Single-Stage Posterior Instrumentation and Unilateral Transpedicular Debridement for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis: Three Years of Follow-Up

Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis Treatment

(1) Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for the treatment of lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. (2) Methods: Fifty-one patients with single-level lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: anterior lumbar interbody fusion with a tri-cortical iliac bone graft (ALIF+ tri-cortical iliac bone graft) (n = 28) and OLIF using PEEK cages with an autologous bone graft (OLIF+ PEEK cages) (n = 23). Perioperative radiographic parameters, complications, and clinical outcomes in both groups were analyzed and compared. (3) Results: The postoperative and final follow-up LL (lumbar lordosis) and RL (regional lordosis) were improved in both groups (p < 0.001). But, compared with the ALIF group, the OLIF group had more improvement of the RL. The operation time was 79 min for the OLIF group and 101 min for the ALIF group (p < 0.05). The intraoperative blood loss was 92 mL for the OLIF group and 114 mL for the ALIF group (p < 0.05). Significant clinical improvement was observed in visual analogue scale scores for the back and Oswestry Disability Index in both groups (p < 0.001). There was no recurrence of infection. (4) Conclusions: Compared with the ALIF group, the OLIF group had more improvement in radiographic and clinical outcomes. Thus, OLIF using PEEK cages with an autologous bone graft could be proposed for the surgical treatment of lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Evaluation of the efficacy of OLIF combined posterior internal fixation for single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined posterior fixation for single-segment lumbar tuberculosis (TB).

Methods

The medical records of spinal TB patients who were admitted to our department from January 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed, and those meeting the inclusion criteria were finally included for analysis. The operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Cobb angle of surgical segment, bone graft fusion rate, erythrocytic sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), neurological function (ASIA grade) and complications of the included patients were all recorded and analyzed.

Results

Thirty-nine patients with lumbar TB were finally included. The mean operative time, operative blood loss, and hospital stay were 135.8 ± 19.2 min, 239.4 ± 84.7 ml, and 9.5 ± 2.7 days, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 26.3 ± 7.5 months. During the follow-up, both VAS score and ODI were significantly improved at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperative, and the last follow-up, compared with preoperative (P < 0.001). Cobb angle was significantly corrected at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.001), however, from 3 months postoperative to the last follow-up, Cobb angle was getting lost (P < 0.01). Bone graft fusion rate at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperative, and last follow-up were 66.67%, 87.18%, 94.88%, and 100%, respectively. Compared with preoperative, ESR and CRP were both showed significant decrease at 1 and 6 months postoperative, and the last follow-up (P < 0.001). At the last follow-up, all patients had improvement in ASIA grade compared with preoperative (P < 0.001). Six patients were found with postoperative complications, and all were cured after active treatment.

Conclusions

OLIF combined posterior internal fixation is safe and effective in the treatment of single-segment lumbar TB, with satisfactory pain relief, improvement of lumbar and neurological function, and deformity correction.

Osteomyelitis of the spine: treatments and future directions

BACKGROUND

Osteomyelitis of the spine is a serious condition that has been increasing with the intravenous drug pandemic and aging population. Multiple different organisms can cause osteomyelitis and mainstay of treatment is early recognition and antibiotics. The course can sometimes be indolent leading to delayed presentations. Once suspected, comprehensive workup and initiation of management should be employed. In rare circumstances, surgical evacuation or deformity correction is indicated. Continued antibiotic treatment should be considered post-operatively.

METHODS

Emerging treatment solutions are being developed to help target osteomyelitis in a more effective manner. In this review, we highlight the epidemiology and pathophysiology of spinal osteomyelitis. We overview the diagnostic workup and treatment options. Finally, we present new options that are currently being investigated and are on the near horizon.

CONCLUSION

This review offers a user friendly resource for clinicians and researchers regarding osteomyelitis of the spine and will serve as a catalyst for further discovery.

Comparison of Granular Bone Grafts and Transverse Process Bone Grafts for Single-Segmental Thoracic Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Single-Center Comparative Study

Background: To compare the clinical efficacy of granular bone grafts and transverse process bone grafts for single-segmental thoracic tuberculosis (TB).

Methods: The clinical records of 52 patients who were diagnosed with single-segmental thoracic TB and treated by one stage posterior debridement, bone graft fusion, and internal fixation in our department from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 25 cases were in the granular bone graft group and 27 cases in the transverse processes bone graft group. Outcomes including the visual analog scale (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), neurological function, operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, Cobb angle, bone graft fusion time, and postoperative complications were all recorded and analyzed.

Results: There were no significant differences in operative time, operative blood loss, and hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.05). With an average follow-up of 18–33 months, all patients in the two groups showed significant improvement in VAS score, ESR, CRP, and neurological function compared with preoperative measurements (P < 0.05), however, no significant differences were found for the last follow-up (P > 0.05). The two groups showed similar Cobb angle correction (P > 0.05), but the granular bone graft group had a larger Cobb angle loss than the transverse processes bone graft group (P < 0.05). The bone graft fusion time of the granular bone graft group was shorter than that of the transverse processes bone graft group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the postoperative complications rate between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Granular bone grafts and transverse process bone grafts may achieve comparable clinical efficacy for single-segmental thoracic TB, but the former method had a shorter bone fusion time.

Nonstructural bone graft for single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: surgical indications, clinical efficacy, and preliminary experiences in 34 patients

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate the surgical indications, clinical efficacy, and preliminary experiences of nonstructural bone grafts for lumbar tuberculosis (TB).

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with lumbar TB who were treated with nonstructural bone grafts were retrospectively assessed. The operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, bone graft fusion time, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment grade, and Cobb angle were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, Cobb angle correction, and Cobb angle loss were 192.59 ± 42.16 minutes, 385.29 ± 251.82 mL, 14.91 ± 5.06 days, 9.02° ± 3.16°, and 5.54° ± 1.09°, respectively. During the mean follow-up of 27.53 ± 8.90 months, significant improvements were observed in the ESR, CRP concentration, VAS score, ODI, and ASIA grade. The mean bone graft fusion time was 5.15 ± 1.13 months. Three complications occurred, and all were cured after active treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonstructural bone grafts may achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy for appropriately selected patients with lumbar TB.

Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the surgical treatment of single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: A single-center retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical treatment for single segment lumbar tuberculosis from 2015 to 2018 in our department were retrospectively included in this study. The included patients were divided into two groups, namely oblique lateral interbody fusion combined percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF) group and traditional posterior transforaminal or transpedicular approach debridement and pedicle screws fixation (PTA) group, according to the surgical methods. Outcomes including operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), Cobb angle correction and loss, bone fusion time, ASIA grade and complications were all recorded and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were included in this study, involving 23 patients in the OLIF group and 37 patients in the PTA group. The OLIF group had less operative time, blood loss and shorter hospital stay compared with the PTA group (P < 0.05). Both the two groups achieved significant improvements in ESR, CRP and ASIA grade at the last follow-up (P < 0.05), but no significant differences were found between them (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in Cobb angle correction and loss between the two groups (P > 0.05), but the bone graft fusion time of the OLIF group was significantly shorter than the PTA group (P < 0.05). The two groups achieved similar improvement in VAS score and ODI at 12 months postoperative and the last follow-up, however, OLIF group had a lower VAS score and ODI at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperative (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05) and all patients were cured after active treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Both OLIF and PTA can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy in the surgical treatment of single segment lumbar TB, but OLIF has the advantages of less surgical trauma, faster postoperative recovery and shorter bone fusion time.

Anterior oblique retroperitoneal approach vs posterior transpedicular approach for the treatment of one- or two-level lumbar vertebral osteomyelitis: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of debridement fusion surgery between two surgical approaches for one- or two-level lumbar vertebral osteomyelitis (LVO): oblique retroperitoneal approach (ORA) and posterior transpedicular approach (PTA).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study for adult patients with one- or two-level lumbar vertebral pyogenic spondylitis. The primary clinical outcomes included the following: surgery-related information (intra-operative blood loss, operation time, and hospital length of stay), infection control (primary failure and recurrence), and bony fusion. The secondary objective was to determine the differences between groups in mean reduction of pain characters and physical functioning.

RESULTS

The data of 80 patients were collected retrospectively. The duration of follow-up was 27.8 ± 4.7 months (range, 24-42). Intra-operative blood loss, operation time, and hospital length of stay in ORA debridement were significantly lower. Primary failure (2.3% vs 2.7%) was similar between the groups, but recurrence (13.9% vs 5.4%) had difference. Bony fusion (94.6.3% vs 86.1.%) in ORA debridement was higher than those in PTA debridement at the final follow-up. Fusion occurred at six to 14 months (mean 9.8 months). Patients in ORA group had better results in functional and pain scores in the first three months, with similar results at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In summary, ORA debridement provides a quicker recovery compared with PTA debridement for one- or two-level LVO. As for the infection control and fusion rate, both debridement approaches had similar results.

Application of polyetheretherketone cages through minimally invasive oblique retroperitoneal approach for the treatment of lumbar polymicrobial spondylodiscitis: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study with 7 cases

Despite the plethora of evidence in support of the use of structural osseous autograft in lumbar spondylodiscitis, attention has recently been turned to the addition of synthetic materials such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to restore anterior vertebral column support.From January 2015 to April 2017, 7 patients with lumbar polymicrobial spondylodiscitis were surgically treated with a minimally invasive oblique retroperitoneal approach to the infected focus. The patients underwent a standard lateral minimally invasive oblique retroperitoneal approach using direct lateral interbody fusion system. The PEEK cages were loaded with autologous bone graft. All the patients underwent posterior fixation with percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation. Lumbar function was measured using Oswestry Disability Index, and pain was measured with visual analog scale. Fusion and subsidence were also recorded.The study included 5 female and 2 male patients. The median age was 58.9 years. The duration of follow-up was 31.8 ± 6.1 months (range: 24-47). All patients recovered from the infection without relapse within 24-month follow-up. Visual analog scale significantly declined from 7.57 ± 0.53 before surgery to 1.57 ± 0.53 at 12-month follow-up. Mean Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 72.14 ± 6.82 before surgery to 22.28 ± 2.13 after surgery. All patients had solid fusion at 2-year follow-up. Fusion occurred at 6 to 15 months (mean 9.8 months).The specific use of PEEK cages in lumbar polymicrobial spondylodiscitis suggests reliable outcome in terms of clinical and imaging outcomes in our limited cases.