1
|
Duan Y, Feng D, Zhu M, Qiu H, Li T, Chen Z, Jiang L, Huang Y. Modic Changes Increase the Cage Subsidence Rate in Spinal Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:64-72. [PMID: 37865194 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of different Modic changes (MC) grades on the cage subsidence rate after spinal interbody fusion surgery. METHODS We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to August 13, 2023, for relevant randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies. Review Manager 5.3 and STATA13.0 were used to conduct this meta-analysis. The subsidence rate was assessed using relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Six studies with a total of 716 segments were allocated to four groups according to the type of MC. The subsidence rate in the non-Modic changes (NMC) was significantly lower than that in the MC. The subsidence rate in the NMC was significantly lower than that in the MC in the subgroup of cages with extra instrumentation. No significant difference was identified between the 2 groups in the oblique lumbar interbody fusion subgroup. The subsidence rate in the NMC was significantly lower than that in the MC in the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion subgroup. The subsidence rate in the NMC was significantly lower than that in the MC1 and MC2. We found no significant difference between NMC and MC3, MC1 and MC2, MC1 and MC3, or MC2 and MC3. CONCLUSIONS MC may be associated with a higher cage subsidence rate. With the increase in MC grades, the incidence of subsidence decreased gradually, but it was always higher than that in the NMC. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion may be a better choice for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with MC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchen Duan
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Dagang Feng
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Min Zhu
- Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan province Integrative Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Heng Qiu
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Tong Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Zhen Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Leiming Jiang
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yong Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di M, Weng Y, Wang G, Bian H, Qi H, Wu H, Chen C, Dou Y, Wang Z, Ma X, Xu B, Zhu S, Lu WW, Yang Q. Cortical Endplate Bone Density Measured by Novel Phantomless Quantitative Computed Tomography May Predict Cage Subsidence more Conveniently and Accurately. Orthop Surg 2023; 15:3126-3135. [PMID: 37853959 PMCID: PMC10694013 DOI: 10.1111/os.13897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies have shown that bone mineral density (BMD) is a predictor of cage subsidence. Phantom-less quantitative computed tomography (PL-QCT) can measure volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of lumbar trabecular and cortical bone. The study of endplate vBMD (EP-vBMD) is important in predicting cage settlement after extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF). This study aimed to determine the risk factors for postoperative cage subsidence after XLIF, particularly focusing on the relationship between vBMD measured by automatic PL-QCT and cage subsidence. METHODS Patients who underwent XLIF surgery from January 2018 to October 2020 with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were retrospectively included. Cage subsidence was defined as >2 mm cage sinking on the adjacent endplate in follow-up imaging evaluation. Outcome measures were localized vBMDs included EP-vBMDs with different region of interest (ROI) heights measured by PL-QCT based on a customized muscle-fat algorithm. Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney test, Fisher exact test, univariable and multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were executed in this study. RESULTS One hundred and thirteen levels of 78 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65 ± 7.9 years for 11 males and 67 females. Cage subsidence occurred on 45 (39.8%) surgical levels. There was no significant difference in demographics, fused levels, or preoperative radiographic parameters. 1.25-mm EP-vBMD (0.991 [0.985,0.997], p = 0.004) and P-TB-vBMD (cage-positioned trabecular volumetric bone mineral density) (0.988 [0.977-0.999], p = 0.026) were cage-subsidence relevant according to univariate analysis. Low 1.25-mm EP-vBMD (0.992 [0.985, 0.999], p = 0.029) was an independent risk factor according to multifactorial analysis. CONCLUSION Preoperative low EP-vBMD was an independent risk factor for postoperative cage subsidence after XLIF. EP-vBMD measured by most cortex-occupied ROI may be the optimal vBMD parameter for cage subsidence prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyuan Di
- Graduate SchoolTianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Department of Spine SurgeryTianjin Hospital, Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Yuanzhi Weng
- Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong KongPokfulamChina
- Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyThe University of Hong Kong‐Shenzhen HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Guohua Wang
- Graduate SchoolTianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Department of Spine SurgeryTianjin Hospital, Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Hanming Bian
- Graduate SchoolTianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Department of Spine SurgeryTianjin Hospital, Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Huan Qi
- Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong KongPokfulamChina
- Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyThe University of Hong Kong‐Shenzhen HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Hongjin Wu
- Graduate SchoolTianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Department of Spine SurgeryTianjin Hospital, Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Chao Chen
- Department of Spine SurgeryTianjin Hospital, Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Yiming Dou
- Department of Spine SurgeryTianjin Hospital, Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Zhi Wang
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Xinlong Ma
- Department of Spine SurgeryTianjin Hospital, Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Baoshan Xu
- Department of Spine SurgeryTianjin Hospital, Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Shan Zhu
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Weijia William Lu
- Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong KongPokfulamChina
- Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyThe University of Hong Kong‐Shenzhen HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Qiang Yang
- Department of Spine SurgeryTianjin Hospital, Tianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma X, Lin L, Wang J, Meng L, Zhang X, Miao J. Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with unilateral versus bilateral posterior fixation in patients with osteoporosis. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:776. [PMID: 37845750 PMCID: PMC10577918 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04262-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the clinical efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with unilateral (UPSF) and bilateral pedicle screw internal fixation (BPSF) in patients with osteoporosis. METHODS Clinical data of 57 patients who underwent single-segment OLIF surgery with a clear diagnosis of osteoporosis from December 2018 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 27 patients underwent OLIF + UPSF and 30 patients underwent OLIF + BPSF. Surgical technique-related indexes were recorded, including operative time, operative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay; clinical outcome-related indexes included postoperative complications, Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at preoperative, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months postoperative follow-up; and imaging outcome-related indexes included the measurement of preoperative and postoperative segmental lordosis (SL), and observation of the degree of cage subsidence and bone graft fusion. RESULTS The surgery was successfully performed in 57 patients, and there was no statistical difference in operative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay between UPSF group and BPSF group (P > 0.05). In terms of operative time, there was a significant difference (UPSF group: 92.30 ± 11.03 min, BPSF group: 119.67 ± 16.41, P < 0.05). Postoperative VAS and ODI scores exhibited significant improvement (P < 0.05). At the 12 months postoperative follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores in the BPSF group were significantly better than those in the UPS group (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative images, the SL was significantly improved in both groups after surgery (P < 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, the fusion rate in the UPSF group was significantly lower than that in the BPSF group (P < 0.05). At 1 year postoperatively, the fusion rate in the UPSF group was not significantly different from that in the BPSF group (P > 0.05). At 1 year postoperatively, the rate and degree of cage subsidence was higher in the UPSF group than in the BPSF group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION In the long term, OLIF combined with bilateral posterior fixation applied to the osteoporosis patients is superior to OLIF surgery combined with unilateral posterior fixation in terms of clinical and imaging outcomes. It is effective in improving pain relief and functional improvement, accelerating bone graft fusion, and reducing cage subsidence compared with UPSF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Ma
- Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300210, China
| | - Longwei Lin
- Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300210, China
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300210, China
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Lin Meng
- Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xingze Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300210, China
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jun Miao
- Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300210, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhong Y, Wang Y, Zhou H, Wang Y, Gan Z, Qu Y, Hua R, Chen Z, Chu G, Liu Y, Jiang W. Biomechanical study of two-level oblique lumbar interbody fusion with different types of lateral instrumentation: a finite element analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1183683. [PMID: 37457575 PMCID: PMC10345158 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1183683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to verify the biomechanical properties of a newly designed angulated lateral plate (mini-LP) suited for two-level oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). The mini-LP is placed through the lateral ante-psoas surgical corridor, which reduces the operative time and complications associated with prolonged anesthesia and placement in the prone position. Methods A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element (FE) model of an intact L1-L5 lumbar spine was constructed and validated. The intact model was modified to generate a two-level OLIF surgery model augmented with three types of lateral fixation (stand-alone, SA; lateral rod screw, LRS; miniature lateral plate, mini-LP); the operative segments were L2-L3 and L3-L4. By applying a 500 N follower load and 7.5 Nm directional moment (flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation), all models were used to simulate human spine movement. Then, we extracted the range of motion (ROM), peak contact force of the bony endplate (PCFBE), peak equivalent stress of the cage (PESC), peak equivalent stress of fixation (PESF), and stress contour plots. Results When compared with the intact model, the SA model achieved the least reduction in ROM to surgical segments in all motions. The ROM of the mini-LP model was slightly smaller than that of the LRS model. There were no significant differences in surgical segments (L1-L2, L4-L5) between all surgical models and the intact model. The PCFBE and PESC of the LRS and the mini-LP fixation models were lower than those of the SA model. However, the differences in PCFBE or PESC between the LRS- and mini-LP-based models were not significant. The fixation stress of the LRS- and mini-LP-based models was significantly lower than the yield strength under all loading conditions. In addition, the variances in the PESF in the LRS- and mini-LP-based models were not obvious. Conclusion Our biomechanical FE analysis indicated that LRS or mini-LP fixation can both provide adequate biomechanical stability for two-level OLIF through a single incision. The newly designed mini-LP model seemed to be superior in installation convenience, and equally good outcomes were achieved with both LRS and mini-LP for two-level OLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Zhong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yujie Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Hong Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Yudong Wang
- Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ziying Gan
- Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yimeng Qu
- Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Runjia Hua
- Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Zhaowei Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Genglei Chu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yijie Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Weimin Jiang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kiapour A, Massaad E, Kodigudla MK, Kelkar A, Begley MR, Goel VK, Block JE, Shin JH. Resisting subsidence with a truss Implant: Application of the "Snowshoe" principle for interbody fusion devices. J Biomech 2023; 155:111635. [PMID: 37216894 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The primary objective was to compare the subsidence resistance properties of a novel 3D-printed spinal interbody titanium implant versus a predicate polymeric annular cage. We evaluated a 3D-printed spinal interbody fusion device that employs truss-based bio-architectural features to apply the snowshoe principle of line length contact to provide efficient load distribution across the implant/endplate interface as means of resisting implant subsidence. Devices were tested mechanically using synthetic bone blocks of differing densities (osteoporotic to normal) to determine the corresponding resistance to subsidence under compressive load. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the subsidence loads and evaluate the effect of cage length on subsidence resistance. The truss implant demonstrated a marked rectilinear increase in resistance to subsidence associated with increase in the line length contact interface that corresponds with implant length irrespective of subsidence rate or bone density. In blocks simulating osteoporotic bone, comparing the shortest with the longest length truss cage (40 vs. 60 mm), the average compressive load necessary to induce subsidence of the implant increased by 46.4% (383.2 to 561.0 N) and 49.3% (567.4 to 847.2 N) for 1 and 2 mm of subsidence, respectively. In contrast, for annular cages, there was only a modest increase in compressive load when comparing the shortest with the longest length cage at a 1 mm subsidence rate. The Snowshoe truss cages demonstrated substantially more resistance to subsidence than corresponding annular cages. Clinical studies are required to support the biomechanical findings in this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Kiapour
- Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Elie Massaad
- Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Manoj K Kodigudla
- Engineering Center for Orthopedic Research Excellence, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Amey Kelkar
- Engineering Center for Orthopedic Research Excellence, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Matthew R Begley
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Vijay K Goel
- Engineering Center for Orthopedic Research Excellence, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | | | - John H Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Godolias P, Tataryn ZL, Plümer J, Cibura C, Freyvert Y, Heep H, Dudda M, Schildhauer TA, Chapman JR, Oskouian RJ. Cage subsidence-A multifactorial matter! ORTHOPADIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023:10.1007/s00132-023-04363-9. [PMID: 37012487 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-023-04363-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study OBJECTIVE: Wider cages are associated with improved decompression and reduced subsidence, but variation in cage physical properties limits consistent outcome analysis after thoracolumbar interbody fusion. This study investigated cage subsidence and its relationship to lateral and posterior approaches with a focus on the hypothesis that the larger surface area of lateral cages results in lower subsidence rates. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed 194 patients who underwent interbody fusion between 2016 and 2019 with a primary outcome of cage subsidence. Secondary outcomes were cage distribution (patients, approaches, expandability), cage dimensions, t‑scores, length of hospital stay, blood loss, surgical time, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch. RESULTS Medical records were reviewed for 194 patients receiving 387 cages at 379 disc levels. Subsidence was identified in 35.1% of lateral cages, 40.9% of posterior cages, and 36.3% of all cages. Lower surface area (p = 0.008) and cage expandability were associated with subsidence risk. Lower anteroposterior cage length proved to be a significant factor in the subsidence of posteriorly placed cages (p = 0.007). Osteopenic and osteoporotic patients experienced cage subsidence 36.8% of the time compared to 3.5% of patients with normal t‑scores (p = 0.001). Cage subsidence correlated with postoperative deterioration of the PI-LL mismatch (p = 0.03). Patients receiving fusion augmentation with bone morphogenic protein experienced higher fusion rates (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Cage subsidence is a common complication that can significantly impact operative outcomes following thoracolumbar interbody fusion. Low t‑scores, smaller surface area, cage expandability, and lower cage length in posterior approaches contribute significantly to cage subsidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Periklis Godolias
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, St. Josef Hospital Essen-Werden, Propsteistraße 2, 45239, Essen, Germany.
| | - Zachary L Tataryn
- Seattle Science Foundation, 550 17th Avenue, Suite 600, WA 98122, Seattle, USA
| | - Jonathan Plümer
- Seattle Science Foundation, 550 17th Avenue, Suite 600, WA 98122, Seattle, USA
| | - Charlotte Cibura
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany
| | - Yevgeniy Freyvert
- Seattle Science Foundation, 550 17th Avenue, Suite 600, WA 98122, Seattle, USA
| | - Hansjörg Heep
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, St. Josef Hospital Essen-Werden, Propsteistraße 2, 45239, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Dudda
- Department of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG-Klinikum Duisburg, Großenbaumer-Allee 250, 47249, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Thomas A Schildhauer
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jens R Chapman
- Seattle Science Foundation, 550 17th Avenue, Suite 600, WA 98122, Seattle, USA
| | - Rod J Oskouian
- Seattle Science Foundation, 550 17th Avenue, Suite 600, WA 98122, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Buckland AJ, Braly BA, O'Malley NA, Ashayeri K, Protopsaltis TS, Kwon B, Cheng I, Thomas JA. Lateral decubitus single position anterior posterior surgery improves operative efficiency, improves perioperative outcomes, and maintains radiological outcomes comparable with traditional anterior posterior fusion at minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine J 2023; 23:685-694. [PMID: 36641035 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The advantages of Lateral Single Position surgery (LSPS) in the perioperative period has previously been demonstrated, however 2-year postoperative outcomes of this novel technique have not yet been compared to circumferential anterior-posterior fusion (FLIP) at 2-years postoperatively. PURPOSE Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LSPS versus gold-standard FLIP STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multi-center retrospective cohort review. PATIENT SAMPLE Four hundred forty- two patients undergoing lumbar fusion via LSPS or FLIP OUTCOME MEASURES: Levels fused, operative time, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and reasons for reoperation at 30-days, 90-days, 1-year, and 2-years. Radiographic outcomes included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch, and segmental lumbar lordosis. METHODS Patients were grouped as LSPS if anterior and posterior portions of the procedure were performed in the lateral decubitus position, and FLIP if patients were repositioned from supine or lateral to prone position for the posterior portion of the procedure under the same anesthetic. Groups were compared in terms of demographics, intraoperative, perioperative and radiological outcomes, complications and reoperations up to 2-years follow-up. Measures were compared using independent samples or paired t-tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p<.05. RESULTS Four hundred forty- two pts met inclusion, including 352 LSPS and 90 FLIP pts. Significant differences were noted in age (62.4 vs 56.9; p≤.001) and smoking status (7% vs 16%; p=.023) between the LSPS and FLIP groups. LSPS demonstrated significantly lower Op time (97.7min vs 297.0 min; p<.001), fluoro dose (36.5mGy vs 78.8mGy; p<.001), EBL (88.8mL vs 270.0mL; p<.001), and LOS (1.91 days vs 3.61 days; p<.001) compared to FLIP. LSPS also demonstrated significantly fewer post-op complications than FLIP (21.9%vs 34.4%; p=.013), specifically regarding rates of ileus (0.0% vs 5.6%; p<.001). No differences in reoperation were noted at 30-day (1.7%LSPS vs 4.4%FLIP, p=.125), 90-day (5.1%LSPS vs 5.6%FLIP, p=.795) or 2-year follow-up (9.7%LSPS vs 12.2% FLIP; p=.441). LSPS group had a significantly lower preoperative PI-LL (4.1° LSPS vs 8.6°FLIP, p=.018), and a significantly greater postoperative LL (56.6° vs 51.8°, p = .006). No significant differences were noted in rates of fusion (94.3% LSPS vs 97.8% FLIP; p=.266) or subsidence (6.9% LSPS vs 12.2% FLIP; p=.260). CONCLUSIONS LSPS and circumferential fusions have similar outcomes at 2-years post-operatively, while reducing perioperative complications, improving perioperative efficiency and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Buckland
- Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Spine and Scoliosis Research Associates Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Spine Research Center, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Nicholas A O'Malley
- Spine Research Center, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Ashayeri
- Spine Research Center, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Brian Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Malone H, Mundis GM, Collier M, Kidwell RL, Rios F, Jelousi M, Galli S, Shahidi B, Akbarnia BA, Eastlack RK. Can a bioactive interbody device reduce the cost burden of achieving lateral lumbar fusion? J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:646-653. [PMID: 36303478 DOI: 10.3171/2022.4.spine211070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intervertebral devices are increasingly utilized for fusion in the lumbar spine, along with a variety of bone graft materials. These various grafting materials often have substantial cost burdens for the surgical procedure, although they are necessary to overcome the limitations in healing capacity for many traditional interbody devices. The use of bioactive interbody fusion devices, which have demonstrable stimulatory capacity for the surrounding osteoblasts and osteoprogenitor cells and allow for osseointegration, may reduce this heavy reliance on osteobiologics for achieving interbody fusion. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of successful interbody fusion with a bioactive lateral lumbar interbody titanium implant with limited volume and low-cost graft material. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective study (May 2017 to October 2018) of consecutively performed lateral lumbar interbody fusions with a bioactive 3D-printed porous titanium interbody device. Each interbody device was filled with 2-3 cm3/cage of a commercially available ceramic bone extender (β-tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite) and combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation. No other biological agents or grafts were utilized. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables were captured. Fusion success was the primary endpoint of the study, with graft subsidence, fixation failure, and patient-reported outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] and visual analog scale [VAS]-back and -leg pain scores) collected as secondary endpoints. The authors utilized a CT-based fusion classification system that accounted for both intervertebral through-growth (bone bridging) and ingrowth (integration of bone at the endplate-implant interface). RESULTS In total, 136 lumbar levels were treated in 90 patients. The mean age was 69 years, and 63% of the included patients were female. Half (50.0%) had undergone previous spinal surgery, and a third (33.7%) had undergone prior lumbar fusion. A third (33.7%) were treated at multiple levels (mean levels per patient 1.51). One year after surgery, the mean improvements in patient-reported outcomes (vs preoperative scores) were -17.8 for ODI (p < 0.0001), -3.1 for VAS-back pain (p < 0.0001), and -2.9 for VAS-leg pain (p < 0.0001). Bone bridging and/or appositional integrity was achieved in 99.3% of patients, including 97.8% who had complete bone bridging. No fixation loosening or implant failure was observed at any segment. Low-grade graft subsidence (Marchi grade ≤ I) occurred in 3 levels (2.2%), and intraoperative endplate violation occurred twice (1.5%). High-grade subsidence was not found. No implant failure or revision surgery for pseudarthrosis/subsidence was necessary. CONCLUSIONS The use of bioactive titanium interbody devices with a large surface footprint appears to result in a very high rate of effective fusion, despite the use of a small volume of low-cost biological material. This potential change in the osteobiologics required to achieve high fusion rates may have a substantially beneficial impact on the economic burden inherent to spinal fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hani Malone
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego
- 5San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego
- 5San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California
| | - Martin Collier
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Naval Medical Center, San Diego
- 5San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California
| | - Reilly L Kidwell
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego
- 5San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California
| | - Fernando Rios
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego
- 5San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California
| | - Michael Jelousi
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego
- 5San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California
| | - Shae Galli
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego
- 5San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California
| | - Bahar Shahidi
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego; and
- 5San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California
| | | | - Robert K Eastlack
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego
- 5San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alan N, Vodovotz L, Muthiah N, Deng H, Guha D, Agarwal N, Ozpinar A, Mushlin HM, Puccio L, Hamilton DK, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS. Subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage: single-institution case series. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:663-669. [PMID: 35594892 DOI: 10.3171/2022.4.spine2245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cage subsidence is a well-known phenomenon after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), occurring in 10%-20% of cases. A 3D-printed porous titanium (pTi) cage has a stiffness that mimics the modulus of elasticity of native vertebrae, which reduces stress at the bone-hardware interface, lowering the risk of subsidence. In this study, the authors evaluated their institutional rate of subsidence and resultant reoperation in patients who underwent LLIF using a 3D-printed pTi interbody cage. METHODS This is a retrospective case series of consecutive adult patients who underwent LLIF using pTi cages from 2018 to 2020. Demographic and clinical characteristics including age, sex, bone mineral density, smoking status, diabetes, steroid use, number of fusion levels, posterior instrumentation, and graft size were collected. The Marchi subsidence grade was determined at the time of last follow-up. Outcome measures of interest were subsidence and resultant reoperation. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the extent to which clinical and operative characteristics were associated with Marchi grade I-III subsidence. Significance was assessed at p < 0.05. RESULTS Fifty-five patients (38 with degenerative disc disease and 17 with adult spinal deformity) were treated with 97 pTi interbody cages with a mean follow-up of 18 months. The mean age was 63.6 ± 10.1 years, 60% of patients were female, and 36% of patients had osteopenia or osteoporosis. Patients most commonly underwent single-level LLIF (58.2%). Sixteen patients (29.1%) had posterior instrumentation. The subsidence grade distribution was as follows: 89 (92%) grade 0, 5 (5%) grade I, 2 (2%) grade II, and 1 (1%) grade III. No patients who were active or prior smokers and no patients with posterior instrumentation experienced graft subsidence. No clinical or operative characteristics were significantly associated with graft subsidence. One patient (1.8%) required reoperation because of subsidence. CONCLUSIONS In this institutional case series, subsidence of pTi intervertebral cages after LLIF occurred in 8% of operated levels, 3% of which were grade II or III. Only 1 patient required reoperation. These reported rates are lower than those reported for polyetheretherketone implants. Further studies are necessary to compare the impact of these cage materials on subsidence after LLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Alan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh
| | - Lena Vodovotz
- 2University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nallammai Muthiah
- 2University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Hansen Deng
- 2University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Daipayan Guha
- 3Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Alp Ozpinar
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh
| | - Harry M Mushlin
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Lauren Puccio
- 2University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David K Hamilton
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh
| | - David O Okonkwo
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh
| | - Adam S Kanter
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yee-Yanagishita C, Fogel G, Douglas B, Essayan G, Poojary B, Martin N, Williams GM, Peng Y, Jekir M. Biomechanical comparison of subsidence performance among three modern porous lateral cage designs. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2022; 99:105764. [PMID: 36130418 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cage subsidence remains a major complication after spinal surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the subsidence performance of three modern porous cage designs. METHODS Three porous cages were evaluated: a porous titanium cage, a porous polyetheretherketone cage and a truss titanium cage. Mechanical testing was performed for each cage per the American Society for Testing and Materials F2077 and F2267 standards to evaluate cage stiffness and block stiffness, and per a novel clinically relevant dynamic subsidence testing method simulating cyclic spine loading during 3-months postoperatively to evaluate the subsidence displacement. FINDINGS The porous polyetheretherketone cage demonstrated the lowest cage stiffness (21.0 ± 1.1 kN/mm), less than half of both titanium cages (truss titanium cage, 49.1 kN/mm; porous titanium cage, 43.6 kN/mm). The block stiffness was greatest for the porous titanium cage (2867.7 ± 105.3 N/mm), followed by the porous polyetheretherketone (2563.4 ± 72.9 N/mm) and truss titanium cages (2213.7 ± 21.8 N/mm). The dynamic subsidence displacement was greatest for the truss titanium cage, which was 1.5 and 2.5 times the subsidence displacement as the porous polyetheretherketone and porous titanium cages respectively. INTERPRETATIONS Specific porous cage design plays a crucial role in the cage subsidence performance, to a greater degree than the selection of cage materials. A porous titanium cage with body lattice and microporous endplates significantly outperformed a truss titanium cage with a similar cage stiffness in subsidence performance, and a porous polyetheretherketone cage with half of its stiffness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guy Fogel
- Spine Pain Begone Clinic, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yun Peng
- NuVasive Inc., San Diego, CA, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fogel G, Martin N, Lynch K, Pelletier MH, Wills D, Wang T, Walsh WR, Williams GM, Malik J, Peng Y, Jekir M. Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis. Spine J 2022; 22:1028-1037. [PMID: 35017054 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Cage subsidence remains a serious complication after spinal fusion surgery. Novel porous designs in the cage body or endplate offer attractive options to improve subsidence and osseointegration performance. PURPOSE To elucidate the relative contribution of a porous design in each of the two major domains (body and endplates) to cage stiffness and subsidence performance, using standardized mechanical testing methods, and to analyze the fusion progression via an established ovine interbody fusion model to support the mechanical testing findings. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING A comparative preclinical study using standardized mechanical testing and established animal model. METHODS To isolate the subsidence performance contributed by each porous cage design feature, namely the stress-optimized body lattice (vs. a solid body) and microporous endplates (vs. smooth endplates), four groups of cages (two-by-two combination of these two features) were tested in: (1) static axial compression of the cage (per ASTM F2077) and (2) static subsidence (per ASTM F2267). To evaluate the progression of fusion, titanium cages were created with a microporous endplate and internal lattice architecture analogous to commercial implants used in subsidence testing and implanted in an endplate-sparing, ovine intervertebral body fusion model. RESULTS The cage stiffness was reduced by 16.7% by the porous body lattice, and by 16.6% by the microporous endplates. The porous titanium cage with both porous features showed the lowest stiffness with a value of 40.4±0.3 kN/mm (Mean±SEM) and a block stiffness of 1976.8±27.4 N/mm for subsidence. The body lattice showed no significant impact on the block stiffness (1.4% reduction), while the microporous endplates decreased the block stiffness significantly by 24.9% (p<.0001). All segments implanted with porous titanium cages were deemed rigidly fused by manual palpation, except one at 12 weeks, consistent with robotic ROM testing and radiographic and histologic observations. A reduction in ROM was noted from 12 to 26 weeks (4.1±1.6° to 2.2±1.4° in lateral bending, p<.05; 2.1±0.6° to 1.5±0.3° in axial rotation, p<.05); and 3.3±1.6° to 1.9±1.2° in flexion extension, p=.07). Bone in the available void improved with time in the central aperture (54±35% to 83±13%, p<.05) and porous cage structure (19±26% to 37±21%, p=.15). CONCLUSIONS Body lattice and microporous endplates features can effectively reduce the cage stiffness, therefore reducing the risk of stress shielding and promoting early fusion. While body lattice showed no impact on block stiffness and the microporous endplates reduced the block stiffness, a titanium cage with microporous endplates and internal lattice supported bone ingrowth and segmental mechanical stability as early as 12 weeks in ovine interbody fusion. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Porous titanium cage architecture can offer an attractive solution to increase the available space for bone ingrowth and bridging to support successful spinal fusion while mitigating risks of increased subsidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Fogel
- Spine Pain Begone Clinic, 2833 Babcock Rd Suite 306, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | | | - Kelli Lynch
- NuVasive, 7475 Lusk Blvd., San Diego, CA 92129, USA
| | - Matthew H Pelletier
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Clinical Sciences Building, Gate 6, Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Daniel Wills
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Clinical Sciences Building, Gate 6, Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Tian Wang
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Clinical Sciences Building, Gate 6, Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - William R Walsh
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Clinical Sciences Building, Gate 6, Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | | | - Jeremy Malik
- NuVasive, 7475 Lusk Blvd., San Diego, CA 92129, USA
| | - Yun Peng
- NuVasive, 7475 Lusk Blvd., San Diego, CA 92129, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fogel G, Martin N, Williams GM, Unger J, Yee-Yanagishita C, Pelletier M, Walsh W, Peng Y, Jekir M. Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Cage Material and Design Influences Subsidence and Osseointegration Performance. World Neurosurg 2022; 162:e626-e634. [PMID: 35346883 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to quantify the effect of cage material (titanium-alloy vs. polyetheretherketone or PEEK) and design (porous vs. solid) on subsidence and osseointegration. METHODS Three lateral cages (solid PEEK, solid titanium, and 3-dimension-printed porous titanium cages) were evaluated for cage stiffness, subsidence compression stiffness, and dynamic subsidence displacement under simulated postoperative spine loading. Dowel-shaped implants made of grit-blasted solid titanium alloy (solid titanium) and porous titanium were fabricated using commercially available processes. Samples were processed for mechanical push-out testing and polymethylmethacrylate histology following an established ovine bone implantation model. RESULTS The solid titanium cage exhibited the greatest stiffness (57.1 ± 0.6 kN/mm), followed by the porous titanium cage (40.4 ± 0.3 kN/mm) and the solid PEEK cage (37.1 ± 1.2 kN/mm). In the clinically relevant dynamic subsidence, the porous titanium cage showed the least amount of subsidence displacement (0.195 ± 0.012 mm), significantly less than that of the solid PEEK cage (0.328 ± 0.020 mm) and the solid titanium cage (0.538 ± 0.027 mm). Bony on-growth was noted histologically on all implant materials; however, only the porous titanium supported bony ingrowth with marked quantities of bone formed within the interconnected pores through 12 weeks. Functional differences in osseointegration were noted between groups during push-out testing. The porous titanium showed the highest maximum shear stress at 12 weeks and was the only group that demonstrated significant improvement (4-12 weeks). CONCLUSIONS The choice of material and design is critical to cage mechanical and biological performances. A porous titanium cage can reduce subsidence risk and generate biological stability through bone on-growth and ingrowth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Fogel
- Spine Pain Begone Clinic, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Pelletier
- Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - William Walsh
- Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yun Peng
- NuVasive Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhou J, Yuan C, Liu C, Liu M, Zhou L, Wang J. Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density and stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease and primary lumbar degenerative diseases. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2022; 30:10225536221091846. [PMID: 35410526 DOI: 10.1177/10225536221091846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the vertebral bone mineral density and the value of stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion (SA OLIF) for the management of single-level adjacent segment disease (ASD) and primary lumbar degenerative diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-eight patients undergoing single-level SA OLIF was divided into index surgery group (n = 36) or revision surgery group (n = 42) at single center. The vertebral body Hounsfield units (HU) value was measured to assess bone mineral density of operated level by the preoperative CT. The following data were retrospectively collected and compared between the two groups: demographic, surgical data, clinical results, and complications. RESULTS No differences were found between the two groups in surgical data. The fusion segment HU values in the revision group were significantly higher than that in the index group (147.4 ± 35.3 vs 129.2 ± 38.4 p = .033). There were significant differences while comparing fusion segment HU values to L1-L4 horizontal plane (147.4 ± 35.3 vs 126.1 ± 28.4, p = .000) and L1 (147.4 ± 35.3 vs 126.8 ± 26.2, p = .000) in revision group, meanwhile, no statistically significant difference was observed in index group (p > .05). The cage subsidence was observed in the revision group (n = 2) and index group (n = 9) (p = .045). The patients with cage subsidence had significantly lower vertebral HU values. CONCLUSION SA OLIF is valid alternative to the traditional posterior approach in the management of ASD with good clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up. Increased HU values of fusion segment may play a role in the management of ASD by SA OLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, 105785The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chao Yuan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, 105785The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chao Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, 105785The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Minghan Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, 105785The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lei Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, 105785The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, 105785The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li XH, She LJ, Zhang W, Cheng XD, Fan JP. Biomechanics of extreme lateral interbody fusion with different internal fixation methods: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:134. [PMID: 35139843 PMCID: PMC8829978 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05049-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Establishing a normal L3–5 model and using finite element analysis to explore the biomechanical characteristics of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) with different internal fixation methods. Method The L3–5 CT image data of a healthy adult male volunteer were selected to establish a normal lumbar finite element model (M0). The range of motion (ROM) of L3–4 and L4–5, under flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation, and right rotation, together with L3–4 disc pressure was analyzed. Then the L4–5 intervertebral disc was excised and implanted with a cage, supplemented by different types of internal fixation, including lateral two-hole plate model (M1), lateral four-hole plate model (M2), VerteBRIDGE plating model (M3), lateral pedicle model (M4), posterior unilateral pedicle screw model (M5) and posterior bilateral pedicle screw model (M6). The ROM,the maximum stress value of the cage, and the maximum stress value of the intervertebral disc of L3–4 were analyzed and studied . Results The ROM of L3–4 and L4-L5 segments in the validation model under various motion states was basically consistent with previous reports. The lumbar finite element model was validated effectively. After XLIF-assisted internal fixation, the range of activity in L3–4 segments of each internal fixation model was greater than that of the normal model under various working conditions, among which the M5、M6 model had the larger range of activity in flexion and extension. After the internal fixation of L4–5 segments, the mobility in M1-M6 was significantly reduced under various motion patterns. In terms of flexion and extension, the posterior pedicle fixation model (M5、M6) showed a significant reduction,followed by M2. The maximal von mises cage stress of M1 was obviously greater than that of other models (except the left bending). Compared with M0, the intervertebral disc stress of M1-M6 at L3–4 segments was increased. Conclusions It is recommended that the posterior bilateral pedicle screw model is the first choice, followed by the lateral four-hole plate model for fixation during XLIF surgery. However, it is still necessary to be aware of the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) in the later stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Hua Li
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Li-Jun She
- Department of Tuberculosis, The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, No.42 Tanan Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China. .,Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, China.
| | - Xiao-Dong Cheng
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Jin-Peng Fan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shijiazhuang First Hospital, No. 365 Jianhua South Street, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Guha D, Mushlin HM, Muthiah N, Vodovotz LL, Agarwal N, Alan N, Hamilton DK, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS. CT Hounsfield Units as a predictor of reoperation and graft subsidence following standalone and multi-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg 2022; 161:e417-e426. [PMID: 35149250 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Standalone single and multi-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) are increasingly being applied to treat degenerative spinal conditions in a less invasive fashion. Graft subsidence following LLIF is a known complication and has been associated with poor bone mineral density (BMD). Previous research has demonstrated the utility of CT Hounsfield Units (HU) as a surrogate for BMD. This study aims to investigate the relationship between CT HU and subsidence and reoperation after standalone and multi-level LLIF. METHODS A prospectively-maintained single-institution database was retrospectively reviewed for LLIF patients from 2017-2020 including single and multi-level standalone cases with or without supplemental posterior fixation. Data on demographics, graft parameters, BMD on DEXA, preoperative mean segmental CT HU, and postoperative subsidence and reoperation, were collected. Three-foot standing radiographs were used to measure preoperative global sagittal alignment and disc height, and subsidence at last follow-up. Subsidence was classified using the Marchi grading system corresponding to disc height loss: Grade 0: 0-24%; I: 25-49%; II: 50-74%; III: 75-100%. RESULTS Eighty-nine LLIF patients met study criteria, with mean follow-up 19.9 ± 13.9 months. Among the 54 patients who underwent single-level LLIF, mean segmental HU was 152.0 ± 8.7 in 39 patients with Grade 0 subsidence, 136.7 ± 10.4 in nine with Grade I subsidence, 133.9 ± 23.1 in three with Grade II subsidence, and 119.9 ± 30.9 in three with Grade III subsidence (p=0.032). In the 96 instrumented levels in 35 patients who underwent multi-level LLIF, 85 had Grade 0 subsidence, 9 Grade I, 1 Grade II, and 1 Grade III, with no differences in HU. In multivariate logistic regression, increased CT HU was independently associated with a decreased risk of reoperation in both single-level and multi-level LLIF (OR:0.98, 95%CI:0.97-0.99, p=0.044; and OR:0.97, 95%CI: 0.94-0.99, p=0.017, respectively). Overall BMD on DEXA was not associated with graft subsidence nor reoperation. Using a receiver-operating-characteristic curve to establish separation between patients requiring reoperation and those that did not, the determined threshold HU for single-level LLIF was 131.4 (sensitivity 0.62, specificity 0.65), and for multi-level was 131.0 (sensitivity 0.67, specificity 0.63). CONCLUSIONS Lower CT HU are independently associated with an increased risk of graft subsidence following single-level LLIF. In addition, lower CT HU significantly increased the risk of reoperation in both single and multi-level LLIF with a critical threshold of 131 HU. Preoperative CT HU may provide a more robust gauge of local bone quality and the likelihood of graft subsidence requiring reoperation following LLIF, than overall BMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daipayan Guha
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Division of Neurosurgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Harry M Mushlin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nallammai Muthiah
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lena L Vodovotz
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nima Alan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Faculty of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David O Okonkwo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Faculty of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam S Kanter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Faculty of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Macki M, La Marca F. Evolution of Complex Spine Surgery in Neurosurgery: From Big to Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Spinal Deformity. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2022; 45:339-357. [PMID: 35976456 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-99166-1_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Spinal instrumentation for adult spinal deformity dates back to the surgical correction of secondary complications from infectious processes, such as Pott's disease and poliomyelitis [1]. With the population aging at a longer life expectancy today, advanced degenerative spinal diseases and idiopathic scoliosis supersede as the most common causes of adult spinal deformity. Correction of the thoracolumbar malignment, specifically, has rapidly evolved with the burgeoning success of spinal instrumentation. The objective of this chapter is to review the metamorphosis of operative principles for adult thoracolumbar deformity, from aggressive osteotomies in the posterior bony elements to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) at the intervertebral disc space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Macki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Allegiance Hospital, Jackson, MI, USA
| | - Frank La Marca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Allegiance Hospital, Jackson, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Laterally placed expandable interbody spacers with and without adjustable lordosis improve patient outcomes: a preliminary one-year chart review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022; 213:107123. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
18
|
Falowski SM, Koga SF, Northcutt T, Garamszegi L, Leasure J, Block JE. Improving the Management of Patients with Osteoporosis Undergoing Spinal Fusion: The Need for a Bone Mineral Density-Matched Interbody Cage. Orthop Res Rev 2021; 13:281-288. [PMID: 34934366 PMCID: PMC8684416 DOI: 10.2147/orr.s339222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
With an increasingly aging population globally, a confluence has emerged between the rising prevalence of degenerative spinal disease and osteoporosis. Fusion of the anterior spinal column remains the mainstay surgical intervention for many spinal degenerative disorders. However, decreased vertebral bone mineral density (BMD), quantitatively measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), complicates treatment with surgical interbody fusion as weak underlying bone stock increases the risk of post-operative implant-related adverse events, including cage subsidence. There is a necessity for developing cages with advanced structural designs that incorporate bioengineering and architectural principles to tailor the interbody fusion device directly to the patient’s BMD status. Specifically, lattice-designed cages that mimic the web-like structure of native cancellous bone have demonstrated excellent resistance to post-operative subsidence. This article provides an introductory profile of a spinal interbody implant designed intentionally to simulate the lattice structure of human cancellous bone, with a similar modulus of elasticity, and specialized to match a patient’s bone status across the BMD continuum. The implant incorporates an open pore design where the degree of pore compactness directly corresponds to the patient’s DXA-defined BMD status, including patients with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Falowski
- Argires-Marotti Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jon E Block
- Independent Clinical Consultant, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li Q, Long X, Shi L, Wang Y, Guan T, Lv J, Cai L. Prevalence and risk factors for cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28085. [PMID: 34889258 PMCID: PMC8663804 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an effective treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases. Cage subsidence (CS) contitutes one of the most common postoperative complications. Many risk factors for CS after LIF have been reported in some studies. However, controversies still exist. The objective of this study will be to summarize data on the prevalence and risk factors of CS after LIF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Our study present a protocol that conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors for CS after LIF. Two reviewers retrieved the relevant articles using the 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) from inception to May 31st, 2021. Primary outcome will be the prevalence of CS after LIF. Second outcomes include the risk factors associated with postoperative CS and clinical outcomes associated with postoperative CS. Three reviewers will screen citation titles and abstracts and evaluated full-text of each potentially relevant citation, and then extracted the data using a data extraction form. Any discrepancies in decisions between reviewers will be resolved through discussion. We assessed the methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). The aim of the extra analysis is to explore the explanations of the heterogeneity (age, gender, race, year of publication, type of study and surgical procedure). Publication bias will be assessed by Begg test, Egger test and funnel plots. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No primary data will be collected and individual patient information and endangering participant rights, thus ethics approval is not required. Findings will be reported through publication and media. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42021257981 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#joinuppage).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiujiang Li
- Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
- Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Xingxia Long
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China
| | - Lin Shi
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Dianjiang Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Yinbin Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Tao Guan
- Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Jinhan Lv
- Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Lijun Cai
- Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li YM, Huang Z, Towner J, Li YI, Bucklen BS. Laterally Placed Expandable Interbody Spacers With and Without Adjustable Lordosis Improve Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study. Cureus 2021; 13:e20302. [PMID: 35028207 PMCID: PMC8748004 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Interbody spacers are necessary for achieving disc height restoration when surgical intervention is used for the treatment of severe degenerative disc disease. Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS LLIF) is a popular surgical approach that historically uses large static interbody spacers through a lateral approach. However, static spacers have been associated with iatrogenic distraction and excessive impaction forces, which may increase the risk of subsidence and loss of lordosis, compromising stability. Expandable interbody spacers with or without adjustable lordosis may help address these concerns by maximizing segmental lordosis and aiding in sagittal balance correction. This study describes the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with expandable interbody spacers with or without adjustable lordosis, for MIS LLIF. Materials and methods This is retrospective, single-surgeon Institutional Review Board-exempt chart review was of 103 consecutive patients who had undergone MIS LLIF at one to two contiguous level(s) utilizing expandable interbody spacers with or without adjustable lordosis (66/103 patients had adjustable lordosis spacers). Collection of clinical and radiographic functional outcomes occurred at preoperative and postoperative time points through 24 months. Results One-hundred and three consecutive patients were evaluated-average age, 58.2 ± 12.1 years; 42.1% (45/107) were female. There were 78.6% (81/103) one-level cases and 21.4% (22/103) two-level cases for a total of 125 levels; 44.8% (56/125) were performed at L4-5 and 34.4% (43/125) at L3-4. The average estimated blood loss was 24.6 ± 12.3cc. Mean operative time was 61.0 ± 19.1 min, and mean fluoroscopic time was 28.2 ± 14.6 sec. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores decreased significantly by an average of 7.1 ± 1.0 points at 24 months (p<0.001). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores significantly decreased by a mean of 67.4 ± 8.9 points at 24 months (p<0.001). Lumbar lordosis significantly improved by a mean of 3.1 ± 8.8° at 24 months (p=0.001). Anterior, middle, and posterior disc height significantly increased at 24 months by averages of 4.7 ± 3.1, 4.0 ± 3.0, and 2.1 ± 2.2mm, respectively (p<0.001). Neuroforaminal height had significantly increased at 24 months by a mean of 3.0 ± 3.6mm (p<0.001). Segmental lordosis significantly improved by 3.7 ± 2.9° at 24 months (p<0.001). There were 51 patients with abnormal preoperative Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis (PI-LL) measurements that significantly improved by 9.1 ± 4.9° (p<0.001) and 52 patients with normal preoperative PI-LL measurements that improved by 0.2 ± 4.6° (p=0.748) at 24 months. One-hundred percent fusion occurred at all levels, and no findings of radiolucency were observed. One case of subsidence (1/125, 0.8%) was reported at 24 months. No implanted-related complications were reported, with 0% pseudoarthrosis and no secondary surgery required at the operative levels. Conclusion Indirect decompression and sagittal correction were achieved and maintained through a 24-month follow-up. Functional clinical outcomes significantly improved based on decreased VAS pain and ODI scores at 24 months. This study resulted in positive clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients who underwent MIS LLIF with expandable interbody spacers with or without adjustable lordosis.
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhou J, Yuan C, Liu C, Zhou L, Wang J. Hounsfield unit value on CT as a predictor of cage subsidence following stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:960. [PMID: 34789220 PMCID: PMC8600787 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04833-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the correlation between vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) values and cage subsidence in patients treated with stand-alone (SA) OLIF. METHODS A retrospective review of collected data was performed on 76 patients who underwent SA OLIF. We utilized the HU value for lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) obtained on preoperative CT. The vertebral HU values of patients with subsidence were compared to those without subsidence. The correlation between cage subsidence and clinical score was investigated. RESULTS Sixteen patients (21.1%) had at least radiographic evidence of interbody cage subsidence. The average cage subsidence was 2.5 ± 1.3 mm (range 0.9-4.8 mm). There were no significant differences in sex, BMI, preoperative diagnoses, or fused level (p > 0.05); however, there were significant differences between the cage subsidence group and the nonsubsidence group in age, average of the lowest T-score, and average HU value, including for the L1 vertebrae, L1-L4 horizontal plane, and L1-L4 sagittal plane (p < 0.05). The average HU value of the L1-L4 horizontal plane showed a more predictable AUC of 0.909 (95% CI, 0.834-0.984; P < 0.001) compared with the average of the lowest T-score following an AUC of 0.791 (95% CI, 0.674-0.909; P < 0.001). Based on logistic regression analysis, the average HU value of the L1-L4 horizontal plane (OR, 0.912; 95% CI, 0.861-0.966; P = 0.002) was an independent factor influencing cage subsidence. CONCLUSIONS Patients with lower average HU values of the lumbar vertebrae are at a much higher risk of developing cage subsidence after SA OLIF. Measurement of preoperative HU values on preexisting CT scans could be rapid, simple and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, No.183, Xinqiao Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao Yuan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, No.183, Xinqiao Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, No.183, Xinqiao Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, No.183, Xinqiao Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, No.183, Xinqiao Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
周 晶, 周 蕾, 刘 超, 袁 超, 王 建. [CT value of vertebral body predicting Cage subsidence after stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2021; 35:1449-1456. [PMID: 34779172 PMCID: PMC8586776 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202105058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the correlation between CT value and Cage subsidence in patients with lumbar degenerative disease treated with stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). METHODS The clinical data of 35 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases treated with stand-alone OLIF between February 2016 and October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 15 males and 20 females; the age ranged from 29 to 81 years, with an average of 58.4 years. There were 39 operative segments, including 32 cases of single-segment, 2 cases of double-segment, and 1 case of three-segment. Preoperative lumbar CT was used to measure the CT values of the axial position of L 1 vertebral body, the axial and sagittal positions of L 1-4 vertebral body, surgical segment, and the axial position of upper and lower vertebral bodies as the bone mineral density index, and the lowest T value was recorded by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were recorded before operation and at last follow-up. At last follow-up, the lumbar interbody fusion was evaluated by X-ray films of the lumbar spine and dynamic position; the lumbar lateral X-ray film was used to measure the subsidence of the Cage, and the patients were divided into subsidence group and nonsubsidence group. The univariate analysis on age, gender, body mass index, lowest T value, CT value of vertebral body, disease type, and surgical segment was performed to initially screen the influencing factors of Cage subsidence; further the logistic regression for multi-factor analysis was used to screen fusion independent risk factors for Cage subsidence. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were used to analyze the CT value and the lowest T value to predict the Cage subsidence. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between Cage subsidence and clinical results. RESULTS All the 35 patients were followed up 27-58 months, with an average of 38.7 months. At last follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores were significantly decreased when compared with preoperative scores ( t=32.850, P=0.000; t=31.731, P=0.000). No recurrent lower extremity radiculopathy occurred and no patient required revision surgery. Twenty-seven cases (77.1%) had no Cage subsidence (nonsubsidence group); 8 cases (22.9%) had at least radiographic evidence of Cage subsidence, the average distance of Cage subsidence was 2.2 mm (range, 1.1-4.2 mm) (subsidence group). At last follow-up, there was 1 case of fusion failure both in the subsidence group and the nonsubsidence group, there was no significant difference in the interbody fusion rate (96.3% vs. 87.5%) between two groups ( P=0.410). Univariate analysis showed that the CT value of vertebral body (L 1 axial position, L 1-4 axial and sagittal positions, surgical segment, and upper and lower vertebral bodies axial positions) and the lowest T value were the influencing factors of Cage subsidence ( P<0.05). According to ROC curve analysis, compared with AUC of the lowest T value [0.738, 95% CI (0.540, 0.936)], the AUC of the L 1-4 axis CT value was 0.850 [95% CI (0.715, 0.984)], which could more effectively predict Cage subsidence. Multivariate analysis showed that the CT value of L 1-4 axis was an independent risk factor for Cage subsidence ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION The CT value measurement of the vertebral body based on lumbar spine CT before stand-alone OLIF can predict the Cage subsidence. Patients with low CT values of the lumbar spine have a higher risk of Cage subsidence. However, the Cage subsidence do not lead to adverse clinical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 晶 周
- 中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第二附属医院骨科(重庆 400037)Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, P.R.China
| | - 蕾 周
- 中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第二附属医院骨科(重庆 400037)Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, P.R.China
| | - 超 刘
- 中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第二附属医院骨科(重庆 400037)Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, P.R.China
| | - 超 袁
- 中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第二附属医院骨科(重庆 400037)Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, P.R.China
| | - 建 王
- 中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第二附属医院骨科(重庆 400037)Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Segami K, Espinoza Orías AA, Miyamoto H, Kanzaki K, An HS, Inoue N. Regional distribution of computed tomography attenuation across the lumbar endplate. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0259001. [PMID: 34705863 PMCID: PMC8550599 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The vertebral endplate forms a structural boundary between intervertebral disc and the trabecular bone of the vertebral body. As a mechanical interface between the stiff bone and resilient disc, the endplate is the weakest portion of the vertebral-disc complex and is predisposed to mechanical failure. However, the literature concerning the bone mineral density (BMD) distribution within the spinal endplate is comparatively sparse. The objective of this study is to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) distribution of computed tomography (CT) attenuation across the lumbosacral endplate measured in Hounsfield Units (HU). A total of 308 endplates from 28 cadaveric fresh-frozen lumbosacral spines were used in this study. Each spine was CT-scanned and the resulting DICOM data was used to obtain HU values of the bone endplate. Each individual endplate surface was subdivided into five clinically-relevant topographic zones. Attenuation was analyzed by spinal levels, sites (superior or inferior endplate) and endplate region. The highest HU values were found at the S1 endplate. Comparisons between the superior and inferior endplates showed the HU values in inferior endplates were significantly higher than those in the superior endplates within the same vertebra and the HU values in endplates cranial to the disc were significantly higher than those in the endplates caudal to the disc within the same disc. Attenuation in the peripheral region was significantly higher than in the central region by 32.5%. Regional comparison within the peripheral region showed the HU values in the posterior region were significantly higher than those in the anterior region and the HU values in the left region were significantly higher than those in the right region. This study provided detailed data on the regional HU distribution across the lumbosacral endplate, which can be useful to understand causes of some endplate lesions, such as fracture, and also to design interbody instrumentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyuki Segami
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Alejandro A. Espinoza Orías
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Hiroe Miyamoto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Koji Kanzaki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Howard S. An
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Nozomu Inoue
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Farber SH, Naeem K, Bhargava M, Porter RW. Single-position prone lateral transpsoas approach: early experience and outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 2021:1-8. [PMID: 34678768 DOI: 10.3171/2021.6.spine21420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) via a transpsoas approach is a workhorse minimally invasive approach for lumbar arthrodesis that is often combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation. There has been increasing interest in performing single-position surgery, allowing access to the anterolateral and posterior spine without requiring patient repositioning. The feasibility of the transpsoas approach in patients in the prone position has been reported. Herein, the authors present a consecutive case series of all patients who underwent single-position prone transpsoas LLIF performed by an individual surgeon since adopting this approach. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of a consecutive case series of adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who underwent single-position prone LLIF for any indication between October 2019 and November 2020. Pertinent operative details (levels, cage use, surgery duration, estimated blood loss, complications) and 3-month clinical outcomes were recorded. Intraoperative and 3-month postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess for interbody subsidence. RESULTS Twenty-eight of 29 patients (97%) underwent successful treatment with the prone lateral approach over the study interval; the approach was aborted in 1 patient, whose data were excluded. The mean (SD) age of patients was 67.9 (9.3) years; 75% (21) were women. Thirty-nine levels were treated: 18 patients (64%) had single-level fusion, 9 (32%) had 2-level fusion, and 1 (4%) had 3-level fusion. The most commonly treated levels were L3-4 (n = 15), L2-3 (n = 12), and L4-5 (n = 11). L1-2 was fused in 1 patient. The mean operative time was 286.5 (100.6) minutes, and the mean retractor time was 29.2 (13.5) minutes per level. The mean fluoroscopy duration was 215.5 (99.6) seconds, and the mean intraoperative radiation dose was 170.1 (94.8) mGy. Intraoperative subsidence was noted in 1 patient (4% of patients, 3% of levels). Intraoperative lateral access complications occurred in 11% of patients (1 cage repositioning, 2 inadvertent ruptures of anterior longitudinal ligament). Subsidence occurred in 5 of 22 patients (23%) with radiographic follow-up, affecting 6 of 33 levels (18%). Postoperative functional testing (Oswestry Disability Index, SF-36, visual analog scale-back and leg pain) identified significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS This single-surgeon consecutive case series demonstrates that this novel technique is well tolerated and has acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes. Larger patient series with longer follow-up are needed to further elucidate the safety profile and long-term outcomes of single-position prone LLIF.
Collapse
|
25
|
Jones C, Okano I, Salzmann SN, Reisener MJ, Chiapparelli E, Shue J, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP. Endplate volumetric bone mineral density is a predictor for cage subsidence following lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a risk factor analysis. Spine J 2021; 21:1729-1737. [PMID: 33716124 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT It has been reported in previous studies that a decreased bone mineral density (BMD) as measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is associated with subsidence. However, there is limited research on the role of volumetric BMD (vBMD) as measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Further, metabolic conditions such as obesity and type 2 diabetes have been associated with poor bone quality, but the impact of these metabolic conditions on on subsidence rates following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) remains unclear. As such, risk factors for subsidence following LLIF is an area of ongoing research. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for subsidence following LLIF with a focus on metabolic conditions and vBMD as measured by QCT. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study at a single academic institution. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive patients undergoing LLIF with or without posterior screws from 2014 to 2019 at a single academic institution who had a pre-operative CT and radiological imaging including radiographs or CT scans between 5 and 14 months post-operatively to assess for cage subsidence. OUTCOME MEASURE Subsidence prevalence following LLIF. METHODS We reviewed patients undergoing LLIF with or without posterior screws from 2014 to 2019 with a follow-up ≥5 months. Cage subsidence was assessed using the grading system by Marchi et al. Endplate volumetric BMD (EP-vBMD), vertebral bone volumetric BMD (VB-vBMD), BMI, and diabetes status were measured. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression analyses with a generalized mixed model were conducted. Ad hoc analysis, including receiver operative characteristic curve analysis, was used for identifying the cut-off values in significant continuous variables for subsidence. Chi-Squared and ANOVA tests were used for categorical comparisons. RESULTS Five hundred sixty-seven levels in 347 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age (± SD) was 61.7 ± 11.1yrs, 50.3% were male, and 89.6% were Caucasian. Subsidence was observed in 160 levels (28.2%). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an absence of posterior screws [OR = 2.854 (1.483 - 5.215), p=.001] and decreased EP-vBMD [0.996 (0.991 - 1.000), p=.032] were associated with an increased risk of subsidence. Increased BMI and diabetes status were not associated with increased rates of subsidence. Patients without posterior screws and low EP-vBMD experienced subsidence at 44.9% of levels. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrated that decreased EP-vBMD and standalone status were significantly associated with increased rates of subsidence following LLIF independent of BMI or diabetes status. Further analysis demonstrated that patients with a decreased EP-vBMD and without posterior screws experienced subsidence nearly 2.5 times higher than patients with no risk factors. In patients with a low EP-vBMD undergoing LLIF, posterior screws should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor Jones
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Ichiro Okano
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Stephan N Salzmann
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | - Erika Chiapparelli
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Jennifer Shue
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Andrew A Sama
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Frank P Cammisa
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Federico P Girardi
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Alexander P Hughes
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA..
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chung NS, Lee HD, Jeon CH. The Impact of Vertebral End Plate Lesions on the Radiological Outcome in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion. Global Spine J 2021; 11:1176-1182. [PMID: 32744116 PMCID: PMC8453684 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220941447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES Vertebral end plate (EP) lesions include Modic changes, Schmorl's nodes, EP erosion, EP sclerosis, and so on. While previous studies have mostly focused on the association between vertebral EP lesions and low back pain, few studies evaluated the influence of vertebral EP lesions on the radiological outcomes in lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS This study included a total of 125 operated disc levels from 86 consecutive patients who underwent a 1- or 2-level oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and had more than 1-year regular follow-up. The presence of vertebral EP lesions, changes in disc heights/angle, cage subsidence, and fusion grade were examined. The associations between vertebral EP lesions and radiological parameters were analyzed. RESULT The presence of Modic changes, Schmorl's node, EP cartilage erosion, and EP sclerosis were found in 72 (57.6%), 26 (20.8%), 31 (24.8%), and 44 (35.2%) disc levels, respectively. The mean anterior disc height increased from 6.9 ± 3.8 mm to 13.1 ± 2.7 mm (P < .001) and the mean segmental angle increased from 2.9° ± 5.8° to 9.2° ± 4.8° (P < .001) at the last follow-up. The overall fusion rate was 98.4% (123/125) and cage subsidence rate was 7.2% (9/125). All radiological parameters and cage subsidence rate were not different regardless of vertebral EP lesions. CONCLUSIONS Vertebral EP lesions did not affect the overall radiological outcome in 1- or 2-level OLIF. These results come from the stable contact between lateral cage and peripheral rim of vertebral EP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam-Su Chung
- Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Han-Dong Lee
- Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Chang-Hoon Jeon
- Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea,Chang-Hoon Jeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Geyounggi-do, 16499, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhao L, Zeng J, Xie T, Pu X, Lu Y. [Advances in research on Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2021; 35:1063-1067. [PMID: 34387439 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202104036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objective To summarize the advances in research on Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion, and provide reference for its prevention. Methods The definition, development, clinical significance, and related risk factors of Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion were throughout reviewed by referring to relevant domestic and doreign literature in recent years. Results At present, there is no consensus on the definition of Cage subsidence, and mostly accepted as the disk height reduction greater than 2 mm. Cage subsidence mainly occurs in the early postoperative stage, which weakens the radiological surgical outcome, and may further damage the effectiveness or even lead to surgical failure. Cage subsidence is closely related to the Cage size and its placement location, intraoperative endplate preparation, morphological matching of disk space to Cage, bone mineral density, body mass index, and so on. Conclusion The appropriate size and shape of the Cage usage, the posterolateral Cage placed, the gentle endplate operation to prevent injury, the active perioperative anti-osteoporosis treatment, and the education of patients to control body weight may help to prevent Cage subsidence and ensure good surgical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| | - Jiancheng Zeng
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| | - Tianhang Xie
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| | - Xingxiao Pu
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| | - Yufei Lu
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:2377-2384. [PMID: 34215921 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06912-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to compare the early subsidence rate (6-12 months) of standalone novel 3D-printed titanium (Ti) versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cages after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). METHOD A retrospective study of 113 patients (186 levels) who underwent LLIF surgery with Ti or PEEK cages was conducted. Early subsidence was measured in each treated level using the Marchi et al. classification in radiographs or CT scans acquired at 6-12 months follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analyses with generalized mixed models, setting subsidence as the outcome variable and including cage type (Ti vs PEEK) as well as significant and trending variables (p < 0.10) in univariate analyses, were conducted. RESULTS In total, 51 female and 62 male patients were analyzed. The median [IQR] age at surgery was 60.0 [51.0-70.0] years. Of the 186 levels, 119 levels were treated using PEEK and 67 levels with Ti cages. The overall subsidence rate for Grades I-III was significantly less in the Ti versus the PEEK group (p = 0.003). For high-grade subsidence (Grade II or III), Ti cages also demonstrated a subsidence rate (3.0%) that was significantly less compared to PEEK cages (18.5%) (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that patients treated with Ti cages were less likely to develop severe subsidence compared to those treated with PEEK (OR = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01, 0.30) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that 3D-printed novel Ti cages had a significantly lower early subsidence rate compared to PEEK cages in standalone LLIF patients.
Collapse
|
29
|
Hunt JP, Begley MR, Block JE. Truss implant technology™ for interbody fusion in spinal degenerative disorders: profile of advanced structural design, mechanobiologic and performance characteristics. Expert Rev Med Devices 2021; 18:707-715. [PMID: 34160337 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1947244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Interbody fusion devices are customarily used in fusion of the anterior spinal column for treatment of degenerative disc disease. Their traditional role is to reestablish and maintain intervertebral disc height, contain bone graft and provide mechanical support for the spine while osseointegration takes place. Utilizing the principles of mechanobiology, a unique biokinetic interbody fusion device has been developed that employs an advanced structural design to facilitate and actively participate in the fusion consolidation process.Areas covered: This article profiles and characterizes 4WEB Medical's Truss Implant Technology™ which includes a range of 3D-printed titanium spinal interbody implants and non-spinal implants whose design is based on truss structures enabled by advances in additive manufacturing. Four main areas of the implant design and functionality are detailed: bio-architecture, mechanobiologic underpinnings, bioactive surface features, and subsidence resistance. Pre-clinical and clinical examples are provided to describe and specify the bioactive roles and contributions of each design feature.Expert opinion: The distinct and unique combination of features incorporated within the truss cage design results in a biokinetic implant that actively participates in the bone healing cascade and fusion process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew R Begley
- Department of Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bakare AA, Fessler DR, Wewel JT, Fontes RBV, Fessler RG, O'Toole JE. Changes in Segmental and Lumbar Lordosis After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Different Lordotic Cage Angulations. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:440-448. [PMID: 33963028 DOI: 10.14444/8066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) affords a wide operative corridor to allow for a large interbody cage implantation for segmental reconstruction. There is a paucity of data describing segmental lordosis (SL) achieved with lordotic implants of varying angles. Here we compare changes in SL and lumbar lordosis (LL) after implantation of 6°, 10°, and 12° cages. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed LLIF cases over a 5.5-year period. We derived SL and LL using the standard cobb angle measurement from a standing lateral radiograph. We analyzed mean changes in SL and LL over time using the linear mixed effect model to estimate these longitudinal changes. RESULTS The most frequently treated level was L3-4, followed by L4-5. Significant increases in mean SL were found at each follow-up time point for all the cohorts. In an intercohort comparison, the mean changes in SL at immediate postoperative and last follow-up were significantly greater in the 10° cohort than 6° ([7.4° versus 3.1°, P = .004], [6.1° versus 2.3°, P = .025] respectively). The 12° cohort had higher mean change in SL at last follow-up than the 6° cohort (5.9° versus 2.3°, P = .022). There was no difference in mean change in SL between the 10° and 12° cohorts. No difference in overall mean LL over time was found. In terms of mean change in LL, no difference was observed except at immediate and 6-month postoperative in the 10° cohort ([9.6°, P = .001], [8.5, P = .003] respectively). By comparing mean change in LL, no difference existed except between the 10° and 6° immediately after surgery (9.6° versus 0.2°, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS LLIF cages significantly improve SL at the index level. However, this increase in SL is greater for 10° and 12° cages than the standard 6° cage. Use of 10° cages also resulted in overall improved LL than 6° cages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adewale A Bakare
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David R Fessler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joshua T Wewel
- Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta Brain and Spine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ricardo B V Fontes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Richard G Fessler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John E O'Toole
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Minimally invasive extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) to manage adjacent level disease – A case series and literature review. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2020.101014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
32
|
Li YM, Huang Z, Towner J, Li YI, Riggleman JR, Ledonio C. Expandable Technology Improves Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:87-93. [PMID: 33900961 DOI: 10.14444/8012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Static interbody spacers are standard of care for minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS LLIF). However, placement of large static interbody spacers typically requires multiple trialing, endplate preparation, and forceful impaction. A lateral expandable interbody spacer with adjustable lordosis can be inserted at a reduced height, to optimize the endplate-to-endplate fit. This study describes radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients treated using lateral titanium expandable interbody spacers with adjustable lordosis using MIS LLIF. METHODS This is a single-surgeon, retrospective, institutional review board-exempt chart review of 24 consecutive patients who underwent MIS LLIF at 1-2 contiguous level(s) using expandable spacers with adjustable lordosis. Radiographic and clinical functional outcomes were collected and compared at preoperative and postoperative time points up to 24 months. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used when appropriate. Statistical results were significant if P < .05. RESULTS Twenty-four consecutive patients were evaluated with an average age of 57.8 ± 12.6 years; 45.8% were female. Visual analog scale for back pain improved by 7.3 ± 1.0 points, whereas Oswestry Disability Index scores improved by a mean of 67.5 ± 11.3 points at 24 months (P < .001). Lumbar lordosis improved by a mean of 6.3 ± 10.1° at 24 months (P < .001). There were 29 spinal levels, with 41.4% at L4-5 and 34.5% at L3-4. Anterior, middle, and posterior disc height significantly increased at 24 months by means of 4.5 ± 2.9 mm, 4.0 ± 2.8 mm, and 2.6 ± 1.9 mm, respectively (P < .001). Neuroforaminal height significantly improved by 3.3 ± 3.9 mm at 24 months (P < .001). Segmental lordosis improved by 3.6 ± 3.0° at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS This study showed significant positive clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients who underwent MIS LLIF using expandable interbody spacers with adjustable lordosis. Correction of sagittal alignment was achieved and maintained up to 2-year follow-up. The use of expandable spacers with adjustable lordosis was shown to be safe and effective in this cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Michael Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Zheng Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - James Towner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Yan Icy Li
- Minimally Invasive Brain and Spine Institute University Spine and Neurosurgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Jessica R Riggleman
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center, A Division of Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles Ledonio
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center, A Division of Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Walsh WR, Pelletier M, Wills D, Wang T, Bannigan S, Vizesi F. Authors reply to "does undercut macrostructure cage cause increase of subsidence incidence and decease of disc height?". Spine J 2021; 21:353-354. [PMID: 33509410 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- William R Walsh
- Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Matthew Pelletier
- Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dan Wills
- Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tian Wang
- Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aleinik AY, Mlyavykh SG, Qureshi S. Lumbar Spinal Fusion Using Lateral Oblique (Pre-psoas) Approach (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2021; 13:70-81. [PMID: 35265352 PMCID: PMC8858408 DOI: 10.17691/stm2021.13.5.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Lumbar spinal fusion is one of the most common operations in spinal surgery. For its implementation, anterolateral (pre-psoas) approach (oblique lumbar interbody fusion, OLIF) is now increasingly used due to its high efficacy and safety. However, there is still little information on the clinical and radiological results of using this technique. The aim of the study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of OLIF in the treatment of lumbar spine disorders as presented in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ya Aleinik
- Neurosurgeon, Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia
| | - S G Mlyavykh
- Director of the Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia
| | - S Qureshi
- Associate Attending Orthopedic Surgeon Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70 St., New York, NY, 10021, USA;; Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Li YM, Frisch RF, Huang Z, Towner J, Li YI, Greeley SL, Ledonio C. Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study. Global Spine J 2020; 10:998-1005. [PMID: 32875829 PMCID: PMC7645091 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219886278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable interbody spacers to static interbody spacers. METHODS This is a retrospective, institutional review board-exempt chart review of 62 consecutive patients diagnosed with degenerative disc disease who underwent minimally invasive spine surgery lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS LLIF) using static or expandable spacers. There were 27 patients treated with static spacers, and 35 with expandable spacers. Radiographic and clinical functional outcomes were collected. Statistical results were significant if P < .05. RESULTS Mean improvement in visual analogue scale back and leg pain scores was significantly greater in the expandable group compared to the static group at 6 and 24 months by 42.3% and 63.8%, respectively (P < .05). Average improvement in Oswestry Disability Index scores was significantly greater in the expandable group than the static group at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months by 28%, 44%, 59%, 53%, and 89%, respectively (P < .05). For disc height, the mean improvement from baseline to 24 months was greater in the static group compared to the expandable group (P < .05). Implant subsidence was significantly greater in the static group (16.1%, 5/31 levels) compared with the expandable group (6.7%, 3/45 levels; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS This study showed positive clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients who underwent MIS LLIF with expandable spacers compared to those with static spacers. Sagittal correction and pain relief was achieved and maintained through 24-month follow-up. The expandable group had a lower subsidence rate than the static group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Michael Li
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA,Yan Michael Li, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
| | | | - Zheng Huang
- Guanghua Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - James Towner
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Yan Icy Li
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Samantha L. Greeley
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center (MERC), A Division of Globus Medical, Audubon, PA, USA
| | - Charles Ledonio
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center (MERC), A Division of Globus Medical, Audubon, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Importance of the epiphyseal ring in OLIF stand-alone surgery: a biomechanical study on cadaveric spines. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2020; 30:79-87. [PMID: 33226482 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06667-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSES To explore the function of endplate epiphyseal ring in OLIF stand-alone surgery using a biomechanical model to reduce the complications of endplate collapse and cage subsidence. METHODS In total, 24 human cadaveric lumbar function units (L1-2 and L3-4 segments) were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group was implanted with long fusion cages which engaged with both inner and outer regions of epiphyseal ring (Complete Span-Epiphyseal Ring, CSER). Those engaged with only the inner half of epiphyseal ring were the second group (Half Span-Epiphyseal Ring, HSER). Each group was divided into two subgroups [higher cage-height (HH) and normal cage-height (NH)]. Specimens were fixed in testing cups and compressed at approximately 2.5 mm/s, until the first sign of structural failure. Trabecular structural damage was analyzed by Micro-CT, as well as the difference of bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) et al. in different regions. RESULTS Endplate collapse was mainly evident in the inner region of epiphyseal ring, where trabecular injury of sub-endplate bone was most concentrated. Endplate collapse incidence was significantly higher in HSER than CSER specimens (P = 0.017). A structural failure occurred at a lower force in HSER (1.41 ± 0.34 KN) compared with CSER (2.44 ± 0.59 KN). HH subgroups failed at a lower average force than NH subgroups. Micro-CT results showed a more extensive trabecular fracture in HSER specimens compared to CSER specimens, especially in HH subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Endplate collapse is more likely to occur with short half span cages than complete span cages, and taller cages compared with normal height cages. During OLIF surgery, we should choose cages matching intervertebral disc space height and place the cages spanning over the whole epiphyseal ring to improve support strength.
Collapse
|
37
|
Kim SK, Elbashier OM, Lee SC, Choi WJ. Can posterior stand-alone expandable cages safely restore lumbar lordosis? A minimum 5-year follow-up study. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15:442. [PMID: 32993711 PMCID: PMC7523357 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01866-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lumbar lordosis (LL) can be restored, and screw-related complications may be avoided with the stand-alone expandable cage method. However, the long-term spinopelvic changes and safety remain unknown. We aimed to elucidate the long-term radiologic outcomes and safety of this technique. METHODS Data from patients who underwent multi-level stand-alone expandable cage fusion and 80 patients who underwent screw-assisted fusion between February 2007 and December 2012, with at least 5 years of follow-up, were retrospectively analyzed. Segmental angle and translation, short and whole LL, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, and presence of subsidence, pseudoarthrosis, retropulsion, cage breakage, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and screw malposition were assessed. The relationship between local, lumbar, and spinopelvic effects was investigated. The implant failure rate was considered a measure of procedure effectiveness and safety. RESULTS In total, 69 cases were included in the stand-alone expandable cage group and 150 cases in the control group. The stand-alone group showed shorter operative time (58.48 ± 11.10 vs 81.43 ± 13.75, P = .00028), lower rate of PJK (10.1% vs 22.5%, P = .03), and restoration of local angle (4.66 ± 3.76 vs 2.03 ± 1.16, P = .000079) than the control group. However, sagittal balance (0.01 ± 2.57 vs 0.50 ± 2.10, P = .07) was not restored, and weakness showed higher rate of subsidence (16.31% vs 4.85%, P = .0018), pseudoarthrosis (9.92% vs 2.42%, P = .02), cage, and retropulsion (3.55% vs 0, P = .01) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS Stand-alone expandable cage fusion can restore local lordosis; however, global sagittal balance was not restored. Furthermore, implant safety has not yet been proven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Kook Kim
- Himchan and UHS Spine and Joint Centre, University Hospital Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.,Department of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Regulatory Sciences, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of South Korea.,Joint and Arthritis Research, Orthopaedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, Seoul, Republic of South Korea
| | - Ogeil Mubarak Elbashier
- Himchan and UHS Spine and Joint Centre, University Hospital Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Su-Chan Lee
- Joint and Arthritis Research, Orthopaedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, Seoul, Republic of South Korea
| | - Woo-Jin Choi
- Department of Spine Center, Neurosurgery, Hurisarang Hospital, 618 Gyeryong-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 35299, Republic of South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Xi Z, Mummaneni PV, Wang M, Ruan H, Burch S, Deviren V, Clark AJ, Berven SH, Chou D. The association between lower Hounsfield units on computed tomography and cage subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 49:E8. [DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.focus20169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEOne vexing problem after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery is cage subsidence. Low bone mineral density (BMD) may contribute to subsidence, and BMD is correlated with Hounsfield units (HUs) on CT. The authors investigated if lower HU values correlated with subsidence after LLIF.METHODSA retrospective study of patients undergoing single-level LLIF with pedicle screw fixation for degenerative conditions at the University of California, San Francisco, by 6 spine surgeons was performed. Data on demographics, cage parameters, preoperative HUs on CT, and postoperative subsidence were collected. Thirty-six–inch standing radiographs were used to measure segmental lordosis, disc space height, and subsidence; data were collected immediately postoperatively and at 1 year. Subsidence was graded using a published grade of disc height loss: grade 0, 0%–24%; grade I, 25%–49%; grade II, 50%–74%; and grade III, 75%–100%. HU values were measured on preoperative CT from L1 to L5, and each lumbar vertebral body HU was measured 4 separate times.RESULTSAfter identifying 138 patients who underwent LLIF, 68 met the study inclusion criteria. All patients had single-level LLIF with pedicle screw fixation. The mean follow-up duration was 25.3 ± 10.4 months. There were 40 patients who had grade 0 subsidence, 15 grade I, 9 grade II, and 4 grade III. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or smoking. There were no significant differences in cage sizes, cage lordosis, and preoperative disc height. The mean segmental HU (the average HU value of the two vertebrae above and below the LLIF) was 169.5 ± 45 for grade 0, 130.3 ± 56.2 for grade I, 100.7 ± 30.2 for grade II, and 119.9 ± 52.9 for grade III (p < 0.001). After using a receiver operating characteristic curve to establish separation criteria between mild and severe subsidence, the most appropriate threshold of HU value was 135.02 between mild and severe subsidence (sensitivity 60%, specificity 92.3%). After univariate and multivariate analysis, preoperative segmental HU value was an independent risk factor for severe cage subsidence (p = 0.017, OR 15.694, 95% CI 1.621–151.961).CONCLUSIONSLower HU values on preoperative CT are associated with cage subsidence after LLIF. Measurement of preoperative HU values on CT may be useful when planning LLIF surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo Xi
- Departments of 1Neurosurgery and
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | | | | | | | - Shane Burch
- 2Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Vedat Deviren
- 2Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | | | - Sigurd H. Berven
- 2Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Agarwal N, White MD, Zhang X, Alan N, Ozpinar A, Salvetti DJ, Tempel ZJ, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS, Hamilton DK. Impact of endplate-implant area mismatch on rates and grades of subsidence following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an analysis of 623 levels. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:12-16. [PMID: 32114533 DOI: 10.3171/2020.1.spine19776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a useful minimally invasive approach for select spinal disorders, but implant subsidence may occur in up to 30% of patients. Previous studies have suggested that wider implants reduce the subsidence rate. This study aimed to evaluate whether a mismatch of the endplate and implant area can predict the rate and grade of implant subsidence. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients who underwent stand-alone LLIF between July 2008 and June 2015; 297 patients (623 surgical levels) met inclusion criteria. Imaging studies were examined to grade graft subsidence according to Marchi criteria. Thirty patients had radiographic evidence of implant subsidence. The endplates above and below the implant were measured. RESULTS A total of 30 patients with implant subsidence were identified. Of these patients, 6 had Marchi grade 0, 4 had grade I, 12 had grade II, and 8 had grade III implant subsidence. There was no statistically significant correlation between the endplate-implant area mismatch and subsidence grade or incidence. There was also no correlation between endplate-implant width and length mismatch and subsidence grade or incidence. However, there was a strong correlation between the usage of the 18-mm-wide implants and the development of higher-grade subsidence (p = 0.002) necessitating surgery. There was no significant association between the degree of mismatch or Marchi subsidence grade and the presence of postoperative radiculopathy. Of the 8 patients with 18-mm implants demonstrating radiographic subsidence, 5 (62.5%) required reoperation. Of the 22 patients with 22-mm implants demonstrating radiographic subsidence, 13 (59.1%) required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS There was no correlation between endplate-implant area, width, or length mismatch and Marchi subsidence grade for stand-alone LLIF. There was also no correlation between either endplate-implant mismatch or Marchi subsidence grade and postoperative radiculopathy. The data do suggest that the use of 18-mm-wide implants in stand-alone LLIF may increase the risk of developing high-grade subsidence necessitating reoperation compared to the use of 22-mm-wide implants.
Collapse
|
40
|
Li YM, Frisch RF, Huang Z, Towner JE, Li YI, Edsall AL, Ledonio C. Comparative Effectiveness of Laterally Placed Expandable versus Static Interbody Spacers: A 1-Year Follow-Up Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study. Asian Spine J 2020; 15:89-96. [PMID: 32521948 PMCID: PMC7904492 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2019.0260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective chart review. Purpose This study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with expandable and static interbody spacers following minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-LLIF) with 12-month follow-up. Overview of Literature A common surgical option for the treatment of degenerative disk disease (DDD) is MIS-LLIF using static or expandable spacers to restore disk height (DH), neuroforaminal height (NH), and segmental lordosis. Static spacers may require excessive trialing and aggressive impaction, potentially leading to endplate disruption and subsidence. Expandable spacers allow for in situ expansion to help address complications associated with static spacers. Methods This is an Institutional Review Board-exempt review of 69 patients (static, n=32; expandable, n=37) diagnosed with DDD who underwent MIS-LLIF at 1–2 contiguous level(s) using static or expandable spacers. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were collected and compared at pre- and postoperative time points up to 12 months. Results The expandable group had a significantly higher mean change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months vs. static (∆VAS at 12 months: expandable, 6.7±1.3; static, 5.1±2.6). Mean improvement of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly better for the expandable group vs. static (∆ODI at 12 months: expandable, 63.2±13.2; static, 29.8±23.4). Mean DH and NH significantly increased at final follow-up for both groups, with no significant difference in DH improvement between groups. The expandable mean NH improvement at 6 weeks and 6 months was significantly greater vs. static. Segmental lordosis significantly improved in the expandable group at all time intervals vs static. Subsidence rate at 12 months was significantly lower in the expandable group (1/46, 2.2%) vs. static (12/37, 32.4%). Conclusions Expandable spacers resulted in a significantly lower subsidence rate, improve segmental lordosis, and VAS and ODI outcomes at 12 months vs. static.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Michael Li
- Department of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Zheng Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Guanghua Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - James Edward Towner
- Department of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Yan Icy Li
- Department of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Amber Lynn Edsall
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center (MERC), A Division of Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA
| | - Charles Ledonio
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center (MERC), A Division of Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Laterally placed expandable interbody spacers improve radiographic and clinical outcomes: A 1-year follow-up study. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2019.100639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
42
|
Jain D, Ray WZ, Vaccaro AR. Advances in Techniques and Technology in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Spinal Fusion. JBJS Rev 2020; 8:e0171. [DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.19.00171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
43
|
Rentenberger C, Okano I, Salzmann SN, Winter F, Plais N, Burkhard MD, Shue J, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP. Perioperative Risk Factors for Early Revisions in Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. World Neurosurg 2020; 134:e657-e663. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
44
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN An experimental laboratory-based biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE To investigate the correlation between cage size and subsidence and to quantify the resistance to subsidence that a larger cage can provide. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The assumption that a bigger interbody cage confers less subsidence has not been proven. There was no previous study that has shown the superiority of lateral cages to bullet cages in terms of subsidence and none that has quantified the correlation between cage size and subsidence. METHODS A cage was compressed between two standardized polyurethane foam blocks at a constant speed. Four sizes of bullet cages used for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and six sizes of lateral cages used for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) were tested. The force required for a 5 mm subsidence, axial area of cages, and stiffness were analyzed. RESULTS A larger cage required a significantly higher force for a 5 mm subsidence. Longer bullet cages required marginal force increments of only 6.2% to 14.6% compared to the smallest bullet cage. Lateral cages, however, required substantially higher increments of force, ranging from 136.4% to 235.7%. The average force of lateral cages was three times that of bullet cages (6426.5 vs. 2115.9 N), and the average stiffness of the LLIF constructs was 3.6 times that of the TLIF constructs (635.5 vs. 2284.2 N/mm). There was a strong correlation between the axial area of cages and the force for a 5 mm subsidence. Every 1 mm increment of axial area corresponded to approximately 8 N increment of force. CONCLUSION Cage size correlated strongly with the force required for a 5 mm subsidence. The LLIF constructs required higher force and were stiffer than the TLIF constructs. Among bullet cages, longer cages only required marginal increments of force. Lateral cages, however, required substantially higher force. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A.
Collapse
|
45
|
Epstein NE. Review of Risks and Complications of Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). Surg Neurol Int 2019; 10:237. [PMID: 31893138 PMCID: PMC6911674 DOI: 10.25259/sni_559_2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Extreme lateral interbody fusions (XLIF) and Minimally Invasive (MIS) XLIF were developed to limit the vascular injuries associated with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and minimize the muscular/ soft tissue trauma attributed to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF). Methods Nevertheless, XLIF/MIS XLIF pose significant additional risks and complications that include; multiple nerve injuries (e.g. lumbar plexus, ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, genitofemoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and subcostals (to the anterior abdominal muscles: abdominal oblique), and sympathectomy), major vascular injuries, bowel perforations/postoperative ileus, seromas, pseudarthrosis, subsidence, and reoperations. Results The risks of neural injury with XLIF/MIS XLIF (up to 30-40%) are substantially higher than for TLIF, PLIF, PLF, and ALIF. These neural injuries included: lumbar plexus injuries (13.28%); new sensory deficits (0-75% (21.7%-40%); permanent 62.5%); motor deficits (0.7-33.6%-40%); iliopsoas weakness (9%-31%: permanent 5%), anterior thigh/groin pain (12.5-34%), and sympathectomy (4%-12%). Additional non-neurological complications included; subsidence (10.3%-13.8%), major vascular injuries (0.4%), bowel perforations, recurrent seroma, malpositioning of the XLIF cages, a 45% risk of cage-overhang, pseudarthrosis (7.5%), and failure to adequately decompress stenosis. In one study, reviewing 20 publications and involving 1080 XLIF patients, the authors observed "Most (XLIF) studies are limited by study design, sample size, and potential conflicts of interest." Conclusion Many new neurological deficits and other adverse events/complications are attributed to MIS XLIF/ XLIF. Shouldn't these significant risk factors be carefully taken into consideration before choosing to perform MIS XLIF/XLIF?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy E Epstein
- Professor of Clinical Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York, and Chief of Neurosurgical Spine and Education, NYU Winthrop Hospital, NYU Winthrop NeuroScience/Neurosurgery, Mineola, New York 11501, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kolcun JPG, Brusko GD, Wang MY. Novel Application of a New Lateral System for Adjacent-level Revision Surgery: A Case Report. Cureus 2019; 11:e5092. [PMID: 31516799 PMCID: PMC6721911 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has grown in popularity as a minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) approach that can be offered to patients with prior surgeries from a posterior approach. In this report, we present a patient with a focal disease and a history of multiple posterior lumbar surgeries who underwent LLIF with a novel application of the DuoTM system (Spineology Inc., MN, USA) adjacent to prior surgical levels and without posterior instrumentation. At one year postoperatively, she continued to have no back pain or complaints relating to her lumbar pathology. The case demonstrates the novel use of a new MISS LLIF system that requires minimal exposure as compared to current LLIF systems to treat a patient with adjacent segment disease and progressive symptoms following multiple posterior decompressive surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G Damian Brusko
- Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | - Michael Y Wang
- Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| |
Collapse
|