Concomitant Sacral Dural Arteriovenous Fistula and Conus Medullaris Arteriovenous Malformation with Respective Drainage Veins: Case Report and Literature Review

Endovascular treatment of epidural arteriovenous fistula associated with sacral arteriovenous malformation: case report

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas with sacral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) are a rare type of spinal arteriovenous fistulas. There are two varieties of spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas (SEDAVFs), with type 1 involving intradural venous drainage and type 2 not involving intradural venous drainage. We present a case of transarterial embolization for type 1 SEDAVFs with sacral AVM. Within 8 months, a 14-year-old boy presented with progressively weaker lower extremities and bladder-bowel dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the whole spine revealed thoracic spinal cord congestion, a single dilated flow void running from the lumbosacral area to the conus medullaris, and continuing cranial draining up to the C5 level via the perimedullary vein. Filling of the venous sac through a preferential feeder after embolizing the AVM nidus was performed. After 3 months, the clinical follow-up showed improvement of motoric function, although mild. Endovascular treatment for SEDAVF type 1 might have achieved total obliteration without any procedural complications. Nevertheless, it can be very challenging due to multiple feeders and the presence of an AVM nidus like in this case. However, the most difficult thing in fistula cases is establishing the diagnosis and finding the fistula point. Early treatment is required, due to the fact that longstanding lesions could cause irreversible damage.

Cauda equina arteriovenous fistula supplied by proximal radicular artery and concomitant sacral dural arteriovenous fistula: A case report and literature review

Background

Cauda equina arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) fed by the proximal radicular artery are exceedingly rare. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) in the sacral region are rare and usually misdiagnosed. We report a case of a cauda equina AVF with concomitant sacral DAVF. We also review the coexistence of multiple types of spinal vascular malformations in a single patient.

Case Description

A 54-year-old man presented with progressive weakness of the lower extremities for 1 month. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral and thoracic spine showed spinal cord congestion, extending from the conus medullaris to the level of T7, and abnormal tortuous and dilated flow void, running from the level of L5 to T12 along anterior surface of the spinal cord. Spinal angiography demonstrated the fistula at the level of L2 below the conus medullaris. Based on intraoperative findings, the cauda equina AVF supplied by the proximal radicular artery with cranial drainage through the enlarged radicular vein was confirmed and successfully obliterated. Another enlarged arterialized radicular vein running parallel to another cauda equina nerve root is observed with unknown origin. After the operation, the patient showed mild improvement of his symptoms. Follow-up MRI and contrast-enhanced MR angiography revealed an another sacral DAVF vascularized by the lateral sacral artery.

Conclusion

The coexistence of different spinal vascular malformations in a same patient is extremely rare. Most authors of several studies hypothesized that venous hypertension and thrombosis due to the presence or treatment of the first spinal vascular lesion may produce a second DAVF.

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula 8 years after lumbar discectomy surgery: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) is an extremely rare vascular malformation of the central nervous system that is often confused with degenerative spinal disorders due to similar early symptoms and clinical features. Here, we report a case of SDAVF recurrence 8 years after lumbar spine surgery and summarize relevant literature.

CASE SUMMARY

A 54-year-old male was admitted to our hospital complaining of lower back pain, numbness in both lower extremities and intermittent claudication. Subsequent imaging identified lumbar spinal stenosis. Following surgical treatment, the patient’s symptoms significantly resolved, and he was able to perform daily activities. However, similar symptoms appeared 8 years later, followed by confirmation of SDAVF diagnosis. The patient underwent neurosurgery 7 mo after symptom onset. The follow-up period lasted 14 mo, and the patient remains with marginal neurological symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the importance of prompt SDAVF diagnosis. Due to its nonspecific clinical presentation, the clinical experience of the surgeon and definitive imaging examination are indispensable. Additionally, timely neurosurgery is effective and may significantly improve patient outcomes.