Temporal Galeofascial Flap for Reconstruction After Transmaxillary Approaches to the Clival Region

Temporal Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques

The temporal region is a great source of vascularized flap, providing extremely variable and versatile options for reconstruction in head and neck surgery. Its popularity has led to the conception of a large variety of different flaps, in terms of contents and design. Temporal flaps are highly pliable and flexible, providing adequate bulk to obliterate dead spaces and improving engraftment, thus facilitating wound healing. The need to access different anatomical compartments, often far from the original flap anatomical site, has led surgeons to develop techniques to enlarge pedicles and bulk, by reverting and splitting flaps' contents, as well as through partial mandibular and zygomatic resection. To further increase versatility, a multilayered combination of different regional tissues and muscle segmentation techniques has been described. Historically, each flap has had its own proponents and opponents, but a pointy review systematizing techniques and comparatively analyzing different flaps was still missing in the literature. The field of use of some flaps has been progressively limited by the increasing relevance of free tissue transfers, which nowadays may provide success rates up to 95% with a constrained morbidity, thus offering an effective alternative, when available. Given the wide range of reconstructive strategies based on temporal flaps, there is still a great debate on nomenclature and surgical techniques. The present study systematizes the topic, classifying regional flaps according to contents and indications. Harvesting techniques are described stepwise and schematically illustrated, thus offering an indispensable tool to the armamentarium of reconstructive surgeons.

The Transorbital Pericranial Flap

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to describe and evaluate the feasibility, mobility, and surface area provided by the simple and extended transorbital pericranial flap (TOPF). Furthermore, we compared this novel technique with the current practice of pericranial flap harvesting and insetting techniques. We also studied the adequacy of the TOPF in the reconstruction of postoperative anterior cranial fossa (ACF) defects.

METHODS

The TOPF was performed bilaterally in 5 alcohol-preserved, latex-injected human cadaveric specimens. The TOPF was harvested in 2 stages: the orbitonasal stage and the cranial stage. For the orbitonasal stage, a transorbital superior eyelid approach was used. We have described 2 harvesting techniques for creating 2 distinct TOPF types (simple and extended) according to the main vascular pedicle. The superficial flap areas offered by the simple and extended TOPF and the traditional bicoronal pericranial flap were calculated and compared. The distances from the supratrochlear and supraorbital arteries to specified anatomical landmarks were also measured. Additionally, the ACF defect area of relevant surgical cases performed using endoscopic transcribriform approaches were measured on immediate postoperative computed tomography head scans using radiological imaging software.

RESULTS

The harvest of both the simple and the extended TOPFs was efficient. As expected, the areas offered by simple and extended TOPFs were smaller than that offered by the traditional bicoronal flap. However, the surface area offered by either the simple or extended TOPF provides sufficient coverage for most ACF defects. A high spatial distribution was observed between the vascular pedicles and their respective foramen or notch.

CONCLUSIONS

The TOPF represents a novel harvesting, tunneling, and insetting technique that offers a large, versatile, pedicled flap for coverage of most standard ACF defects after endoscopic surgery.

Advances in vascularized flaps for skull base reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in anterior skull base surgery have resulted in the increasing diversification of reconstructive techniques. New vascularized flaps have been suggested in the last years, some quite similar, whereas new uses and applications have been suggested for some vascularized flaps, which have already established their value over the last decades. In this article, we describe the developments in skull base reconstruction with vascularized flaps and analyse the international experience in the use of vascularized flaps published with a focus on the last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past 18 months, a number of novel or modified vascularized intranasal flaps have been described, focusing on reconstruction of larger defects, the medial orbital wall, the anterior skull base (septal flip-flap) and dissection of the nasoseptal flap from the SPA foramen. Extranasal vascularized flaps, which have been around for a long time, still have their rightful place in skull base reconstruction and have recently been adjusted for endoscopic use.

SUMMARY

We present an overview of the latest developments in vascularized flaps (intranasal and extranasal), their new implications, their modifications and complications or predictions of viability.

Combined Technique of Temporal Muscle Augmentation for Muscle Reconstruction in Case of Small to Medium Anatomic Defects

Inadequate temporal muscle (TM) reconstruction after surgery may hesitate in potentially severe functional and aesthetic sequelae, making it of paramount importance to carefully consider TM reconstruction even in case of small deformities.The authors describe the combined temporal muscle augmentation technique (CTMA), an innovative technique for TM augmentation for muscle reconstruction in case of small to medium substance loss.A cadaver study was conducted as preclinical validation of the technique for the assessment of CTMA coverage capability. CTMA consists in a combination of 2 techniques for muscle surface coverage (MSC) increase: the radial (RA) and the longitudinal augmentation (LA), which enables to harvest a radial (RF) and a longitudinal flap (LF), respectively.Each flap derives from a different muscle-bundle, spearing TM segmentation and functional performance, and are supplied by a specific neuro-vascular peduncle, which makes flaps functionally independent.A surgical case is reported to demonstrate the feasibility of the technique.Combined temporal muscle augmentation technique provides an overall coverage surface of 6.5 ± 0.6 cm, which corresponds to a gap distance of 2.5 ± 0.2 cm, with RF providing a statistically significant larger surface of coverage compared to LF (×2.1; P = 0.0001).Combined temporal muscle augmentation technique is easy and fast to perform displaying a good reconstructive capability with complete preservation of temporal muscle anatomic compartmentalization and segmental vasculature. It might be considered as a safe and effective alternative in the reconstruction of small-to medium TM defects.