Volume-Staged Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Large Brain Arteriovenous Malformation

Long-term outcome of a tailored embolization strategy with Gamma Knife radiosurgery for high-grade brain arteriovenous malformations: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

The safety and efficacy of embolization with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for high-grade brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) are uncertain. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the long-term outcome of a tailored embolization strategy with GKRS and identify the independent factors associated with bAVM obliteration.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and January 2017, a consecutive cohort of 159 patients with high-grade bAVMs who underwent embolization with GKRS was enrolled in this prospective single-center cohort study. All patients received a tailored embolization strategy with GKRS. The primary outcome was defined as bAVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were neurological function and complications.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 40.4 months, 5 patients were lost to follow-up. One hundred eighteen of the remaining 154 patients had favorable neurological outcomes with complete bAVM obliteration. A decrease in bAVM nidus size was observed in 36 patients. Five patients developed intracranial hemorrhage during the latency period, and 2 patients died. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the obliteration rate increased each year and reached the peak point at approximately 3 years. The multivariate Cox regression analysis of factors affecting bAVM obliteration revealed that postembolization bAVM volume < 10 cm3 (p = 0.02), supratentorial location (p < 0.01), staged embolization prior to GKRS (p < 0.01), and mean Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade (p < 0.01) were independent factors associated with a high obliteration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggested that high-grade bAVMs treated using a tailored embolization strategy with GKRS were associated with a favorable clinical outcome and obliteration rate. Postembolization bAVM volume < 10 cm3, supratentorial location, staged embolization prior to GKRS, and low mean SM grade were associated with a high obliteration rate.

Comparison of Single-Session, Neoadjuvant, and Adjuvant Embolization Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treatment is to prevent bleeding or subsequent hemorrhage with complete obliteration. For large, difficult-to-treat AVMs, multimodal approaches including surgery, endovascular embolization, and gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) are frequently used.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the outcomes of AVMs treated with single-session, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant embolization GKRS.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a database of 453 patients with AVMs who underwent GKRS between January 2007 and December 2017 at our facility. The obliteration rate, incidence of latent period bleeding, cyst formation, and radiation-induced changes were compared among the 3 groups, neoadjuvant-embolized, adjuvant-embolized, nonembolized group. In addition, the variables predicting AVM obliteration and complications were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients were enrolled in this study. The neoadjuvant-embolized, adjuvant-embolized, and nonembolized groups comprised 29 (12.7%), 19 (8.3%), and 180 (78.9%) patients, respectively. Significant differences were detected among the 3 groups in the history of previous hemorrhage and the presence of aneurysms ( P < .0001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed a significant inverse correlation between neoadjuvant embolization and obliteration occurring 36 months after GKRS (hazard ratio, 0.326; P = .006).

CONCLUSION

GKRS with either neoadjuvant or adjuvant embolization is a beneficial approach for the treatment of AVMs with highly complex angioarchitectures that are at risk for hemorrhage during the latency period. Embolization before GKRS may be a negative predictive factor for late-stage obliteration (>36 months). To confirm our conclusions, further studies involving a larger number of patients and continuous follow-up are necessary.

Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center

Objective

This study aimed to study the efficiency and safety of a dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery strategy for large meningiomas or meningiomas close to important nerve structures.

Methods

This study evaluates the outcome of a prospectively accrued series of 71 consecutive patients with meningiomas treated with staged dose-fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The average peripheral doses for the first and second fractions were 9.0 ± 0.9 Gy (8–12 Gy) and 8.6 ± 0.7 Gy (range, 7–10 Gy), respectively. The interval between fractions was 6.1 ± 1.9 months (range, 3–12 months). The median follow-up time was 36 months (12–96 months).

Results

During the follow-up period after the second fraction, 97.2% achieved tumor control in our series. A total of 2 patients exhibited local recurrence at 30 and 60 months after the second fraction, respectively. No treatment-related complications or new long-term neurological dysfunctions were reported. MRIs observed slightly or moderately increased peritumoral edema in six patients, but no specific neurological complaints are attributed to this finding.

Conclusion

This study investigates the efficiency and safety of dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery as an alternative option for meningiomas that were large in volume, adjacent to crucial structures, or in patients with contraindications to craniotomy.

Untangling the Modern Treatment Paradigm for Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) often present treatment challenges. Patients with unruptured AVMs must consider not only whether they want to be treated, but what treatment modality they would prefer. Vascular neurosurgeons, neurointerventional surgeons, and stereotactic radiosurgeons must in turn guide their patients through the most appropriate treatment course considering the risk of AVM rupture, an individual AVM’s characteristics, and patient preferences. In this review we will look at how the clinical trial “A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (ARUBA)” has influenced the approach to unruptured brain AVMs and the treatment modalities available to clinicians to deal with these formidable lesions.

Intracranial arteriovenous malformations

The treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) has evolved over the last 10 years. It is now possible to see that obliteration continues for up to 10 years and that the final obliteration rate may be between 85% and 90%. Improved imaging has made the treatment more efficient and has reduced the complications. It is possible to treat larger AVMs in a single session than was previously thought possible without increases in the complication rates. In addition, treatments of larger lesions can be staged. The use of 3D rotating angiography produces remarkable images which can be imported into GammaPlan. On the other hand efforts are ongoing to avoid the need for digital subtraction angiography, which would make the treatment a lot more comfortable.

The factors associated with obliteration following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain arteriovenous malformations: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Various factors have been reported to affect the obliteration of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This meta-analysis was conducted to identify the factors potentially associated with AVM obliteration after SRS.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched databases and included studies that evaluated predictors of AVM obliteration after SRS using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized as effect estimates.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, involving 4415 AVM cases, were included. According to combined estimates on univariate (UV) and multivariate (MV) analysis, age, gender and prior haemorrhage did not affect the closure probability. The following factors showed a significant and independent association with increased AVM obliteration: smaller AVMs maximal diameter (MV, HR: 1.32), smaller AVM volume (MV, HR: 1.05), AVM volume <10-15 cc (MV, HR: 1.55), higher margin dose (MV, HR: 1.05), margin dose ≥17-18 Gy (MV, HR: 3.71) and early treatment period (MV, HR: 1.78). Previous embolization and deep-seated AVM were independently negative predictors of obliteration whereas deep venous drainage was a positive predictor. Prior surgery, compactness of nidus, lower grading scores and higher SRS maximum dose were associated factors subject to confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

Multiple factors associated with obliteration should be taken into consideration for selection of candidates with AVMs for SRS. AVM volume and radiation dose are the most prominent factor in assessing obliteration after SRS. Age, gender and prior haemorrhage may not affect the consideration of SRS treatment. Cautious use of SRS is needed for previously embolized AVM patients.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery For Brain Vascular Malformations: Current Evidence And Future Tasks

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has long been used for treating brain vascular malformations, including arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs), and cavernous malformations (CMs). Herein, current evidence and controversies regarding the role of stereotactic radiosurgery for vascular malformations are described. 1) It has already been established that GKRS achieves 70–85% obliteration rates after a 3–5-year latency period for small to medium-sized AVMs. However, late radiation-induced adverse events (RAEs) including cyst formation, encapsulated hematoma, and tumorigenesis have recently been recognized, and the associated risks, clinical courses, and outcomes are under investigation. SRS-based therapeutic strategies for relatively large AVMs, including staged GKRS and a combination of GKRS and embolization, continue to be developed, though their advantages and disadvantages warrant further investigation. The role of GKRS in managing unruptured AVMs remains controversial since a prospective trial showed no benefit of treatment, necessitating further consideration of this issue. 2) Regarding DAVFs, GKRS achieves 41–90% obliteration rates at the second post-GKRS year with a hemorrhage rate below 5%. Debate continues as to whether GKRS might serve as a first-line solo therapeutic modality given its latency period. Although the post-GKRS outcomes are thought to differ among lesion locations, further outcome analyses regarding DAVF locations are required. 3) GKRS is generally accepted as an alternative for small or medium-sized CMs in which surgery is considered to be too risky. The reported hemorrhage rates ranged from 0.5–5% after GKRS. Higher dose treatments (>15 Gy) were performed during the learning curve, while, with the current standard treatment, a dose range of 12–15 Gy is generally selected, and has resulted in acceptable complication rates (< 5%). Nevertheless, further elucidation of long-term outcomes is essential.