Functional discomfort and a shift in midwifery paradigm

The barriers to offering non-pharmacological pain management as an initial option for laboring women: A review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Many women use pharmacological or non-pharmacological pain management (NPPM) during childbirth, however, evidence shows the usage rates of pharmacological pain management are increasing. The shift towards a biomedical approach to birth care opposes the enduring midwifery philosophy of trusting the woman and her body. Identifying midwives’ beliefs and attitudes towards perceived and actual barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option will provide insight into the factors that affect this.

METHODS

This review of the literature sought to understand midwives’ beliefs and attitudes towards the barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option for laboring women. Peer-reviewed journals were searched for primary research that met the inclusion criteria and explored midwives’ beliefs and attitudes towards the barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option for laboring women. Included studies were evaluated for quality according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists.

RESULTS

Thirteen qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria and four main themes of barriers to midwives offering NPPM emerged: health system-related, health facility-related, health practitioner-related, and health consumer-related barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

The review of the literature highlighted there are barriers that prevent or delay the initial utilization of non-pharmacological methods of pain management in labor by midwives. These findings can be used as a platform to inform further research into this topic.

A meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative research on women's experience of midwifery care

Labor and birth constitute a significant emotional event for a childbearing woman. The aim was to explore women's reflections on their experiences of labor and birth and how these were influenced by the midwifery care they received. A modified version of Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnographic approach was used to develop an inductive and interpretive synthesis of nine qualitative articles. Relevant databases were searched and qualitative articles appraised by means of the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Two metaphors were identified: The guide-Please share your knowledge and The motherly midwife as an anchor. The comprehensive understanding of the images evoked by the metaphors resulted in an overall metaphoric representation of the women's experiences: The midwife as a birth pilot, that is, a positive labor and birth experience is dependent on the relationship with the midwife. This finding confirms previous knowledge that a trusting relationship results in confidence, while feeling secure leads to a positive birth experience. The metaphors facilitate understanding of the significance of the midwife for women's labor and birth experiences. Knowledge of labor and birth experiences helps to broaden understanding of the necessity of midwives being willing to engage, act, be aware of errors that may affect women's birth experience, and employ tools to predict unexpected adverse events.

The nature of labour pain: An updated review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The pain experience associated with labour is complex. Literature indicates psychosocial and environmental determinants of labour pain, and yet methods to support women usually target physiological attributes via pharmacological interventions.

AIM

To provide an update of our understanding of labour pain based on modern pain science. The review aims to help explain why women can experience labour pain so differently - why some cope well, whilst others experience great suffering. This understanding is pertinent to providing optimal support to women in labour.

METHOD

A literature search was conducted in databases Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and PsycINFO, using search terms labor/labour, childbirth, pain, experience and perception. Thirty-one papers were selected for inclusion.

FINDINGS

Labour pain is a highly individual experience. It is a challenging, emotional and meaningful pain and is very different from other types of pain. Key determinants and influences of labour pain were identified and grouped into cognitive, social and environmental factors.

CONCLUSION

If a woman can sustain the belief that her pain is purposeful (i.e. her body working to birth her baby), if she interprets her pain as productive (i.e. taking her through a process to a desired goal) and the birthing environment is safe and supportive, it would be expected she would experience the pain as a non-threatening, transformative life event. Changing the conceptualisation of labour pain to a purposeful and productive pain may be one step to improving women's experiences of it, and reducing their need for pain interventions.