Transcorticosubcortical Approach for Left Posterior Mediobasal Temporal Region Gliomas: A Case Series and Anatomic Review of Relevant White Matter Tracts

An update on tests used for intraoperative monitoring of cognition during awake craniotomy

PURPOSE

Mapping higher-order cognitive functions during awake brain surgery is important for cognitive preservation which is related to postoperative quality of life. A systematic review from 2018 about neuropsychological tests used during awake craniotomy made clear that until 2017 language was most often monitored and that the other cognitive domains were underexposed (Ruis, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 40(10):1081-1104, 218). The field of awake craniotomy and cognitive monitoring is however developing rapidly. The aim of the current review is therefore, to investigate whether there is a change in the field towards incorporation of new tests and more complete mapping of (higher-order) cognitive functions.

METHODS

We replicated the systematic search of the study from 2018 in PubMed and Embase from February 2017 to November 2023, yielding 5130 potentially relevant articles. We used the artificial machine learning tool ASReview for screening and included 272 papers that gave a detailed description of the neuropsychological tests used during awake craniotomy.

RESULTS

Comparable to the previous study of 2018, the majority of studies (90.4%) reported tests for assessing language functions (Ruis, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 40(10):1081-1104, 218). Nevertheless, an increasing number of studies now also describe tests for monitoring visuospatial functions, social cognition, and executive functions.

CONCLUSIONS

Language remains the most extensively tested cognitive domain. However, a broader range of tests are now implemented during awake craniotomy and there are (new developed) tests which received more attention. The rapid development in the field is reflected in the included studies in this review. Nevertheless, for some cognitive domains (e.g., executive functions and memory), there is still a need for developing tests that can be used during awake surgery.

Cortical incisions and transcortical approaches for intra-axial and intraventricular lesions: A scoping review

Background

Transcortical approaches, encompassing various surgical corridors, have been employed to treat an array of intraparenchymal or intraventricular brain pathologies, including tumors, vascular malformations, infections, intracerebral hematomas, and epileptic surgery. Designing cortical incisions relies on the lesion location and characteristics, knowledge of eloquent functional anatomy, and advanced imaging such as tractography. Despite their widespread use in neurosurgery, there is a noticeable lack of systematic studies examining their common lobe access points, associated complications, and prevalent pathologies. This scoping review assesses current evidence to guide the selection of transcortical approaches for treating a variety of intracranial pathologies.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, searching PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were included if ≥5 patients operated on using transcortical approaches, with reported data on clinical features, treatments, and outcomes. Data analysis and synthesis were performed.

Results

A total of 50 articles encompassing 2604 patients were included in the study. The most common primary pathology was brain tumors (60.6%), particularly gliomas (87.4%). The transcortical-transtemporal approach was the most frequently identified cortical approach (70.48%), and the temporal lobe was the most accessed brain lobe (55.68%). The postoperative course outcomes were reported as good (55.52%), poor (28.38%), and death (14.62%).

Conclusion

Transcortical approaches are crucial techniques for managing a wide range of intracranial lesions, with the transcortical-transtemporal approach being the most common. According to the current literature, the selective choice of cortical incision and surgical corridor based on the lesion's pathology and anatomic-functional location correlates with acceptable functional outcomes.

Brain connectomics applied to oncological neuroscience: from a traditional surgical strategy focusing on glioma topography to a meta-network approach

The classical way for surgical selection and planning in cerebral glioma mainly focused on tumor topography. The emerging science of connectomics, which aims of mapping brain connectivity, resulted in a paradigmatic shift from a modular account of cerebral organization to a meta-network perspective. Adaptive behavior is actually mediated by constant changes in interactions within and across large-scale delocalized neural systems underlying conation, cognition, and emotion. Here, to optimize the onco-functional balance of glioma surgery, the purpose is to switch toward a connectome-based resection taking account of both relationships between the tumor and critical distributed circuits (especially subcortical pathways) as well as the perpetual instability of the meta-network. Such dynamic in the neural spatiotemporal integration permits functional reallocation leading to neurological recovery after massive resection in structures traditionally thought as "inoperable." This better understanding of connectome increases benefit/risk ratio of surgery (i) by selecting resection in areas deemed "eloquent" according to a localizationist dogma; (ii), conversely, by refining intraoperative awake cognitive mapping and monitoring in so-called non-eloquent areas; (iii) by improving preoperative information, enabling an optimal selection of intrasurgical tasks tailored to the patient's wishes; (iv) by developing an "oncological disconnection surgery"; (v) by defining a personalized multistep surgical strategy adapted to individual brain reshaping potential; and (vi) ultimately by preserving environmentally and socially appropriate behavior, including return to work, while increasing the extent of (possibly repeated) resection(s). Such a holistic vision of neural processing can enhance reliability of connectomal surgery in oncological neuroscience and may also be applied to restorative neurosurgery.

Updated perspectives on awake neurosurgery with cognitive and emotional assessment for patients with low-grade gliomas

Introduction: Thanks to early extensive surgical resection combined with medical oncological therapies, life expectancy dramatically increased in low-grade glioma (LGG), with an overall survival currently over 15 years. Therefore, patients should be able to maintain valuable family and socio-professional activities.Areas covered: For many decades, cognitive and emotional aspects were neglected by surgical and medical neurooncologists. The goal of surgery was to avoid hemiplegia and/or aphasia, with no considerations regarding behavior. However, because LGG patients live longer, they must be cognitively and affectively able to make long-term projects. Preservation of higher-order functions should be considered systematically in LGG surgery by means of awake cognitive/emotional mapping and monitoring.Expert opinion: The aim is to incorporate recent advances in neurosciences, which proposed revisited models of cerebral processing relying on a meta-network perspective, into the pre-, intra- and postoperative procedure. In this connectomal approach, brain functions result from complex interactions within and between neural networks. This improved understanding of a constant instability of the neural system allows a better cognitive/emotional assessment before and after each treatment over years, in order to preserve personality and adaptive behavior for each LGG patient, based on his/her own definition of quality of life. It is time to create oncological neurosciences.

Risk Assessment by Pre-surgical Tractography in Left Hemisphere Low-Grade Gliomas

Background: Tracking the white matter principal tracts is routinely typically included during the pre-surgery planning examinations and has revealed to limit functional resection of low-grade gliomas (LGGs) in eloquent areas.

Objective: We examined the integrity of the Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF) and Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fasciculus (IFOF), both known to be part of the language-related network in patients with LGGs involving the temporo-insular cortex. In a comparative approach, we contrasted the main quantitative fiber tracking values in the tumoral (T) and healthy (H) hemispheres to test whether or not this ratio could discriminate amongst patients with different post-operative outcomes.

Methods: Twenty-six patients with LGGs were included. We obtained quantitative fiber tracking values in the tumoral and healthy hemispheres and calculated the ratio (H_IFOF–T_IFOF)/H_IFOF and the ratio (H_SLF–T_SLF)/H_SLF on the number of streamlines. We analyzed how these values varied between patients with and without post-operative neurological outcomes and between patients with different post-operative Engel classes.

Results: The ratio for both IFOF and SLF significantly differed between patient with and without post-operative neurological language deficits. No associations were found between white matter structural changes and post-operative seizure outcomes.

Conclusions: Calculating the ratio on the number of streamlines and fractional anisotropy between the tumoral and the healthy hemispheres resulted to be a useful approach, which can prove to be useful during the pre-operative planning examination, as it gives a glimpse on the potential clinical outcomes in patients with LGGs involving the left temporo-insular cortex.