1
|
Taniguchi K, Watari T, Nagoshi K. Characteristics and trends of medical malpractice claims in Japan between 2006 and 2021. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0296155. [PMID: 38109373 PMCID: PMC10727369 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Classification and analysis of existing data on medical malpractice lawsuits are useful in identifying the root causes of medical errors and considering measures to prevent recurrence. No study has shown the actual prevalence of all closed malpractice claims in Japan, including the number of cases and their trial results. In this study, we illustrated the recent trends of closed malpractice claims by medical specialty, the effects of the acceptance rates and the settlements and clarified the trends and characteristics. This was a descriptive study of all closed malpractice claims data from the Supreme Court in Japan from 2006-2021. Trends and the characteristics in closed malpractice claims by medical specialty and the outcomes of the claims, including settlements and judgments, were extracted. The total number of closed medical malpractice claims was 13,340 in 16 years, with a high percentage ending in settlement (7,062, 52.9%), and when concluding in judgment (4,734, 35.3%), the medical profession (3,589, 75.8%) was favored. When compared by medical specialty, plastic surgery and obstetrics/gynecology were more likely resolved by settlement. By contrast, psychiatry cases exhibited a lower likelihood of settlement, and the percentage of cases resulting in unfavorable outcomes for patients was notably high. Furthermore, there has been a decline in the number of closed medical malpractice claims in Japan in recent years compared to the figures observed in 2006. In particular, the number of closed medical malpractice claims in obstetrics/gynecology and the number of closed medical malpractice claims per 1,000 physicians decreased significantly compared to other specialties. In conclusion, half of the closed malpractice claims were settled, and a low percentage of patients won their cases. Closed medical malpractice claims in Japan have declined in most medical specialties since 2006. Additionally, obstetrics/gynecology revealed a significant decrease since introducing the Obstetrics/Gynecology Medical Compensation System in 2009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaori Taniguchi
- Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Takashi Watari
- General Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Kiwamu Nagoshi
- Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamamoto N, Watari T, Shibata A, Noda T, Ozaki T. The impact of system and diagnostic errors for medical litigation outcomes in orthopedic surgery. J Orthop Sci 2023; 28:484-489. [PMID: 34887150 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical litigation resulting from medical errors has a negative impact on health economics for both patients and medical practitioners. In medical litigation involving orthopedic surgeons, we aimed to identify factors contributing to plaintiff victory (orthopedic surgeon loss) through a comprehensive assessment. METHODS This retrospective study included 166 litigation claims against orthopedic surgeons using a litigation database in Japan. We evaluated the sex and age of the patient (plaintiff), initial diagnosis, diagnostic error, system error, the time and place of each claim that led to malpractice litigation, the institution's size, and clinical outcomes. The main outcome was the litigation outcome (acceptance or rejection) in the final judgment. Acceptance meant that the orthopedic surgeon lost the malpractice lawsuit. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association of factors with an accepted claim. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 42 years, and 65.7% were male. The litigation outcome of 85 (51.2%) claims was acceptance. The adjusted median indemnity paid was $151,818. The multivariable analysis showed that diagnostic error, system error, sequelae, inadequate medical procedure, and follow-up observation were significantly associated with the orthopedic surgeon losing the lawsuit. In particular, claims involving diagnostic errors were more likely to be acceptance claims, in which the orthopedic surgeon lost (adjusted odds ratio 16.7, 95% confidence intervals: 4.7 to 58.0, p < 0.001). All of the claims in which the orthopedic surgeon lost were associated with a diagnostic or system error, with the most common one being system error. CONCLUSIONS System errors and diagnostic errors were significantly associated with acceptance claims (orthopedic surgeon losses). Since these are modifiable factors, it is necessary to take measures not only for individual physicians but also for the overall medical management system to enhance patient safety and reduce the litigation risk of orthopedic surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norio Yamamoto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Miyamoto Orthopedic Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Systematic Review Workshop Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Watari
- Shimane University Hospital, General Medicine Center, Shimane, Japan; Harvard Medical School, Master of Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety, Boston, USA.
| | - Ayako Shibata
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Noda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Ozaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Watanabe J, Yamamoto N, Shibata A, Oide S, Watari T. The impact and prevention of systemic and diagnostic errors in surgical malpractice claims in Japan: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Today 2022; 53:562-568. [PMID: 36127545 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-022-02590-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
The Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) has been proven to improve patient outcomes. However, few studies have evaluated the details of litigation and its prevention in terms of systemic and diagnostic errors as potentially preventable problems. The present study explored factors associated with accepted claims (surgeon-loss). We retrospectively searched the national Japanese malpractice claims database between 1961 and 2017. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we assessed the association between medical malpractice variables (systemic and diagnostic errors, facility size, time, place, and clinical outcomes) and litigation outcomes (acceptance). We evaluated whether or not the factors associated with litigation could have been prevented with the SURPASS checklist. We identified 339 malpractice claims made against general surgeons. There were 159 (56.3%) accepted claims, and the median compensation paid was 164,381 USD. In multivariable analyses, system (odds ratio, 27.2 95% confidence interval 13.8-53.5) and diagnostic errors (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 2.7-10.5) had a significant statistical association with accepted claims. The SURPASS checklist may have prevented 7% and 10% of the accepted claims and systemic errors, respectively. It is unclear what proportion of accepted claims indicated that general surgeon loses should be prevented from performing surgery if the SURPASS checklist were used. In conclusion, systemic and diagnostic errors were associated with accepted claims. Surgical teams should adhere to the SURPASS checklist to enhance patient safety and reduce surgeon risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Tochigi Medical Center Shimotsuga, Tochigi, Japan.,Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan
| | - Norio Yamamoto
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Miyamoto Orthopedic Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ayako Shibata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shiho Oide
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.,Urogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Watari
- General Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Shimane, Japan. .,Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoz S, Al-Sharshahi ZF, Aljuboori Z, Al-Rawi MA. Letter to the Editor: Forensic Neurosurgery: A Luxury or Necessity? World Neurosurg 2022; 158:318-319. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
5
|
Kandregula S, Lefever D, Trosclair K, Savardekar A, Menger R, Agarwal N, Kimmell K, Mazzola C, Cozzens J, Rosenow J, Schirmer C, Guthikonda B. "There's got to be a better way": Global Perspectives of Medicolegal Environment and Neurosurgical Socioeconomics. World Neurosurg 2021; 151:341-347. [PMID: 34243667 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Neurosurgery is considered to have one of the greatest risks of medical malpractice claims. However, medicolegal issues in neurosurgery are often disregarded and underrated worldwide. Medical errors in the neurosurgical field can be attributed to multiple factors, including highly morbid pathologies, the technical difficulty of neurosurgical procedures, and the involvement and interaction of a multidisciplinary team in the care of neurosurgical patients. Health care providers worldwide are at risk of lawsuits, sometimes even when no deviation from the standard of care had occurred in a given case. Often, governments use additional tactics to decrease the burden on compensators and extrajudicial institutions and to decrease the court's flow of irrational litigation. Continuous amendments to health care acts and newer reforms to address these issues have materialized worldwide. In the present narrative review, we have reviewed the global perspectives of medicolegal issues, with a focus on neurosurgical discipline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Kandregula
- Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Devon Lefever
- Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Krystle Trosclair
- Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Amey Savardekar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Richard Menger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Political Science, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kristopher Kimmell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Catherine Mazzola
- Department of Neurosurgery, NJ Craniofacial Center, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jeffrey Cozzens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Joshua Rosenow
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Clemens Schirmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bharat Guthikonda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Watari T, Otsuki K. In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "Characteristics and Burden of Diagnostic Error-Related Malpractice Claims in Neurosurgery". World Neurosurg 2021; 147:253. [PMID: 33685026 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Watari
- Shimane University Hospital, Postgraduate Clinical Training Center, Shimane, Japan; Harvard Medical School Master of Healthcare Quality and Safety, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Kazuya Otsuki
- Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| |
Collapse
|