1
|
Chen Y, Yu P, Li Z, Xu H, Li S, Wang Q, Ji F, Lan Q. Outcomes and adverse events for spinal synovial cysts surgical treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024:10.1007/s00402-024-05460-w. [PMID: 39039314 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05460-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal synovial cysts (SSCs) are a rare cause of nerve root and spinal cord compression. Surgical excision of SSCs remains the mainstay of treatment in the presence of unremitting symptoms or neurological deficits, but the choice of the surgical approach remains controversial. The goal of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with traditional approaches (interlaminar or laminectomy/hemilaminectomy) and minimally invasive approaches (microsurgical tubular approaches or endoscopic approaches) for SSCs. METHODS Studies reporting surgical management of SSCs were searched in three online databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science). This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement. It was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021288992). The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to evaluate bias. Extracted research data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16 and SPSS statistics 25. RESULTS A total of 22 related relevant studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence, reoperation, and operation time between minimally invasive approaches and traditional approaches (p > 0.05), but minimally invasive approaches had a good functional improvement (p = 0.004). Postoperative length of hospital stays and intraoperative bleeding in traditional approaches were also higher than in minimally invasive approaches (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Based on the available evidence, minimally invasive approaches may be better than traditional approaches in the treatment of SSCs. Minimally invasive approaches had the advantages of improving clinical satisfaction, with a similar complication rate to traditional approaches. Moreover, endoscopic and microsurgical tubular approaches had similar outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004, P.R. China
| | - Pei Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004, P.R. China
| | - Zhaoliang Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004, P.R. China
| | - Hui Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004, P.R. China
| | - Shenggang Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004, P.R. China
| | - Qing Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004, P.R. China
| | - Fufu Ji
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004, P.R. China
| | - Qing Lan
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Federico VP, Forlenza EM, Acuna AJ, Vucicevic RS, Conaway WK, Nie JW, Butler AJ, Gabriel S, Lopez GD, An HS, Colman MW, Phillips FM. Risk of Subsequent Fusion After Isolated Decompression of Lumbar Facet Cysts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32:339-345. [PMID: 38320287 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lumbar facet cysts represent a potential source of nerve root compression in elderly patients. Isolated decompression without fusion has proven to be a reasonable treatment option in properly indicated patients. However, the risk of lumbar fusion after isolated decompression and facet cyst excision has yet to be elucidated. METHODS The PearlDiver database was reviewed for patients undergoing isolated laminectomy for lumbar facet cyst from January 2015 to December 2018 using Current Procedural Terminology coding. Patients undergoing concomitant fusion or additional decompression, as well as those diagnosed with preexisting spondylolisthesis or without a minimum of 5-year follow-up, were excluded. Rates of subsequent lumbar fusion and potential risk factors for subsequent fusion were identified. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi square test, and multivariate logistic regression. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS In total, 10,707 patients were ultimately included for analysis. At 5-year follow-up, 727 (6.79%) of patients underwent subsequent lumbar fusion after initial isolated decompression. Of these, 301 (2.81% of total patients, 41.4% of fusion patients) underwent fusion within the first year after decompression. Multivariate analysis identified chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and osteoarthritis as risk factors for requiring subsequent lumbar fusion at 5 years following the index decompression procedure ( P < 0.033; all). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing isolated decompression for lumbar facet cysts undergo subsequent lumbar fusion at a 5-year rate of 6.79%. Risk factors for subsequent decompression include chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. This study will assist spine surgeons in appropriately counseling patients on expected postoperative course and potential risks of isolated decompression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Federico
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (Federico, Forlenza, Acuna, Vucicevic, Conaway, Nie, Butler, Lopez, An, Colman, and Phillips), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA (Gabriel)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Judy BF, Abou-Mrad T, Bydon A. Synovial Cyst in the Setting of an Interspinous Fusion Device. World Neurosurg 2023; 179:144-145. [PMID: 37597664 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
Synovial cysts of the spine are degenerative cystic lesions that can lead to severe symptoms secondary to compression of the spinal cord, individual nerve roots, and/or the cauda equina. Some believe the etiology of this entity is related to increased motion across the facet joint and instability. We report a case of a lumbar synovial cyst located at the same level as a previously inserted spinous process fusion device. This case illustrates that, unlike a transpedicular instrumented fusion where the risk of synovial cyst formation is zero, a spinal process fusion can still lead to synovial cyst formation likely due to persistent micromotion across that segment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan F Judy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Ali Bydon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benato A, Menna G, Rapisarda A, Polli FM, D’Ercole M, Izzo A, D’Alessandris QG, Montano N. Decompression with or without Fusion for Lumbar Synovial Cysts—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072664. [PMID: 37048747 PMCID: PMC10095101 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of symptomatic lumbar synovial cysts (LSC) is still a matter of debate. Previous systematic reviews did not stratify data according to different treatment techniques or incompletely reported comparative data on patients treated with lumbar posterior decompression (LPD) and lumbar decompression and fusion (LDF). The aim of our study was to compare LPD and LDF via a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature. The design of this study was in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review questions were as follows: among patients suffering from symptomatic lumbar synovial cysts (population) and treated with either posterior lumbar decompression or posterior decompression with fusion (intervention), who gets the best results (outcome), in terms of cyst recurrence, reoperation rates, and improvement of postoperative symptoms (comparison)? The search of the literature yielded a total of 1218 results. Duplicate records were then removed (n = 589). A total of 598 articles were screened, and 587 records were excluded via title and abstract screening; 11 studies were found to be relevant to our research question and were assessed for eligibility. Upon full-text review, 5 were excluded because they failed to report any parameter separately for both LPD and LDF. Finally, 6 studies for a total of 657 patients meeting the criteria stated above were included in the present investigation. Our analysis showed that LDF is associated with better results in terms of lower postoperative back pain and cyst recurrence compared with LPD. No differences were found in reoperation rates and complication rates between the two techniques. The impact of minimally invasive decompression techniques on the different outcomes in LSC should be assessed in the future and compared with instrumentation techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Benato
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Section, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Grazia Menna
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Section, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Rapisarda
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Section, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Polli
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Section, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela D’Ercole
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Section, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Izzo
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Section, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Quintino Giorgio D’Alessandris
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Section, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Montano
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Section, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gonzalez GA, Corso K, Kothari P, Franco D, Porto G, Miao J, Wainwright JV, O'Leary M, Hines K, Mahtabfar A, Vanderkarr M, Thalheimer S, Sharan A, Jallo J, Harrop J. Lumbar Synovial Cysts-Should You Fuse or Not? Neurosurgery 2022; 92:1013-1020. [PMID: 36700698 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal synovial cysts are lesions that most commonly occur in the lumbar region. The need for an instrumented spinal fusion in addition to lumbar decompression with removal of the synovial cyst is unknown. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that select patients who underwent decompression with instrumented fusion for lumbar synovial cysts would be less likely to have subsequent surgery (SS) in a 2-year period than patients treated with laminectomy alone. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was performed using IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Patients who had a lumbar synovial cyst diagnosis and laminectomy surgery with or without fusion surgery were included in this study. Patients were tracked for SS 2 years after surgery. Laminectomy patients were propensity score-matched to laminectomy with fusion (LF) patients using a 2:1 ratio. The log-rank test and Cox regression were used to compare the cumulative incidence of SS between groups. RESULTS There were 7664 and 1631 patients treated with laminectomy and LF before matching. After matching, there were 2212 laminectomy and 1631 LF patients and patient characteristics were balanced. The 2-year incidence of recurrent SS was 3.1% ([CI]: 2.2%, 4.0%) and 1.7% (95% CI: 0.9%, 2.5%) laminectomy and LF, respectively. Compared with laminectomy, LF had a statistically significant lower risk of recurrent SS (hazard ratio: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.32-0.97]; P -value: .04). CONCLUSION All patients who had concomitant lumbar fusion showed decreased chance of having a cyst- or noncyst-related recurrence SS when compared with all patients undergoing laminectomy alone, regardless of diagnosis at the time of SS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn A Gonzalez
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine Corso
- Real World Data Sciences, Medical Device Epidemiology, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Daniel Franco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Guilherme Porto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jingya Miao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John V Wainwright
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew O'Leary
- Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kevin Hines
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aria Mahtabfar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mari Vanderkarr
- Real World Data Sciences, Medical Device Epidemiology, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Sara Thalheimer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashwini Sharan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jack Jallo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James Harrop
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khalid SI, Nie JW, Thomson KB, Nie JZ, Patil SN, Zakrzewski V, Souter J, Smith JS, Mehta AI. Five-Year Outcomes After Decompression and Fusion Versus Decompression Alone in the Treatment of Lumbar Synovial Cysts. World Neurosurg 2022; 166:e23-e33. [PMID: 35691521 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal synovial cysts are acquired, fluid-filled lesions of the facet joint that most commonly occur in the lumbar spine. They are thought to arise from degenerative changes and to result from segmental instability. Although the treatment of these lesions has been studied, the long-term implications and effects of the different strategies for surgical intervention (i.e., decompression and fusion vs. decompression alone) have not yet been elucidated or established. METHODS Using an all-payer database with 53 million patient records (MARINER-53), patients with a diagnosis of lumbar synovial cysts were identified. Patients who had undergone lumbar fusion versus laminectomy were matched 1:1 using binomial and gaussian logistic regression models to evaluate the need for future lumbar surgery within 5 years after their index procedure. RESULTS No statistically significant differences were noted between the 5-year rates of subsequent intervention, additional laminectomy, or fusion among patients who had undergone index decompression and fusion (n = 51; 10.5%) versus decompression alone (n = 43; 8.8%; P = 0.39). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in the odds of intervention type after index decompression and fusion versus decompression alone (subsequent laminectomy: odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-1.09; subsequent fusion: odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-2.02). CONCLUSIONS Patient-specific factors and surgeon-patient-shared decision-making should be used when planning interventions for these lesions. However, synovial cysts might not require a fusion procedure for presumed instability. Further investigation is required, using randomized and prospective studies, to further evaluate the effective treatment of this entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed I Khalid
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - James W Nie
- College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kyle B Thomson
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeffrey Z Nie
- School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Shashank N Patil
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Victoria Zakrzewski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John Souter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jennifer S Smith
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ankit I Mehta
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Page PS, Parmar V, Momin E, Burkett DJ, Greeneway GP, Hanna A, Resnick DK. Classification and Reliability of Lumbar Facet Cysts Grading Scales. World Neurosurg 2021; 155:e391-e394. [PMID: 34425294 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of symptomatic lumbar facet cysts has been associated with segmental instability. Given this association, decompression versus decompression with fusion is a frequently debated topic. Multiple grading scales have been devised to identify patients at high risk for development of cyst recurrence; however, there exists no external evaluation of these scales. METHODS A retrospective review of 54 patients undergoing initial treatment for lumbar synovial cysts at a single institution over the past 12 years was conducted. Surgical treatment consisted of decompression with cystectomy without fusion. Patients were assessed and classified according to the NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG) and Rosenstock Classification systems. Five neurosurgeons reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance images, and results were classified. Interrater reliability was assessed using both Gwet's AC1 coefficient and Krippendorff's alpha. A 1-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate predictive ability of both classification systems. RESULTS In total, of the 54 patients who underwent decompression, 7 had cyst recurrence. Overall cyst recurrence was most common in NSURG grade 2 cysts (3/12, 25%) followed by grade 1 cysts (4/27, 14.8%). Of the NSURG grade 3 and 4 patients, none had cyst recurrence. In the Rosenstock grades the most common recurrence was in grade 3 cysts (1/4, 25%) followed by grade 1 cysts (5/26, 19.2%). Interrater reliability demonstrated good reproducibility on Gwet's AC1 and Krippendorff's alpha on both grading scales. Neither score was predictive of cyst recurrence (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The Rosenstock and NeuroSpine scores demonstrate good overall interrater reliability but are inconsistent in their ability to predict recurrence of lumbar facet cysts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul S Page
- University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Neurosurgery, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Vikas Parmar
- University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Neurosurgery, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Eric Momin
- University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Neurosurgery, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Daniel J Burkett
- University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Neurosurgery, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Garret P Greeneway
- University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Neurosurgery, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Amgad Hanna
- University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Neurosurgery, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Daniel K Resnick
- University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Neurosurgery, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
| |
Collapse
|