A Multicenter Study Investigating the Surgeon Experience with a Robotic-Assisted Exoscope as Part of the Neurosurgical Armamentarium

Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed Using a Three-Dimensional Exoscope

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common neurosurgical procedure. Portions of the procedure, such as the discectomy, foraminotomy, graft placement, and plate placement, are often performed using operating microscopes to maximize visualization and minimize neurovascular injury. Although standard operating microscopes offer superb visualization, they lack ergonomic and educational utility. With modern advancements in digital imaging and stereopsis, there has been a surge of interest in evaluating modern exoscopes for their utility in cranial and spinal neurosurgery.1-3 In Video 1, we demonstrate the use of a commercial three-dimensional exoscope from skin incision through completion of a two-level ACDF. Both the lead surgeon and the assistant surgeon were able to maintain a neutral, ergonomic, and comfortable position throughout the surgery. Furthermore, we tested the utility of this technique in 15 patients undergoing ACDF (2 one-level, 9 two-level, 3 three-level, and 1 four-level). Mean (SD) overall operative time was 118 (34) minutes (2-level ACDF, 110 [12] minutes), and mean (SD) blood loss was 23 (8.0) mL. The Neck Disability Index score and visual analog scale score for neck pain improved significantly at 6 weeks postoperatively (from 59.6 [1.3] to 27.9 [3.0] and from 6.3 [1.0] to 2.5 [0.92], respectively; P < 0.001 for both). Thus, excellent clinical outcomes can be achieved using three-dimensional exoscopes with comparable operative time and blood loss compared with conventional surgical microscopes or loupes. Given the improved ergonomic and teaching potential of exoscopes, the use of three-dimensional exoscopes for neurosurgical and spine surgeries warrants further investigation.

Exoscope Use in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications, Benefits, and Limitations

BACKGROUND

Exoscopes were recently developed as an alternative to the operative microscope (OM) and endoscope for intraoperative visualization during neurosurgery. Prior reviews studying mixed cranial and spinal surgical cohorts reported advantages with exoscope use, including improved ergonomics and teaching. In recent years, there has been an increase in exoscope research, with no updated systematic review focused exclusively on the benefits and limitations of exoscope use in spine surgery. Thus, we sought to systematically synthesize the literature related to exoscope-assisted spine surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies reported between 2010 and September 2023. Data, such as the exoscope model used, procedure types performed, and user observations, were then collected.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies met our inclusion criteria, including 481 patients with spine pathologies who underwent a surgical procedure using 1 of 9 exoscope models. The lumbar region was the most frequently operated area (n = 234; 48.6%), and discectomies comprised the most overall procedures (n = 273; 56.8%). All patients benefited clinically. The reported advantages of exoscopes compared with OMs or endoscopes were improved focal distance, surgeon posture, trainee education, compactness, and assistant participation. Other aspects such as stereopsis, illumination, and cost had various observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Exoscopes have advantages compared with OMs or endoscopes during spine surgery. The user learning curve is minimal, and no negative patient outcomes have been reported. However, some aspects of exoscope use necessitate longer term prospective research before exoscopes can be considered a standard tool in the armamentarium of intraoperative visualization strategies.

Exoscope Efficacy and Feasibility in Pediatric Spinal Neurosurgery: A Single-Institution Cohort Case Series

BACKGROUND

The exoscope has emerged as an efficacious microscope in adult spinal neurosurgery providing improved operative field visibility and surgeon ergonomics. However, outcome data and feasibility are underrepresented in the pediatric literature. We present the largest case series aimed at assessing operative and clinical outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing various exoscope-assisted spinal surgeries.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on all consecutive pediatric (age <18 years) spinal surgeries performed with the use of an exoscope by 3 senior surgeons at a single institution from 2020-2023. Demographics and clinical and operative outcomes were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-six exoscope-assisted pediatric spine surgeries were performed on 89 unique patients, 41 (42.7%) of which were male. The mean age at surgery was 12 (±5.3) years. Spinal cord detethering (55.8%) was the most common procedure performed. The overall mean operative time for all procedures was 155 (±86) minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 18 (±41) mL. The mean length of stay was 5.4 (±6.5) days. There were 14 (14.6%) patients with complications in this cohort. At final follow-up, 64 (83.1%) of symptomatic patients reported neurologic symptom improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the exoscope in a variety of pediatric spinal surgeries resulted in an acceptable average operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and rate of neurologic symptom improvement. The exoscope appears to be an efficacious option for pediatric neurosurgical spinal procedures.

Surgical Posture with Microscopic Versus Exoscopic Visualization in Anterior Cervical Procedures

BACKGROUND

Surgeons sustain deviated postures during procedures even with the use of loupes or an operative microscope. The surgical exoscope is a new intraoperative visualization technology designed to improve surgical ergonomics; however, no objective data exist to say that surgeon posture is significantly improved. This study aimed to quantify the difference in posture during standard anterior cervical spine procedures performed with the aid of an operative microscope versus an exoscope.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study utilizing a posture-sensing device at the surgeon's cervicothoracic junction. The primary outcome was the proportion of time under scope spent in a deviated posture, defined as greater than 10 degrees of deviation from neutral in the x- and y-axes (flexion/extension and lateral bending) of the surgeon's upper torso. Average deviation from baseline for the x-, y-, and z-axes (flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively), as well as the percentage of operative time spent with the visualization aid was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 37 anterior cervical procedures were recorded: 18 were performed with an exoscope and 19 with a microscope. Surgeons spent significantly more time in the deviated posture with the operative microscope than with the exoscope (32% vs. 8% with x-axis >10 deg, P <0.005; 20% vs. 6% with y-axis >10 deg, P <0.05). This is also reflected by the significant differences in the average deviation in the x- and y-axes, while under scope.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing the exoscope for anterior cervical spine procedures allows surgeons to spend less time in a deviated posture.

Application of the Robotic-Assisted Digital Exoscope for Resection of Posterior Fossa Tumors in Adults: A Series of 45 Cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Complete safe resection is the goal when pursuing surgical treatment for posterior fossa (PF) tumors. Efforts have led to the development of the exoscope that delineates tumors from non-neoplastic brain. This investigation aims to assess patient outcomes where PF tumor resection is performed with the exoscope by a retromastoid or suboccipital approach.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for patients with PF tumors who underwent exoscope resection from 2017 to 2022. Patient demographics, clinical, operative, and outcome findings were collected. Extent of resection studies were also performed. Associations between perioperative data, discharge disposition, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients (22 male patients) with a median age of 57 years were assessed. Eighteen (40%) and 27 patients (60%) were diagnosed with malignant and benign tumors, respectively. Tumor neurovascular involvement was found in 28 patients (62%). Twenty-four (53%) and 20 (44%) tumors formed in the cerebellum and cerebellopontine angle cistern, respectively. One tumor (2%) was found in the cervicomedullary junction. The mean extent of resection was 96.7% for benign and malignant tumors. The PFS and OS rate at 6 months (PFS6, OS6) was 89.7% and 95.5%, respectively. Neurological complications included sensory loss and motor deficit, with 11 patients reporting no postoperative symptoms. Of the neurological complications, 14 were temporary and 9 were permanent.

CONCLUSION

The exoscope is an effective intraoperative visualization tool for delineating PF tumors. In our series, we achieved low postoperative tumor volumes and a high gross total resection rate.

Intraoperative Imaging and Optical Visualization Techniques for Brain Tumor Resection: A Narrative Review

Advancements in intraoperative visualization and imaging techniques are increasingly central to the success and safety of brain tumor surgery, leading to transformative improvements in patient outcomes. This comprehensive review intricately describes the evolution of conventional and emerging technologies for intraoperative imaging, encompassing the surgical microscope, exoscope, Raman spectroscopy, confocal microscopy, fluorescence-guided surgery, intraoperative ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. We detail how each of these imaging modalities contributes uniquely to the precision, safety, and efficacy of neurosurgical procedures. Despite their substantial benefits, these technologies share common challenges, including difficulties in image interpretation and steep learning curves. Looking forward, innovations in this field are poised to incorporate artificial intelligence, integrated multimodal imaging approaches, and augmented and virtual reality technologies. This rapidly evolving landscape represents fertile ground for future research and technological development, aiming to further elevate surgical precision, safety, and, most critically, patient outcomes in the management of brain tumors.

Exoscopic Microsurgery: A Change of Paradigm in Brain Tumor Surgery? Comparison with Standard Operative Microscope

BACKGROUND

The exoscope is a high-definition telescope recently introduced in neurosurgery. In the past few years, several reports have described the advantages and disadvantages of such technology. No studies have compared results of surgery with standard microscope and exoscope in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

METHODS

Our retrospective study encompassed 177 patients operated on for GBM (WHO 2021) between February 2017 and August 2022. A total of 144 patients were operated on with a microscope only and the others with a 3D4K exoscope only. All clinical and radiological data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been estimated in the two groups and compared by the Cox model adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, gross total resection, MGMT methylated promoter, and operator's experience).

RESULTS

IDH was mutated in 9 (5.2%) patients and MGMT was methylated in 76 (44.4%). Overall, 122 patients received a gross total resection, 14 patients received a subtotal resection, and 41 patients received a partial resection. During follow-up, 139 (73.5%) patients experienced tumor recurrence and 18.7% of them received a second surgery. After truncation to 12 months, the median PFS for patients operated on with the microscope was 8.82 months, while for patients operated on with the exoscope it was >12 months. Instead, the OS was comparable in the two groups. The multivariable Cox model showed that the use of microscope compared to the exoscope was associated with lower progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.55, 95%CI = 1.66-7.56, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The exoscope has proven efficacy in terms of surgical resection, which was not different to that of the microscope. Furthermore, patients operated on with the exoscope had a longer PFS. A comparable OS was observed between microscope and exoscope, but further prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed.

Improving Surgeon Well-Being: Ergonomics in Neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal disorders are common among surgeons, and affect most neurosurgeons over the course of their career. Although all subspecialist neurosurgeons may be affected by physical strain, spine surgeons and skull base surgeons have a high propensity for workplace injury as a result of long procedures with repetitive movements in strained physical positions.

METHODS

In this review, the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in neurosurgery, the state of innovation to improve ergonomics in the operating room for neurosurgeons, and potential limitations in advancing technology with the goal of maximizing neurosurgeon longevity are discussed.

RESULTS

Innovations such as robotics, the exoscope, and handheld devices with more degrees of freedom have allowed surgeons to maneuver instruments without exerting excessive effort, all while maintaining neutral body positioning, avoiding joint and muscle strain.

CONCLUSIONS

As new technology and innovation in the operating room develop, there has been a larger emphasis placed on maximizing surgeon comfort and neutral positioning, by minimizing force exertion and fatigue.