Pedicle Screw with Cement Augmentation in Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Cement-augmented pedicle screw for thoracolumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cement-augmentation pedicle screws have been widely used in spinal internal fixation surgery combined with osteoporosis in recent years, which can significantly improve the fixation strength, but compared with conventional methods, whether it has more advantages is still inconclusive of evidencebased medicine. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of cement-augmented pedicle screw in the treatment of thoracolumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies published from the establishment of the database up until June 2023. We included studies that concerning the cement-augmented pedicle screw and the traditional pedicle screw placement for thoracolumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis. We excluded repeated publication, researches without full text, incomplete information or inability to conduct data extraction and animal experiments, case report, reviews and systematic reviews. STATA 15.1 software was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The sample size of patients were totally 881, of which, 492 patients in cement-augmented screw group and 389 patients in conventional screw group. Meta-analysis results showed that Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score (WMD = 1.69, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.22), intervertebral space height (WMD = 1.66, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.29) and post-operation fusion rate (OR = 2.80, 95% CI 1.49 to 5.25) were higher in the cement-augmented screw group than those in the conventional screw group. Operation time was longer in the cement-augmented screw group than that in the conventional screw group (WMD = 15.47, 95% CI 1.25 to 29.70). Screw loosening rate was lower in the cement-augmented screw group than those in the conventional screw group (OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.22). However, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss and Visual analog scale (VAS) score were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional pedicle screw placement, cement-augmented pedicle screw is more effective in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar degenerative disease by improving fusion rate and interbody height, reducing the incidence of screw loosening, and elevating long-term efficacy.

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with stress end plate augmentation and anterolateral screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with osteoporosis: a matched-pair case-controlled study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has been proven to be effective in treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Whether OLIF is suitable for treating patients with DLSS with osteoporosis (OP) is still controversial. Bone cement augmentation is widely used to enhance the internal fixation strength of osteoporotic spines. However, the effectiveness of OLIF combined with bone cement stress end plate augmentation (SEA) and anterolateral screw fixation (AF) for DLSS with OP have not confirmed yet.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of OLIF-AF versus OLIF-AF-SEA in the treatment of DLSS with OP.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 60 patients with OP managed for DLSS at L4-L5.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog scale (VAS) score of the lower back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disk height (DH), lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), cage subsidence and fusion rate.

METHODS

The study was performed as a retrospective matched-pair case‒controlled study. Patients with OP managed for DLSS at L4-L5 between October 2017 and June 2020 and completed at least 2 years of follow-up were included, which were 30 patients treated by OLIF-AF and 30 patients undergoing OLIF-AF-SEA. The demographics and radiographic data, fusion status and functional outcomes were therefore compared to evaluate the efficacy of the two approaches.

RESULTS

Pain and disability improved similarly in both groups at the 24-month follow-up. However, the SEA group had lower pain and functional disability at 3 months postoperatively (p<.05). The mean postoperative disc height decrease (△DH) was significantly lower in the SEA group than in the control group (1.17±0.81 mm vs 2.89±2.03 mm; p<.001). There was no significant difference in lumbar lordosis (LL) or segmental lordosis (SL) between the groups preoperatively and 1 day postoperatively. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in SL and LL between the groups at 24 months postoperatively (p<.05). CS was observed in 4 cases (13.33%) in the SEA group and 17 cases (56.67%) in the control group (p<.001). A nonsignificant difference was observed in the fusion rate between the SEA and control groups (p=.347) at 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that OLIF-AF-SEA was safe and effective in the treatment of DLSS with OP. Compared with OLIF-AF, OLIF-AF-SEA results in a minor postoperative disc height decrease, a lower rate of CS, better sagittal balance, and no adverse effect on interbody fusion.

The Influence of Different Injection Hole Designs of Augmented Pedicle Screws on Bone Cement Leakage and Distribution Patterns in Osteoporotic Patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare cement distribution and leakage for 2 bone cement-augmented screws with different designs of injection holes in patients and the impact of screw locations and bone mineral density (BMD) on the results.

METHODS

This study recruited 40 patients who underwent instrumentation with cement-augmented screws. Screw holes of group A were 4 holes located in the distal one third of screws, while screw holes of group B were 6 holes located in distal, middle, and proximal sites. Postoperative computed tomography images were obtained to evaluate the rate and type of cement leakage and the distribution pattern of cement. The lateral or center position of screw tip, BMD, and T-score were also analyzed for their influence on the results.

RESULTS

Of 192 screws, 80 (41.7%) exhibited cement leakage on postoperative computed tomography. The incidence of cement distribution in the posterior half and type B leakage in group B was significantly higher compared with group A. In group A, the probability of cement distribution in the posterior half was significantly increased when the screw was laterally inserted. For both groups, the higher incidence of cement distribution in the posterior half was correlated with lower BMD and T-score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that screws with injection holes closer to the screw tip had higher incidences of distribution in the anterior half of the body and lower incidences of type B leakage. Patients with lower BMD and T-scores should be closely monitored, and a more centered position is recommended for screw insertion.

Rescue Augmentation: Increased Stability in Augmentation After Initial Loosening of Pedicle Screws

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVES

Failure of pedicle screws is a major problem in spinal surgery not only postoperatively, but also intraoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether cement augmentation may restore mounting of initially loosened pedicle screws.

METHODS

A total of 14 osteoporotic or osteopenic human cadaveric vertebral bodies (L2)-according to quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-were instrumented on both sides by conventional pedicle screws and cement augmented on 1 side. In vitro fatigue loading (cranial-caudal sinusoidal, 0.5 Hz) with increasing peak force (100 N + 0.1 N/cycles) was applied until a screw head displacement of 5.4 mm (∼20°) was reached. After loosening, the nonaugmented screw was rescue augmented, and fatigue testing was repeated.

RESULTS

The fatigue load reached 207.3 N for the nonaugmented screws and was significantly (P = .009) exceeded because of initial cement augmentation (300.6 N). The rescue augmentation after screw loosening showed a fatigue load of 370.1 N which was significantly higher (P < .001) compared with the nonaugmented screws. The impact of bone density on fatigue strength decreased from the nonaugmented to the augmented to the rescue-augmented screws and shows the greatest effect of cement augmentation on fatigue strength at low bone density.

CONCLUSIONS

Rescue augmentation leads to similar or higher fatigue strengths compared with those of the initially augmented screws. Therefore, the cement augmentation of initially loosened pedicle screws is a promising option to restore adequate screw stability.

Diagnostic, Surgical, and Technical Considerations for Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review

Objective: Osteoporosis is increasing in incidence as the ageing population continues to grow. Decreased bone mineral density poses a challenge for the spine surgeon. In patients requiring lumbar interbody fusion, differences in diagnostics and surgical approaches may be warranted. In this systematic review, the authors examine studies performing lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis and suggest avenues for future study. Methods: A systematic literature review of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases was performed for studies published between 1986 and 2020. Studies evaluating diagnostics, surgical approaches, and other technical considerations were included. Results: A total of 13 articles were ultimately selected for qualitative analysis. This includes studies demonstrating the utility of Hounsfield units in diagnosis, a survey of surgical approaches, as well as exploring the use of vertebral augmentation and cortical bone screw trajectory. Conclusions: This systematic review provides a summary of preliminary findings with respect to the use of Hounsfield units as a diagnostic tool, the benefit or lack thereof with respect to minimally invasive approaches, and the question of whether or not cement augmentation or cortical bone trajectory confers benefit in osteoporotic patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion. While the findings of these studies are promising, the current state of the literature is limited in scope and, for this reason, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from these data. The authors highlight gaps in the literature and the need for further exploration and study of lumbar interbody fusion in the osteoporotic spine.

Ceramic Biologics for Bony Fusion-a Journey from First to Third Generations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide information on characteristics and use of various ceramics in spine fusion and future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

In most recent years, focus has been shifted to the use of ceramics in minimally invasive surgeries or implementation of nanostructured surface modification features to promote osteoinductive properties. In addition, effort has been placed on the development of bioactive synthetics. Core characteristic of bioactive synthetics is that they undergo change to simulate a beneficial response within the bone. This change is based on chemical reaction and various chemical elements present in the bioactive ceramics. Recently, a synthetic 15-amino acid polypeptide bound to an anorganic bone material which mimics the cell-binding domain of type-I collagen opened a possibility for osteogenic and osteoinductive roles of this hybrid graft material. Ceramics have been present in the spine fusion arena for several decades; however, their use has been limited. The major obstacle in published literature is small sample size resulting in low evidence and a potential for bias. In addition, different physical and chemical properties of various ceramics further contribute to the limited evidence. Although ceramics have several disadvantages, they still hold a great promise as a value-based graft material with being easily available, relatively inexpensive, and non-immunogenic.

Reduced cement volume does not affect screw stability in augmented pedicle screws

Purpose

Cement augmentation of pedicle screws is able to improve screw anchorage in osteoporotic vertebrae but is associated with a high complication rate. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of different cement volumes on pedicle screw fatigue strength.

Methods

Twenty-five human vertebral bodies (T12–L4) were collected from donors between 73 and 97 years of age. Bone density (BMD) was determined by quantitative computed tomography. Vertebral bodies were instrumented by conventional pedicle screws, and unilateral cement augmentation was performed. Thirteen vertebrae were augmented with a volume of 1 ml and twelve with a volume of 3 ml bone cement. A fatigue test was performed using a cranial–caudal sinusoidal, cyclic load (0.5 Hz) with increasing compression force (100 N + 0.1 N/cycles).

Results

The load to failure was 183.8 N for the non-augmented screws and was increased significantly to 268.1 N (p < 0.001) by cement augmentation. Augmentation with 1 ml bone cement increased the fatigue load by 41% while augmentation with 3 ml increased the failure load by 51% compared to the non-augmented screws, but there was no significant difference in fatigue loads between the specimens with screws augmented with 1 ml and screws augmented with 3 ml of bone cement (p = 0.504).

Conclusion

Cement augmentation significantly increases pedicle screw stability. The benefit of augmentation on screw anchorage was not significantly affected by reducing the applied volume of cement from 3 ml to 1 ml. Considering the high risk of cement leakage during augmentation, we recommend the usage of a reduced volume of 1 ml bone cement for each pedicle screw.

Graphic Abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material .