inclusion criteria. 810 patients underwent SpTR out of a total of 2056 patients. 9 of 11 studies demonstrated improved outcomes with SpTR compared to GTR (median improvement in OS of 10.5 months), with no significant difference in postoperative complication rate. Overall study quality was variable, with ten studies presenting level IV evidence and one study presenting level IIIb evidence. Subgroup meta-analysis based on SpTR definition demonstrated a statistically significant 35% lower risk of mortality in patients who underwent anatomical SpTR compared to patients who underwent GTR (Hazard ratio = 0.65, 95% CI 0.47- 0.91, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review indicates SpTR may be associated with improved OS compared to GTR for GBM, especially with anatomical SpTR. However, this is limited by variable study design and significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity among studies. There is need for prospective clinical data to further guide parameters regarding the use of SpTR in GBM.

Further understanding of glioma mechanisms of pathogenesis: implications for therapeutic development

Introduction: Recent discoveries in the molecular makeup of gliomas, the relationship of certain molecular drivers, and the patient's response to therapy and overall prognosis have resulted in a paradigm shift and redefined our understanding of glioma and revealed potential vulnerabilities within this recalcitrant and lethal disease.Areas covered: We summarize the current classification of malignant glioma in the context of the historical background, current data-driven treatment strategies, and recent discoveries of the mechanisms of pathogenesis of this disease which recapitulates the developing brain. We describe the relationship to common genetic alterations found in glioma, and possible avenues to exploit these newly revealed mechanisms.Expert opinion: Improved understanding of the molecular underpinnings of this disease has been directly translated into treatment decisions and an improved ability to counsel patients regarding their prognosis. We are beginning to see the first glimmer of a return on the investment in regard to immunotherapy in malignant glioma, with further anticipated successful exploitations of the unique pathophysiology of glioma.

Supramaximal resection: A systematic review of its safety, efficacy and feasibility in glioblastoma

The philosophy of 'supramaximal resection' (SMR) beyond the T1-enhanced margin holds some potential in glioblastoma surgery, but the quality of available literature has not been elucidated. A systematic review of published studies of SMR in glioblastoma surgery was performed. Articles were sought in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register for Clinical Trials. The search items were grouped into three themes; supramaximal resection, glioblastoma and outcomes. Cases were included wherein the initial extent of resection was described as exceeding gross total resection, that is to say, beyond the area of T1-enhancement on MRI. Only newly diagnosed glioblastoma was considered. Articles containing primary patient data, including outcome data, were included; reviews, editorials, descriptive articles and systematic reviews were excluded. Subsequently, 1123 unique articles were initially retrieved. After screening article titles and abstracts for relevance to SMR in glioblastoma, seven articles remained, and were all included post-full text review. No randomized controlled trials were discovered. Almost all studies were of Level 4 quality, according to Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. The included articles yielded a total of 2019 surgically treated glioblastoma patients, 13.5% of whom underwent SMR. Preliminary results suggest SMR of glioblastoma positively impacts overall and progression free survival. However, the contemporaneous literature supporting glioblastoma SMR is of low quality, with neither anatomical nor radiographic definitional consensus for what constitutes SMR. Prospective studies of larger pooled populations with standardized technical, radiological and outcome measures in designated centers would help minimize bias and validate SMR in appropriately selected glioblastoma patients.

Supramarginal resection of glioblastoma: 5-ALA fluorescence, combined intraoperative strategies and correlation with survival

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach involving oncologists, radiotherapists and surgeons. Surgery constitutes the initial step of the therapeutic strategy and its efficacy is dependent on the extent of resection (EOR). Over the last decade, the goal of surgical treatment was the resection of the contrast enhancement on T1 MRI, defined as gross-total resection (GTR). More recently, an increasing number of studies reports a positive impact on survival parameters of a more aggressive surgical strategy aiming to resect all peri-tumoral infiltrated areas. These areas are histologically characterized by the presence of pathological cells infiltrating normal white matter and surround the neoplastic core of glioblastoma identified by gadolinium enhancement in T1-weighted MR. Intuitively, the major risk of the so called supramarginal resection is related to the possibility of resecting functionally eloquent brain tissue. Several strategies have been proposed to maximize the safety of resection and minimize the occurrence of postoperative functional deficits. The aim of this review was to focus on the clinical impact of supramarginal resection of glioblastomas, highlighting the role of image-guided surgery combined with neuromonitoring to increase surgical safety and efficacy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The MEDLINE database has been queried for the literature research.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Ten studies matched the inclusion criteria, reporting a global number of 3221 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests a positive correlation between a more extensive resection based on FLAIR abnormal areas and overall survival.

Temporal Glioblastoma Mimicking Basal Ganglia Invasion: Distinguishing Removable and Unremovable Tumors

OBJECTIVE

Maximal safe resection prolongs the survival of patients with glioblastoma (GB). However, whether total resection of the enhanced lesion is pursued or abandoned depends on preoperative judgments based on the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Anatomically, medial temporal tumor tends to invade toward the temporal stem, insula, and basal ganglia, representing tumor with high surgical risk. In the present study, we describe the key radiologic features of medial temporal GB to achieve extent of resection.

METHODS

We reviewed all GB cases located in the temporal lobe (tGB) treated between April 2013 and March 2018 at Kitasato University Hospital. On the basis of MRI, tGB was simply classified into 3 groups: medial tGB and nonmedial tGB, and medial tGB was further subdivided into invading type and mimicking type. We focused on the resectability of medial tGB.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with tGB were identified. Twenty were included in the nonmedial tGB, and 7 were in the medial tGB. All medial tGB seemed to invade into the basal ganglia and/or the lenticulostriate arteries, but detailed examination revealed 2 types of tumor, invading type (3 cases) and mimicking type (4 cases). The invading type had true involvement of the basal ganglia and/or lenticulostriate arteries, whereas the mimicking type had no involvement of these structures. This new classification is highly effective, as the former is unresectable, but the latter is totally resectable.

CONCLUSIONS

Medial tGB is a challenging tumor for maximal safe resection, so our classification will help to identify cases of removable medial tGB.

Association Between Supratotal Glioblastoma Resection and Patient Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Gross total resection (GTR) of the contrast enhancing (CE) area will improve the survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM). However, GBM can infiltrate into the brain parenchyma, beyond the CE margins. It remains unclear whether resection beyond the CE area (supratotal resection [SPTR]) can improve survival without causing additional neurological deficits. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to study the association between SPTR and overall survival of patients of GBM.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, and other literature databases were searched for eligible studies until August 2018. Studies involving patients with GBM that had compared SPTR with GTR were included in the present study. The main outcome was overall survival, presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and median overall survival differences with the 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis, which included 6 studies and 1168 unique patients with GBM, showed that compared with GTR, SPTR of GBM resulted in a 53% lower risk of mortality at any time during follow-up (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.72; P = 0.0005). The median overall survival of the SPTR group was 6.4 months (95% CI, 3.2-9.7) longer than the GTR group (P = 0.0001). Reports on postoperative deficits were limited, and the quality of evidence was moderate to very low.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with GTR, SPTR of GBM resulted in a lower risk of mortality and longer median overall survival. However, the quality of evidence of the available studies was poor. Therefore, it remains unclear whether SPTR is safe and actually improves the survival of patients with GBM. Future prospective trials and a standardized definition of SPTR are needed.