1
|
Morphable models of the lumbar spine to vary geometry based on pathology, demographics, and anatomical measurements. J Biomech 2023; 146:111421. [PMID: 36603365 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The shape of the lumbar spine influences its function and dysfunction. Yet examining the influence of geometric differences associated with pathology or demographics on lumbar biomechanics is challenging in vivo where these effects cannot be isolated, and the use of simple anatomical measurements does not fully capture the complex three-dimensional geometry. The goal of this work was to develop and share morphable models of the lumbar spine that allow geometry to be varied according to pathology, demographics, or anatomical measurements. Partial least squares regression was used to generate statistical shape models that quantify geometric differences associated with pathology, demographics, and anatomical measurements from the lumbar spines of 87 patients. To determine if the morphable models detected meaningful geometric differences, the ability of the morphable models to classify spines was compared with models generated from random labels. The models for disc herniation (p < 0.04), spondylolisthesis (p < 0.001), and sex (p < 0.01) all performed significantly better than the random models. Age was predicted with a root mean square error of 14.1 years using the age-based model. The morphable models for anatomical measurements were able to produce instances with root mean square errors less than 0.8°, 0.3 cm2, and 0.7 mm between desired and resulting measurements. This method can be used to produce morphable models that enable further analysis of the relationship among shape, pathology, demographics, and function through computational simulations. The morphable models and code are available at https://github.com/aclouthier/morphable-lumbar-model.
Collapse
|
2
|
Du R, Xu G, Bai X, Li Z. Facet Joint Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. J Pain Res 2022; 15:3689-3710. [PMID: 36474960 PMCID: PMC9719706 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s389602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Facet joint osteoarthritis (OA) is the most frequent form of facet joint syndrome. Medical history, referred pain patterns, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging studies (standard radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography) may suggest but not confirm lumbar facet joint (LFJ) syndrome as a source of low back pain (LBP). However, the diagnosis and treatment of facet joint syndrome is still controversial and needs further study. It is widely acknowledged that block with local anesthetic is perhaps the most effective method to establish a diagnosis of pain from LFJ. Particularly, there are different rates of success among different populations selected for diagnostic block with various positive criteria. Currently, in addition to conservative treatments for pain such as painkillers, functional exercises, and massage, there are many other methods, including block, denervation of the nerves that innervate the joints by radiofrequency, freezing or endoscopy, and injections. Due to the limited duration of pain relief from neurolysis of medial branch, many scholars have recently turned their targets to dorsal roots and LFJ capsules. Therefore, we reviewed the latest research progress of facet joint syndrome from diagnosis to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruihuan Du
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gang Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Mechanism for Repair and Remodeling of Orthopedic Diseases, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xujue Bai
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhonghai Li
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Mechanism for Repair and Remodeling of Orthopedic Diseases, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Z, Tian Y, Li C, Li D, Ibrahim Y, Yuan S, Wang X, Tang J, Zhang S, Wang L, Liu X. Radiographic risk factors for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: A comparison with healthy control subjects. Front Surg 2022; 9:956696. [PMID: 36311947 PMCID: PMC9614147 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.956696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the radiologic parameters of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and determine the radiographic risk factors for DLS by making comparisons with healthy control subjects. Methods Seventy-five patients with L4/5 DLS (Meyerding grade I) and 53 healthy control subjects were analyzed. The L1-S1 disc height index (DHI), L4/5 facet joint angle (FJA), and relative cross-sectional area (RCSA) of paravertebral muscles were measured in both groups. The initial L4/5 DHI (iDHI) before the onset of DLS were estimated based on the L3/4 DHI of the DLS group and DHI of the control group. The sagittal parameters of DLS were also included in this study. Results The DHI of L4/5 was lower in the DLS group than in the control group (P < 0.05), but the DHI of the L1-L4 segments were much higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The initial L4/5 DHI and FJA of the DLS group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The RCSA of the paravertebral muscles were smaller in the DLS group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that iDHI, FJA, and RCSA of the total paraspinal muscles were risk factors for DLS. The cutoff values for iDHI, FJA, and RCSA were 0.504, 56.968°, and 1.991 respectively. The iDHI was associated with lumbar lordosis (LL), while L4/5 DHI was associated with the RCSA of the multifidus muscle and psoas major muscle (P < 0.05). Conclusion A large initial lumbar disc height, large FJA, and paravertebral muscle atrophy may be risk factors for DLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Xinyu Liu
- Correspondence: Xinyu Liu Lianlei Wang
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie H, Ouyang Z, Zhang H. Radiographic Analysis of Pedicle Screw Retractor-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Segment Spondylolisthesis in Adults: A Retrospective Study and Technical Note. Orthop Surg 2022; 14:2219-2229. [PMID: 35979946 PMCID: PMC9483061 DOI: 10.1111/os.13441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The objective of this study was to introduce a retractor that can be temporarily installed on unilateral pedicle screws to achieve distraction‐reduction and nerve root protection, and to analyze the efficacy and safety of retractor‐assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods This was a retrospective study of 125 patients who underwent retractor‐assisted TLIF for single‐segment spondylolisthesis from November 2017 to February 2021. Based on morphology, patients were divided into degenerative (N = 66) and isthmic groups (N = 59). Differences in demographics and preoperative characteristics between the groups were analyzed using the independent samples t‐test and χ2 test. Changes in radiographic parameters (disc height, foramen height, spondylolisthesis degree, slippage length, and segmental lordosis) before and after surgery were compared using the paired samples t‐test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between facet joint angle (FJA) and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Results Unilateral screw retractor‐assisted TLIF significantly corrected spondylolisthesis and improved disc height and segmental lordosis (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in foramen height between the two sides before and after operation (pre: 15.81 ± 3.58 mm vs 15.69 ± 3.68 mm, p = 0.599; post: 18.65 ± 2.31 mm vs 18.74 ± 2.26 mm, p = 0.516). The degree of spondylolisthesis in the DLS group before surgery was significantly lower than that in the isthmic spondylolisthesis group (17.70 ± 5.62% vs 25.18 ± 9.73%, p < 0.001), whereas a similar degree of correction could be achieved after surgery (5.91 ± 3.12% vs 7.16 ± 5.69%, p = 0.135). FJAs from L3/4 to L5/S1 were significantly smaller in patients with DLS than those in with isthmic spondylolisthesis (p < 0.05). Patients with facet sagittalization were more likely to have DLS (β: −0.101, odds ratio [OR]:0.904, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.874–0.934, p < 0.001), while the cut‐off FJA of L4/5 for predicting L4 spondylolisthesis was 53.19. Conclusions Pedicle screw retractor‐assisted TLIF is effective and safe in treating both degenerative and isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis. The unilateral retractor has the capacity to maintain the disc height achieved by paddle distractors, which optimizes the nerve protection and distractor placement. Patients with an FJA on L4/5 <53.19 were more likely to have DLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongwei Xie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, PR China.,Orthopaedics Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China.,Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China.,Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China
| | - Ziyu Ouyang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, PR China.,Orthopaedics Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China.,Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China.,Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China
| | - Hua Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, PR China.,Orthopaedics Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China.,Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China.,Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China
| |
Collapse
|