Association of Frailty and Self-Care Activity With Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment in the Elderly

Surgical management of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian: a narrative review

Optimal management paradigms of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian population are controversial given the higher incidence of comorbidities with concern for poor prognosis and fear of increased complications associated with surgical management. In this narrative review, we aim to detail the complex clinical considerations when approaching odontoid screw fixation/instrumented fusion, spinal decompression, and spinal fusion in the octogenarian. Literature review was conducted via Google Scholar and PubMed databases, with literature selected based on statistical power and clinical relevance to the following pathologies/surgical techniques: odontoid fracture, surgical decompression, and surgical fusion in the octogenarian. The aforementioned pathologies were selected based on prevalence in the advanced-age population in which surgical screening techniques and management remain nonuniform. Preoperative evaluation of the octogenarian patient increasingly includes frailty, sarcopenia, and osteopenia/osteoporosis assessments. In cases of odontoid fracture, conservative management appears to provide beneficial clinical outcomes with lower rates of complication compared to surgery; however, rates of radiographic odontoid fusion are far lower in conservatively managed patients. Regarding surgical decompression and fusion, the presence of comorbidities may be more predictive of outcome rather than age status, with the advent of minimally invasive techniques providing safety and efficacy in the surgical management of this age cohort. Age status may be less pertinent than previously thought in the decision to pursue spinal surgery for odontoid fracture, spinal decompression, or spinal fusion; however, each of these procedures has respective risks and benefits that must be considered within the context of each patient's comorbidity profile.

5-year outcomes of surgical intervention in patients with adult spine deformity according to preoperative 5-item modified frailty index scores

PURPOSE

Frailty increases vulnerability to dependency and/or death, and is important in predicting the risk for adverse effects following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. For easy determination of frailty, the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) was established. However, there are few reports that show the relationship between frailty and mid-term operative outcomes after ASD surgery. The objective of this retrospective study is to determine the correlation of frailty using mFi-5 scores with postoperative medical complications, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and radiographic alignment 5 years after ASD surgery.

METHODS

208 patients were divided into robust (R), pre-frail (PF), and frail (F) groups based on mFI-5 scores. Postoperative medical complications, preoperative and 5-year follow-up PROMs and radiographic alignment were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 91, 79, and 38 patients in group R, PF, and F, respectively. There was no significant difference in age and sex. Discharge to care facility (16 (18%):21 (27%):16 (42%), p = 0.014) and postoperative cardiac complications (2 (2%):0 (0%):3 (8%), p = 0.031) were higher in frail patients. Preoperative ODI (38.3:45.3:54.7, p < 0.001) and SRS-22 (2.7:2.5:2.3, p = 0.004), 5-year postoperative ODI (27:27.2:37.9, p = 0.015), 5-year postoperative SVA (57.8°:78.5°:86.4°, p = 0.039) and 5-year postoperative TPA (23.9°:29.4°:29.5°, p = 0.011) were significantly worse in group F compared to group R.

CONCLUSION

Postoperatively, frail patients are more likely to have cardiac complications, inferior PROMs and deterioration of post-correction global spinal alignment. Preoperative assessment using mFI-5 is beneficial to individualize risks, optimize patients, and manage postoperative expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Morphology of paraspinal muscles in frail and non-frail older adults evaluated through FRAIL scale

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a condition characterized by the progressive deterioration of physiological functioning, which is closely related to adverse events. Multiple previous investigations applied frailty scales for spine research, and the purpose of this study is to investigate the differences in the morphology of the paraspinal muscles in frail and non-frail older adults evaluated through FRAIL scale.

METHODS

The sample of this retrospectively cross-sectional study consisted of individuals who were ≥ 60 years of age and with lumbar degenerative disease. We divided patients into two groups (0-2 = non-Frail, 3-5 = Frail) according to the FRAIL scale. The cross-sectional area (CSA) and percentage of the fatty infiltration (FI%) of the paraspinal muscles were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The fCSA (functional cross-sectional area) of the non-Frail group (32.78 [28.52, 38.28]) (cm²) was significantly greater than that of the Frail group (28.50 [24.11, 34.77]) (p < 0.001). The ES FI% (erector spinae fatty infiltration rate) (24.83 ± 6.61 vs. 29.60 ± 7.92, p < 0.001) and MF FI% (multifidus fatty infiltration rate) (31.68 ± 5.63 vs. 41.12 ± 7.04, p < 0.001) of the non-Frail group were significantly lower than that of Frail group.

CONCLUSIONS

The paraspinal muscles of elderly Frail patients screened by the FRAIL scale are worse than those of the non-Frail patients, and the ability of the FRAIL scale to distinguish paraspinal muscle morphology has important clinical significance.

Which frailty scales for patients with adult spinal deformity are feasible and adequate? A systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Frailty as a concept is not yet fully understood, and is not the same as comorbidity. It is associated with an increased risk of adverse events and mortality after surgery, which makes its preoperative assessment significant. Despite its relevance, it still remains unclear which scales are appropriate for use in patients with spinal pathology.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and measurement properties of frailty scales for spine patients, specifically with adult spinal deformity (ASD), and to propose adequate scales for primary triage to prevent surgery in too frail patients and for preoperative assessment to modify patients' condition and surgical plans.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review.

METHODS

Systematic search was performed between 2010 and 2021 including terms relating to spinal disorders, frailty scales, and methodological quality. Characteristics of the studies and frailty scales and data describing relation to treatment outcomes were extracted. The risk of bias was determined with the QAREL score.

RESULTS

Of the 1993 references found, 88 original studies were included and 23 scales were identified. No prospective interventional study was found where the preoperative frailty assessment was implemented. Predictive value of scales for surgical outcomes varied, dependent on spinal disorders, type of surgeries, patients' age and frailty at baseline, and outcomes. Seventeen studies reported measurement properties of eight scales but these studies were not free of bias. In 30 ASD studies, ASD-Frailty Index (ASD-FI, n=14) and 11-item modified Frailty Index (mFI-11, n=11) were most frequently used. These scales were mainly studied in registry studies including young adult population, and carry a risk of sample bias and make their validity in elderly population unclear. ASD-FI covers multidisciplinary concepts of frailty with 40 items but its feasibility in clinical practice is questionable due to its length. The Risk Analysis Index, another multidisciplinary scale with 14 items, has been implemented for preoperative assessment in other surgical domains and was proven to be feasible and effective in interventional prospective studies. The FRAIL is a simple questionnaire with five items and its predictive value was confirmed in prospective cohort studies in which only elderly patients were included.

CONCLUSIONS

No adequate scale was identified in terms of methodological quality and feasibility for daily practice. Careful attention should be paid when choosing an adequate scale, which depends on the setting of interest (eg triage or preoperative work-up). We recommend to further study a simple and predictive scale such as FRAIL for primary triage and a comprehensive and feasible scale such as Risk Analysis Index for preoperative assessment for patients undergoing spine surgery, as their adequacy has been shown in other medical domains.