Type II Fractures in Older Adults: Can They Be Treated Conservatively?: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

Controversies in the Management of Type II Odontoid Fractures

The management of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly is controversial, as these patients often have numerous medical comorbidities that increase the risks of surgery, but they may also fail to achieve fracture healing with nonsurgical management. Recent changes in technology and surgeon attitudes may influence the preferred approach to both surgical and nonsurgical treatments for many clinicians. While bony fracture healing remains the goal of management, a stable fibrous union is increasingly considered a satisfactory outcome. The optimal surgical approach remains debated, with some authors raising concerns about the risk of swallowing dysfunction being particularly problematic with odontoid screw placement in the elderly. The use of BMP-2 applied either anteriorly into the fracture site or posteriorly in the interlaminar space and placement of temporary posterior fixation to be removed upon demonstration of anterior bony healing are novel surgical techniques that are presently the subject of investigation. A clearer understanding of the currently available treatment options and the associated controversies may improve clinician decision-making and potentially better patient outcomes in the management of type II odontoid fractures for the growing geriatric population.

[Conservative treatment of trauma-associated fractures of the cervical spine with orthoses-A review]

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injuries of the cervical spine are common and can significantly differ in the prognosis and treatment depending on the structure affected. We present the current evidence for conservative treatment of these fractures with orthoses in this review.

METHODOLOGY

The literature search followed the PRISMA protocol. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS‑I and evidence levels were determined according to AHCPR.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were identified. The level of evidence according to AHCPR is limited (IIb, III and IV) and every study had a serious risk of bias in at least one subdivision. Of the authors 11 presented conservative treatment concepts for C2 dens fractures, 7 studies focussed on vertebral arch fractures and 9 on vertebral body fractures. Radiological parameters (kyphosis angle, bone consolidation) and the neurological status were frequently reported as endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Stable C2 dens fractures without relevant clinical restrictions allow conservative treatment in a rigid cervical orthosis under radiological monitoring every 1-4 weeks. Type II fractures require special attention due to the risk of instability. Hangman's fractures can be safely treated in rigid cervical orthoses. The current state of knowledge does not allow any recommendation for conservative treatment of Hangman's fractures with orthoses. Stable vertebral body fractures without involvement of the spinal canal can also be treated conservatively with orthotic devices. Randomized controlled studies are required to develop a secure state of evidence and are currently not available.

Odontoid fracture in geriatric patients - analysis of complications and outcome following conservative treatment vs. ventral and dorsal surgery

BACKGROUND

Different treatment options are discussed for geriatric odontoid fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment options for geriatric odontoid fractures.

METHODS

Included were patients with the following criteria: age ≥ 65 years, identification of seniors at risk (ISAR score ≥ 2), and odontoid fracture type A/B according to Eysel and Roosen. Three groups were compared: conservative treatment, surgical therapy with ventral screw osteosynthesis or dorsal instrumentation. At a follow-up examination, the range of motion and the trabecular bone fracture healing rate were evaluated. Furthermore, demographic patient data, neurological status, length of stay at the hospital and at the intensive care unit (ICU) as well as the duration of surgery and occurring complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were included and 43 patients could be re-examined (range: 2.7 ± 2.1 months). Patients with dorsal instrumentation had a better rotation. Other directions of motion were not significantly different. The trabecular bone fracture healing rate was 78.6%. The patients with dorsal instrumentation were hospitalized significantly longer; however, their duration at the ICU was shortest. There was no significant difference in complications.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric patients with odontoid fracture require individual treatment planning. Dorsal instrumentation may offer some advantages.

The optimal treatment of type II and III odontoid fractures in the elderly: an updated meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine fractures in the elderly, with a controversial optimal treatment. The objective of this review was to compare the outcome of surgical and conservative treatments in elderly (≥ 65 years), by updating a systematic review published by the authors in 2013.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in seven databases. Clinical outcome was the primary outcome. Fracture union- and stability were secondary outcomes. Pooled point estimates and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using the random-effects model. A random-effects multivariable meta-regression model was used to correct for baseline co-variates when sufficiently reported.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, of which forty were case series and one a cohort study. No clinical differences in outcomes including the Neck Disability Index (NDI, 700 patients), Visual Analogue Scale pain (VAS, 180 patients), and Smiley-Webster Scale (SWS, 231 patients) scores were identified between surgical and conservative treatments. However, fracture union was higher in surgically treated patients (pooled incidence 72.7%, 95% CI 66.1%, 78.5%, 31 studies, 988 patients) than in conservatively treated patients (40.2%, 95% CI 32.0%, 49.0%, 22 studies, 912 patients). This difference remained after correcting for age and fracture type. Fracture stability (41 studies, 1917 patients), although numerically favoring surgery, did not appear to differ between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

While surgically treated patients showed higher union rates than conservatively treated patients, no clinically relevant differences were observed in NDI, VAS pain, and SWS scores and stability rates. These results need to be further confirmed in well-designed comparative studies with proper adjustment for confounding, such as age, fracture characteristics, and osteoporosis degree.

Comparison of Hard and Soft Cervical Collars for the Management of Odontoid Peg Fractures in the Elderly

Introduction

Odontoid peg fractures (OF) are the most common cervical spine fracture in the elderly. This retrospective analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of older patients with OF who had been managed non-operatively with either a hard or soft cervical collar.

Materials and Methods

We analysed the retrospective data of the clinical and radiographic records of patients 60 years or older who presented over a 10-year period with OF and were treated non-operatively with a cervical collar. Mortality was the primary outcome measure with mechanism of injury, complications, and fracture healing secondary measures.

Results

45 patients (hard collar n = 22; soft collar n = 23) were included with comparable demographics for frailty and co-morbidities in each group; age was significantly higher in the soft collar group (80.6 vs 86.4 years; P = .0065). Associated injuries and complications were not significantly different overall, or when Type II fractures were separately analysed (P = .435 associated injuries, P = .121 complications). All-cause mortality was greater in the soft collar group (30-day mortality hard: 0%, soft: 9%; 1-year mortality hard: 18%, soft: 48% P = .035). However, once corrected for age, this proved not to reach significance (P = .333) in any fracture type. Non-union was common (77%) but was not significantly different (hard = 70%; soft = 87%; P = .419).

Discussion

Consistent with other reports, non-union rates remained substantial regardless of which collar was used. After controlling for age, there was no difference in all-cause mortality between elderly patients treated with a hard or soft cervical collar for odontoid peg fractures.

Conclusions

Soft collars appear suitable for the treatment of odontoid peg fractures in the elderly without compromising outcome. Larger cohort analyses will help confirm this finding.