Impact of Dual-Layer Duraplasty During Hemicraniectomy on Morbidity and Operative Metrics of Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study Comparing a Single-Layer with a Dual-Layer Technique

Dural Reconstruction Materials for the Repairing of Spinal Neoplastic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Spinal tumors often lead to more complex complications than other bone tumors. Nerve injuries, dura mater defect, and subsequent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage generally appear in spinal tumor surgeries and are followed by serious adverse outcomes such as infections and even death. The use of suitable dura mater replacements to achieve multifunctionality in fluid leakage plugging, preventing adhesions, and dural reconstruction is a promising therapeutic approach. Although there have been innovative endeavors to manage dura mater defects, only a handful of materials have realized the targeted multifunctionality. Here, we review recent advances in dura repair materials and techniques and discuss the relative merits in both preclinical and clinical trials as well as future therapeutic options. With these advances, spinal tumor patients with dura mater defects may be able to benefit from novel treatments.

Homologous amniotic membrane as a dural substitute in decompressive craniectomies

INTRODUCTION

A dura mater substitute in decompressive craniectomies must protect the brain while providing a dissection plane between the cortex and myocutaneous layer. The human amniotic membrane (AM) has anti-inflammatory, wound healing, and differentiation properties. We tested AM properties as a dural substitute by comparing the outcomes to biological ones.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data on 25 patients who randomly underwent decompressive craniectomy with lyophilized AM patches and 25 in which biological substitutes were utilized between 2015 and 2019. The AM was laid with the epithelial side facing the brain because of the anti-adhesive proprieties, while the chorion facing the myocutaneous flap. We collected data on demographics, neurological status, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes. Additionally, we created a score - dura mimicking score- and reviewed postoperative imaging and pathological specimens.

RESULTS

The majority (96%) of AM grafts were integrated into native dura. Thirteen patients scored as excellent and 11 good on our "dura mimicking score", showing tissue integration ability but no cerebral cortex adhesion. The histopathological analysis showed that AM had thick plates of dense fibrous tissue with small reactive vessels, reactive fibroblasts, and lymphocytes infiltrate. The AM group's first outcomes were not different from the biological substitute patients but higher integration rate to the dura and less adhesion to the myocutaneous flap in AM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We documented the anti-adhesive, protective, and integrative properties of AM dural substitute patches in patients who underwent decompressive craniectomies, comparing the intraoperative differences and postoperative outcomes to biological dural substitutes.