Ventriculoatrial Shunts: Review of Technical Aspects and Complications

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt entry points in patients undergoing shunt placement: A single-center study

Background

The ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt redirects cerebrospinal fluid flow, with the selection of entry points crucial for optimal outcomes. Anatomical landmarks and specific entry points, such as Kocher's, Frazier's, Keen's, and Dandy's points, have been utilized for shunt catheter placement. This study investigates the impact of various entry points on outcomes, particularly the necessity for revision procedures, in patients undergoing VP shunt placement.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from patients in our center's database, collected from October 2017 to October 2022. Participants were classified based on ventriculoperitoneal shunt entry points. The study followed STROBE guidelines. Continuous variables were presented as means with standard deviations (SD) and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Linear Model ANOVA and Pearson's Chi-squared tests were used for comparisons. Data analysis was conducted using Jamovi software.

Results

Our study included 94 patients who underwent shunt procedures. The patients were categorized into four treatment groups: Dandy point (10), Frazier point (21), Keen point (43), and Kocher point (20).

Conclusion

Our study found no significant differences in age, FOHR, and indication for shunt placement among catheter entry point subgroups. However, gender distribution, catheter length, and catheter tip location significantly varied. The proportion of patients requiring revision surgery varied among the groups, with the highest rate in the Dandy point group and the lowest in the Keen group; however, the difference among the entry groups was insignificant.

The Long-Term Patency of the Internal Jugular Vein and the Common Facial Vein as Entrance Sites for Venous Access in Ventriculoatrial Shunts: A Comparative Analysis from a Single-Center Study

OBJECTIVE

The ventriculoatrial (VA) shunt is a surgical intervention used to manage hydrocephalus, although it is less often utilized compared to the ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Placement of the distal catheter typically involves the utilization of either the common facial vein (CFV) or the internal jugular vein (IJV), 2 frequently employed options for venous access. This study aims to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference between the long-term patency (2 years) of the distal end of the VA shunt of these 2 options.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who received VA shunt surgeries with the employment of the CFV or IJV as access veins at Rajavithi Hospital in Thailand between January 2015 and December 2020. The analysis focused on long-term patency and potential complications.

RESULTS

The study comprised a total of 42 participants. Twenty-six (61.9%) individuals underwent ventriculoatrial (VA) shunt surgery via the CFV, while the other 16 (38.1%) underwent the same procedure using the IJV. Neither of the 2 groups required shunt revision due to distal catheter malfunction. Most cases exhibited no significant complications apart from a single instance of shunt system infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In VA shunt surgery, both the CFV and IJV can be used as venous access sites for the right atrium because there is no discernible difference between their complications or long-term patency. Anatomical considerations, patient-specific characteristics, and the surgeon's preference should all be considered when choosing the venous access location for the placement of a VA shunt.

Ventriculoatrial shunt displacement by a central venous catheter in pediatrics: report of two atypical cases

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of hydrocephalus accounts for 40% of all procedures in pediatric neurosurgery. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement is the treatment of choice for most patients. When contraindicated due to different abdominal complications, the use of a ventriculoatrial shunt is a safe second option. Nevertheless, this procedure is not without risk of complications. An extremely rare complication is the displacement of the distal catheter by a central venous catheter.

CASE REPORT

We present two atypical cases of shunt dysfunction related to the placement of a central venous catheter.

CONCLUSION

After an extensive review of the literature, we believe these are the first cases of this unusual complication in children. Awareness of this complication is essential for its prevention and to ensure safe medical care.

Ventriculopleural shunt outcomes for pediatric hydrocephalus: a single-institution experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to analyze rates of ventriculopleural (VPL) shunt failure and complications among patients with pediatric hydrocephalus, and to analyze which factors may predict early (< 1 year) or late (> 1 year) VPL shunt failure in this sample.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all consecutive VPL shunt placements from 2000 to 2019 at our institution. Data was collected on patient characteristics, shunt history, and shunt type. Primary endpoints include rates of VPL shunt survival and rates of symptomatic pleural effusion. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate shunt survival, and Fisher's exact test and t-test were used to compare differences between categorical variables and means, respectively (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with pediatric hydrocephalus underwent VPL shunt placement (mean age 14.2 years). Of the 27 patients with long-term follow-up (mean 46 months), VPL shunt revision was required in 19, seven of which were due to pleural effusion. Overall shunt survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 76%, 62%, 55%, and 46%, respectively. Mean duration of shunt survival was 26.74 months. Overall pleural effusion rate was 26%. No patient-specific factors, including shunt valve type, were significantly associated with shunt survival, risk of early revision, or risk of pleural effusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are comparable to those reported in the literature and represent one of the largest case series on the topic. VPL shunts are a viable second-line option when ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is not possible or desirable, though there are high rates of shunt revision and pleural effusion.