Anatomical Fat Grafting for Reconstruction of Frontotemporal Contour Deformities After Neurosurgical and Craniofacial Surgical Interventions: A Symmetry Outcome Study

Skeletal and Soft Tissue Surgeries in the Long-term Management of Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A 20-Year Review

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue procedures are often crucial for normalizing the long-term facial appearance in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis, yet they are underrepresented in the literature and existing treatment algorithms. This study evaluated secondary soft tissue surgeries in relation to skeletal operations in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review evaluated patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated at a tertiary children's hospital from 2003 to 2023. Craniofacial skeletal and soft tissue procedures were assessed for timing and frequency. Skeletal surgeries included redo fronto-orbital advancements, monobloc advancement/distraction ± facial bipartition, and LeFort III or III/I advancement/distraction. Soft tissue surgeries encompassed oculoplastic procedures, scalp reconstruction, fat grafting, and septorhinoplasty.

RESULTS

Of 106 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis, 57 (57.8%) underwent ≥1 secondary skeletal operation, and 101 (95.3%) underwent ≥1 soft tissue procedures, averaging 3.7 ± 3.3 soft tissue procedures per patient. Patients who underwent secondary forehead advancement had significantly higher rates of subsequent lateral canthopexy (71.4% vs 25.6, P < 0.001), ptosis reconstruction (17.9% vs 7.7%, P = 0.025), and frontotemporal fat grafting (50.0% vs 15.4%, P < 0.001) than those who did not. Patients who underwent midface advancement surgery had significantly higher rates of subsequent lateral canthopexy (65.4% vs 11.1%, P < 0.001), medial canthopexy (7.7% vs 0.0%, P = 0.038), scalp reconstruction (36.5% vs 16.7%, P = 0.020), frontotemporal fat grafting (34.6% vs 14.8%, P = 0.018), malar fat grafting (11.5% vs 0.0%, P = 0.010), and septorhinoplasty (26.9% vs 1.9%, P < 0.001) than those who did not. Specifically, LeFort III or III/I advancement/distractions were significantly associated with higher rates of subsequent septorhinoplasties (33.3% vs 1.6%, P < 0.001). The mean follow-up was 10.2 ± 7.0 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed an intricate interplay between skeletal and soft tissue surgery in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Exploring techniques to reduce the need for further corrective surgery and anticipating necessary secondary interventions may improve patient counseling and outcomes.

Quantifying outcomes of autologous fat transplantation in different facial deformities: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autologous fat transplantation has become a common treatment for facial deformities. However, facial deformities are the result of complex diseases with different causes, and there has been no review on the effectiveness of autologous fat transplantation for facial deformities of different aetiologies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Web of Science, Embase, and Medline Ovid databases was performed up to December 2022. Two investigators independently performed screening and data extraction according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, followed by a meta-analysis using random-effects model for surgeon and patient satisfaction, facial symmetry, and complication rates. Twelve-month postoperative fat graft retention was estimated by meta-regression.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the criteria, including 13 case series studies, 14 cohort studies, and four randomized clinical trials, with a total of 1572 patients. Follow-up visits within 6-12 months were performed in most of the studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed high overall surgeon satisfaction of 97% (95% CI: 92%-100%) and patient satisfaction of 95% (95% CI: 89%-99%), with a low complication rate of 3.4% (95% CI: 1.9%-5.9%). At 12 months postoperatively, a lower retention rate of 43% (95% CI: 28%-58%) was estimated in cases of acquired atrophic deformities compared with 64% (95% CI: 57%-71%) in cases of mixed deformities. Overall, autologous fat transplantation improved facial symmetry by 13% (95% CI: 8.4%-18%).

CONCLUSION

Autologous fat transplantation is generally a safe and effective procedure that can compensate for facial volume deficits and improve facial symmetry but may be less effective in cases of acquired atrophic facial deformities.

Aesthetic Effect of Autologous Fat Transplantation on Frontotemporal Depression Filling and Its Influence on SCL-90 and SES of Patients

Objectives

This study aimed to study the aesthetic effect of autologous fat transplantation in frontotemporal depression filling as well as the influence on the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES) score of patients.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with frontotemporal depression admitted to the outpatient department of burn and plastic surgery in our hospital were selected as the observation group, and all of them received autologous fat transplantation. The filling effect of patients in the observation group was discussed. Simultaneously, 50 volunteers were selected as the control group to compare the SCL-90 and SES scores of the observation group and the control group.

Result

① A total of 100 patients with frontotemporal depression were treated with autologous fat transplantation, and the secondary autologous fat transplantation rate was 10%; two cases of fat absorption occurred during the 12-month follow-up after surgery; on the 7th day, 6 months, and 12 months after the operation, the satisfaction rate of the patients who visited the doctor was 96.00%, 97%, and 92.00%; the satisfaction rate of the plastic surgeon was 94.00%, 96%, and 90.00%; the satisfaction rate of the third party was 96.00%, 98%, and 92.00%. ② The preoperative scores of somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, terror, paranoia, and psychotic factor scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, terror, paranoia, and psychotic factor scores in the observation group at 6 months after the operation were lower than those before operation (P < 0.05). The preoperative SES score of the observation group (28.51 ± 9.81) was significantly lower than that of the control group (32.47 ± 5.39) (P < 0.05). The SES score (34.17 ± 9.81) in the observation group at 6 months after the operation was significantly higher than that before the operation (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The aesthetic effect of autologous fat transplantation in frontotemporal depression filling is good and safe. Simultaneously, it can improve the mental health and self-esteem of patients and has high clinical value.

Correction of temporal hollowing after pterional craniotomy by autologous fat grafting. A single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Aesthetic complications following neurosurgical procedures impact patient quality of life and self-perception. Postoperative temporal hollowing is frequently seen after temporal craniotomy, resulting mainly from atrophy of the temporal muscle. Autologous fat grafting is a tailorable method to correct such approach-related sequelae. We herein present our clinical patient series and discuss pearls and pitfalls of this method.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, correction of postoperative temporal hollowing using autologous fat grafting was performed in 16 patients. Temporal tissue thickness ratio was measured using magnetic resonance tomography images to visualize the graft. Patients, plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons evaluated the results independently using the herein presented scale.

RESULTS

The mean interval between the neurosurgical procedure and fat grafting was 62 months. A mean volume of 11.5 ml autologous fat was injected in an average of 2.5 sessions after initial rigotomy. Temporal tissue thickness was significantly augmented at a mean of 2.2 years after the operation (mean 0.71 ± 0.25, range 0.43-1.1; p=0.0214) as compared to the preoperative finding (mean 0.48 ± 0.1, range 0.32-0.6). Patients were more satisfied with the results than were surgeons, reflecting the significant impact of the deformity on patient self-esteem.

CONCLUSIONS

Autologous fat grafting is a valuable method for correcting postoperative temporal hollowing that provides stable results, high patient and surgeon satisfaction and can be tailored to the patient's individual needs. It should not be considered a merely aesthetic operation, but an important rehabilitation step towards restoring the patient's quality of life.

Evaluation of facial symmetry after jaw reconstruction surgery

The current study proposes a 3D objective method of evaluating facial symmetry after reconstructive surgery of orofacial structures. 3D models of the craniofacial and soft tissue surfaces were reflected about the mid-sagittal plane. The original model was aligned with the reflection and the best plane of symmetry was found. A deviation contour map quantified the areas of asymmetry and gave a global score of the asymmetry. The asymmetry scores were successfully obtained for 18 patients who had underwent reconstruction of lower face. The asymmetry values at craniofacial and soft tissue levels were moderately correlated (R2=0.39). Overall, the developed method effectively highlights areas of asymmetry and can help evaluate aesthetic outcomes of facial reconstruction surgery.