1
|
El Naamani K, Khanna O, Syal A, Momin AA, Abbas R, Amllay A, Sambangi A, Hunt A, Dougherty J, Lawall CL, Tjoumakaris SI, Gooch MR, Herial NA, Rosenwasser RH, Zarzour H, Schmidt RF, Jabbour PM. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Transfemoral Versus Transradial Access for Carotid Stenting. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:445-452. [PMID: 36861988 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transradial (TR) approach has emerged as an alternative to the transfemoral (TF) approach in carotid artery stenting (CAS) because of its perceived benefits in access site complications and overall patient experience. OBJECTIVE To assess outcomes of TF vs TR approach for CAS. METHODS This is a retrospective single-center review of patients receiving CAS through the TR or TF route between 2017 and 2022. All patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease who underwent attempted CAS were included in our study. RESULTS A total of 342 patients were included in this study: 232 underwent CAS through TF approach vs 110 through the TR route. On univariate analysis, the rate of overall complications was more than double for the TF vs TR cohort; however, this did not achieve statistical significance (6.5% vs 2.7%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.59 P = .36). The rate of cross-over from TR to TF was significantly higher on univariate analysis (14.6 % vs 2.6%, OR = 4.77, P = .005) and on inverse probability treatment weighting analysis (OR = 6.11, P < .001). The rate of in-stent stenosis (TR: 3.6% vs TF: 2.2%, OR = 1.71, P = .43) and strokes at follow-up (TF: 2.2% vs TR: 1.8%, OR = 0.84, P = .84) was not significantly different. Finally, median length of stay was comparable between both cohorts. CONCLUSION The TR approach is safe, feasible, and provides similar rates of complications and high rates of successful stent deployment compared with the TF route. Neurointerventionalists adopting the radial first approach should carefully assess the preprocedural computed tomography angiography to identify patients amenable to TR approach for carotid stenting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kareem El Naamani
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leung YYR, Bera K, Urriza Rodriguez D, Dardik A, Mas JL, Simonte G, Rerkasem K, Howard DP. Safety of Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Stenosis by Age: Meta-Analysis With Individual Patient Data. Stroke 2023; 54:457-467. [PMID: 36647921 PMCID: PMC9855737 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.122.040819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is uncertainty whether elderly patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis have higher rates of adverse events following carotid endarterectomy. In trials, recurrent stroke risk on medical therapy alone increased with age, whereas operative stroke risk was not related. Few octogenarians were included in trials and there has been no systematic analysis of all study types. We aimed to evaluate the safety of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic elderly patients, particularly in octogenarians. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies (from January 1, 1980 through March 1, 2022) reporting post carotid endarterectomy risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. We included observational studies and interventional arms of randomized trials if the outcome rates (or the raw data to calculate these) were provided. Individual patient data from 4 prospective cohorts enabled multivariate analysis. RESULTS Of 47 studies (107 587 patients), risk of perioperative stroke was 2.04% (1.94-2.14) in octogenarians (390 strokes/19 101 patients) and 1.85% (1.75-1.95) in nonoctogenarians (1395/75 537); P=0.046. Perioperative death was 1.09% (0.94-1.25) in octogenarians (203/18 702) and 0.53% (0.48-0.59) in nonoctogenarians (392/73 327); P<0.001. Per 5-year age increment, a linear increase in perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, and death were observed; P=0.04 to 0.002. However, during the last 3 decades, perioperative stroke±death has declined significantly in octogenarians (7.78% [5.58-10.55] before year 2000 to 2.80% [2.56-3.04] after 2010); P<0.001. In Individual patient data multivariate-analysis (5111 patients), age ≥85 years was independently associated with perioperative stroke (P<0.001) and death (P=0.005). Yet, survival was similar for octogenarians versus nonoctogenarians at 1-year (95.0% [93.2-96.5] versus 97.5% [96.4-98.6]; P=0.08), as was 5-year stroke risk (11.93% [9.98-14.16]) versus 12.78% [11.65-13.61]; P=0.24). CONCLUSIONS We found a modest increase in perioperative risk with age in symptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. As stroke risk increases with age when on medical therapy alone, our findings support selective urgent intervention in symptomatic elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya Yuan Rachel Leung
- Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK (Y.Y.R.L., D.P.J.H.)
| | - Kasia Bera
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK (K.B., D.U.R., D.P.J.H.)
| | - Daniel Urriza Rodriguez
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK (K.B., D.U.R., D.P.J.H.)
| | - Alan Dardik
- Yale Department of Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.D.)
- Department of Surgery, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven (A.D.)
| | - Jean-Louis Mas
- Department of Neurology, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Université Paris-Cité, Inserm, France (J.-L.M.)
| | - Gioele Simonte
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Italy (G.S.)
| | - Kittipan Rerkasem
- Environmental - Occupational Health Sciences and Non-Communicable Diseases Research Group, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand (K.R.)
- Clinical Surgical Research Center, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand (K.R.)
| | - Dominic P.J. Howard
- Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK (Y.Y.R.L., D.P.J.H.)
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK (K.B., D.U.R., D.P.J.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lanza G, Orso M, Alba G, Bevilacqua S, Capoccia L, Cappelli A, Carrafiello G, Cernetti C, Diomedi M, Dorigo W, Faggioli G, Giannace V, Giannandrea D, Giannetta M, Lanza J, Lessiani G, Marone EM, Mazzaccaro D, Migliacci R, Nano G, Pagliariccio G, Petruzzellis M, Plutino A, Pomatto S, Pulli R, Reale N, Santalucia P, Sirignano P, Ticozzelli G, Vacirca A, Visco E. Guideline on carotid surgery for stroke prevention: updates from the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. A trend towards personalized medicine. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2022; 63:471-491. [PMID: 35848869 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.22.12368-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This guideline (GL) on carotid surgery as updating of "Stroke: Italian guidelines for Prevention and Treatment" of the ISO-SPREAD Italian Stroke Organization-Group, has recently been published in the National Guideline System and shared with the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE) and other Scientific Societies and Patient's Association. METHODS GRADE-SIGN version, AGREE quality of reporting checklist. Clinical questions formulated according to the PICO model. Recommendations developed based on clinical questions by a multidisciplinary experts' panel and patients' representatives. Systematic reviews performed for each PICO question. Considered judgements filled by assessing the evidence level, direction, and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS The panel provided indications and recommendations for appropriate, comprehensive, and individualized management of patients with carotid stenosis. Diagnostic and therapeutic processes of the best medical therapy, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid stenting (CAS) according to the evidences and the judged opinions were included. Symptomatic carotid stenosis in elective and emergency, asymptomatic carotid stenosis, association with ischemic heart disease, preoperative diagnostics, types of anesthesia, monitoring in case of CEA, CEA techniques, comparison between CEA and CAS, post-surgical carotid restenosis, and medical therapy are the main topics, even with analysis of uncertainty areas for risk-benefit assessments in the individual patient (personalized medicine [PM]). CONCLUSIONS This GL updates on the main recommendations for the most appropriate diagnostic and medical-surgical management of patients with atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis to prevent ischemic stroke. This GL also provides useful elements for the application of PM in good clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Lanza
- Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS MultiMedica, Castellanza Hospital, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Orso
- Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Umbria and Marche, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Alba
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Sergio Bevilacqua
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesia and Resuscitation, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Capoccia
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cappelli
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Carrafiello
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Cernetti
- Department of Cardiology and Hemodynamics, San Giacomo Apostolo Hospital, Castelfranco Veneto, Treviso, Italy
- Cardiology and Hemodynamics Unit, Ca' Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Marina Diomedi
- Stroke Unit, Tor Vergata Polyclinic Hospital, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Walter Dorigo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi Polyclinic Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gianluca Faggioli
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Alma Mater Studiorum University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vanni Giannace
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - David Giannandrea
- Department of Neurology, USL Umbria 1, Hospitals of Gubbio, Gualdo Tadino and Città di Castello, Perugia, Italy
| | - Matteo Giannetta
- Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Donato Hospitals, San Donato Polyclinic Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Jessica Lanza
- Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy -
| | - Gianfranco Lessiani
- Unit of Vascular Medicine and Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine, Villa Serena Hospital, Città Sant'Angelo, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Enrico M Marone
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Daniela Mazzaccaro
- Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Donato Hospitals, San Donato Polyclinic Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rino Migliacci
- Department of Internal Medicine, Valdichiana S. Margherita Hospital, USL Toscana Sud-Est, Cortona, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Nano
- Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Donato Hospitals, San Donato Polyclinic Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Pagliariccio
- Department of Emergency Vascular Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Plutino
- Stroke Unit, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Ancona, Italy
| | - Sara Pomatto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Sant'Orsola Malpighi Polyclinic Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Raffaele Pulli
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | | | - Pasqualino Sirignano
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Ticozzelli
- First Department of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Vacirca
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), IRCSS Sant'Orsola Polyclinic Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Emanuele Visco
- Department of Cardiology and Hemodynamics, San Giacomo Apostolo Hospital, Castelfranco Veneto, Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patient-Tailored Stenting versus Endarterectomy for the Treatment of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12060882. [PMID: 35743667 PMCID: PMC9224726 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Carotid artery stenosis is a major cause of acute ischemic strokes in adults. Given the consequences and sequelae of an acute ischemic stroke, intervention while patients are still asymptomatic is a key opportunity for stroke prevention. Although carotid endarterectomy has been the gold standard of treatment for carotid stenosis for many years, recent advances in carotid stenting technology, practitioner experience, and dual antiplatelet therapy have expanded the use for treatments other than endarterectomy. Review of the current literature has demonstrated that endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting produce overall similar results for the treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis, but certain factors may help guide physicians and patients in choosing one treatment over the other. Age 70 years and older, renal disease, poor medication compliance, and unstable plaque features all portend better outcomes from endarterectomy, whereas age under 70 years, high cervical location of disease, cardiac disease, and reliable medication compliance favor stenting. The decision to pursue endarterectomy versus stenting is therefore complex, and although large studies have demonstrated similar outcomes, the approach to treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis must be optimized for each individual patient to achieve the best possible outcome.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pryamikov AD, Mironkov AB, Loluev RY, Khripun AI. [Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in advanced age patients]. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEĬROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2021; 85:113-117. [PMID: 33560627 DOI: 10.17116/neiro202185011113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The manuscript is devoted to world experience of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in advanced age patients. Some authors report the advantages of endovascular surgery in elderly patients while the others prefer carotid endarterectomy. Senile patients (75-80 years old) with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis is one of the most difficult group for the management. This is due to a more complex assessment of perioperative surgical risk, high incidence of complicated atherosclerotic plaques in carotid arteries and dubious benefits of surgery considering short life expectancy and severe comorbidities. Accumulation of experience in the management of advanced age patients should be valuable for either optimizing or individualizing surgical strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Pryamikov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Buyanov Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - A B Mironkov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Buyanov Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - R Yu Loluev
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A I Khripun
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Geus SW, Farber A, Levin S, Carlson SJ, Cheng TW, Tseng JF, Siracuse JJ. Perioperative Outcomes of Carotid Interventions in Octogenarians. Ann Vasc Surg 2020; 68:15-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.05.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
7
|
Qin LW, Qin LH, Yu Y, Hou XW, Wang C, Weeks C. Impact of early diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis by carotid ultrasound: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19709. [PMID: 32481359 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of carotid ultrasound (CU) for early diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis (CAS). METHODS Literatures will be sought from the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PSYCINFO, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The search will cover from the start of indexing to the present without any limitations of language and publication status. All study quality will be assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, and data will be analyzed by RevMan V.5.3 software and Stata V.12.0 software. RESULTS This study will investigate the impact of CU for early diagnosis of CAS through sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio. CONCLUSION The findings of this study may provide helpful evidence for the impact of CU for early diagnosis of CAS. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019153904.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xin-Wei Hou
- School of Clinical Medicine, Jiamusi University
| | - Chen Wang
- Second Ward of Neurology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thirty-Day Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting in Elderly Patients: A Single-Center Experience. World Neurosurg 2020; 138:e311-e316. [PMID: 32112939 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in elderly patients is controversial. The aims of this study were to evaluate 30-day outcomes after CAS in elderly patients (≥70 years old) and to investigate risk factors for postoperative incidence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) to improve CAS safety based on clinical evidence in this specific subgroup of patients. METHODS The data set included patients who underwent CAS between 2001 and 2017 at Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University. The primary outcome variable was 30-day postoperative incidence of the following MACE: death, myocardial infarction, and ipsilateral stroke. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify high-risk patients and procedural characteristics associated with MACE. RESULTS A total of 1029 elderly patients who underwent CAS for carotid artery stenosis were identified and analyzed. The incidence of postoperative MACE was 3.01% (n = 31 cases [5 deaths, 24 strokes, and 2 myocardial infarctions]). After multivariate analysis, independent predictors of MACE included a family history of stroke (odds ratio [OR] = 3.817; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.227-11.876; P = 0.021), symptomatic status (OR = 2.650; 95% CI, 1.210-5.806; P = 0.015), and modified Rankin Scale score ≥3 (OR = 4.594; 95% CI, 1.708-12.352; P = 0.003). Hyperlipidemia was not an independent risk factor (OR = 1.597; 95% CI, 0.745-3.425; P = 0.229). CONCLUSIONS At our center, CAS was safely performed in elderly patients. A family history of stroke, symptomatic status, and modified Rankin Scale score ≥3 indicating a neurologic deficit increased the risk of 30-day postoperative MACE.
Collapse
|
9
|
Synchronous Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft versus Staged Carotid Artery Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft for Patients with Concomitant Severe Coronary and Carotid Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2020; 62:463-473.e4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2019] [Revised: 06/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
10
|
Carotid artery stenting outcomes in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70:1725-1726. [PMID: 31653387 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
11
|
Tzoumas A, Giannopoulos S, Texakalidis P, Charisis N, Machinis T, Koullias GJ. Synchronous versus Staged Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft for Patients with Concomitant Severe Coronary and Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 63:427-438.e1. [PMID: 31629126 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the systemic nature of atherosclerosis, arteries at different sites are commonly simultaneously affected. As a result, severe coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) frequently coexists with significant carotid stenosis that warrants revascularization. To compare simultaneous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and CABG versus staged CEA and CABG for patients with concomitant CAD and carotid artery stenosis in terms of perioperative outcomes. METHODS This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I2 statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. RESULTS Eleven studies comprising 44,895 patients were included in this meta-analysis (21,710 in the synchronous group and 23,185 patients in the staged group). The synchronous CEA and CABG group had a statistically significant lower risk for myocardial infarction (MI) (odds ratio [OR] 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.61, I2 = 0%) and higher risk for stroke (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.34-1.71, I2 = 0%) and death (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.75, I2 = 47.8%). Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00-1.61, I2 = 0.0%), postoperative bleeding (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.22-3.05, I2 = 0.0%), and pulmonary complications (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.24-9.60, I2 = 67.5%) were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients in the simultaneous CEA and CABG group had a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality and stroke and lower risk for MI as compared to staged CEA and CABG group. The rates of TIA, postoperative bleeding, and pulmonary complications were similar between the 2 groups. Future randomized trials or prospective cohorts are needed to validate our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Tzoumas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Pavlos Texakalidis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Nektarios Charisis
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY
| | - Theofilos Machinis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - George J Koullias
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY
| |
Collapse
|