Factors that support change in the delivery of midwifery led care in hospital settings. A review of current literature

Everyone should have their own midwife: Women's and staff experiences during the implementation of two midwifery continuity of care models in regional Australia

PROBLEM

Midwifery Continuity of Care (MCoC) remains inaccessible for most Australian women; this is especially true in rural and regional areas.

BACKGROUND

Strong evidence demonstrates MCoC models improve experiences for women and their babies and are also shown to improve midwifery workforce wellbeing. However, implementation and upscale remains limited.

AIM

To explore the views and experiences of implementing MCoC for both staff and women, understanding their experiences, concerns and solutions in a regional context.

METHODS

Qualitative data was collected via focus groups with women and healthcare staff, at six and twelve month post implementation. Data was thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke six step process.

FINDINGS

The findings support that 'women love it' and midwives working in the new MCoC model 'loved their job'. The major concern was that not all women could access the model and disconnected communication was problematic during implementation. 'Sharing stories' was a solution to overcoming these issues and promoting the positive impact of MCoC - in particular ways of working and adaption to an all-risk midwifery group practice.

DISCUSSION

This study supports widespread evidence that MCoC is valued by both women and staff. In a regional context it is important to recognise challenges faced during implementation and identifying solutions that other maternity services could consider when implementing MCoC.

CONCLUSION

The study offers strong recommendation for regional areas to consider MGP to maintain safe, quality local maternity services.

Normal birth rates before and after the merging of mixed-risk and low-risk maternity wards in Iceland: A retrospective cohort study on the impact of inter-professional preventative measures

BACKGROUND

In 2014, the National University Hospital of Iceland (NUHI) merged a mixed-risk birth unit and a midwifery-led low-risk unit into one mixed-risk unit. Interprofessional preventative and mitigating measures were implemented since there was a known threat of cultural contamination between mixed-risk and low-risk birth environments. The aim of the study was to assess whether the NUHI's goal of protecting the rates of birth without intervention had been achieved and to support further development of labor services.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all women who had singleton births at NUHI birth units in two 2-year periods, 2012-2013 and 2015-2016. The primary outcome variables, birth without intervention, with or without artificial rupture of membranes (AROM), were adjusted for confounding variables using logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcome variables (individual interventions and maternal and neonatal complications) were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t test, and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

The rate of births without interventions, both with and without AROM, increased significantly after the unit merger and accompanying preventative measures. The rates of AROM, oxytocin augmentation, episiotomies, and epidural analgesia decreased significantly. The rate of induction increased significantly. There were no significant differences in maternal or neonatal complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Interprofessional preventative measures, implemented alongside a mixed-risk and low-risk birth unit merger, can increase rates of births without interventions in a mixed-risk hospital setting. However, it is necessary to maintain awareness of the possible effects of a mixed-risk birth environment on the use of childbirth interventions and examine the long-term effects of preventative measures.

Implementing midwifery continuity of care models in regional Australia: A constructivist grounded theory study

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND

Strong international evidence demonstrates significantly improved outcomes for women and their babies when supported by midwifery continuity of care models. Despite this, widespread implementation has not been achieved, especially in regional settings.

AIM

To develop a theoretical understanding of the factors that facilitate or inhibit the implementation of midwifery continuity models within regional settings.

METHODS

A Constructivist Grounded Theory approach was used to collect and analyse data from 34 interviews with regional public hospital key informants.

RESULTS

Three concepts of theory emerged: 'engaging the gatekeepers', 'midwives lacking confidence' and 'women rallying together'. The concepts of theory and sub-categories generated a substantive theory: A partnership between midwives and women is required to build confidence and enable the promotion of current evidence; this is essential for engaging key hospital stakeholders to invest in the implementation of midwifery continuity of care models.

DISCUSSION

The findings from this research suggest that midwives and women can significantly influence the implementation of midwifery continuity models within their local maternity services, particularly in regional settings. Midwives' reluctance to transition is based on a lack of confidence and knowledge of what it is really like to work in midwifery continuity models. Similarly, women require education to increase awareness of continuity of care benefits, and a partnership between women and midwives can be a strong political force to overcome many of the barriers.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of midwifery continuity of care needs a coordinated ground up approach in which midwives partner with women and promote widespread dissemination of evidence for this model, directed towards consumers, midwives, and hospital management to increase awareness of the benefits.

Experiences of and visions for collaboration between midwives and nurses in Nova Scotia

PROBLEM

In jurisdictions where midwifery and nursing are autonomous and separate health care professions, little is known about how they collaborate during the delivery of perinatal health care services.

BACKGROUND

Midwifery became a regulated profession in the province of Nova Scotia, Canada in 2009. Since regulation, midwives and nurses have worked together at three models sites for the delivery of midwifery services and perinatal care.

QUESTION

How do midwives and nurses collaborate during the provision of birthing care in Nova Scotia, Canada?

METHODS

This was an instrumental case study guided by feminist poststructuralism. Individual interviews of 17 participants were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Twenty-five documents were reviewed, and field notes were gathered. Feminist poststructuralist discourse analysis was used.

FINDINGS

Midwives and nurses collaborated well together. Participants described how positive collaborative experiences could influence a new way for midwives and nurses to work together. In this paper we present the theme Moving forward: A Modern Model for Nurses and Midwives working together, and its sub-themes of 1)'The birthing culture has changed' and 2) 'Allies and advocates'.

DISCUSSION

Within the global context of strengthening midwifery and nursing, this study illustrated the potential for developing formal, collaborative perinatal models of care led by midwife and nurse teams to address inequities in perinatal health care services.

CONCLUSION

Midwives and nurses need more opportunities to collaborate and to build professional relationships. Establishing a midwife-led and nurse supported model of care may transform existing perinatal health care values, beliefs, and practices.

What do midwifery leaders need in order to be effective in contributing to the reform of maternity services?

PROBLEM

Little is known about what midwifery leaders need to effectively contribute to maternity services reform.

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence establishing midwifery continuity of care as the gold standard of maternity care, implementation of these models has been slow. Midwives in health service leadership roles are in an ideal position to re-orientate maternity services to midwifery continuity of care.

QUESTION

What do midwives in leadership positions need in order to be effective in contributing to the reform of maternity services in Australia?

METHODS

This qualitative descriptive study used purposive sampling to recruit 13 midwifery leaders from across Australia. Individual telephone interviews were conducted and analysed through line-by-line coding and identification of themes.

FINDINGS

Five main themes emerged from the data: 'core leadership skills and education are essential'; 'motivation and commitment to implementing evidence-based maternity care'; 'ability to create and sustain strategic relationships'; 'bringing the vision to life' which contained two sub-themes of 'changing the culture' and 'reaching midwifery's full potential'; and, 'organisational support and commitment are key to maternity reform'.

DISCUSSION

This study echoes findings from previous research emphasising the importance of leadership attributes and development opportunities for midwifery leaders. Additional needs of midwifery leaders were also revealed, which have not yet been extensively explored in the literature, including a strong commitment to continuity of care, effective relationships with key stakeholders and support from healthcare executives.

CONCLUSION

Midwifery leaders need to be equipped to contribute to maternity care reform through leadership development opportunities, effective relationships and support from healthcare executives.

Leadership and management in midwifery-led continuity of care models: A thematic and lexical analysis of a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Although midwifery-led continuity of care is associated with superior outcomes for mothers and babies, it is not available to all women. Issues with implementation and sustainability might be addressed by improving how it is led and managed - yet little is known about what constitutes the optimal leadership and management of midwifery-led continuity models.

DESIGN

Following a systematic search of academic databases for relevant publications, 25 publications were identified. These were analysed, thematically to clarify (dis)similar themes, and lexically, to clarify how words within the publications travelled together.

FINDINGS

The publications were replete with three key themes. First, leadership - important yet challenged. Second, management of organisational change; barriers and enhancers. Third, promotors of sustainable models of care. Complementarily, the lexical analysis suggests that references to midwives and leadership among the publications did not typically travel together, as reported in the publications and were distant to one another, although management was inter-connected to both and to change. Leadership and management were not closely coupled with midwives or relationships with women.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Midwifery leadership matters and can be enacted irrespective of position or seniority. Midwifery-led continuity of care models can be better managed via a multipronged approach. Improved leadership and management can help sustain such care. Although there was a perceived need for midwifery leadership, there did not seem to be an association between leadership and midwives in the lexical analysis. Many publications focused on the style theory of leadership and the transformational style theory.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Instead of focusing on leaders and the presumption of a leadership scarcity, it might be more beneficial to start focusing within, looking with a new lens on leadership within midwifery at all levels. It might also be constructive for the profession to investigate a more progressive form of leadership, one that is relational and focuses on leadership rather than on the leader.

Factors influencing utilisation of ‘free-standing’ and ‘alongside’ midwifery units for low-risk births in England: a mixed-methods study

Background

Midwifery-led units (MUs) are recommended for ‘low-risk’ births by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence but according to the National Audit Office were not available in one-quarter of trusts in England in 2013 and, when available, were used by only a minority of the low-risk women for whom they should be suitable. This study explores why.

Objectives

To map the provision of MUs in England and explore barriers to and facilitators of their development and use; and to ascertain stakeholder views of interventions to address these barriers and facilitators.

Design

Mixed methods – first, MU access and utilisation across England was mapped; second, local media coverage of the closure of free-standing midwifery units (FMUs) were analysed; third, case studies were undertaken in six sites to explore the barriers and facilitators that have an impact on the development of MUs; and, fourth, by convening a stakeholder workshop, interventions to address the barriers and facilitators were discussed.

Setting

English NHS maternity services.

Participants

All trusts with maternity services.

Interventions

Establishing MUs.

Main outcome measures

Numbers and types of MUs and utilisation of MUs.

Results

Births in MUs across England have nearly tripled since 2011, to 15% of all births. However, this increase has occurred almost exclusively in alongside units, numbers of which have doubled. Births in FMUs have stayed the same and these units are more susceptible to closure. One-quarter of trusts in England have no MUs; in those that do, nearly all MUs are underutilised. The study findings indicate that most trust managers, senior midwifery managers and obstetricians do not regard their MU provision as being as important as their obstetric-led unit provision and therefore it does not get embedded as an equal and parallel component in the trust’s overall maternity package of care. The analysis illuminates how provision and utilisation are influenced by a complex range of factors, including the medicalisation of childbirth, financial constraints and institutional norms protecting the status quo.

Limitations

When undertaking the case studies, we were unable to achieve representativeness across social class in the women’s focus groups and struggled to recruit finance directors for individual interviews. This may affect the transferability of our findings.

Conclusions

Although there has been an increase in the numbers and utilisation of MUs since 2011, significant obstacles remain to MUs reaching their full potential, especially FMUs. This includes the capacity and willingness of providers to address women’s information needs. If these remain unaddressed at commissioner and provider level, childbearing women’s access to MUs will continue to be restricted.

Future work

Work is needed on optimum approaches to improve decision-makers’ understanding and use of clinical and economic evidence in service design. Increasing women’s access to information about MUs requires further studies of professionals’ understanding and communication of evidence. The role of FMUs in the context of rural populations needs further evaluation to take into account user and community impact.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 12. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.