Reliability of an Intraoperative Radiographic Anteroposterior View of the Spinal Midline for Detection of Pedicle Screws Breaching the Medial Pedicle Wall in the Thoracic, Lumbar, and Sacral Spine

A novel method to evaluate the transverse pedicle angles of the lower lumbar vertebrae using digital radiography

To investigate a novel approach for establishing the transverse pedicle angle (TPA) of the lower lumbar spine using preoperative digital radiography (DR). Computed Tomography (CT) datasets of the lower lumbar were reconstructed using MIMICS 17.0 software and then imported into 3-matic software for surgical simulation and anatomical parameter measurement. A mathematical algorithm of TPA based on the Pythagorean theorem was established, and all obtained data were analyzed by SPSS software. The CT dataset from 66 samples was reconstructed as a digital model of the lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5), and the AP length/estimated lateral length for L3 between the right and left sides was statistically significant (P = 0.015, P = 0.005). The AP length of the right for L4 was smaller than that of the left after a paired t test was executed (P = 0.006). Both the width of the pedicle and the length of the pedicle (P2C1) were consistent with TPA (L3 Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging
• Male
• Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
• Female
• Middle Aged
• Adult
• Aged
• Algorithms
• Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods

Collapse

Grants

• Social Development Science and Technology Project of Shaanxi Province
• Education Department of Shaanxi Province
• Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Shixun Wu Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Key Laboratory of Bone Joint Disease Basic and Clinical Translation of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Shizhang Liu Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Key Laboratory of Bone Joint Disease Basic and Clinical Translation of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Ming Ling Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Key Laboratory of Bone Joint Disease Basic and Clinical Translation of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Minggang Huang Department of Computed Tomography, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Zhe Liu Department of Computed Tomography, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Xianglong Duan Key Laboratory of Bone Joint Disease Basic and Clinical Translation of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Second Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Institute of Medical Research, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an Shaanxi, China Second Department of General Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

Collapse

Assessing intraoperative pedicle screw placement accuracy using biplanar radiographs compared to three-dimensional imaging

To date, biplanar imaging (2D) has been the method of choice for pedicle screw (PS) positioning and verified for the anteroposterior view and (spinal midline) M-line method. In recent years, the use of intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging has become available with the Gertzbein-Robbins system (GRS) to assess PS breach and positioning confirmation. The aim is to determine if 2D imaging is sufficient to assess PS position in comparison to advanced 3D imaging.Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 204 consecutive adult patients who underwent posterior thoracic and lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal surgery by a single surgeon (2019-2022).Of the 204 patients, 187 (91.6%) had intraoperative images available for analysis. A total of 1044 PS implants were used; 922 (88.3%) were robotically placed. Postoperative CT scans were verified with M-line/GRS findings. Among 103 patients (50.5%) with a total of 362 screws, (34.7%) had postoperative CT, intraoperative 3D scan, and intraoperative 2D scan for analysis. Postoperative CT findings were consistent with all GRS findings, validating that 3D imaging was accurate. Screws (1%) were falsely verified by the M-line as 3D imaging confirmed false negative or positive findings.In our series, intraoperative 3D scan was as accurate as postoperative CT scan in assessing PS breach. A significant number of PS may be falsely read as accurate on 2D imaging, that is in fact inaccurate when assessed on 3D imaging. An intraoperative post-instrumentation 3D scan may be preferable to prevent postoperative recognition of a falsely verified screw on biplanar imaging.

Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography is as reliable as conventional computed tomography for identification of pedicle screw breach in thoracolumbar spine surgery

Objectives

To test the hypothesis that intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using the Allura augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) system in a dedicated hybrid operating room (OR) matches computed tomography (CT) for identification of pedicle screw breach during spine surgery.

Methods

Twenty patients treated with spinal fixation surgery (260 screws) underwent intraoperative CBCT as well as conventional postoperative CT scans (median 12 months after surgery) to identify and grade the degree of pedicle screw breach on both scan types, according to the Gertzbein grading scale. Blinded assessments were performed by three independent spine surgeons and the CT served as the standard of reference. Screws graded as Gertzbein 0 or 1 were considered clinically accurate while grades 2 or 3 were considered inaccurate. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were the primary metrics of diagnostic performance.

Results

For this patient group, the negative predictive value of an intraoperative CBCT to rule out pedicle screw breach was 99.6% (CI 97.75–99.99%). Among 10 screws graded as inaccurate on CT, 9 were graded as such on the CBCT, giving a sensitivity of 90.0% (CI 55.5–99.75%). Among the 250 screws graded as accurate on CT, 244 were graded as such on the CBCT, giving a specificity of 97.6% (CI 94.85–99.11%).

Conclusions

CBCT, performed intraoperatively with the Allura ARSN system, is comparable and non-inferior to a conventional postoperative CT scan for ruling out misplaced pedicle screws in spinal deformity cases, eliminating the need for a postoperative CT.

Key Points

• Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CT) using the Allura ARSN is comparable with conventional CT for ruling out pedicle screw breaches after spinal fixation surgery.

• Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography can be used to assess need for revisions of pedicle screws making routine postoperative CT scans unnecessary.

• Using cone beam computed tomography, the specificity was 97.6% and the sensitivity was 90% for detecting pedicle screw breaches and the negative predictive value for ruling out a pedicle screw breach was 99.6%.

Augmented reality navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging vs fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand surgery for spine fixation surgery: a matched-control study comparing accuracy

This study aimed to compare screw placement accuracy and clinical aspects between Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation (ARSN) and free-hand (FH) technique. Twenty patients underwent spine surgery with screw placement using ARSN and were matched retrospectively to a cohort of 20 FH technique cases for comparison. All ARSN and FH cases were performed by the same surgeon. Matching was based on clinical diagnosis and similar proportions of screws placed in the thoracic and lumbosacral vertebrae in both groups. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed on postoperative scans according to the Gertzbein scale and grades 0 and 1 were considered accurate. Procedure time, blood loss and length of hospital stay, were collected as secondary endpoints. A total of 262 and 288 screws were assessed in the ARSN and FH groups, respectively. The share of clinically accurate screws was significantly higher in the ARSN vs FH group (93.9% vs 89.6%, p < 0.05). The proportion of screws placed without a cortical breach was twice as high in the ARSN group compared to the FH group (63.4% vs 30.6%, p < 0.0001). No statistical difference was observed for the secondary endpoints between both groups. This matched-control study demonstrated that ARSN provided higher screw placement accuracy compared to free-hand.