Synovial Cyst as a Marker for Lumbar Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Outcomes and adverse events for spinal synovial cysts surgical treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Spinal synovial cysts (SSCs) are a rare cause of nerve root and spinal cord compression. Surgical excision of SSCs remains the mainstay of treatment in the presence of unremitting symptoms or neurological deficits, but the choice of the surgical approach remains controversial. The goal of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with traditional approaches (interlaminar or laminectomy/hemilaminectomy) and minimally invasive approaches (microsurgical tubular approaches or endoscopic approaches) for SSCs.

METHODS

Studies reporting surgical management of SSCs were searched in three online databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science). This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement. It was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021288992). The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to evaluate bias. Extracted research data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16 and SPSS statistics 25.

RESULTS

A total of 22 related relevant studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence, reoperation, and operation time between minimally invasive approaches and traditional approaches (p > 0.05), but minimally invasive approaches had a good functional improvement (p = 0.004). Postoperative length of hospital stays and intraoperative bleeding in traditional approaches were also higher than in minimally invasive approaches (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the available evidence, minimally invasive approaches may be better than traditional approaches in the treatment of SSCs. Minimally invasive approaches had the advantages of improving clinical satisfaction, with a similar complication rate to traditional approaches. Moreover, endoscopic and microsurgical tubular approaches had similar outcomes.

Risk of Subsequent Fusion After Isolated Decompression of Lumbar Facet Cysts

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar facet cysts represent a potential source of nerve root compression in elderly patients. Isolated decompression without fusion has proven to be a reasonable treatment option in properly indicated patients. However, the risk of lumbar fusion after isolated decompression and facet cyst excision has yet to be elucidated.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was reviewed for patients undergoing isolated laminectomy for lumbar facet cyst from January 2015 to December 2018 using Current Procedural Terminology coding. Patients undergoing concomitant fusion or additional decompression, as well as those diagnosed with preexisting spondylolisthesis or without a minimum of 5-year follow-up, were excluded. Rates of subsequent lumbar fusion and potential risk factors for subsequent fusion were identified. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi square test, and multivariate logistic regression. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

In total, 10,707 patients were ultimately included for analysis. At 5-year follow-up, 727 (6.79%) of patients underwent subsequent lumbar fusion after initial isolated decompression. Of these, 301 (2.81% of total patients, 41.4% of fusion patients) underwent fusion within the first year after decompression. Multivariate analysis identified chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and osteoarthritis as risk factors for requiring subsequent lumbar fusion at 5 years following the index decompression procedure ( P < 0.033; all).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing isolated decompression for lumbar facet cysts undergo subsequent lumbar fusion at a 5-year rate of 6.79%. Risk factors for subsequent decompression include chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. This study will assist spine surgeons in appropriately counseling patients on expected postoperative course and potential risks of isolated decompression.

Lumbar parafacetal cyst-spinal segmental instability is the cause and stabilization is the treatment: A clinical report of eight surgically-treated patients

Objective

The authors report the results of "only-fixation" of the affected spinal segment without any decompression of the bones or soft tissue or manipulation of the cyst wall or contents in eight cases having lumbar parafacetal cyst (LPFC). This surgical strategy was based on the concept that LPFCs are secondary to spinal instability, has a protective or adaptive role, and is reversible following stabilization.

Materials and Methods

During the period from January 2018 to January 2023, eight consecutive patients having LPFC were surgically treated. There were 5 males and 3 females, and their ages ranged from 48 to 72 years (average 63 years). Seven patients had a single cyst and one patient had multiple cysts. The patients presented with symptoms classically attributed to lumbar canal stenosis. Apart from the cyst-affected spinal segment, degenerative alterations were observed in adjoining spinal segments in six out of seven patients having a single cyst. All patients underwent "only fixation" of the unstable spinal segments without any kind of bone or soft-tissue resection and without any manipulation or handling of the cyst wall or contents.

Results

During the follow-up period that ranged from 12 to 57 months (average 29 months), all patients improved from their symptoms. The recovery was observed in the immediate postoperative period and was lasting.

Conclusions

LPFCs are one of the several secondary alterations observed in spinal degeneration. Identification of unstable spinal segments and their fixation constitutes rational treatment of lumbar parafacetal cysts. Direct handling and resection of cysts are unnecessary.

Perspective: Operate on lumbar synovial cysts and avoid ineffective percutaneous techniques

Background

Lumbar synovial cysts (LSC), best diagnosed on MR studies, may cause symptoms/signs ranging from unilateral radiculopathy to cauda equina compressive syndromes. Attempts at percutaneous treatment of LSC typically fail. Rather, greater safety/efficacy is associated with direct surgical resection with/without fusion.

Methods

Treatment of LSC with percutaneous techniques, including cyst aspiration/perforation, injection (i.e., with/without steroids, saline/other), dilatation, and/or disruption/bursting, classically fail. This is because LSCs' tough, thickened, and adherent fibrous capsules cause extensive thecal sac/nerve root compression, and contain minimal central "fluid" (i.e., "crank-case" and non-aspirable). Multiple percutaneous attempts at decompression, therefore, typically cause several needle puncture sites risking dural tears (DT)/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, direct root injuries, failure to decompress the thecal sac/nerve roots, infections, hematomas, and over the longer-term, adhesive arachnoiditis.

Results

Alternatively, many studies document the success of direct or even partial resection of LSC (i.e., partial removal with marked cyst/dural adhesions with shrinking down the remnant of capsular tissue). Surgical decompressions of LSC, ranging from focal laminotomies to laminectomies, may or may not warrant additional fusions.

Conclusions

Symptomatic LSC are best managed with direct or even partial operative resection/decompression with/without fusion. The use of varying percutaneous techniques classically fails, and increases multiple perioperative risks.

Percutaneous uniportal full-endoscopic surgery for treating symptomatic lumbar facet joint cysts under local anesthesia combined with monitored anesthesia care: a preliminary report of eight cases with at least 1 year follow-up

Background

Lumbar facet joint cysts (FJCs) are a relatively rare clinical pathology that can result in radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication. Various treatments such as percutaneous aspiration and surgery have been reported to have good clinical outcomes. However, few clinical studies have aimed to treat symptomatic lumbar FJCs by using uniportal full-endoscopic (UFE) surgery. This study aimed to investigate the preliminary clinical outcomes of UFE surgery for the treatment of lumbar FJCs under local anesthesia combined with monitored anesthesia care (MAC).

Methods

Eight patients (five males and three females) with symptomatic lumbar FJCs who underwent UFE surgery under local and MAC anesthesia were enrolled in this study between January 2018 and April 2022. The clinical characteristics, radiological features, operative information, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and overall outcome rating based on the modified MacNab criteria were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Of the eight patients, four underwent a transforaminal approach and four underwent an interlaminar approach. Postoperatively, the mean VAS score for leg pain decreased from 6.1 before surgery to 0.6 after surgery, and the ODI decreased from 74.5% to 14.7%. All patients were followed up for more than 1 year, and the good-to-excellent rate based on the modified MacNab criteria remained 100% at the last follow-up. No complications occurred during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Lumbar FJCs can cause severe radiating leg pain and/or neurogenic claudication due to the dural sac compression and nerve roots. As an alternative treatment, UFE decompression under local and MAC anesthesia may provide effective clinical outcomes for symptomatic lumbar FJCs.

Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis

The treatment of lumbar spinal synovial cysts (LSCs) which are relatively rare but can cause neurogenic dysfunction and intractable pain has been a controversial topic for many years. Surgical excision of LSCs is the standard treatment for patients in whom conservative treatment options fail. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare clinical outcomes between minimally invasive approaches using tubular retractors (microscopic vs. endoscopic) and traditional percutaneous approaches for LSCs. Studies reporting surgical management of LSCs were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science database. This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement, registered in Prospero (CRD42021288992). A total of 1833 patients were included from both the related relevant studies (41 studies, n = 1831) and the present series (n = 2). Meta-analysis of minimally invasive tubular approaches revealed no statistically significant difference in pain improvement, dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence and operation time between minimal groups with traditional groups (p > 0.05). Minimal groups had better Functional improvement of 100% (95% CI 1.00-1.00; p < 0.001, I2 = 75.3%) and less reoperation rates of 0% (95% CI - 0.00-0.00; p = 0.007, I2 = 47.1%). Postoperative length of hospital stay and intraoperative bleeding in minimal groups were also less than traditional groups (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed endoscopic groups had less operation time (p = 0.004), and there was no significant difference in the rest. For patients with LSCs but without obvious clinical and imaging evidence of vertebral instability, even when preoperative stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis is present, minimally invasive tubular approaches without fusion may provide the best outcome in surgical management.

Synovial Cyst in the Setting of an Interspinous Fusion Device

Synovial cysts of the spine are degenerative cystic lesions that can lead to severe symptoms secondary to compression of the spinal cord, individual nerve roots, and/or the cauda equina. Some believe the etiology of this entity is related to increased motion across the facet joint and instability. We report a case of a lumbar synovial cyst located at the same level as a previously inserted spinous process fusion device. This case illustrates that, unlike a transpedicular instrumented fusion where the risk of synovial cyst formation is zero, a spinal process fusion can still lead to synovial cyst formation likely due to persistent micromotion across that segment.

Decompression with or without Fusion for Lumbar Synovial Cysts—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The management of symptomatic lumbar synovial cysts (LSC) is still a matter of debate. Previous systematic reviews did not stratify data according to different treatment techniques or incompletely reported comparative data on patients treated with lumbar posterior decompression (LPD) and lumbar decompression and fusion (LDF). The aim of our study was to compare LPD and LDF via a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature. The design of this study was in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review questions were as follows: among patients suffering from symptomatic lumbar synovial cysts (population) and treated with either posterior lumbar decompression or posterior decompression with fusion (intervention), who gets the best results (outcome), in terms of cyst recurrence, reoperation rates, and improvement of postoperative symptoms (comparison)? The search of the literature yielded a total of 1218 results. Duplicate records were then removed (n = 589). A total of 598 articles were screened, and 587 records were excluded via title and abstract screening; 11 studies were found to be relevant to our research question and were assessed for eligibility. Upon full-text review, 5 were excluded because they failed to report any parameter separately for both LPD and LDF. Finally, 6 studies for a total of 657 patients meeting the criteria stated above were included in the present investigation. Our analysis showed that LDF is associated with better results in terms of lower postoperative back pain and cyst recurrence compared with LPD. No differences were found in reoperation rates and complication rates between the two techniques. The impact of minimally invasive decompression techniques on the different outcomes in LSC should be assessed in the future and compared with instrumentation techniques.

Lumbar spinal ganglion cyst: A systematic review with case illustration

PURPOSE

Ganglion cysts are benign soft tissue lesions found in joints, most commonly wrists. The incidence for juxtafacet cysts, the condition under which spinal ganglion cysts are categorized, is between 0.06% and 5.8%. Spinal ganglion cysts often arise in the most mobile segment of the lumbar spine, L4-L5. Patients commonly present with pain, radiculopathy, and weakness. Conservative management is used, but surgical resection is the most common treatment modality. We aim to review the literature and present a rare case of an L2-L3 situated spinal ganglion cyst, treated with maximal safe resection.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were queried using Boolean operators and search terms, "spinal ganglion cyst, lumbar ganglion cyst, and lumbar juxtafacet cyst". Presentation, surgical management, and postoperative course of a 29-year-old male with an L2-L3 spinal ganglion cyst are also described.

RESULTS

The search yielded 824 articles; 23 met inclusion criteria. These papers consisted of 27 spinal ganglion cyst cases with disaggregated patient data. 63.0% of patients were male, and 53.4 years (range: 23-86) was the average age at presentation. Mean symptom duration was 1.9 years (range: 3 days-12 years). 70.4% of patients reported complete symptom resolution. 14.8% of cases noted neural foramen involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal ganglion cysts are benign lesions typically presenting with radiculopathy. Maximal safe resection is an effective treatment modality with low complication rates. Future studies are needed to understand if neural foramen involvement leads to increased symptom severity.

Utility of Flexion-Extension Radiographs with Brackets and Magnetic Resonance Facet Fluid for the Assessment of Lumbar Instability in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

To propose a new standardized technique for evaluating lumbar stability in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using lumbar lateral flexion-extension radiographs with brackets and magnetic resonance facet fluid.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 57 patients diagnosed with lumbar (L4-5) spondylolisthesis was performed. We analyzed lateral flexion-extension radiographs obtained with a bracket (LFEB) and without a bracket (LFE). Sagittal translation, segmental angulation, posterior opening, lumbar instability, and changes in lumbar lordosis were compared using functional radiographs. The mean width and maximum width of the facet fluid, mean facet joint length, and facet fluid index (FFI) of the 2 groups were compared using sagittal translation.

RESULTS

The average value of sagittal translation was 1.68 ± 0.96 mm in LFE and 3.07 ± 1.29 mm in LFEB, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Segmental angulation, posterior opening, and changes in lumbar lordosis were significantly greater in LFEB than in LFE. The instability detection rate was 14.0% in LFE and 35.1% in LFEB. The FFI, maximum width, and mean width were significantly increased in the unstable lumbar spondylolisthesis group compared with the stable group in LFEB. The FFI and maximum width of the facet fluid were significantly increased in the unstable lumbar spondylolisthesis group compared with the stable group in LFE.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar lateral flexion-extension radiographs with brackets can standardize the operation process and provide sufficient hyperflexion and hyperextension images. The width of the facet fluid and FFI are significant factors in the evaluation of lumbar stability in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Decompression without Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Synovial Cysts: Feasibility and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lumbar synovial cysts (LSCs) can cause painful radiculopathy and sensory and/or motor deficits. Historically, first-line surgical treatment has been decompression with fusion. Recently, minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion has shown equal or superior results to traditional decompression and fusion methods.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the long-term efficacy of minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion in the treatment of LSC as it relates to the rate of subsequent fusion surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed over a 10-year period of patients undergoing minimally invasive laminectomy for symptomatic LSCs. The primary end point was the rate of revision surgery requiring fusion.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients with symptomatic LSCs underwent minimally invasive laminectomy alone January 2010-August 2020 at our institution. The most common location was L4-5 (72%). Preoperative imaging identified spondylolisthesis (grade 1) in 43 patients (57%), none of which was unstable on available dynamic radiographs. Average procedure duration was 93 minutes, with 78% of patients discharged home on the same day of surgery. Over 46 months of mean follow-up, 17 patients (20%) required 19 revision operations. Of those operations, 16 were spinal fusions (17.6%). Median time to fusion surgery was 36 months. There were no identifiable risk factors on multivariate regression analysis that predicted the need for fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive laminectomy is an effective first-line treatment for symptomatic LSCs and avoids the need for fusion in most treated patients. Of our patients, 18% required a fusion over 46 months, suggesting that further studies are required to guide patient selection.

Neuropathic Pain due to Compression of Cervical Medial Branch by Cervical Juxtafacet Cyst: A Case Report

In the current report, we describe an interesting case of cervical juxtafacet that developed outside the intervertebral foramen, compressing the cervical medial branch and causing neuropathic pain in the posterior inferior neck pain. A 61-year-old woman visited a local pain clinic due to neuropathic pain with a tingling and burning nature (numeric rating scale [NRS]: 5 out of 10) on the left posterior inferior neck area for 4 months. Paresthesia was observed in the left posterior inferior neck area. On cervical radiography, segmental instability was observed at the C3-4 and C4-5 levels. Moreover, on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine, a cyst (size: 1.3 cm × 0.7 cm × 1 cm) was outside the intervertebral foramen, contacting the left C4-5 facet joint and left C5 articular pillar. We thought that compression of the left C5 medial branch by the cyst could cause the patient's pain. We conducted computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous needle aspiration of a cervical juxtafacet cyst. An 18-gauge needle was advanced under the guidance of CT into the largest portion of the cyst through a posterolateral oblique approach. Gelatinous mucoid fluid (approximately 0.5 cc) was aspirated. Immediately after the aspiration, 80% of the patient's pain was disappeared, and dysesthesia was completely disappeared. At the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups, the patient reported slight pain (NRS: 1) on the left posterior inferior neck. Cervical juxtafacet cysts can develop outside of the intervertebral foramen and spinal canal. Percutaneous needle aspiration can be a useful therapeutic tool for the treatment of such cysts.

Acute development of spinal lumbar synovial facet cyst within 1 week after lumbar decompression: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Synovial facet cysts can sometimes develop in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after decompressive laminectomy. The etiology of spinal lumbar synovial cysts is still unclear, but their formation is associated with underlying spinal instability, facet joint arthropathy, and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

OBSERVATIONS

A 61-year-old-male patient presented with neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Radiographic studies showed grade I spondylolisthesis and radiological predictors of delayed spinal instability. He underwent lumbar decompression and shortly thereafter developed spinal instability and recurrent symptoms, with formation of a new spinal lumbar synovial facet cyst. He required revisional decompression, cyst excision, and posterolateral spinal fusion for definitive treatment.

LESSONS

The literature reports postoperative spinal instability in up to one-third of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and stable degenerative spondylolisthesis who undergo decompressive laminectomy. Close radiographic monitoring and early advanced imaging may be prudent in this patient population if they develop new postoperative neurological symptoms and show radiographic predictors of instability on preoperative imaging. Posterolateral spinal fusion with instrumentation should be considered in addition to lumbar decompression in this select group of patients who demonstrate radiographic predictors of delayed spinal instability if they are medically capable of tolerating a spinal fusion procedure.

The Fate of Lumbar Facet Cyst After Indirect Decompression Using Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Favorable clinical outcomes have been reported for oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for various lumbar degenerative diseases. However, there is only limited evidence on the safety and effectiveness of OLIF in degenerative spondylolisthesis with lumbar facet cyst (LFC), and OLIF is often regarded as a relative contraindication for these patients. The authors prospectively enrolled patients who underwent a single-level OLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis with LFC to evaluate the morphological changes of LFC and their clinical significance following OLIF. Twenty patients with a mean age of 69.6 years (range, 65-86 years) were enrolled. At 1 week postoperative, 5 (25%) patients had a residual cyst, whereas 15 (75%) patients had completely resolved cysts on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). No patient had a residual cyst on the 1-year postoperative MRI. Patients with cyst resolution (n=15) on the 1-week postoperative MRI had a larger slip percentage difference on the preoperative dynamic radiograph when compared with patients with no cyst resolution (n=5) (4.7%±2.8% vs 1.3%±0.3%, P=.002). The group with cyst resolution also showed a greater expansion of facet fluid width following OLIF, although this was not statistically significant (1.2±0.7 mm vs 0.7±0.5 mm, P=.098). For both groups, all preoperative clinical scores showed a significant improvement at 1 year after OLIF, but there was no significant difference between the groups at all time points. Preliminary 1-year follow-up results from this prospective series suggest that OLIF can be a useful option for fusion surgery in LFC patients with apparent segmental instability. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(5):306-312.].

Classification and Reliability of Lumbar Facet Cysts Grading Scales

BACKGROUND

The presence of symptomatic lumbar facet cysts has been associated with segmental instability. Given this association, decompression versus decompression with fusion is a frequently debated topic. Multiple grading scales have been devised to identify patients at high risk for development of cyst recurrence; however, there exists no external evaluation of these scales.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 54 patients undergoing initial treatment for lumbar synovial cysts at a single institution over the past 12 years was conducted. Surgical treatment consisted of decompression with cystectomy without fusion. Patients were assessed and classified according to the NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG) and Rosenstock Classification systems. Five neurosurgeons reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance images, and results were classified. Interrater reliability was assessed using both Gwet's AC1 coefficient and Krippendorff's alpha. A 1-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate predictive ability of both classification systems.

RESULTS

In total, of the 54 patients who underwent decompression, 7 had cyst recurrence. Overall cyst recurrence was most common in NSURG grade 2 cysts (3/12, 25%) followed by grade 1 cysts (4/27, 14.8%). Of the NSURG grade 3 and 4 patients, none had cyst recurrence. In the Rosenstock grades the most common recurrence was in grade 3 cysts (1/4, 25%) followed by grade 1 cysts (5/26, 19.2%). Interrater reliability demonstrated good reproducibility on Gwet's AC1 and Krippendorff's alpha on both grading scales. Neither score was predictive of cyst recurrence (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Rosenstock and NeuroSpine scores demonstrate good overall interrater reliability but are inconsistent in their ability to predict recurrence of lumbar facet cysts.

Outcomes and complications following minimally invasive excision of synovial cysts of the lumbar spine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar synovial cysts (LSC) are one of the manifestations of spinal degenerative cascade. Spinal stenosis or presence of instability in these patients can lead to various symptoms and surgery is indicated following failure of non-operative management for symptomatic synovial cysts. Surgery when performed consists of either decompression with resection of cyst with our without fusion. The efficacy and complications of minimally invasive techniques using tubular retractors (microscopic or endoscopic) in comparison to traditional open techniques remain to be studied.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of different databases was performed to retrieve studies describing the use of minimal invasive techniques using tubular retractors (both microscopic and endoscopic) in patients with LSC. Meta-analysis with subgroup analysis and metaregression was done.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis with total of 388 patients. Eighty-six percent of patients (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 80-90%) had favorable outcome as per Macnab's criteria (excellent and good outcome) with the pooled standard mean difference between preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) being -4.44 (95% CI -8.78 to -0.10, p-value=0.0474, I² 82%). The pooled percentage change in visual analogue scale (VAS) after surgery was 76.5% (95% CI 66.9-84%, I² 82%). The pooled proportion of incidental durotomies, cyst recurrence and patients requiring operation being 8% (95% CI 5-11%, I² 0%), 4% (95% CI 2-7%, I² 0%,) and 5% (95% CI 3-9%) respectively. Studies were homogeneous with an I² value of 0%. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the outcome rates or complication rates between the microscopic and endoscopic subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive techniques for the resection of LSC is a safe and effective alternative to traditional surgical approaches with no difference between the microscopic and endoscopic approaches.

Different Types of Double-Level Degenerative Lumber Spondylolisthesis: What Is Different in the Sagittal Plane?

BACKGROUND

Degenerative lumber spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a common orthopedic condition, described as a condition that compared with the lower vertebra, the superior vertebra slides forward or backward in the sagittal plane without accompanying isthmic spondylolisthesis. Information pertaining to different types of double-level DLS is scarce. This study aims to analyze parameters of patients with different types of double-level DLS to provide a reference for guiding surgical treatment and restoring sagittal balance of patients with DLS.

METHODS

From January 2014 to January 2020, records of patients with double-level DLS were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with double-level DLS were divided into 3 types: anterior, posterior, and combined; the anterior and combined types were studied. The sagittal spinopelvic parameters included C7 tilt, maximal thoracic kyphosis, maximal lumbar lordosis (LLmax), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). After descriptive analysis, demographic and radiographic data were compared.

RESULTS

Forty and 18 patients were included in the anterior and combined type groups, respectively. Both groups had different levels of chronic low back pain, but the incidence of radiating leg pain and neurogenic claudication was significantly higher in the anterior type. Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale low back scores were also higher in the anterior type. In the anterior type, C7 tilt (7.14 ± 2.15 vs. 5.41 ± 2.28, P = 0.007), LLmax (50.02 ± 14.76 vs. 36.96 ± 14.56, P = 0.003), PI (68.28 ± 9.16 vs. 55.53 ± 14.19, P < 0.001), PT (28.68 ± 7.31 vs. 19.38 ± 4.70, P < 0.001), and PT/PI (42.45 ± 11.22 vs. 36.04 ± 9.87, P = 0.041) were significantly higher. In the anterior type, PI correlated positively with LLmax (r = 0.59) and SS (r = 0.71). LLmax and SS (r = 0.65) had a positive correlation. PT/PI and SS (r = -0.77) had a negative correlation. In the combined type, PI correlated positively with LLmax (r = 0.61) and SS (r = 0.88), and PT/PI correlated negatively with SS (r = -0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with double-level DLS, the sagittal spinopelvic parameters differed between the anterior and combined types. Overall, spinal surgeons should focus on correcting sagittal deformities, relieving postoperative clinical symptoms, and improving quality of life during fusion surgery.

Comparison of Decompression versus Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Synovial Cysts and Predictive Factors for Cyst Recurrence

BACKGROUND

The management of lumbar synovial cysts (LSC) has been a controversial topic for many years. Whereas many authors label LSC as markers of instability and thus necessitating fusion, others suggest that decompression alone without fusion is a viable initial treatment option. Our objective was to clarify outcomes in patients undergoing decompression alone and decompression with fusion for symptomatic LSC and identify factors for cyst recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective case series was performed of all patients undergoing initial treatment for LSC at a single institution ranging from January 1999 to February 2020. Surgical treatment included either decompression with cystectomy or decompression with cystectomy and a fusion procedure. Preoperative symptoms were collected and included radicular pain, motor deficits, sensory deficits, or bowel/bladder changes. Radiographic data were calculated individually and confirmed with radiology reports. Categorical variables were assessed using χ² analysis and continuous variables were assessed with the 2-sample t test.

RESULTS

In total, 161 patients were identified as presenting with symptomatic LSC. Of these, 104 patients underwent decompression alone versus 57 who underwent decompression and fusion. In the decompression group 11 patients required reoperation at the level of the cyst compared with none in those undergoing fusion as their initial procedure (10.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.012). On subgroup analysis of those undergoing decompression as their initial procedure, patients with cyst recurrence demonstrated a statistically significant greater coronal facet inclination angle compared with those without cyst recurrence (52.4° vs. 40.6°, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Decompression alone is a reasonable choice for the initial management of LSC, although it does carry a significant risk of same-level reoperation due to cyst recurrence and spondylolisthesis. Preoperative coronal facet inclination angle may be a useful measurement in predicting cyst recurrence following decompression.

An Unusual Case of Radicular Pain Caused by Bilateral Lumbar Synovial Cyst: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Introduction

Spinal synovial cysts (SSCs) constitute an uncommon degenerative lesion of the spine. They are usually asymptomatic but they may also cause symptoms of variable severity. SSCs are benign growths adjoining the facet joints that may induce low back pain, lumbar radiculopathy, and neurological deficit. There are different treatment options that range from conservative management to interventions like image-guided epidural steroid injection or direct cyst puncture and finally to open or endoscopic spinal canal decompression and spinal bone fusion with/without instrumentation. A discussion of current management options for this unusual disease is presented. Material and Methods. A 52-year-old female patient presented with low back pain and left leg pain. Plain radiography demonstrated instability at the L4-L5 level. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) revealed a bilateral cystic lesion at the L4-L5 level with associated instability and degenerative disc disease at the level L5-S1. Initially, conservative treatment was performed by aspiration of the left cyst and infiltration with corticosteroids with improvement of the pain for 1 year. After this period, the radicular and the low back pain reoccurred.

Results

Following leg pain recurrence, a hybrid L4-S1 fusion was performed. After surgery, there was clinical improvement and six months later, the patient returned to daily activities. The radiological study after five-year follow-up shows adequate implant position, without signs of loosening, compatible with solid fusion.

Conclusion

After reviewing the literature, the optimal management for patients with symptomatic lumbar synovial cyst must be very individualized, which is essential to achieve a favorable outcome.

Lumbar Facet Joint Cyst Treated With Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization

Spinal facet joint cysts (FJCs) are an increasingly reported cause of lower back pain, radiculopathy, and neurological deficits owing to their proximity to adjacent nerve roots. The etiology of these cysts has not yet been fully elucidated, although they appear to be related to degenerative changes in the facet joints themselves. Conservative management strategies including physical therapy and oral analgesics rarely result in spontaneous regression of an FJC, often providing only short-term relief. The current treatment modalities reported for FJCs generally range from percutaneous cyst aspiration to decompression surgery with or without instrumented spinal fusion. However, instrumented fusion often results in a higher rate of complications such as pseudoarthrosis and adjacent segment disease. The Coflex^® (Paradigm Spine, LLC, New York, NY) interlaminar stabilization (ILS) implant is a novel titanium, U-shaped device which acts as a motion-preserving stabilizer and has proven to be a viable alternative to instrumental fusion. Here, we discuss a case of an FJC treated with both decompression and placement of a Coflex ILS device.

Transdural Approach to Resection of Intraspinal Extradural Ventral Cysts in the Lumbar Spine

BACKGROUND

Intraspinal extradural ventral cysts in the lumbar spine can cause back pain and neurological deficits of the lower extremities. For the resection of this type of space-occupying lesion, the transdural approach has not been reported in the literature.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 66-year-old man presented, suffering from progressive radiation pain of his bilateral lower extremities. Imaging examination revealed a cystic lesion in ventral side of lumbar spinal canal. We conducted the excision of the cyst with the transdural approach. The symptoms of the patient disappeared immediately after the operation and recurrence of the symptoms has not been observed in the 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This operation approach is safe and effective. Compared with the previous surgical approach reported in the literature, by this approach surgeons could achieve less injury, shorter operation time, and the same surgical outcomes in the short term. Therefore, we would like to present this approach to provide an alternative to deal with similar lesions.