1
|
Wilson SB, Ward J, Munjal V, Lam CSA, Patel M, Zhang P, Xu DS, Chakravarthy VB. Machine Learning in Spine Oncology: A Narrative Review. Global Spine J 2024:21925682241261342. [PMID: 38860699 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241261342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative Review. OBJECTIVE Machine learning (ML) is one of the latest advancements in artificial intelligence used in medicine and surgery with the potential to significantly impact the way physicians diagnose, prognose, and treat spine tumors. In the realm of spine oncology, ML is utilized to analyze and interpret medical imaging and classify tumors with incredible accuracy. The authors present a narrative review that specifically addresses the use of machine learning in spine oncology. METHODS This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) methodology. A systematic review of the literature in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases since inception was performed to present all clinical studies with the search terms '[[Machine Learning] OR [Artificial Intelligence]] AND [[Spine Oncology] OR [Spine Cancer]]'. Data included studies that were extracted and included algorithms, training and test size, outcomes reported. Studies were separated based on the type of tumor investigated using the machine learning algorithms into primary, metastatic, both, and intradural. A minimum of 2 independent reviewers conducted the study appraisal, data abstraction, and quality assessments of the studies. RESULTS Forty-five studies met inclusion criteria out of 480 references screened from the initial search results. Studies were grouped by metastatic, primary, and intradural tumors. The majority of ML studies relevant to spine oncology focused on utilizing a mixture of clinical and imaging features to risk stratify mortality and frailty. Overall, these studies showed that ML is a helpful tool in tumor detection, differentiation, segmentation, predicting survival, predicting readmission rates of patients with either primary, metastatic, or intradural spine tumors. CONCLUSION Specialized neural networks and deep learning algorithms have shown to be highly effective at predicting malignant probability and aid in diagnosis. ML algorithms can predict the risk of tumor recurrence or progression based on imaging and clinical features. Additionally, ML can optimize treatment planning, such as predicting radiotherapy dose distribution to the tumor and surrounding normal tissue or in surgical resection planning. It has the potential to significantly enhance the accuracy and efficiency of health care delivery, leading to improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth B Wilson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jacob Ward
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Vikas Munjal
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Mayur Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University College of Engineering, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David S Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adida S, Legarreta AD, Hudson JS, McCarthy D, Andrews E, Shanahan R, Taori S, Lavadi RS, Buell TJ, Hamilton DK, Agarwal N, Gerszten PC. Machine Learning in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Neurosurgery 2024; 94:53-64. [PMID: 37930259 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) can offer revolutionary advances in their application to the field of spine surgery. Within the past 5 years, novel applications of ML have assisted in surgical decision-making, intraoperative imaging and navigation, and optimization of clinical outcomes. ML has the capacity to address many different clinical needs and improve diagnostic and surgical techniques. This review will discuss current applications of ML in the context of spine surgery by breaking down its implementation preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Ethical considerations to ML and challenges in ML implementation must be addressed to maximally benefit patients, spine surgeons, and the healthcare system. Areas for future research in augmented reality and mixed reality, along with limitations in generalizability and bias, will also be highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Adida
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Andrew D Legarreta
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Joseph S Hudson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - David McCarthy
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Edward Andrews
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Regan Shanahan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Suchet Taori
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Raj Swaroop Lavadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Thomas J Buell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Peter C Gerszten
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ren G, Yu K, Xie Z, Wang P, Zhang W, Huang Y, Wang Y, Wu X. Current Applications of Machine Learning in Spine: From Clinical View. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1827-1840. [PMID: 34628966 PMCID: PMC9609532 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211035363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative review. OBJECTIVES This review aims to present current applications of machine learning (ML) in spine domain to clinicians. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive PubMed search of peer-reviewed articles that were published between 2006 and 2020 using terms (spine, spinal, lumbar, cervical, thoracic, machine learning) to examine ML in spine. Then exclude research of other domain, case report, review or meta-analysis, and which without available abstract or full text. RESULTS Total 1738 articles were retrieved from database, and 292 studies were finally included. Key findings of current applications were compiled and summarized in this review. Main clinical applications of those techniques including image processing, diagnosis, decision supporting, operative assistance, rehabilitation, surgery outcomes, complications, hospitalization and cost. CONCLUSIONS ML had achieved excellent performance and hold immense potential in spine. ML could help clinical staff to improve medical level, enhance work efficiency, and reduce adverse events. However more randomized controlled trials and improvement of interpretability are essential to clinicians accepting models' assistance in real work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GuanRui Ren
- Southeast University Medical College,
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Kun Yu
- Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital, Nanjing,
Jiangsu, China
| | - ZhiYang Xie
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda
Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - PeiYang Wang
- Southeast University Medical College,
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Southeast University Medical College,
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yong Huang
- Southeast University Medical College,
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - YunTao Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda
Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China,YunTao Wang, Department of Spine Surgery,
Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, No. 87, Dingjiaqiao
Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.
| | - XiaoTao Wu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda
Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China,XiaoTao Wu, Department of Spine Surgery,
Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, No. 87, Dingjiaqiao
Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Is Open Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Secondary to Lung Cancer Really Beneficial? A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg 2020; 144:e253-e263. [PMID: 32827738 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Spinal cord compression secondary to metastatic epidural lung cancer generally has a worse prognosis when compared with other metastatic tumors. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of open surgery on the survival time, ambulation status, and associated prognostic variables of these patients over the past 2 decades. METHODS We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases to identify patients with spinal cord compression secondary to metastatic lung cancer. We assessed the role of the following factors on survival outcome and ambulation recovery: Karnofsky Performance Scale, number of extraspinal bone metastases, number of metastases in the vertebrae, major internal organs involvement, vertebral location of spinal metastases, and neurologic status. RESULTS Our initial search yielded 367 articles, from which 11 studies met the eligibility criteria for a total of 395 patients. Significant correlations with the survival period and the recovery in ambulation were found in the prognostic score for the number of metastases in vertebrae (R = 0.74 and 0.88, respectively), and in the prognostic score for metastases to major internal organs (R = 0.82 and 0.81, respectively). A significant correlation with survival period was found in the numbers of extraspinal bone metastases (R = -0.82). The rates of major complications were comparable with those for open surgery for metastatic tumors of other origin. CONCLUSIONS Fewer vertebral metastases and less major internal organ involvement were associated with longer survival periods and greater ambulation recovery in patients undergoing open surgery for spinal cord compression secondary to metastatic lung cancer.
Collapse
|