1
|
Rana P, Brennan J, Johnson A, Patton CM, Turcotte JJ. Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Hospital Outpatient Versus Ambulatory Surgery Center Lumbar Decompression Surgery. Global Spine J 2024:21925682241290171. [PMID: 39370415 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241290171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Chart Review. OBJECTIVES Outpatient spinal surgeries in Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) have gained traction due to their potential cost efficiencies and improved perioperative processes. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness and patient outcomes of lumbar laminectomies performed in hospital settings vs ASCs. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 771 patients who underwent 1 or 2-level outpatient laminectomy between 2019 and 2023. Patient demographics, 90-day and one-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and one-year episode of care costs were evaluated. A one-year cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the EQ-5D to measure quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS ASC patients demonstrated lower body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, with a higher prevalence of 1-level laminectomies compared to hospital patients. ASC-based laminectomy was associated with lower initial surgery cost and one-year episode of care costs ($5662 ± 4748 vs $10229 ± 9202, P < 0.001), with similar rates of complications and postoperative resource utilization. These trends remained after controlling for patient demographics, comorbidities, and number of levels treated. In patients completing baseline and 1-year EQ-5D scores, ASC-based laminectomy was over twice as cost-effective as hospital procedures ($64873/QALY gained vs $152630). CONCLUSIONS The findings support the safety and one-year cost effectiveness of ASCs for appropriately selected patient populations undergoing lumbar laminectomy. Additional studies are needed to replicate these findings across institutions, and to assess the cost effectiveness of ASC-based laminectomy beyond one-year postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parimal Rana
- Luminis Health Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Jane Brennan
- Luminis Health Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Andrea Johnson
- Luminis Health Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Chad M Patton
- Luminis Health Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Justin J Turcotte
- Luminis Health Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schönnagel L, Tani S, Vu-Han TL, Zhu J, Camino-Willhuber G, Dodo Y, Caffard T, Chiapparelli E, Oezel L, Shue J, Zelenty WD, Lebl DR, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Sokunbi G, Hughes AP, Sama AA. Predicting conversion of ambulatory ACDF patients to inpatient: a machine learning approach. Spine J 2024; 24:563-571. [PMID: 37980960 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Machine learning is a powerful tool that has become increasingly important in the orthopedic field. Recently, several studies have reported that predictive models could provide new insights into patient risk factors and outcomes. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common operation that is performed as an outpatient procedure. However, some patients are required to convert to inpatient status and prolonged hospitalization due to their condition. Appropriate patient selection and identification of risk factors for conversion could provide benefits to patients and the use of medical resources. PURPOSE This study aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm to identify risk factors associated with unplanned conversion from outpatient to inpatient status for ACDF patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This is a machine-learning-based analysis using retrospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF in an ambulatory setting at a single specialized orthopedic hospital between February 2016 to December 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES Length of stay, conversion rates from ambulatory setting to inpatient. METHODS Patients were divided into two groups based on length of stay: (1) Ambulatory (discharge within 24 hours) or Extended Stay (greater than 24 hours but fewer than 48 hours), and (2) Inpatient (greater than 48 hours). Factors included in the model were based on literature review and clinical expertise. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative factors, such as surgery duration and time, were included. We compared the performance of different machine learning algorithms: Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). We split the patient data into a training and validation dataset using a 70/30 split. The different models were trained in the training dataset using cross-validation. The performance was then tested in the unseen validation set. This step is important to detect overfitting. The performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROC) as the primary outcome. An AUC of 0.7 was considered fair, 0.8 good, and 0.9 excellent, according to established cut-offs. RESULTS A total of 581 patients (59% female) were available for analysis. Of those, 140 (24.1%) were converted to inpatient status. The median age was 51 (IQR 44-59), and the median BMI was 28 kg/m2 (IQR 24-32). The XGBoost model showed the best performance with an AUC of 0.79. The most important features were the length of the operation, followed by sex (based on biological attributes), age, and operation start time. The logistic regression model and the SVM showed worse results, with an AUC of 0.71 each. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a novel approach to predicting conversion to inpatient status in eligible patients for ambulatory surgery. The XGBoost model showed good predictive capabilities, superior to the older machine learning approaches. This model also revealed the importance of surgical duration time, BMI, and age as risk factors for patient conversion. A developing field of study is using machine learning in clinical decision-making. Our findings contribute to this field by demonstrating the feasibility and accuracy of such methods in predicting outcomes and identifying risk factors, although external and multi-center validation studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schönnagel
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA; Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Soji Tani
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan
| | - Tu-Lan Vu-Han
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jiaqi Zhu
- Biostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, 541 E. 71st Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Gaston Camino-Willhuber
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Yusuke Dodo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan
| | - Thomas Caffard
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Erika Chiapparelli
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Lisa Oezel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Jennifer Shue
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - William D Zelenty
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Darren R Lebl
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Frank P Cammisa
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Federico P Girardi
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Gbolabo Sokunbi
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Alexander P Hughes
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Andrew A Sama
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amen TB, Song J, Mai E, Rudisill SS, Bovonratwet P, Subramanian T, Kaidi AK, Maayan O, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Unplanned readmissions following ambulatory spine surgery: assessing common reasons and risk factors. Spine J 2023; 23:1848-1857. [PMID: 37716549 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Although outpatient spine surgery is becoming increasingly popular in the United States, unplanned readmission following outpatient surgery remains a significant postoperative concern. PURPOSE This study aimed to (1) describe the incidence and timing of 30-day unplanned readmission after ambulatory lumbar and cervical spine surgery (2) evaluate the common reasons for readmission, and (3) identify factors associated with readmission in this population. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent ambulatory cervical or lumbar spine surgery between 2015 and 2020 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. OUTCOME MEASURES Hospital readmission within 30 postoperative days. METHODS Patients who underwent ambulatory cervical or lumbar spine surgery between 2015 and 2020 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Reasons for and timing of unplanned readmissions were recorded. Multivariable poisson regressions were employed to determine any independent predictors of readmission. RESULTS A total of 33,092 ambulatory cervical and 68,115 ambulatory lumbar spine surgery patients were identified. Incidences of 30-day readmission were 3.37% and 3.07% among cervical and lumbar patients, respectively. The most common surgical site-related reasons for readmission included uncontrolled pain, recurrence of disc herniation or major symptom, and postoperative hematoma/seroma. Common nonsurgical site-related reasons included gastrointestinal, neurological, and cardiovascular complications. Factors associated with readmission among cervical patients included age ≥55, BMI ≥35, functional dependence, diabetes, smoking, COPD, and steroid use, whereas factors associated with readmission following lumbar spine surgery included age ≥65, female sex, BMI ≥35, functional dependence, ASA ≥3, diabetes, smoking, COPD, and hypertension (p<.05 for all). CONCLUSION This study highlights the common reasons and factors associated with unplanned readmission following ambulatory spine surgery. Consideration of these factors may be critical to ensuring appropriate patient selection for ambulatory spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troy B Amen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Junho Song
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Mai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel S Rudisill
- Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Patawut Bovonratwet
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Austin K Kaidi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Omri Maayan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khalid SI, Mirpuri P, Thomson K, Elsamadicy A, Massaad E, Deysher D, Khilwani H, Adogwa O, Shin JH, Mehta AI. Outcomes Following 2-Level Cervical Interventions with Cage-and-Plate, Zero-Profile, or Arthroplasty Constructs. World Neurosurg 2023; 180:e607-e617. [PMID: 37797683 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Though cage-and-plate constructs are widely used for disk height restoration in surgery for cervical disc disease, concerns over range of motion limitations and adjacent disc space violations have fueled the development of artificial disc and zero-profile constructs. This study investigated the outcomes of patients undergoing two-level cervical interventions via arthroplasty, cage-and-plate, or zero-profile constructs. METHODS Patients undergoing two-level anterior cervical procedures between 2010 and 2020 were identified using an all-payer claims database. Logistic regression models were utilized to develop criteria for a 1:1:1-exact match procedure. The primary outcome was the need for additional surgery within 30 months, and the secondary outcomes included medical and surgical complications observed within 30 days of index intervention. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS 133,831 patients were identified as undergoing two-level anterior cervical interventions. Seven thousand three hundred seventy-one records were analyzed through a 1:1:1 match. Patients who received zero-profile versus cage-and-plate constructs had significantly decreased odds of requiring additional surgery within 30 months (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.64; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.51-0.81). However, postoperative medical complications were increased among patients who received zero-profile constructs compared to cage-and-plate (OR 1.59; 95%CI 1.07-2.37). Patients who underwent arthroplasty also had decreased odds for additional surgery versus cage-and-plate (OR 0.75; 95%CI 0.60-0.93). There was no significant difference between arthroplasty and cage-and-plate constructs in developing postoperative surgical or medical complications. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing two-level interventions, cage-and-plate constructs were associated with increased odds of additional surgery within 30 months following index procedures when compared to zero-profile constructs or arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed I Khalid
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | - Pranav Mirpuri
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin School of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kyle Thomson
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin School of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Aladine Elsamadicy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Elie Massaad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel Deysher
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Harsh Khilwani
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Owoicho Adogwa
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - John H Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ankit I Mehta
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tani S, Okano I, Dodo Y, Camino-Willhuber G, Caffard T, Schönnagel L, Chiapparelli E, Amoroso K, Tripathi V, Arzani A, Oezel L, Shue J, Zelenty WD, Lebl DR, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP, Sokunbi G, Sama AA. Risk Factors for Unexpected Conversion From Ambulatory to Inpatient Admission Among One-level or Two-level ACDF Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1427-1435. [PMID: 37389987 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING A retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the conversion of patient status from ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to inpatient. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Surgeries are increasingly performed in an ambulatory setting in an era of rising healthcare costs and pressure to improve patient satisfaction. ACDF is a common ambulatory cervical spine surgery, however, there are certain patients who are unexpectedly converted from an outpatient procedure to inpatient admission and little is known about the risk factors for conversion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent one-level or two-level ACDF in an ambulatory setting at a single specialized orthopedic hospital between February 2016 to December 2021 were included. Baseline demographics, surgical information, complications, and conversion reasons were compared between patients with ambulatory surgery or observational stay (stay <48 h) and inpatient (stay >48 h). RESULTS In total, 662 patients underwent one-level or two-level ACDF (median age, 52 yr; 59.5% were male), 494 (74.6%) patients were discharged within 48 hours and 168 (25.4%) patients converted to inpatient. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that females, low body mass index <25, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA) ≥3, long operation, high estimated blood loss, upper-level surgery, two-level fusion, late operation start time, and high postoperative pain score were considered independent risk factors for conversion to inpatient. Pain management was the most common reason for the conversion (80.0%). Ten patients (1.5%) needed reintubation or remained intubated for airway management. CONCLUSIONS Several independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay after ambulatory ACDF surgery were identified. Although some factors are unmodifiable, other factors, such as procedure duration, operation start time, and blood loss could be potential targets for intervention. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for life-threatening airway complications in ambulatory-scheduled ACDF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soji Tani
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Okano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Dodo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Thomas Caffard
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lukas Schönnagel
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Krizia Amoroso
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Vidushi Tripathi
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Artine Arzani
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Lisa Oezel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Jennifer Shue
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Darren R Lebl
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Frank P Cammisa
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Gbolabo Sokunbi
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Andrew A Sama
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gowd AK, Agarwalla A, Beck EC, Derman PB, Yasmeh S, Albert TJ, Liu JN. Prediction of Admission Costs Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Utilizing Machine Learning. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1549-1557. [PMID: 36301923 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE Predict cost following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) within the 90-day global period using machine learning models. BACKGROUND The incidence of ACDF has been increasing with a disproportionate decrease in reimbursement. As bundled payment models become common, it is imperative to identify factors that impact the cost of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was accessed in 2018 for all primary ACDFs by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) procedure codes. Costs were calculated by utilizing the total hospital charge and each hospital's cost-to-charge ratio. Hospital characteristics, such as volume of procedures performed and wage index, were also queried. Readmissions within 90 days were identified, and cost of readmissions was added to the total admission cost to represent the 90-day healthcare cost. Machine learning algorithms were used to predict patients with 90-day admission costs >1 SD from the mean. RESULTS There were 42,485 procedures included in this investigation with an average age of 57.7±12.3 years with 50.6% males. The average cost of the operative admission was $24,874±25,610, the average cost of readmission was $25,371±11,476, and the average total cost was $26,977±28,947 including readmissions costs. There were 10,624 patients who were categorized as high cost. Wage index, hospital volume, age, and diagnosis-related group severity were most correlated with the total cost of care. Gradient boosting trees algorithm was most predictive of the total cost of care (area under the curve=0.86). CONCLUSIONS Bundled payment models utilize wage index and diagnosis-related groups to determine reimbursement of ACDF. However, machine learning algorithms identified additional variables, such as hospital volume, readmission, and patient age, that are also important for determining the cost of care. Machine learning can improve cost-effectiveness and reduce the financial burden placed upon physicians and hospitals by implementing patient-specific reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirudh K Gowd
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Avinesh Agarwalla
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
| | - Edward C Beck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Siamak Yasmeh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Todd J Albert
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Joseph N Liu
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine, Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carlson BC, Dawson JM, Beauchamp EC, Mehbod AA, Mueller B, Alcala C, Mullaney KJ, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Schwender JD, Shafa E, Transfeldt EE, Garvey TA. Choose Wisely: Surgical Selection of Candidates for Outpatient Anterior Cervical Surgery Based on Early Complications Among Inpatients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:1830-1840. [PMID: 35869896 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.01356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are attractive targets for transition to the outpatient setting. We assessed the prevalence of rapid responses and major complications in the inpatient setting following 1 or 2-level ACDFs and CDAs. We evaluated factors that may place patients at greater risk for a rapid response or a postoperative complication. METHODS This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing 1 or 2-level ACDF or CDA at 1 hospital over a 2-year period (2018 and 2019). Data on patient demographic characteristics, surgical procedures, and comorbidities were collected. Rapid response events were identified by hospital floor staff and involved acute changes in a patient's clinical condition. Complications were events that were life-threatening, required an intervention, or led to delayed hospital discharge. RESULTS In this study, 1,040 patients were included: 888 underwent ACDF and 152 underwent CDA. Thirty-six patients (3.5%) experienced a rapid response event; 22% occurred >24 hours after extubation. Patients having a rapid response event had a significantly higher risk of developing a complication (risk ratio, 10; p < 0.01) and had a significantly longer hospital stay. Twenty-four patients (2.3%) experienced acute complications; 71% occurred >6 hours after extubation. Patients with a complication were older and more likely to be current or former smokers, have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, have asthma, and have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of >2. The length of the surgical procedure was significantly longer in patients who developed a complication. All patients who developed dysphagia had a surgical procedure involving C4-C5 or more cephalad. Patients with a rapid response event or complication were more commonly undergoing revision surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS Rapid response and complications are uncommon following 1 or 2-level ACDFs or CDAs but portend a longer hospital stay and increased morbidity. Revision surgical procedures place patients at higher risk for rapid responses and complications. Additionally, older patients, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, patients who are current or former smokers, and patients who have an ASA score of ≥3 are at increased risk for postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kamalapathy PN, Bell J, Chen D, Raso J, Hassanzadeh H. Propensity Scored Analysis of Outpatient Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: No Increased Complications. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:E320-E326. [PMID: 34740230 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The aim were to (1) evaluate differences in postoperative outcomes and cost associated with outpatient anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) compared with inpatient ALIF, and to (2) identify independent factors contributing to complications after outpatient ALIF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND While lumbar fusion is traditionally performed inpatient, outpatient spinal surgery is becoming more commonplace as surgical techniques improve. METHODS The study population included all patients below 85 years of age who underwent elective ALIF (CPT-22558). Patients were then divided into those who underwent single-level fusion and multilevel fusion using the corresponding additional level fusion codes (CPT-22585). These resulting populations were then split into outpatient and inpatient cohorts by using a service location modifier. To account for selection bias, propensity score matching was performed; the inpatient cohorts were matched with respect to the outpatient cohorts based on age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05 and the Bonferroni correction was used for each multiple comparison (P<0.004). RESULTS Patients undergoing outpatient procedure had decreased rates of medical complications following both single-level and multilevel ALIF. In addition, age above 60, female sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index>3, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and tobacco use were all identified as independent risk factors for increased complications. Finally, the cost of outpatient ALIF was $12,013 while the cost of inpatient ALIF was $27,271 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION The findings add to the growing body of literature advocating for the utilization of ALIF in the outpatient setting for a properly selected group of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
|
9
|
Couch BK, Wawrose RA, LeVasseur CM, Pitcairn SW, Shaw JD, Donaldson WF, Lee JY, Anderst WJ. Residual Motion and Graft Type Do Not Influence Patient-reported Outcomes Following One- or Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:E817-E825. [PMID: 34228692 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the effect of graft type on residual motion and the relationship among residual motion, smoking, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although most patients develop solid fusion based on static imaging following ACDF, dynamic imaging has revealed that many patients continue to have residual motion at the arthrodesis. METHODS Forty-eight participants performed dynamic neck flexion/extension and axial rotation within a biplane radiography system 1 year following ACDF (21 one-level, 27 two-level). PRO scores included the Short Form-36, Neck Disability Index, and Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire. An automated model-based tracking process matched subject-specific bone models to the biplane radiographs with sub-millimeter accuracy. Residual motion was measured across the entire arthrodesis site for both one- and two-level fusions in patients who received either allograft or autograft. Patients were divided into "pseudarthrosis" (>3° of flexion/extension residual motion) and "solid fusion" groups. Residual motion and PROs were compared between groups using Student t tests. RESULTS Patients who received allograft showed more total flexion/extension residual motion (4.1° vs. 2.8°, P = 0.12), although this failed to reach significance. No differences were noted in PROs based on graft type (all P > 0.08) or the presence of pseudarthrosis (all P > 0.13). No differences were noted in residual motion between smokers and nonsmokers (all P > 0.15); however, smokers who received allograft reported worse outcomes than nonsmokers who received allograft and smokers who received autograft. CONCLUSION Allograft may result in slightly more residual motion at the arthrodesis site 1 year after ACDF. However, there is minimal evidence that PROs are adversely affected by slightly increased residual motion, suggesting that the current definition of pseudarthrosis correlates poorly with clinically significant findings. Additionally, autograft appears to result in superior outcomes in patients who smoke.Level of Evidence: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon K Couch
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Epstein N. Perspective on morbidity and mortality of cervical surgery performed in outpatient/same day/ambulatory surgicenters versus inpatient facilities. Surg Neurol Int 2021; 12:349. [PMID: 34345489 PMCID: PMC8326133 DOI: 10.25259/sni_509_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This is an updated analysis of the morbidity and mortality of cervical surgery performed in outpatient/same day (OSD) (Postoperative care unit [PACU] observation 4–6 h), and ambulatory surgicenters (ASC: PACU 23 h) versus inpatient facilities (IF). Methods: We analyzed 19 predominantly level III (retrospective) and IV (case series) studies regarding the morbidity/mortality of cervical surgery performed in OSC/ASC versus IF. Results: A “selection bias” clearly favored operating on younger/healthier patients to undergo cervical surgery in OSD/ASC centers resulting in better outcomes. Alternatively, those selected for cervical procedures to be performed in IF classically demonstrated multiple major comorbidities (i.e. advanced age, diabetes, high body mass index, severe myelopathy, smoking, 3–4 level disease, and other comorbidities) and had poorer outcomes. Further, within the typical 4–6 h. PACU “observation window,” OSD facilities “picked up” most major postoperative complications, and typically showed 0% mortality rates. Nevertheless, the author’s review of 2 wrongful death suits (i.e. prior to 2018) arising from OSD ACDF cervical surgery demonstrated that there are probably many more mortalities occurring following discharges from OSD where cervical operations are being performed that are going underreported/unreported. Conclusion: “Selection bias” favors choosing younger/healthier patients to undergoing cervical surgery in OSD/ ASC facilities resulting in better outcomes. Atlernatively, choosing older patients with greater comorbidities for IF surgery correlated with poorer results. Although most OSD cervical series report 0% mortality rates, a review of 2 wrongful death suits by just one neurosurgeon prior to 2018 showed there are probably many more mortalities resulting from OSD cervical surgery than have been reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Epstein
- Clinical Prof. of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY, and c/o Dr. Marc Aglulnick, 1122 Franklin Avenue Suite 106, Garden City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Foley C, Kendall MC, Apruzzese P, De Oliveira GS. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification as a reliable predictor of postoperative medical complications and mortality following ambulatory surgery: an analysis of 2,089,830 ACS-NSQIP outpatient cases. BMC Surg 2021; 21:253. [PMID: 34020623 PMCID: PMC8140433 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01256-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Seventy percent of surgical procedures are currently performed in the outpatient setting. Although the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification ability to predict risk has been evaluated for in-patient surgeries, an evaluation in outpatient surgeries has yet to be performed. The major goal of the current study is to determine if the ASA classification is an independent predictor for morbidity and mortality for outpatient surgeries. METHODS The 2005 through 2016 NSQIP Participant Use Data Files were queried to extract all patients scheduled for outpatient surgery. ASA PS class was the primary independent variable of interest. The primary outcome was 30-day medical complications, defined as having one or more of the following postoperative outcomes: (1) deep vein thrombosis, (2) pulmonary embolism, (3) reintubation, (4) failure to wean from ventilator, (5) renal insufficiency, (6) renal failure, (7) stroke, (8) cardiac arrest, (9) myocardial infarction, (10) pneumonia, (11) urinary tract infection, (12) systemic sepsis or septic shock. Mortality was also evaluated as a separate outcome. RESULTS A total of 2,089,830 cases were included in the study. 24,777 (1.19%) patients had medical complications and 1,701 (0.08%) died within 30 days. ASA PS IV patients had a much greater chance of dying when compared to healthy patients, OR (95%CI) of 89 (55 to 143), P < 0.001. Nonetheless, over 30,000 ASA PS IV patients had surgery in the outpatient setting. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a stepwise independent association between ASA PS class and medical complications (C statistic = 0.70), mortality (C statistic = 0.74) and readmissions (C statistic = 0.67). Risk stratifying ability was maintained across surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques. CONCLUSIONS ASA PS class is a simple risk stratification tool for surgeries in the outpatient setting. Patients with higher ASA PS classes subsequently developed medical complications or mortality at a greater frequency than patients with lower ASA PS class after outpatient surgery. Our results suggest that the ambulatory setting may not be able to match the needs of high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Foley
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Davol #129, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Mark C Kendall
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Davol #129, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
| | - Patricia Apruzzese
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Gildasio S De Oliveira
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Davol #129, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hospital use following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 89:128-132. [PMID: 34119255 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Most existing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) outcome studies omit emergency department (ED) use. To our knowledge, this study on ED use following ACDF surgery is the first to use a direct patient chart review and the first to include revision patients, 1-5 levels of ACDFs, and performance of corpectomy in the analysis. This study examines the frequency and basis of hospital service use within 30 days of ACDF surgery, specifically ED visits, hospital readmissions, and returns to the operating room. A retrospective chart review was performed for 1273 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF surgery at one institution from July 2013 to June 2016. Of the 1273 patients with ACDF, 97 (7.6%) presented to the ED within 30 days after surgery. Of 43 patients with revision ACDF, 9 (20.9%) returned to the ED, compared with 88 (7.2%) of 1230 patients with primary ACDF (P = 0.001). Of the 111 ED visits by 97 patients, 40 (36%) were for cervicalgia, 13 (12%) were for dysphagia, 8 (7%) were for trauma, 7 (6%) were for nausea, 4 (4%) were for medication refill, 3 (3%) were for dehiscence, 3 (3%) were for pneumonia, and 3 (3%) were for urinary tract infection. Of the ED presentations, 8 (7%) occurred during the first 2 days after surgery, and 46 (41%) occurred within the first postoperative week.
Collapse
|
13
|
Gerling MC, Hale SD, White-Dzuro C, Pierce KE, Naessig SA, Ahmad W, Passias PG. Ambulatory spine surgery. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2019; 5:S147-S153. [PMID: 31656868 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Gerling
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven D Hale
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire White-Dzuro
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara A Naessig
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|