Optical Coherence Tomography Revealing Ganglion Cell Loss in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

In vivo assessment of the ocular biomechanical properties in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

PURPOSE

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is associated with an increased prevalence of open-angle glaucoma, attributed to variations of the pressure gradient between intraocular and intracranial compartments at the level of the lamina cribrosa (LC). As ocular biomechanics influence the behavior of the LC, and a lower corneal hysteresis (CH) has been associated to a higher risk of glaucomatous optic nerve damage, in this study we compared ocular biomechanics of iNPH patients with healthy subjects.

METHODS

 Twenty-four eyes of 24 non-shunted iNPH patients were prospectively recruited. Ocular biomechanical properties were investigated using the ocular response analyzer (Reichert Instruments) for the calculation of the CH, corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). Results were compared with those of 25 eyes of 25 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

 In iNPH eyes, the median CH value and interquartile range (IQR) were 9.7 mmHg (7.8-10) and 10.6 mmHg (9.3-11.3) in healthy controls (p = 0.015). No significant differences were found in IOPcc [18.1 mmHg (14.72-19.92) vs. 16.4 mmHg (13.05-19.6)], IOPg [15.4 mmHg (12.82-19.7) vs. 15.3 mmHg (12.55-17.35)], and CRF [9.65 mmHg (8.07-11.65) vs. 10.3 mmHg (9.3-11.5)] between iNPH patients and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

 In iNPH patients, the CH was significantly lower compared to healthy subjects. This result suggests that ocular biomechanical properties may potentially contribute to the risk of development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage in iNPH patients.

Exploring the Association Between Visual Field Testing and CERAD Neuropsychological Battery in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients

Background

Association between visual field test indices and The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Neuropsychological Battery (CERAD-NB) is unknown. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients provide a unique set of patient data for analysis.

Objective

To assess the reliability of visual field testing using the CERAD-NB in patients with iNPH and to investigate the association between visual field test results and cognitive function.

Methods

62 probable iNPH patients were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmological examination, ophthalmological optical coherence tomography imaging studies, visual field testing, and CERAD-NB. Based on visual field indices, the patients were divided into two groups: unreliable (n = 19) and reliable (n = 43). Independent T-test analysis was performed to examine the relationship between visual field test results and cognitive function. Pearson Chi-square test was used for non-continuous variables.

Results

The unreliable group performed worse in CERAD-NB subtests compared to the reliable group. Statistically significant differences were observed in nine out of ten subtests, with only Clock Drawing showing no statistical significance. Pairwise comparison of the groups showed no statistical significance between amyloid-β (Aβ) biopsy, hyperphosphorylated tau biopsy, apolipoprotein E allele or the ophthalmological status of the patient. But there was a statistically significant difference in cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 and age between the groups.

Conclusions

Patients with unreliable visual field tests performed worse on CERAD-NB subtests. CERAD-NB subtests do not provide a specific cut-off value to refrain patients from visual field testing. Should patients with unreliable visual field tests be screened for cognitive impairment?

Evaluation of Patients With Cognitive Impairment Due to Suspected Idiopathic Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus at Medical Centers for Dementia: A Nationwide Hospital-Based Survey in Japan

Objective

Treatment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) requires collaboration between dementia specialists and neurosurgeons. The role of dementia specialists is to differentiate patients with iNPH from patients with other dementia diseases and to determine if other dementia diseases are comorbid with iNPH. We conducted a nationwide hospital-based questionnaire survey on iNPH in medical centers for dementia (MCDs).

Methods

We developed a questionnaire to assess how physicians in MCDs evaluate and treat patients with cognitive impairment due to suspected iNPH and the difficulties these physicians experience in the evaluation and treatment of patients. The questionnaire was sent to all 456 MCDs in Japan.

Results

Questionnaires from 279 MCDs were returned to us (response rate: 61.2%). Patients underwent cognitive tests, evaluation of the triad symptoms of iNPH, and morphological neuroimaging examinations in 96.8, 77.8, and 98.2% of the MCDs, respectively. Patients with suspected iNPH were referred to other hospitals (e.g., hospitals with neurosurgery departments) from 78.9% of MCDs, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test was performed in 44 MCDs (15.8%). iNPH guidelines (iNPHGLs) and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH), a specific morphological finding, were used and known in 39.4% and 38% of MCDs, respectively. Logistic regression analysis with “Refer the patient to other hospitals (e.g., hospitals with neurosurgery departments) when iNPH is suspected.” as the response variable and (a) using the iNPHGLs, (b) knowledge of DESH, (c) confidence regarding DESH, (d) difficulty with performing brain magnetic resonance imaging, (e) knowledge of the methods of CSF tap test, (f) absence of physician who can perform lumbar puncture, and (g) experience of being told by neurosurgeons that referred patients are not indicated for shunt surgery as explanatory variables revealed that the last two factors were significant predictors of patient referral from MCDs to other hospitals.

Conclusion

Sufficient differential or comorbid diagnosis using CSF tap test was performed in a few MCDs. Medical care for patients with iNPH in MCDs may be improved by having dementia specialists perform CSF tap tests and share the eligibility criteria for shunt surgery with neurosurgeons.

The diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of OCT for the evaluation of the visual function in children with a brain tumour: A systematic review

Purpose

To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) to detect visual acuity (VA) or visual field (VF) loss in children with a brain tumour.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 2021. We included studies evaluating retinal OCT and standard visual function parameters (VA and or VF) in children with a brain tumour. Two authors independently extracted data from each included study. They also assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the QUADAS-2 or QUIPS tool. The diagnostic accuracy of OCT was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The prognostic value of OCT was evaluated with predictive measures (odds ratio).

Results

We included five diagnostic studies, with a total of 186 patients, all diagnosed with optic pathway glioma. No prognostic studies were eligible for inclusion. Included studies evaluated either retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness or ganglion cell layer—inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness. There was considerable heterogeneity between OCT devices, OCT protocols, visual function parameters and threshold values. Sensitivity and specificity for RNFL thickness measurement ranged from 60.0% to 100.0% and 76.6% to 100%, respectively. For GCL-IPL thickness measurement, area under the curve ranged from 0.91 to 0.98 for different diameters.

Conclusion

The literature regarding the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of OCT parameters in children with a brain tumour is scarce. Due to heterogeneity and a considerable risk of bias of included studies, we cannot draw solid conclusions regarding the accuracy of retinal OCT. Future research should investigate the potential of OCT as diagnostic and prognostic tool for the evaluation of the visual function and detection of visual impairment in children with any type of brain tumour.