1
|
Chang PL, Chen MJW, Hsiao PH, Lin CY, Lo YS, Tseng C, Li LY, Lai CY, Chen HT. Navigation-Assisted One-Staged Posterior Spinal Fusion Using Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis-A Case Series. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:300. [PMID: 38399587 PMCID: PMC10889939 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a prevalent three-dimensional spinal disorder, with a multifactorial pathogenesis, including genetics and environmental aspects. Treatment options include non-surgical and surgical treatment. Surgical interventions demonstrate positive outcomes in terms of deformity correction, pain relief, and improvements of the cardiac and pulmonary function. Surgical complications, including excessive blood loss and neurologic deficits, are reported in 2.27-12% of cases. Navigation-assisted techniques, such as the O-arm system, have been a recent focus with enhanced precision. This study aims to evaluate the results and complications of one-stage posterior instrumentation fusion in AIS patients assisted by O-arm navigation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study assesses 55 patients with AIS (12-28 years) who underwent one-stage posterior instrumentation correction supported by O-arm navigation from June 2016 to August 2023. We examined radiological surgical outcomes (initial correction rate, loss of correction rate, last follow-up correction rate) and complications as major outcomes. The characteristics of the patients, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, number of fusion levels, and screw density were documented. Results: Of 73 patients, 55 met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 16.67 years, with a predominance of females (78.2%). The surgical outcomes demonstrated substantial initial correction (58.88%) and sustained positive radiological impact at the last follow-up (56.56%). Perioperative complications, including major and minor, occurred in 18.18% of the cases. Two patients experienced a major complication. Blood loss (509.46 mL) and operation time (402.13 min) were comparable to the literature ranges. Trend analysis indicated improvements in operation time and blood loss over the study period. Conclusions: O-arm navigation-assisted one-stage posterior instrumentation proves reliable for AIS corrective surgery, achieving significant and sustained positive radiological outcomes, lower correction loss, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and absence of implant-related complications. Despite the challenges, our study demonstrates the efficacy and maturation of this surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pao-Lung Chang
- Department of Education, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan;
| | - Michael Jian-Wen Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (M.J.-W.C.); (P.-H.H.); (C.-Y.L.); (Y.-S.L.); (C.T.); (L.-Y.L.); (C.-Y.L.)
- Spine Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Pang-Hsuan Hsiao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (M.J.-W.C.); (P.-H.H.); (C.-Y.L.); (Y.-S.L.); (C.T.); (L.-Y.L.); (C.-Y.L.)
- Spine Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Yu Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (M.J.-W.C.); (P.-H.H.); (C.-Y.L.); (Y.-S.L.); (C.T.); (L.-Y.L.); (C.-Y.L.)
- Spine Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Shun Lo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (M.J.-W.C.); (P.-H.H.); (C.-Y.L.); (Y.-S.L.); (C.T.); (L.-Y.L.); (C.-Y.L.)
- Spine Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, China Medical University, Yunlin County 651, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Precision Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
| | - Chun Tseng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (M.J.-W.C.); (P.-H.H.); (C.-Y.L.); (Y.-S.L.); (C.T.); (L.-Y.L.); (C.-Y.L.)
- Spine Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, China Medical University, Yunlin County 651, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Ling-Yi Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (M.J.-W.C.); (P.-H.H.); (C.-Y.L.); (Y.-S.L.); (C.T.); (L.-Y.L.); (C.-Y.L.)
- Spine Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Ying Lai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (M.J.-W.C.); (P.-H.H.); (C.-Y.L.); (Y.-S.L.); (C.T.); (L.-Y.L.); (C.-Y.L.)
- Spine Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Hsien-Te Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (M.J.-W.C.); (P.-H.H.); (C.-Y.L.); (Y.-S.L.); (C.T.); (L.-Y.L.); (C.-Y.L.)
- Spine Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
- Department of Sport Medicine, College of Health Care, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miyagi M, Saito W, Mimura Y, Nakazawa T, Imura T, Shirasawa E, Uchida K, Ikeda S, Kuroda A, Inoue S, Yokozeki Y, Tanaka Y, Akazawa T, Takaso M, Inoue G. Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery for Neuromuscular Disease Patients with Severe Scoliosis Whose Cobb Angle Was over 100 Degrees. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1090. [PMID: 37374294 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Patients with neuromuscular diseases usually have progressive neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS), requiring invasive surgery. Some patients present with severe scoliosis at the time of consultation and are difficult to treat. Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery combined with anterior release and pre- or intraoperative traction would be effective for severe spinal deformities but would be invasive. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of PSF-only surgery for patients with severe NMS with a Cobb angle > 100°. Materials and Methods: Thirty NMS patients (13 boys and 17 girls; mean age 13.8 years) who underwent PSF-only surgery for scoliosis with a Cobb angle > 100° were included. We reviewed the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV), duration of surgery, blood loss, perioperative complications, preoperative clinical findings, and radiographic findings, including Cobb angle and pelvic obliquity (PO) in the sitting position pre- and postoperatively. The correction rate and correction loss of the Cobb angle and PO were also calculated. Results: The mean duration of surgery was 338 min, intraoperative blood loss was 1440 mL, preoperative %VC was 34.1%, FEV1.0 (%) was 91.5%, and EF was 66.1%. There were eight cases of perioperative complications. The Cobb angle and PO correction rates were 48.5% and 42.0%, respectively. We divided the patients into two groups: the L5 group, in which the LIV was L5, and the pelvis group, in which the LIV was the pelvis. The duration of surgery and PO correction rate in the pelvis group were significantly higher than those in the L5 group. Conclusions: Patients with severe NMS demonstrated severe preoperative restrictive ventilatory impairments. PSF surgery without anterior release or any intra-/preoperative traction showed satisfactory outcomes, including acceptable scoliosis correction and improved clinical findings, even in patients with extremely severe NMS. Instrumentation and fusion to the pelvis for severe scoliosis in patients with NMS showed good PO correction and low correction loss of Cobb angle and PO, but a longer duration of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Miyagi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Wataru Saito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Yusuke Mimura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Nakazawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Takayuki Imura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Eiki Shirasawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Kentaro Uchida
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Ikeda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kuroda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Sho Inoue
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Yuji Yokozeki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Yoshihide Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Akazawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan
| | - Masashi Takaso
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| | - Gen Inoue
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Comparison of four correction techniques for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2022; 31:1028-1035. [PMID: 35224673 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07145-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION When performing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), it is of major importance to address both coronal and sagittal deformities. Although several techniques have been described, few data exist comparing them. Our objective was to compare four techniques (in situ bending (ISB), rod derotation (RD), cantilever (C) and posteromedial translation (PMT)) for the correction of spinal deformity in AIS including thoracic deformity. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including 562 AIS patients with thoracic deformity with at least 24-month follow-up. Radiographic analysis was performed preoperatively, postoperatively and at last follow-up. The main outcomes were main curve correction and thoracic kyphosis restoration (TK). RESULTS Coronal correction rate was significantly different among the four treatment groups (ISB 64% vs C 57% vs RD 55% vs PMT 67%, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression revealed that correction technique did not influence correction rate, whereas implant density, convex side compression and use of derotation connectors did. TK increase was significantly higher in the PMT group (average + 13°) than in DR (+ 3°), while ISB (-3°) and cantilever (-13°) resulted in TK decrease (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that TK increase was only influenced by the reduction technique (p < 0.001) and preoperative TK (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION The four techniques had the same ability to correct spinal deformity in the coronal plane. Three factors were identified to improve correction rate: implant density, convex compression and use of derotation connectors. On the other hand, PMT was more effective in restoring TK, particularly in hypokyphotic patients.
Collapse
|