Examination of Plasma Cell-Free DNA of Glioma Patients by Whole Exome Sequencing

Circulating Tumor DNA in Adults With Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biomarker Performance

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising noninvasive biomarker to capture tumor genetics in patients with brain tumors. Research into its clinical utility, however, has not been standardized because the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA remain undefined.

OBJECTIVE

To (1) review the primary literature about ctDNA in adults with glioma to compare the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA in the cerebrospinal fluid vs the plasma and (2) to evaluate the effect of tumor grade on detection of ctDNA.

METHODS

PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using published studies that assessed ctDNA in either plasma or cerebrospinal fluid among adult patients with confirmed glioma. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were generated using the Rücker-Schumacher method, and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis revealed improved biomarker performance for CSF (AUC = 0.947) vs plasma (AUC = 0.741) ctDNA, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = .141). Qualitative analysis revealed greater sensitivities among single-allele PCR and small, targeted next-generation sequencing panels compared with broader panels. It additionally demonstrated higher sensitivity of ctDNA detection in high-grade vs low-grade gliomas, although these analyses were limited by a lack of specificity reporting in many studies.

CONCLUSION

ctDNA seems to be a highly sensitive and specific noninvasive biomarker among adults with gliomas. To maximize its performance, CSF should be studied with targeted genetic analysis platforms, particularly in high-grade gliomas. Further studies on ctDNA are needed to define its clinical utility in diagnosis, prognostication, glioblastoma pseudoprogression, and other scenarios wherein neoadjuvant therapies may be considered.

A serum-based DNA methylation assay provides accurate detection of glioma

BACKGROUND

The detection of somatic mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from liquid biopsy has emerged as a non-invasive tool to monitor the follow-up of cancer patients. However, the significance of cfDNA clinical utility remains uncertain in patients with brain tumors, primarily because of the limited sensitivity cfDNA has to detect real tumor-specific somatic mutations. This unresolved challenge has prevented accurate follow-up of glioma patients with non-invasive approaches.

METHODS

Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of tumor tissue and serum cell-free DNA of glioma patients.

RESULTS

Here, we developed a non-invasive approach to profile the DNA methylation status in the serum of patients with gliomas and identified a cfDNA-derived methylation signature that is associated with the presence of gliomas and related immune features. By testing the signature in an independent discovery and validation cohorts, we developed and verified a score metric (the "glioma epigenetic liquid biopsy score" or GeLB) that optimally distinguished patients with or without glioma (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 97.78%). Furthermore, we found that changes in GeLB score reflected clinicopathological changes during surveillance (e.g., progression, pseudoprogression or response to standard or experimental treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the GeLB score can be used as a complementary approach to diagnose and follow up patients with glioma.

Whole exome sequencing of cell-free DNA - A systematic review and Bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis

Molecular profiling of tumor derived cell free DNA (cfDNA) is gaining ground as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. However to what extent cfDNA reflects the full metastatic landscape as currently determined by tumor tissue analysis remains controversial. Though technically challenging, whole exome sequencing (WES) of cfDNA enables thorough evaluation of somatic alterations. Here, we review the feasibility of WES of cfDNA and determine the sensitivity of WES-detected single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in cfDNA on individual patient data level using paired tumor tissue as reference (sharedSNVsAlltissueSNVs×100%). The pooled sensitivity was 50% (95% credible interval (CI): 29-72%). The tissue mutant allele frequency (MAF) of variants exclusively identified in tissue was significantly lower (12.5%, range: 0.5-18%) than the tissue MAF of variants identified in both tissue and cfDNA (23.9%, range: 17-38%), p = 0.004. The overall agreement (sharedSNVsAllSNVs×100%)between SNVs in cfDNA and tumor tissue was 31% (95% CI: 15-49%). The number of detected SNVs was positively correlated with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction (p = 0.016). A sub analysis of samples with ctDNA fractions ≥ 25% improved the sensitivity to 69% (95% CI: 46-89%) and agreement to 46% (95% CI: 36-59%), suggesting that WES is mainly feasible for patients with high ctDNA fractions. Pre- and post-analytical procedures were highly variable between studies rendering comparisons problematic. In conclusion, various aspects of WES of cfDNA are largely in its investigative phase, standardization of methodologies is highly needed to bring this promising technique to its clinical potential.