Decompressive Cranioplasty (Osteoplastic Hinged Craniectomy): A Novel Technique for Increased Intracranial Pressure-Initial Experience and Outcome

How much space is needed for decompressive surgery in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: Enabling single-stage surgery

Introduction

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DCE) is routinely performed for intracranial pressure control after malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. Decompressed patients are at risk of traumatic brain injury and the syndrome of the trephined until cranioplasty. Cranioplasty after DCE is itself associated with high complication rates. Single-stage surgical strategies may eliminate the need for follow-up surgery while allowing for safe brain expansion and protection from environmental factors.

Research question

Assess the volume needed for safe expansion of the brain to enable single-stage surgery.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective radiological and volumetric analysis of all patients that had DCE in our clinic between January 2009 and December 2018 and met inclusion criteria. We investigated prognostic parameters in perioperative imaging and assessed clinical outcome.

Results

Of 86 patients with DCE, 44 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median brain swelling was 75.35 mL (8.7-151.2 mL). Median bone flap volume was 113.3 mL (73.34-146.1 mL). Median brain swelling was 1.62 mm below the previous outer rim of the skull (5.3 mm to -2.19 mm). In 79.6% of the patients, the volume of removed bone alone was equivalent to or larger than the additional intracranial volume needed for brain swelling.

Discussion and conclusion

The space provided by removal of the bone alone was sufficient to match the expansion of the injured brain after malignant MCA infarction in the vast majority of our patientsA subgaleal space-expanding flap with a minimal offset can provide protection from trauma and atmospheric pressure without compromising brain expansion.

Development of a Novel Device for Decompressive Craniectomy: An Experimental and Cadaveric Study and Preliminary Clinical Application

BACKGROUND

Decompressive craniectomy is an intervention of established efficacy in patients with intractable cerebral edema.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a new device used in alternative to decompressive craniectomy. This device is designed to perform an augmentative craniotomy by keeping the bone flap elevated using specific cranial suspension titanium plates and giving the brain enough room to swell.

METHODS

We tested the mechanical characteristics of the cranial brackets on dried skulls, on 3D-printed skull models, and on a preserved cadaver head. The resistance of the device was examined through dynamometric testing, and the feasibility of the surgical technique, including the suspension of the bone flap and the skin closure, was investigated on the cadaveric model. A preliminary clinical series of 2 patients is also reported.

RESULTS

The laboratory tests have shown that this system allows an adequate expansion of the intracranial volume and it could withstand a force up to 637 ± 13 N in the synthetic model and up to 658 ± 9 N in the human skull without dislocation or failure of the brackets nor fractures of the bone ridges. Preliminary application in the clinical setting has shown that augmentative craniotomy is effective in the control of intracranial hypertension and could reduce the costs and complications associated with the classical decompressive craniectomy technique.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary laboratory and clinical results show augmentative craniotomy to be a promising, alternative technique to decompressive craniectomy. Further clinical studies will be needed to validate its efficacy.

Presenting Step-Ladder Expansive Cranioplasty as the Next Step After Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: It Is Different!

Context: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DC) is the final surgical remedy for refractory raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Even with years of experience and profound refination of technique, the procedure has less rewarding results in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Besides, arrangements for bone flap preservation and the necessity of follow-up surgery in the form of cranioplasty bring in unavoidable monetary and logistic burdens to the patients. Step-ladder expansive cranioplasty was conceptualized as an alternative to achieve adequate intracranial volume expansion to help normalize ICP, with immediate reinstitution of the Monro-Kellie doctrine. It is also expected to prevent cerebral cortical pressure injury to the cortex underlying the craniectomy defect. The evolution of this concept, as worked out on different models, the surgical technique, and our experience with this technique are discussed in this article. Evidence Acquisition: Multiple research projects undertaken by our team to build up the concept and acquire data necessary to plan the surgical procedure have been published over last eight years. This review article attempts to evaluate the existing knowledge and our clinical experience so far. Results: Step-ladder expansive cranioplasty allows an assured centrifugal displacement of the inner table and underlying dural bag at craniotomy site by at least 9 mm, thereby achieving a minimum volume expansion of 120 cc. Both of these parameters can be increased as desired, if considered necessary by the surgeon. Conclusions: Step-ladder expansive cranioplasty offers an alternative that takes the centripetal pressure exerted by the combination of the tensile strength of the scalp and atmospheric pressure off the brain surface while achieving an assured augmentation of intracranial volume that can be optimized on a case-to-case basis, based on our future understanding of the subject. While it can be a single-stage surgery for those satisfied with the cosmesis, a revision cranioplasty (if required) will be easier, cheaper, and cosmetically superior to achieving cover over a craniotomy defect routinely done after DC.

The Kempe incision for decompressive craniectomy, craniotomy, and cranioplasty in traumatic brain injury and stroke

OBJECTIVE

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is an effective, lifesaving option for reducing intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and other pathologies with elevated ICP. Most DCs are performed via a standard trauma flap shaped like a reverse question mark (RQM), which requires sacrificing the occipital and posterior auricular arteries and can be complicated by wound dehiscence and infections. The Ludwig Kempe hemispherectomy incision (Kempe) entails a T-shaped incision, one limb from the midline behind the hairline to the inion and the other limb from the root of the zygoma to the coronal suture. The authors' objective in this study was to define their implementation of the Kempe incision for DC and craniotomy, report clinical outcomes, and quantify the volume of bone removed compared with the RQM incision.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a single-surgeon experience with DC in TBI and stroke was performed. Patient demographics, imaging, and outcomes were collected for all DCs from 2015 to 2020, and the incisions were categorized as either Kempe or RQM. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans were obtained and processed using a combination of automatic segmentation (in Python and SimpleITK) with manual cleanup and further subselection in ITK-SNAP. The volume of bone removed was quantified, and the primary outcome was percentage of hemicranium removed. Postoperative surgical wound infections, estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of surgery were compared between the two groups as secondary outcomes. Cranioplasty data were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six patients were included in the analysis; there were 57 patients in the craniotomy group (44 patients with RQM incisions and 13 with Kempe incisions) and 79 in the craniectomy group (41 patients with RQM incisions and 38 Kempe incisions). The mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 251 ± 368 days. There was a difference in the amount of decompression between approaches in multivariate modeling (39% ± 11% of the hemicranium was removed via the Kempe incision vs 34% ± 10% via the RQM incision, p = 0.047), although this did not achieve significance in multivariate modeling. Wound infection rates, EBL, and length of surgery were comparable between the two incision types. No wound infections in either cohort were due to wound dehiscence. Cranioplasty outcomes were comparable between the two incision types.

CONCLUSIONS

The Kempe incision for craniectomy or craniotomy is a safe, feasible, and effective alternative to the RQM. The authors advocate the Kempe incision in cases in which contralateral operative pathology or subsequent craniofacial/skull base repair is anticipated.

Augmentation of Supratemporal Hollowing With Silicone Block During Autologous Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy With Additional Temporalis Resection

ABSTRACT

Decompressive craniectomy is a potentially life-saving neurosurgical procedure. In cases of insufficient decompression, uncontrolled intracranial pressure even after sufficient decompression, or when the intracranial pressure is increased due to external factors such as intramuscular hematoma in the temporal muscle, additional temporalis resection may be necessary. However, the hollowing of the supratemporal fossa that occurs after additional temporalis resection can create a major cosmetic problem. Several alternatives are available to fill the hollowing of the supratemporal fossa during cranial reconstruction, but each has a disadvantage, whether it is expensive or difficult to shape for bilateral symmetry. The author solved the cosmetic problem by using a properly carved silicone block to fill the supratemporal fossa while conducting cranioplasty, and here reports it with a literature review.

Simulating Expansion of the Intracranial Space to Accommodate Brain Swelling after Decompressive Craniectomy: Volumetric Quantification in a 3D CAD Skull Model with Contour Elevation

Background: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) can be used to augment intracranial space and halt brainstem compromise. However, a widely adopted recommendation for optimal surgical extent of the DC procedure is lacking. In the current study, we utilized three-dimensional (3D) computer-assisted design (CAD) skull models with defect contour elevation for quantitative assessment. Methods: DC was performed for 15 consecutive patients, and 3D CAD models of defective skulls with contour elevations (0-50 mm) were reconstructed using commercial software. Quantitative assessments were conducted in these CAD subjects to analyze the effects of volumetric augmentation when elevating the length of the contour and the skull defect size. The final positive results were mathematically verified using a computerized system for numerical integration with the rectangle method. Results: Defect areas of the skull CAD models ranged from 55.7-168.8 cm², with a mean of 132.3 ± 29.7 cm². As the contour was elevated outward for 6 mm or above, statistical significance was detected in the volume and the volume-increasing rate, when compared to the results obtained from the regular CAD model. The volume and the volume-increasing rate increased by 3.665 cm³, 0.285% (p < 0.001) per 1 mm of contour elevation), and 0.034% (p < 0.001) per 1 cm² of increase of defect area, respectively. Moreover, a 1 mm elevation of the contour in Groups 2 (defect area 125-150 cm²) and 3 (defect area >150 cm², as a proxy for an extremely large skull defect) was shown to augment the volume and the volume-increasing rate by 1.553 cm³, 0.101% (p < 0.001) and 1.126 cm³, 0.072% (p < 0.001), respectively, when compared to those in Group 1 (defect area <125 cm²). The volumetric augmentation achieved by contour elevation for an extremely large skull defect was smaller than that achieved for a large skull defect. Conclusions: The 3D CAD skull model contour elevation method can be effectively used to simulate the extent of a space-occupying swollen brain and to quantitatively assess the extent of brainstem protection in terms of volume augmentation and volume-increasing rate following DC. As the tangential diameter (representing the degree of DC) exceeded the plateau value, volumetric augmentation was attenuated. However, an increasing volumetric augmentation was detected before the plateau value was reached.