Individualized Anatomy-Based Targeting for VIM-cZI DBS in Essential Tremor

Deep Brain Stimulation with Double Targeting of the VIM and PSA for the Treatment of Rare Tremor Syndromes

INTRODUCTION

In tremor syndromes, pharmacological therapy is the primary treatment, but deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used when it is insufficient. We explore the use of DBS, focusing on the globus pallidus internus for dystonia and the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) for tremor conditions. We introduce the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) as a potential target, suggesting its efficacy in tremor reduction, particularly in rare tremor syndromes. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of double targeting the VIM and PSA in rare tremor conditions, highlighting the limited existing data on this.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2023, 22 patients with rare tremor syndromes were treated with bilateral DBS of the VIM and PSA. This case series consisted of 7 isolated head tremor, 1 hepatic encephalopathic tremor due to Abernethy syndrome, 2 voice tremor, 4 dystonic tremor, and 8 Holmes tremor (2 multiple sclerosis, 2 cerebellar insult, and 4 posttraumatic) patients. Patients' preoperative and 12-month postoperative tremor scores were compared, and the optimum VIM and PSA stimulation areas were investigated.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in the mean TRS score from 3.70 (±0.57) to 0.45 (±0.68) after 12 months of surgery. Specific outcomes for different indications were observed: for head tremor, 6 of 7 patients showed a reduction in TRS scores to 0 points; the vocal tremor patients demonstrated improvement; this change was not statistically significant, which is likely to be due to the low number of patients in this subgroup; the dystonic tremor patients showed either complete tremor abolition or a reduction in TRS scores; the Holmes tremor patients showed an 80% reduction in TRS scores; and the hepatic encephalopathy tremor and Abernethy syndrome patients showed a 75% improvement in TRS scores. The stimulation parameters converged on the VIM and dorsal PSA. Complications included the need for electrode repositioning, infections requiring electrode removal and re-implantation, dysarthria, and stimulation-induced ataxia, which was resolved by adjusting the stimulation parameters.

DISCUSSION

The literature on DBS for rare tremors is limited. Double targeting of the VIM and PSA appears to produce promising improvements on the outcomes reported in the existing literature on VIM-only DBS. The proximity of the VIM and PSA allows for flexible electrode placement, contributing to the potential success of the dual-target approach. We also discuss the theoretical advantages of targeting the PSA based on the distribution of tremor circuits, emphasizing the need for further research and electrophysiological studies.

Dual target deep brain stimulation for complex essential and dystonic tremor - A 5-year follow up

BACKGROUND

Essential tremor (ET) is characterized by action tremor of the upper limbs, head tremor and voice tremor. Dystonic tremor (DT) is produced by muscle contractions in a body affected by dystonia. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) is the most well-known advanced treatment for medication-refractory tremor. However, decline in efficacy overtime has led to explore other targets. This study aimed to measure the efficacy of bilateral dual targeting ViM/caudal Zona Incerta (cZI) stimulation on tremor control. A secondary aim was to evaluate if there was a difference in the efficacy between ET and DT.

METHODS

36 patients were retrospectively recruited at the Walton NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. Patients were assessed pre-operatively, and then at 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years post-operatively with the following scales: Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating (FTMTR) scale, EuroQol-5D, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

RESULTS

Bilateral ViM-cZI DBS significantly improved overall tremor score by 45.1% from baseline to 3-years post-operatively (p < 0.001). It continued to show improvement in overall FTMTR score by 30.7% at 5-years but this failed to meet significance. However, there was no significant improvement of mood or quality of life (QoL) scores. ET group on average showed a significant better clinical outcome compared to the DT group (p > 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that bilateral ViM-cZI DBS treatment had a favourable effect on motor symptoms sustained over the 5-years in tremor patients, especially in ET group. There was limited effect on mood and QoL with similar trends in outcomes for both tremor types.

Impact of biologically effective dose on tremor decrease after stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy for essential tremor: a retrospective longitudinal analysis

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the surgical alternatives for drug-resistant essential tremor (ET). Here, we aimed at evaluating whether biologically effective dose (BEDGy2.47) is relevant for tremor improvement after stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy in a population of patients treated with one (unplugged) isocenter and a uniform dose of 130 Gy. This is a retrospective longitudinal single center study. Seventy-eight consecutive patients were clinically analyzed. Mean age was 69.1 years (median 71, range 36-88). Mean follow-up period was 14 months (median 12, 3-36). Tremor improvement was assessed at 12 months after SRS using the ET rating assessment scale (TETRAS, continuous outcome) and binary (binary outcome). BED was defined for an alpha/beta of 2.47, based upon previous studies considering such a value for the normal brain. Mean BED was 4573.1 Gy2.47 (median 4612, 4022.1-4944.7). Mean beam-on time was 64.7 min (median 61.4; 46.8-98.5). There was a statically significant correlation between delta (follow-up minus baseline) in TETRAS (total) with BED (p = 0.04; beta coefficient - 0.029) and beam-on time (p = 0.03; beta coefficient 0.57) but also between TETRAS (ADL) with BED (p = 0.02; beta coefficient 0.038) and beam-on time (p = 0.01; beta coefficient 0.71). Fractional polynomial multivariate regression suggested that a BED > 4600 Gy2.47 and a beam-on time > 70 min did not further increase clinical efficacy (binary outcome). Adverse radiation events (ARE) were defined as larger MR signature on 1-year follow-up MRI and were present in 7 out of 78 (8.9%) cases, receiving a mean BED of 4650 Gy2.47 (median 4650, range 4466-4894). They were clinically relevant with transient hemiparesis in 5 (6.4%) patients, all with BED values higher than 4500 Gy2.47. Tremor improvement was correlated with BED Gy2.47 after SRS for drug-resistant ET. An optimal BED value for tremor improvement was 4300-4500 Gy2.47. ARE appeared for a BED of more than 4500 Gy2.47. Such finding should be validated in larger cohorts.

Technical Issues of Vim–PSA Double-Target DBS for Essential Tremor

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical treatment for essential tremor (ET), with the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) and posterior subthalamic area (PSA) as the most common targets. The stimulation efficacy of ET with Vim–PSA double-target DBS has been reported. Herein, we aim to propose surgical techniques for Vim–PSA double-target DBS surgery. Methods: This study enrolled six patients with ET who underwent Vim–PSA double-target electrode implantation from October 2019 to May 2022. The targets were located and adjusted using coordinates and multimodality MRI images. A burr hole was accurately drilled in line with the electrode trajectory under the guidance of a stereotactic frame. Novel approaches were adopted during the electrode implantation process for pneumocephalus reduction, including “arachnoid piamater welding” and “water sealing”. Electrophysiological recording was used to identify the implantation sites of the electrodes. A 3D reconstruction model of electrodes and nuclei was established to facilitate programming. Results: The combination of coordinates and multimodality MRI images for target location and adjustment enabled the alignment of Vim and PSA. Postoperative CT scanning showed that the electrode was precisely implanted. Stereotactic guidance facilitated accurate burr hole drilling. “Arachnoid piamater welding” and “water sealing” were efficient in reducing pneumocephalus. Intraoperative electrophysiological verified the efficacy of Vim–PSA double-target DBS surgery. Conclusions: The methods for target location and adjustment, accurate drilling of the burr hole, reduction in pneumocephalus, and intraoperative electrophysiological verification are key issues in DBS surgery targeting both the Vim and PSA. This study may provide technical support for Vim–PSA DBS, especially for surgeons with less experience in functional neurosurgery.

Novel targets in deep brain stimulation for movement disorders

The neurosurgical treatment of movement disorders, primarily via deep brain stimulation (DBS), is a rapidly expanding and evolving field. Although conventional targets including the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) for Parkinson's disease and ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalams (VIM) for tremor provide substantial benefit in terms of both motor symptoms and quality of life, other targets for DBS have been explored in an effort to maximize clinical benefit and also avoid undesired adverse effects associated with stimulation. These novel targets primarily include the rostral zona incerta (rZI), caudal zona incerta (cZI)/posterior subthalamic area (PSA), prelemniscal radiation (Raprl), pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), centromedian/parafascicular (CM/PF) nucleus of the thalamus, nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM), dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRTT), dentate nucleus of the cerebellum, external segment of the globus pallidus (GPe), and ventral oralis (VO) complex of the thalamus. However, reports of outcomes utilizing these targets are scattered and disparate. In order to provide a comprehensive resource for researchers and clinicians alike, we have summarized the existing literature surrounding these novel targets, including rationale for their use, neurosurgical techniques where relevant, outcomes and adverse effects of stimulation, and future directions for research.

Optimal closed-loop deep brain stimulation using multiple independently controlled contacts

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment option for a variety of neurological disorders, including Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. The symptoms of these disorders are known to be associated with pathological synchronous neural activity in the basal ganglia and thalamus. It is hypothesised that DBS acts to desynchronise this activity, leading to an overall reduction in symptoms. Electrodes with multiple independently controllable contacts are a recent development in DBS technology which have the potential to target one or more pathological regions with greater precision, reducing side effects and potentially increasing both the efficacy and efficiency of the treatment. The increased complexity of these systems, however, motivates the need to understand the effects of DBS when applied to multiple regions or neural populations within the brain. On the basis of a theoretical model, our paper addresses the question of how to best apply DBS to multiple neural populations to maximally desynchronise brain activity. Central to this are analytical expressions, which we derive, that predict how the symptom severity should change when stimulation is applied. Using these expressions, we construct a closed-loop DBS strategy describing how stimulation should be delivered to individual contacts using the phases and amplitudes of feedback signals. We simulate our method and compare it against two others found in the literature: coordinated reset and phase-locked stimulation. We also investigate the conditions for which our strategy is expected to yield the most benefit.

In this paper we use computer models of brain tissue to derive an optimal control algorithm for a recently developed new generation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices. DBS is a treatment for a variety of neurological disorders including Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, depression and pain. There is a growing amount of evidence to suggest that delivering stimulation according to feedback from patients, or closed-loop, has the potential to improve the efficacy, efficiency and side effects of the treatment. An important recent development in DBS technology are electrodes with multiple independently controllable contacts and this paper is a theoretical study into the effects of using this new technology. On the basis of a theoretical model, we devise a closed-loop strategy and address the question of how to best apply DBS across multiple contacts to maximally desynchronise neural populations. We demonstrate using numerical simulation that, for the systems we consider, our methods are more effective than two well-known alternatives, namely phase-locked stimulation and coordinated reset. We also predict that the benefits of using multiple contacts should depend strongly on the intrinsic neuronal response. The insights from this work should lead to a better understanding of how to implement and optimise closed-loop multi-contact DBS systems which in turn should lead to more effective and efficient DBS treatments.