Classification of Brainstem Lesion Location

The BSCM score: a guideline for surgical decision-making for brainstem cavernous malformations

Microsurgical resection of brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs) can be performed today with acceptable morbidity and mortality. However, in this highly eloquent location, the indication for surgery remains challenging. We aimed to elaborate a score system that may help clinicians with their choice of treatment in patients with BSCMs in this study. A single-center series of 88 consecutive BSCMs patients with 272 follow-up visits were included in this study. Univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE) were constructed to identify the association of variables with treatment decisions. A score scale assigned points for variables that significantly contributed to surgical decision-making. Surgical treatment was recommended in 37 instances, while conservative treatment was proposed in 235 instances. The mean follow-up duration was 50.4 months, and the mean age at decision-making was 45.9 years. The mean BSCMs size was 14.3 ml. In the multivariable GEE model, patient age, lesion size, hemorrhagic event(s), mRS, and axial location were identified as significant factors for determining treatment options. With this proposed score scale (grades 0–XII), non-surgery was the first option at grades 0–III. The crossover point between surgery and non-surgery recommendations lay between grades V and VI while surgical treatment was found in favor at grades VII–X. In conclusion, the proposed BSCM operating score is a clinician-friendly tool, which may help neurosurgeons decide on the treatment for patients with BSCMs.

Mortality in Patients with Brainstem Cavernous Malformations

OBJECTIVE

Brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCM)-associated mortality has been reported up to 20% in patients managed conservatively, whereas postoperative mortality rates range from 0 to 1.9%. Our aim was to analyze the actual risk and causes of BSCM-associated mortality in patients managed conservatively and surgically based on our own patient cohort and a systematic literature review.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective single-center study encompassing all patients with BSCM that presented to our institution between 2006 and 2018. In addition, a systematic review was performed on all studies encompassing patients with BSCM managed conservatively and surgically.

RESULTS

Of 118 patients, 54 were treated conservatively (961.0 person years follow-up in total). No BSCM-associated mortality was observed in our conservatively as well as surgically managed patient cohort. Our systematic literature review and analysis revealed an overall BSCM-associated mortality rate of 2.3% (95% CI: 1.6-3.3) in 22 studies comprising 1,251 patients managed conservatively and of 1.3% (95% CI: 0.9-1.7) in 99 studies comprising 3,275 patients with BSCM treated surgically.

CONCLUSION

The BSCM-associated mortality rate in patients managed conservatively is almost as low as in patients treated surgically and much lower than in frequently cited reports, most probably due to the good selection nowadays in regard to surgery.