Outcomes Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion in Patients with Polycythemia Vera

Correlation of Patient Reported Satisfaction With Adverse Events Following Elective Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Single Institution Analysis

Background

With increasing emphasis on patient satisfaction metrics, such as the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey, hospital reputations and reimbursements are being affected by their results. The purpose of the current study is to determine if post-operative self-reported patient satisfaction differed among patients who experienced any adverse event (AAE) following elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery compared to those who did not.

Methods

Patients who underwent elective PLF surgery performed at a single institution between February 2013 and May 2020 and returned an HCAHPS survey following discharge were included in the retrospective cohort analysis. Demographic, comorbidity, and HCAHPS survey data were compared between patients who did and did not experience any adverse event (AAE) in the 30-days postoperatively.

Results

Of 5,117 PLF patients, the HCAHPS survey was returned by 1,071 patients, of which 30-day AAE was experienced by 40 (3.73%). Of those that experienced AAE, the survey response rate was significantly lower (13.94% versus 21.35%, p=0.003). Those responding reported lower scores pertaining to if medication side-effects were adequately explained (22.22% versus 52.56%, p=0.002) and if post-discharge care was adequately explained (79.17% versus 93.76%, p=0.005), as well as overall top-box responses (67.62% versus 75.93% survey average, p<0.001).

Conclusions

Patients experiencing AAE after elective PLF surgery are less likely to respond to surveys about their hospital experience. For those who did respond, they report less satisfaction with multiple aspects of their hospital care measured by the HCAHPS survey. Understanding how postoperative adverse events impact patients' perception of healthcare quality provides insight into what patients value and has implications for optimizing their care.

Myocardial Infarction After Lumbar Surgery: A Critical Meta-Analysis of Cohort versus Database Studies for a Rare Complication

BACKGROUND

One potentially fatal complication of spine surgery is myocardial infarction (MI). There is still uncertainty of the true incidence of MI within subsets of spine surgeries. The aim of this study was to survey the contemporary spine literature and ascertain the true incidence of MI after lumbar spine surgery, as well as to provide commentary on the inherent assumptions made when interpreting cohort versus database studies on this topic.

METHODS

A systematic search of 4 electronic databases from inception to November 2020 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against prespecified criteria. MI incidence was then estimated by random-effects meta-analyses of proportions based on cohort versus database studies.

RESULTS

A total of 34 cohort studies and 32 database studies describing 767,326 lumbar procedures satisfied all criteria for selection. There were 12,170 (2%) cases from cohort studies and 755,156 (98%) cases from database studies. Cohort studies reported a significantly older patient cohort (P < 0.01) and longer follow-up period than did database studies (P < 0.03). Using cohort studies only, the incidence of MI was 0.44% (P heterogeneity < 0.01), whereas using database studies only, the incidence of MI was 0.41% (P heterogeneity < 0.01). These 2 incidences were statistically different (P interaction = 0.01). Bias analysis indicated that cohort studies were more vulnerable to small-study biases than were database studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although infrequent, the incidence of MI after lumbar spine surgery is unequivocally nonzero. Furthermore, the literature on this topic remains skewed based on study type, and translation of academic findings into practice should be wary of this.