Common Practice in the Management of Dural Closure: An Italian Questionnaire

Reuse of Nasoseptal Flaps for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction

Introduction  Pedicled nasoseptal flap (NSF) placement is a critical component of skull base reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs). The effectiveness of NSF reuse has not been thoroughly studied. Prior reports using flaps harvested at one center and reused at another may have technical variability bias. Methods  We identified patients who underwent both their initial and NSF-reused surgeries at Weill Cornell Medical College from 2004 to 2022 using a prospective database of all EEAs. Surgical pathology, intraoperative leak grade, use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion and skull base coverage were examined. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of CSF leak. Results  Fourteen patients (six women, eight men) underwent 14 first time and 14 revision operations with median age of 36.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 23.9-61.3) at the time of the NSF reuse. The median interval between the first NSF use and reuse was 70.6 months (IQR: 16.6-87). Eight patients were operated on for pituitary adenoma. Nonadenomas included three craniopharyngiomas and one case each of epidermoid, ependymoma, and chordoma. There were 16 high-flow, 8 low-flow intraoperative leaks, and 4 with no leak. CSF diversion was used in 24 operations. There were three postoperative leaks, one after a first operation and two after NSF reuse. All postoperative CSF leaks, whether first or second operations, occurred in cases with both high-flow intraoperative CSF leak and incomplete NSF coverage ( p  = 0.006). Conclusion  NSF reuse is effective at preventing postoperative CSF leak. The primary predictors of leak are high-flow intraoperative leak and inadequate defect coverage with NSF, regardless of the operation number.

A low-swelling hydrogel as a multirole sealant for efficient dural defect sealing and prevention of postoperative adhesion

Dural defects and subsequent complications, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, are common in both spine surgery and neurosurgery, and existing clinical treatments are still unsatisfactory. In this study, a tissue-adhesive and low-swelling hydrogel sealant comprising gelatin and o-phthalaldehyde (OPA)-terminated 4-armed poly(ethylene glycol) (4aPEG-OPA) is developed via the OPA/amine condensation reaction. The hydrogel shows an adhesive strength of 79.9 ± 12.0 kPa on porcine casing and a burst pressure of 208.0 ± 38.0 cmH2O. The hydrogel exhibits a low swelling ratio at physiological conditions, avoiding nerve compression in the limited spinal and intracranial spaces. In rat and rabbit models of lumbar and cerebral dural defects, the 4aPEG-OPA/gelatin hydrogel achieves excellent performance in dural defect sealing and preventing CSF leakage. Moreover, local inflammation, epidural fibrosis and postoperative adhesion in the defect areas are markedly reduced. Thus, these findings establish the strong potential of the hydrogel sealant for the effective watertight closure of dural defects.

Perioperative Practice Patterns of Craniotomies-Results of a National Neurosurgical Survey in Poland

BACKGROUND

Perioperative craniotomy practices depend mainly on neurosurgeon preferences. To investigate the variations in these preferences, we surveyed neurosurgeons in Poland regarding different aspects of their practices.

METHODS

Anonymous questionnaires were circulated in 2019 at the neurosurgery conferences in Poland. We then analyzed the responses, categorized in subgroups by sex, affiliation, and stage of training.

RESULTS

A total of 114 responses to the questionnaire were obtained. For surgical site exposure, regional hair shaving was the most common pattern (64.9%), followed by whole-scalp (19.3%) and strip line shaving (12.3%). Most respondents (65.8%) used clamp-based devices for bone flap fixation, and approximately one third (30.7%) reported using bone suturing. During cranioplasty, respondents most often used artificial bone implants (69.3%), followed by a preserved bone flap from the patient (24.5%). More than three quarters reported that they (77.2%) performed routine radiologic evaluation after uncomplicated brain tumor surgery. Most patients (64.0%) were discharged between the third and sixth postoperative days. Almost half of emergent surgeries (48.2%) and most elective surgeries (89.5%) were performed with the help of an assistant surgeon. No significant differences were found in practice between the sexes or by affiliation or training stage. We inferred an influence of regional economic status on some of the reported choices.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative craniotomy practices among Polish neurosurgeons show a significant heterogeneity. Economic factors can explain some choices, but others trace to a conservative mindset. Further studies are needed to identify which factors are most relevant and to identify approaches to a standardized method of care.

Management of Incidental Durotomy: Results from a Nationwide Survey Conducted by the French Society of Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To obtain real-life data on the most common practices used for management of incidental durotomy (ID) in France.

METHODS

Data were collected from spinal surgeons using a practice-based online questionnaire. The survey comprised 31 questions on the current management of ID in France. The primary outcome was the identification of areas of consensus and uncertainty on ID follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 217 surgeons (mainly orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons) completed the questionnaire and were included in the analysis. There was a consensus on ID repair with 94.5% of the surgeons considering that an ID should always be repaired, if repairable, and 97.2% performing a repair if an ID occurred. The most popular techniques were simple suture or locked continuous suture (48.3% vs. 57.8% of surgeons). Nonrepairable IDs were more likely to be treated with surgical sealants than with an endogenous graft (84.9% vs. 75.5%). Almost two thirds of surgeons (71.6%) who adapted their standard postoperative protocol after an ID recommended bed rest in the supine position. Among these, 48.8% recommended 24 hours of bed rest, while 53.5% recommended 48 hours of bed rest. The surgeons considered that the main risk factors for ID were revision surgery (98.6%), patient's age (46.8%), surgeon's exhaustion (46.3%), and patient's weight (21.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide survey reflects the lack of a standardized management protocol for ID. Practices among surgeons remain very heterogeneous. Further consensus studies are required to develop a standard management protocol for ID.