Predictors of Nasoseptal Flap Use After Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Mass Resection

Validity of the flap risk score in predicting nasoseptal flap use after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary mass resection

Introduction

There remains a paucity of literature examining the decision algorithm for use of nasoseptal flap (NSF) after endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to pituitary adenoma resection. In 2018, we published the first ever flap risk score (FRS) to predict the use of NSF. We present here a validity study examining the FRS as applied to our center.

Methods

A retrospective review was completed of consecutive patients undergoing EEA from January 2015 to March 2021. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the FRS were calculated. A multivariate logistic model was used to determine the relative weight imaging characteristics in predicting need for NSF. The relative weighting of the FRS was then re-optimized.

Results

A total of 376 patients underwent EEA for pituitary adenoma resection, with 113 (30.1%) requiring NSF. The FRS had a sensitivity and specificity of 43.4% and 94.7%, respectively. Sphenoid sinus extension increased the odds of needing a NSF equivalent to 19 mm of tumor height, as opposed to 6 mm in the original 2018 cohort. The re-optimized model had sensitivity and specificity of 79.6% and 76.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

We present a validity study examining the utility of FRS in predicting the use of NSF after EEA for pituitary adenoma resection. Our results show that while FRS is still predictive of the need for NSF after EEA, it is not as predictive now as it was for its original cohort. Therefore, a more comprehensive model is necessary to more accurately stratify patients' preoperative risk for NSF.

Interdisciplinary challenges and aims of flap or graft reconstruction surgery of sinonasal cancers: What radiologists and radiation oncologists need to know

In sinonasal cancer surgery, a fundamental challenge is to understand the postoperative imaging changes after reconstruction. Misinterpretation of post-operative imaging may lead to a misdiagnosis of tumor recurrence. Because radiotherapy planning is based on imaging, there are many gaps in knowledge to be filled in the interpretation of postoperative imaging to properly define radiotherapy tumor volumes in the presence of flaps. On the other hand, radiotherapy may be responsible for tissue fibrosis or atrophy, the anatomy of the reconstructed region and the functional outcomes may change after radiotherapy compared to surgery alone. This narrative review illustrates the interdisciplinary aims and challenges of sinonasal reconstructive surgery using flaps or grafts. It is particularly relevant to radiologists and radiation oncologists, at a time when intensity modulated radiotherapy and proton therapy have the potential to further contribute to reduction of morbidity.

Experience and modification of skull base reconstruction results in lower complications rates

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of nasal septum bone flap combined with vascularized pedicle nasoseptal flap (VP-NSF) in the treatment of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage in the endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery.

METHODS

A total of 156 patients in group A used a multi-layer skull base reconstruction method of fat-absorbable artificial dura mater- fascia lata-VP-NSF, and were treated with drainage of the lumbar cistern after surgery, in addition, a total of 94 patients in group B used a multi-layer skull base reconstruction method of fat-absorbable artificial dura mater-nasal septal bone flap-VP-NSF, and no lumbar cistern drainage was performed after surgery. Analyzed and compared the differences of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, intracranial infection, re-repair, average bed rest time, pulmonary infection and deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities were analyzed and compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

In group A, 11 cases of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea occurred after operation. In addition, 15 cases developed intracranial infection. During this period, there were 20 cases of pulmonary infection and 3 cases of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities. In group B, there were 1 case of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea (P < 0.05), 2 cases of intracranial infection (P < 0.05), 2 cases of pulmonary infection (P < 0.05), and 0 case of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Nasal septum bone flap combined with VP-NSF is effective in the treatment of high-flow CSF leaks in the endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery, which can avoid postoperative lumbar cistern drainage and is worth popularizing.

Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Objective  Presently, there are no standards for reporting outcomes of endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction (ESBR). This is problematic as a lack of consistent reporting makes synthesizing findings in systematic reviews and meta-analysis challenging. Thus, the aim of this study was to systematically review and describe the patterns of reporting outcomes in ESBR as a foundation for developing reporting guidelines. Study Design  Present study is a systematic review. Methods  Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for all publications with ≥25 patients and a focus on ESBR. The reporting patterns of each study's variables and outcomes were assessed. Results  A total of 112 studies were included in the review. The most commonly reported demographic variables were the number of included patients ( n  = 112, 100%) and types of pathologies treated ( n  = 104, 92.9%). Meanwhile, the most routinely described preoperative variable was history of prior treatment ( n  = 48, 42.9%). Type of reconstruction was a commonly reported intraoperative variable ( n  = 110, 98.2%), though the rate of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was noted in only 76 studies (67.9%). With regard to postoperative outcomes, postoperative CSF leak rate was routinely provided ( n  = 101, 90.2%), but reporting of other surgical complications was more inconsistent. Ultimately, of the 43 variables and outcomes reviewed, a median of 12 (range: 4-22) was reported in each study. Conclusion  There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes reported in studies relating to ESBR. This highlights the need for the development of standard reporting guidelines to minimize bias and improve interstudy comparability.

Reconstruction strategies for intraoperative CSF leak in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is one of the preferred options for skull base pathologies. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a significant complication of EES and neurosurgeons have proposed various reconstructive strategies to decrease this morbidity. We describe and compare the efficacy of these strategies.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for publications between 1990 and November 2019. We defined a reconstruction hierarchy of seven levels from inside to outside: fat graft, intracranial intradural layer (inlay), intracranial extradural layer (onlay), buttress, mucosal flap, nasal packing and lumbar drainage. A single-arm analysis was performed for the primary outcome of CSF leak rate.

RESULTS

Of 3641 records identified, 48 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pituitary tumors had lower postoperative CSF leak rate than other diseases (1.8% vs. 6.5%, RD = -4.7% [-7.1%, -2.1%]). In high CSF flow group, the post-operative leak rate was reduced by application of mucosal flap (4.3% vs. without mucosal flap at 12.8%, RD = -8.5% [-15.1%, -1.9%]). The use of inlay showed potential of decreasing the post-operative leak rate (5.0% vs. 7.2%, RD = -2.2% [-7.7%, 3.3%]). In low CSF flow group, tampon was better than balloon for nasal packing (1.0% vs. 10.5%, RD = -9.5% [-16.5%, -2.4%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Mucosal flap and inlay for high-flow intraoperative CSF leak and tampon (compared with balloon) for low-flow intraoperative CSF leak, improved the postoperative CSF leak rate. Further studies are required to establish more robust evidence.