Endonasal Endoscopic and Transoral Approaches to the Craniovertebral Junction and the Clival Region: A Comparative Anatomical Study

Comparative Anatomical Study of Fronto-Orbito-Zygomatic and Fronto-Temporal Approach to the Central Skull Base

ABSTRACT

Despite the advances in microsurgery and neuroanatomy, surgery of the central skull base still represents a challenge. Fronto-temporal approach has represented the mainstay of surgical approaches to this region. With advances in skull base surgery, orbital and zygomatic extensions were added to fronto-temporal approach to improve exposure minimizing brain retraction.The authors compared fronto-temporal and fronto-orbitozygomatic approaches to the central skull base by using the previously described operability score, to three different anatomical targets: the ipsilateral anterior clinoid process, the contralateral anterior clinoid process, and the ipsilateral posterior clinoid process.Based on the measurements taken, fronto-orbitozygomatic approache showed higher values at all 3 targets. The reported values were critically discussed.The operability score has been reported as an effective method to compare surgical approaches. The present study demonstrated the maximal possibility of exposure of the two approaches. Based on the strong variability of this anatomical region, especially because of the different pathologies, the authors suggest considering the operability score as a further tool to better define the best surgical approach to this anatomical region.

Endoscope-Assisted Neuroportal Transcerebellar Approach to the Fourth Ventricle: An Anatomical Study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Minimally invasive approaches to deep-seated lesions still represent a fundamental issue in modern neurosurgery. Tubular retractors allow to enhance the operability of intraventricular lesions, minimizing the risk of damages to brain parenchyma. Increasing interest for portal devices has been mainly focused on supratentorial pathologies, while transportal approaches in the posterior cranial fossa have been rarely described. In the present study, the authors aimed to investigate the surgical exposure and operability obtained with a microsurgical neuroportal transcerebellar approach targeting the fourth ventricle, assisted by endoscopic exploration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 Six cadaveric specimens were provided for anatomical microsurgical dissection and Vycor ViewSite Brain Access System was used as tubular retractor. Surgical feasibility of the neuroportal transcerebellar approach was demonstrated through a definable and measurable parameter, the operability score.

RESULTS

 The neuroport provided a surgical corridor away from eloquent structures to target the whole fourth ventricle cavity, preventing injury to cerebellar nuclei and white matter pathways and, potentially, minimizing the risk of surgical morbidity. Maximal operability was reached in the pontomedullary junction and medullary area of the ventricular floor. Transportal endoscopic assistance contributed to a further extension of surgical exposure in blind spots, corresponding to the ipsilateral lateral recess, the uppermost part of the fourth ventricle, and the obex.

CONCLUSION

 The neuroportal transcerebellar approach represents a viable alternative route to the fourth ventricle, avoiding vermian splitting or subarachnoid dissection of the cerebellomedullary cistern. Endoscopic assistance enhances the exposure of the surgical field and accomplishes a valid instrument for intraventricular orientation to ease microsurgical procedures.

The rhinopharyngeal flap for reconstruction of lower clival and craniovertebral junction defects

OBJECTIVE

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the lower clivus and craniovertebral junction (CVJ) has been traditionally performed via resection of the nasopharyngeal soft tissues. Alternatively, an inferiorly based rhinopharyngeal (RP) flap (RPF) can be dissected to help reconstruct the postoperative defect and separate it from the oropharynx. To date, there is no evidence regarding the viability and potential clinical impact of the RPF. The aim of this study was to assess RPF viability and its impact on clinical outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 60 patients who underwent EEA to the lower clivus and CVJ was studied. The RPF was used in 30 patients (RPF group), and the nasopharyngeal soft tissues were resected in 30 patients (control group).

RESULTS

Chordoma was the most common surgical indication in both groups (47% in the RPF group vs 63% in the control group, p = 0.313), followed by odontoid pannus (20% in the RPF group vs 10%, p = 0.313). The two groups did not significantly differ in terms of extent of tumor (p = 0.271), intraoperative CSF leak (p = 0.438), and skull base reconstruction techniques other than the RPF (nasoseptal flap, p = 0.301; fascia lata, p = 0.791; inlay graft, p = 0.793; and prophylactic lumbar drain, p = 0.781). Postoperative soft-tissue enhancement covering the lower clivus and CVJ observed on MRI was significantly higher in the RPF group (100% vs 26%, p < 0.001). The RPF group had a significantly lower rate of nasoseptal flap necrosis (3% vs 20%, p = 0.044) and surgical site infection (3% vs 27%, p = 0.026) while having similar rates of postoperative CSF leakage (17% in the RPF group vs 20%, p = 0.739) and meningitis (7% in the RPF group vs 17%, p = 0.424). Oropharyngeal bacterial flora dominated the infections in the control group but not those in the RPF group, suggesting that the RPF acted as a barrier between the nasopharynx and oropharynx.

CONCLUSIONS

The RPF provides viable vascularized tissue coverage to the lower clivus and CVJ. Its use was associated with decreased rates of nasoseptal flap necrosis and local infection, likely due to separation from the oropharynx.