Fibrinolytic-Facilitated Chronic Subdural Hematoma Drainage-A Systematic Review

Preoperative Fibrinogen Levels and Function as Predictive Factors for Acute Bleeding in the Hematoma Cavity After Burr Hole Drainage in Patients with CSDH

OBJECTIVE

Burr hole drainage (BHD) is the primary surgical intervention for managing chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). However, it can lead to postoperative complications such as acute bleeding within the hematoma cavity and hematoma recurrence. The objective of this study is to identify the risk factors for these complications and develop a predictive model for acute hematoma cavity bleeding after BHD in patients with CSDH.

METHODS

This study presents a retrospective cohort investigation conducted at a single center. The clinical dataset of 308 CSDH patients who underwent BHD at a hospital from 2016 to 2022 was analyzed to develop and assess a prognostic model.

RESULTS

The nonbleeding group exhibited a significant correlation between fibrinogen (FIB) and thrombin time (TT), whereas no correlation was observed in the bleeding group. Notably, both FIB and TT were identified as risk factors for postoperative acute bleeding within the hematoma cavity. We developed a prognostic model to predict the occurrence of postoperative acute bleeding within the hematoma cavity after BHD in patients with CSDH. The model incorporated FIB, TT, coronary artery disease, and Glasgow Coma Scale scores. The model exhibited good discrimination (area under the curve: 0.725) and calibration (Hosmer-Leeshawn goodness of fit test: P > 0.1). Furthermore, decision curve analysis demonstrated the potential clinical benefit of implementing this prediction model.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive model developed in this study can forecast the risk of postoperative acute bleeding within the hematoma cavity, thus aiding clinicians in selecting the optimal treatment approach for patients with CSDH.

Surgical Treatment of Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the common clinical intracranial hemorrhagic disorders, accounting for 16%-20% of bilateral CSDH. At present, the surgical treatment of bilateral CSDH mainly includes drilling drainage and neuroendoscopic assistance. The main objective of this paper was to compare the effects of two surgical methods on CSDH.

Methods

153 patients who were diagnosed with CSDH were included in this study. 79 patients were treated with bilateral drilling drainage, and the other 74 patients were treated with neuroendoscope-assisted drainage. The clinical data of the two groups were compared, and the surgical indexes, neurological function, cure rate, and recurrence rate of the two groups were compared. The operation indexes of patients include operation time, postoperative hematoma volume, hospital stay, extubation time, misplacement of drainage tube, recurrence, and hematoma clearance rate.

Results

All patients underwent CT  examination one day after operation. The CT  imaging detection of the two groups was generally good. The cranial CT was reexamined before discharge. The bilateral hematoma disappeared in 114 patients, the unilateral hematoma disappeared in 29 patients, a small amount of compensatory crescent very low-density shadow subdural effusion was observed on the other side, and a small amount of compensatory crescent very low-density shadow subdural effusion was observed on both sides in 10 patients. There was no space occupying effect and intracranial gas disappeared. Compared with neuroendoscopic assisted drainage, the operation time of drilling drainage patients was significantly shorter. The extubation time, drainage tube dislocation, recurrence rate, postoperative hematoma volume, and hematoma clearance rate of patients receiving neuroendoscopic assisted drainage were significantly better than those receiving drilling drainage. The Markwalder score and hospital stay between the two groups were not significant.

Conclusions

Drilling drainage and neuroendoscopic assisted surgery have good therapeutic effects on bilateral CSDH. The operation time of drilling drainage is shorter. Neuroendoscopic assisted surgery has more advantages in extubation time, misplacement of drainage tube, recurrence, postoperative hematoma volume, and hematoma clearance rate.