Rate and Characteristics of Vertebral Artery Injury Following C1-C2 Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Atlantoaxial dislocation due to Os odontoideum in down syndrome: Literature review and case reports

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Os odontoideum is a rare condition commonly associated with atlantoaxial instability (AAI) and leading to atlantoaxial dislocation. The incidence of Os odontoideum is higher in patients with Down syndrome. Similar to odontoid fractures, atlantoaxial dislocation in patients with Os odontoideum can result in neurological deficits, disability, and even mortality.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present two cases of Os odontoideum accompanied by Down syndrome. Both patients were hospitalized due to progressive tetraparesis after falls several months prior. Upon examination, the patients exhibited myelopathy and were unable to walk or stand. MRI revealed spinal stenosis at the C1-C2 level due to atlantoaxial dislocation. C1-C2 fixation using Harms' technique was performed in both cases. One case experienced a complication involving instrument failure, necessitating revision surgery.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Due to the characteristics of transverse ligament laxity, low muscle tone, excessive joint flexibility, and cognitive impairment, children with both Down syndrome and Os odontoideum are at a high risk of disability and even mortality from spinal cord injury. Most authors recommend surgical management when patients exhibit atlantoaxial instability. Additional factors such as low bone density, cognitive impairment, and a high head-to-body ratio may increase the risk of surgical instrument failure and nonunion postoperatively in patients with Down syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Os odontoideum is a cause of AAI in patients with DS. Indication of surgery in the presence of AAI helps to resolve neurological injury and prevent further deterioration. The use of a cervical collar is considered to prevent instrument failure postoperatively.

Extracranial Vertebral Artery Injuries

Paired vertebral arteries (VAs) travel from the subclavian artery through the cervical spine and into the intracranial space where they contribute to posterior cerebral circulation. Blunt and penetrating injuries to the cervical spine risk injury to the VA. Among the most feared complications of vertebral artery injury (VAI) is posterior circulation stroke. Appropriate screening and treatment of these injuries in the trauma setting remain vitally important to aid in the prevention of devastating neurologic sequelae. A robust knowledge of the VA anatomy is required for spine surgeons to avoid VAI during cervical spine approaches and instrumentation. Both anterior and posterior cervical spine surgeries can place the VA at risk. Careful preoperative assessment with the appropriate advanced imaging studies is necessary to verify the course of the VA in the cervical spine and thus prevent iatrogenic injury because anatomic variations along the course of the artery can prove hazardous if not properly anticipated. Iatrogenic VAI can be treated successfully with tamponade. However, in some cases, ligation, repair, or endovascular procedures may be indicated.

Vertebral artery course variation leading to an insufficient proximal anchoring area for thoracic endovascular aortic repair

BACKGROUNDS

We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection in patients with an insufficient proximal anchoring area due to the vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch.

METHODS

In this study, we report two patients with type B aortic dissection who were complicated with left vertebral artery course variation. Specifically, the left vertebral artery originated from the aortic arch. In these patients, the anchoring area (<15 mm) was not sufficient between the left vertebral artery and the ruptured aortic dissection.

RESULT

We reconstructed the left vertebral artery during horacic endovascular aortic repair. Both patients recovered well and were discharged without any adverse events.

CONCLUTION

Our experience shows that horacic endovascular aortic repair is feasible in patients with type B aortic dissection who have an insufficient proximal anchoring area due to the left vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch.

Early Outcomes of Bone Autografting in the Bilateral Atlantoaxial Joints Applied in Posterior Fusion Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Cable-dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation can provide promising results in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation or instability. However, bilateral atlantoaxial joints bone autografting has not been conducted in this technique. We aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of bilateral atlantoaxial joints bone autografting in posterior cable-dragged reduction and cantilever-beam internal fixation.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 14 patients with a minimum 24-month follow-up from December 2019 to September 2020. The granular bone harvested from the iliac crest was packed into the bilateral atlantoaxial joints of 14 patients in posterior cable-dragged reduction and cantilever-beam internal fixation. X-ray imaging and cervical computed tomography (CT) were performed during follow-up. The time required for bone fusion was recorded. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the JOA scores, NDI, and VAS scores. Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-squared test, or the Fisher exact test were used to compare the two groups regarding patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, bone fusion rates, and cervical sagittal alignment.

RESULTS

The operations were successfully performed in all patients without any intraoperative complications. The mean operation time was (169.64 ± 20.91) minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was (130.71 ± 33.62) mL. All patients received satisfactory reductions and firm bony fusion at the final follow-up. The fusion rates were 64.29% in the atlantoaxial joints and 21.43% in post bone graft area at 3 months postoperatively, and a significant difference was observed (p = 0.022). Besides, the cervical sagittal alignment in all patients was well maintained in the last follow-up compared to preoperatively. Importantly, a complete bony fusion in the atlantoaxial joints was observed in all patients. Moreover, the JOA, NDI, and VAS scores had improved significantly at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Bone autografting of the bilateral atlantoaxial joints is a safe and effective technique to increase bone fusion rates, shorten bone fusion time, and reduce complication rates when the cable-dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation approach is used. Therefore, it is a cost-effective surgical procedure for treating patients with atlantoaxial dislocation or instability.

Intraoperative Stereotactic Arteriography in Complex Cervical Spine Surgery

Intra-operative navigation has revolutionized spinal instrumentation. The O-arm (a mobile X-ray system; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) is uniquely capable of enabling visualization of the spine in axial planes. The application of this technology is wide yet underutilized in terms of its capacity to image spinal vascular anatomy. We completed a retrospective chart review of the following case studies. A 24-year-old neurologically intact female presented with a Jefferson fracture without vertebral artery dissection after a motor vehicle accident. After the failure of conservative management due to pseudoarthrosis, the patient opted for fusion. Prior to the procedure, bilateral 5 French femoral sheaths were placed. After exposure, intraarterial (IA) contrast was injected prior to the O-arm spin to visualize both vertebral arteries, which were stretched and adjacent to a mobile boney segment. In the second case, a 71-year-old male presented with right shoulder pain and a flaccid left deltoid secondary to a large enhancing epidural lesion spanning C4-C7. Further work-up confirmed a diagnosis of metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Prior to resection with cervical spinal stabilization, a right radial artery 4 French Glidesheath was placed. Prior to the O-arm spin, the right vertebral artery was selected, and intravenous contrast was injected to permit visualization of the vertebral artery, which was encased within the tumor and at significant risk for iatrogenic injury. Both patients tolerated the endovascular and spinal procedures well without vertebral artery injury. This is the first series to report the effective use of the O-arm for improved visualization of vascular anatomy during surgery for cervical spinal trauma and oncology.

Intraoperative Vertebral Artery Injury: Evaluation, Management, and Prevention

Vertebral artery injury (VAI) is a serious and potentially life-threatening injury that is encountered with trauma to the cervical spine and less frequently during surgery. VAI can occur during either anterior or posterior cervical approaches or instrumentation and often involves anomalous courses of the artery. Although the incidence is rare, serious consequences including fistula formation, thrombosis, pseudoaneurysm development, cerebral ischemia, hemorrhage, and death may occur. Management of VAI can be divided into prevention, including review of preoperative imaging with knowledge of the anatomic course, utilization of surgical landmarks intraoperatively, and prompt recognition and management when injury is encountered.

Comparison of intraoperative CT- and cone beam CT-based spinal navigation for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Due to the complexity of neurovascular structures in the atlantoaxial region, spinal navigation for posterior C1-C2 instrumentation is nowadays a helpful tool to increase accuracy of surgery and safety of patients. Many available intraoperative navigation devices have proven their reliability in this part of the spine. Two main imaging techniques are used: intraoperative CT (iCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

PURPOSE

Comparison of iCT- and CBCT-based technologies for navigated posterior instrumentation in C1-C2 instability.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 81 consecutive patients from July 2014 to April 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Screw accuracy and operating time.

METHODS

Patients with C1-C2 instability received posterior instrumentation using C2 pedicle screws, C1 lateral mass or pedicle screws. All screws were inserted using intraoperative imaging either using iCT or CBCT systems and spinal navigation with autoregistration technology. Following navigated screw insertion, a second intraoperative scan was performed to assess the accuracy of screw placement. Accuracy was defined as the percentage of correctly placed screws or with minor cortical breach (<2 mm) as graded by an independent observer compared to misplaced screws.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients with C1-C2 instability were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 34 patients were operated with the use of iCT and 47 with CBCT. No significant demographic difference was found between groups. In the iCT group, 97.7% of the C1-C2 screws were correctly inserted; 2.3% showed a minor cortical breach (<2 mm); no misplacement (>2 mm). In the CBCT group, 98.9% of screws were correctly inserted; no minor pedicle breach; 1.1% showed misplacement >2 mm. Accuracy of screw placement demonstrated no significant difference between groups. Both technologies allowed sufficient identification of screw misplacement intraoperatively leading to two screw revisions in the iCT and three in the CBCT group. Median time of surgery was significantly shorter using CBCT technology (166.5 minutes [iCT] vs 122 minutes [CBCT]; p<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal navigation using either iCT- or CBCT-based systems with autoregistration allows safe and reliable screw placement and intraoperative assessment of screw positioning. Using the herein presented procedural protocols, CBCT systems allow shorter operating time.

Incidence of vertebral artery injury in patients undergoing cervical spine trauma surgery in correlation with surgical approach: A review

Spinal cord injuries at the cervical spine level represent the most consequential of the related injuries at all levels of the spine. They can trigger permanent unilateral or bilateral damage with conspicuous disability. Regarding unstable injuries, the gold standard approach is open reduction and osteosynthesis, which can select between anterior and posterior surgical access. Each of the aforementioned approaches demonstrates both advantages and disadvantages; thus, it is up to the surgeon to determine the optimal option concerning the patient's safety. Diligent intraoperative control of anatomical reduction is pivotal to obtaining the best feasible postoperative outcomes. Literature data delineate copious complications following surgical intervention in the cervical spine. Indubitably, the most crucial intraoperative complication accounts for vascular injuries, with the most preponderant being the corrosion of the vertebral artery, as it is potentially life-threatening. This paper aims to provide a succinct and compendious review of the existing literature regarding cervical spinal cord injuries and to deduce many inferences concerning the incidence of iatrogenic vertebral artery injuries in relation to the surgical approach for fracture reduction.

Case report: Interdisciplinary treatment of complex C1/C2 fractures in a patient with concomitant three-vessel coronary artery disease requiring bypass surgery

Background

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) frequently leads to consciousness disturbance following hemodynamic collapse. Therefore, MI can occur together with upper cervical spine trauma. Herein, we report the successful treatment of complex C1/C2 fractures in a patient with concomitant three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD).

Case presentation

A 70-year-old patient presented in our emergency outpatient clinic after a hemodynamic collapse without neurological deficits or heart-related complaints. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the cervical spine revealed a dislocated odontoid fracture Anderson and D'Alonzo type II and an unstable Gehweiler type III injury (Jefferson's fracture). An intradiploic arachnoid cyst in the posterior wall of the posterior fossa was a coincident radiological finding. Furthermore, coronary angiography confirmed three-vessel CAD with high-grade coronary artery stenosis. Indication for upper cervical spine surgery and bypass surgery was given. An interdisciplinary team of neurosurgeons, cardiothoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists evaluated the patient's case to develop the most suitable therapy concept and alternative strategies. Finally, in first step, C1-C2 fusion was performed by Harms technique under general anesthesia with x-ray guidance, spinal neuronavigation, Doppler ultrasound and cardiopulmonary monitoring. Cardiothoracic surgeons were on standby. One month later bypass surgery was performed uneventfully. Follow-up CT scan of cervical spine revealed intraosseous screw positioning and beginning fusion of the fractures. The patient did not develop neurological deficits and recovered completely from both surgeries.

Conclusions

Treating complex C1/C2 fractures with concomitant severe CAD requiring treatment is challenging and carries a high risk of complications. To our knowledge, the literature does not provide any guidelines regarding therapy of this constellation. To receive upper cervical spine stability and to prevent both, spinal cord injury and cardiovascular complications, an individual approach is required. Interdisciplinary cooperation to determine optimal therapeutic algorithms is needed.

C1-ring osteosynthesis versus C1-2 fixation fusion in the treatment of unstable atlas fractures: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study with 5-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term effects of posterior C1-ring osteosynthesis and C1-2 fixation fusion in the treatment of unstable atlas fractures.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to analyze 73 patients with atlas fractures who underwent posterior fixation. The intervention group was treated with C1-ring osteosynthesis, and the control group was treated with C1-2 fixation fusion. The patients were followed up for 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after the operation.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients had complete data at the last follow-up. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck pain in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.001). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, radiation dose, bedridden period, hospital stay, and cost in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.001). At the last follow-up, the Neck Disability Index in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group, and the angle of flexion-extension and axial rotation in the intervention group were greater than those in the control group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the authors found that posterior C1-ring osteosynthesis is superior to C1-2 fixation fusion in terms of long-term relief of neck pain and preservation of the physiological function of the cervical vertebrae. This technique is a reliable choice for the treatment of unstable C1 fractures.

Fluoroscopy-Assisted C1-C2 Posterior Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability: A Single-Center Case Series of 78 Patients

Background and Objectives: Posterior C1-C2 fixation, with trans-articular screws (TAS) or screw-rod-construct (SRC), is the main surgical technique for atlantoaxial instability, and can be performed with a fluoroscopy-assisted free-handed technique or 3D navigation. This study aimed to evaluate complications, radiological and functional outcome in patients treated with a fluoroscopy-assisted technique. Materials and Methods: A single-center consecutive cohort study was conducted of all adult patients who underwent posterior C1-C2 fixation, using TAS or CRS, between 2005-2019. Results: Seventy-eight patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 6.8 years. Trauma was the most common injury mechanism (64%), and cervicalgia the predominant preoperative symptom (88%). TAS was used in 33%, and SRC in 67% of cases. Surgery was associated with a significant reduction in cervicalgia (from 88% to 26%, p < 0.001). The most common complications were vertebral artery injury (n = 2, 2.6%), and screw malposition (n = 5, 6.7%, of which 2 were TAS and 3 were SRC). No patients deteriorated in their functional status following surgery. Conclusions: Fluoroscopy-assisted C1-C2 fixation with TAS or SRC is a safe and effective treatment for atlantoaxial instability, with a low complication rate, few surgical revisions, and pain relief in the majority of the cases.