Cement Augmentation for Single-Level Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: Comparison of Vertebroplasty With High-Viscosity Cement and Kyphoplasty

Cement augmentation for treatment of high to mid-thoracic osteoporotic compression fractures, high-viscosity cement percutaneous vertebroplasty versus balloon kyphoplasty

Whilst the majority of the literature suggests that balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) can relieve pain associated with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), evidence of high-viscosity cement (HVC) vertebroplasty (VP) or low viscosity cement (LVC) BKP for the treatment of VCFs at the levels of high and mid-thoracic vertebrae remains limited. The purpose of this study was to identify the different outcomes between HVC VP and LVC BKP used to repair high (T4-6) and mid (T7-9)-thoracic VCFs. A total of 114 patients with painful collapsed single-level vertebrae at high to mid-thoracic level who had undergone HVC VP or LVC BKP at a single tertiary medical center was reviewed retrospectively. All patients were divided into the HVC VP group (n = 72) and the LVC BKP group (n = 42). Clinical outcomes including demographic data and visual analogue scale (VAS) were compared. Radiographic data were collected preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up. More volume (ml) of cement injection was seen in the LVC BKP group (4.40 vs. 3.66, p < 0.001). The operation time (minutes) of the HVC VP group was significantly less than that of the LVC BKP group (33.34 vs. 39.05, p = 0.011). Leakage rate of cement was also fewer in the HVC VP group (26/72 vs. 27/42, p = 0.004). Compared with preoperative data, the VAS was improved after surgery in both groups. The LVC BKP group corrected more middle vertebral body height and local kyphosis angle than the HVC VP group. The outcomes of LVC BKP were not superior to that of HVC VP. HVC VP might be a good alternative to LVC BKP in the treatment of osteoporotic VCFs in high to mid-thoracic spine.

Study on the Relationship between the Use of Bisphosphonates for Antiosteoporosis and Vertebral Re-Fracture after Vertebroplasty

Objective. To explore the effect of bisphosphonates after vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), and to analyze the relationship between the use of bisphosphonates and vertebral refracture. Methods. A total of 150 patients with OVCF were selected from the pain department of our hospital from January 2018 to May 2020. All patients received vertebroplasty after admission, and were divided into the surgery group (62 cases) and combined with the bisphosphonates group (combined group, 88 cases) according to whether patients had used bisphosphonates after surgery. Before surgery, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), vertebral body and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), and Cobb Angle were collected, and the differences among groups were compared to analyze the treatment effect. After the follow-up, patients were divided into two groups according to whether vertebral refracture occurred during the follow-up period. Clinical characteristics, general information, and surgical indicators of patients in the two groups were collected, and related factors of postoperative vertebral refracture were analyzed. Results. There were no significant differences in preoperative VAS score, ODI index, BMD value, and Cobb angle between the two groups $\left(P>0.05\right)$ . At 12 months after surgery, VAS score, ODI index, and Cobb angle decreased, while BMD value increased in both groups. The VAS score, ODI index, and Cobb angle in the combined group were lower than those in the operation group, while the BMD value was higher than that in the operation group, and the difference was significant $\left(P<0.05\right)$ . The results of multivariate regression analysis showed that in BMD, no postoperative antiosteoporosis treatment, bone cement leakage, and poor cement diffusion were independent risk factors for vertebral refracture after vertebroplasty in patients with vertebral compression fractures. Conclusion. In order to avoid recurrent fractures in OVCF patients, attention should be paid to BMD, whether patients take antiosteoporosis drugs, whether bone cement permeation occurs and the diffusion of bone cement, etc. The above factors are the main influencing factors leading to recurrent fractures after PKP and PVP in the clinic.

Vertebroplasty with high-viscosity cement versus conventional kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with high viscosity cement (PVP-HVC) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) with normal-viscosity cement in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

METHODS

Pertinent studies were retrieved by searching five electronic databases up to July 2021. Additional records were identified via hand-searching of related references. Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was done for cement leakage.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, embracing 1050 patients with OVCFs, were included. PVP-HVC was superior to PKP with normal-viscosity cement regarding risk of cement leakage (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54-0.83, I² : 45.1%) and operation time (WMD: -11.26, 95% CI: -14.78 to -8.34, I² : 88.8%). However, TSA revealed that a sufficient level of evidence for leakage reduction may have yet to be reached. PKP groups had a significant decrease in Cobb's angles postoperatively (within 1 month, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.85-3.48, I² : 0%; after 1 year, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.35-4.01, I² : 0%). There are no significant differences between the two procedures pertaining to injected cement volume, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and risk of adjacent vertebral fractures.

CONCLUSION

PVP-HVC and PKP with normal-viscosity cement are safe and effective treatments for the management of OVCF, but the former is superior to the latter in terms of procedure time. The potential of PVP-HVC in reducing cement leaks remains to be validated by more well-designed studies.

OSTEOPOROTIC SPINE FRACTURES TREATED WITH KYPHOPLASTY OR VERTEBROPLASTY: A META-ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) are both widely adopted treatments for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF), however, which of these techniques is more effective has not yet been established. We performed a systematic review of articles, followed by meta-analysis, in an attempt to establish the differences between KP and VP. Initially, 187 articles were obtained, 20 of which were systematically reviewed and submitted to meta-analysis. Thus, 2,226 patients comprised the universe of the present article, 1202 of whom underwent KP and 1024 of whom underwent VP. The statistically significant results observed included lower mean bone cement leakage (ml) in the group submitted to kyphoplasty, with OR: 1.50 [CI95%: 1.16 - 1.95], p <0.05; shorter mean surgical time (minutes), 0.45 [CI90% 0.08 - 0.82], p <0.1, for the group submitted to VP as compared to the KP group; and a lower mean postoperative Oswestry Disability Index score in the KP group, OR: −0.14 [CI95%: −0.28 - 0.01], p <0.05. KP was more effective in improving physical function and had a lower frequency of cement leakage when compared to VP, although it requires longer surgical time. Level of evidence III; Systematic review of level III studies.