Job satisfaction and sustainability of midwives working in caseload models of care: An integrative literature review

The sustainability of midwifery group practice: A cross-sectional study of midwives and managers

PROBLEM

Although there is robust evidence for the benefits of midwifery group practice (MGP) caseload care, there are limited opportunities for women to access this model in Australia. There is also limited knowledge on how to sustain these services.

BACKGROUND

MGP can benefit childbearing women and babies and improve satisfaction for women and midwives. However, sustainability of the model is challenging. While MGPs are often supported and celebrated, in Australia some services have closed, while others struggle to adequately staff MGPs.

AIM

To investigate midwives and managers opinions on the management, culture, and sustainability of MGP.

METHODS

A national survey of MGP midwives and managers was distributed (2021 and 2022). Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 579 midwives and 90 managers completed the survey. The findings suggest that many MGPs do not support new graduates and students to work in MGP. Over half (59.8%) the participants (midwives and managers) reported that the women and families were the best aspect about working in MGP, while 44.3% said the effects on midwives' lifestyle and families were the worst aspect.

DISCUSSION

The relationship with women remains the major motivator for providing MGP care. However, work-life imbalance is a deterrent, exacerbated by staffing shortages. Staffing might be improved by adequate renumeration, strengthening orientation, and attracting new graduates and students through experience in MGP.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to attract midwives to MGP and improve work-life balance and sustainability.

The effect of a midwifery continuity of care program on clinical competence of midwifery students and delivery outcomes: a mixed-methods protocol

BACKGROUND

The midwifery continuity of care model is one of the care models that have not been evaluated well in some countries including Iran. We aimed to assess the effect of a program based on this model on the clinical competence of midwifery students and delivery outcomes in Ahvaz, Iran.

METHODS

This sequential embedded mixed-methods study will include a quantitative and a qualitative phase. In the first stage, based on the Iranian midwifery curriculum and review of seminal midwifery texts, a questionnaire will be developed to assess midwifery students' clinical competence. Then, in the second stage, the quantitative phase (randomized clinical trial) will be conducted to see the effect of continuity of care provided by students on maternal and neonatal outcomes. In the third stage, a qualitative study (conventional content analysis) will be carried out to investigate the students' and mothers' perception of continuity of care. Finally, the results of the quantitative and qualitative phases will be integrated.

DISCUSSION

According to the nature of the study, the findings of this research can be effectively used in providing conventional midwifery services in public centers and in midwifery education.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR.AJUMS.REC.1401.460). Also, the study protocol was registered in the Iranian Registry for Randomized Controlled Trials (IRCT20221227056938N1).

Enabling the context for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Controlled Birthing on Country services: Participatory action research

PROBLEM

Establishment of Birthing on Country services owned and governed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Controlled Health Services has been slow.

BACKGROUND

Birthing on Country services have demonstrated health and cost benefits and require redesign of maternity care. During the Building On Our Strengths feasibility study, use of endorsed midwives and licensing of birth centres has proven difficult.

QUESTION

What prevents Community Controlled Health Services from implementing Birthing on Country services in Queensland and New South Wales?

METHODS

Participatory action research identified implementation barriers. We conducted iterative document analysis of instruments to inform government lobbying through synthesis of policy, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors.

FINDINGS

Through cycles of participatory action research, we analysed 17 documents: 1) policy barriers prevent Community Controlled Health Services from employing endorsed midwives to provide intrapartum care in public hospitals; 2) economic barriers include lack of sustainable funding stream and inadequate Medicare-billing for endorsed midwives; and 3) legal barriers require a medical practitioner in a birth centre. While social barriers (e.g., colonisation, medicalisation) underpin regulations, these were beyond the scope; technological and environmental barriers were not identified.

DISCUSSION

Findings are consistent with the literature on barriers to midwifery practice. Recommendations include a national audit of barriers to Birthing on Country services including healthcare practice insurance, and development of a funding stream. Additionally, private maternity facility regulation must align with evidence on safe birth centre operation.

CONCLUSION

Government can address barriers to scale-up of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Controlled Birthing on Country services.

Swedish midwives' attitudes towards continuity models-a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Midwifery continuity models are growing worldwide, but few such alternatives are available in Sweden. There is sparse knowledge about Swedish midwives' attitudes about midwifery continuity models.

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore Swedish midwives' attitudes toward continuity models. An additional aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a previously developed instrument measuring attitudes to continuity models.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of a national sample of 2537 midwives in Sweden. The participants completed a questionnaire online. A Principal component Analysis was performed to identify components in the instrument.

RESULTS

A fairly similar proportion of midwives worked in antenatal care (30.7%), intrapartum care (30.7%) and in other areas (31.1%). Many midwives (59%) agreed that continuity models should be available to women, but were not certain about if such models should be offered to all women or low risk women only. Two domains of the attitude scale were identified; Relationship-based Midwifery Continuity Models, and Practical and Organisational Aspects of Midwifery Continuity Models. Age, having children, marital status, length of work experience and place of work were associated with high agreement non the two components.

CONCLUSION

Many midwives in general held positive attitudes about continuity models. The relationship aspects were highly valued but midwives were also hesitant about the practical and organisational aspect of continuity models. Unbiased information to midwives about the pros and cons with continuity models should be offered, in order to limit misunderstandings about the model.

The role of part-time arrangements in the sustainability of midwifery continuity of care models in Australia: An integrative review

INTRODUCTION

International maternity care experts have called for expanding midwiferyled continuity of care (MCoC) models. However, the number of models need augmentation as the number of women receiving this care is small. The majority of the midwifery workforce in Australian public health systems comprises women who work part-time. This aspect of the midwifery workforce demands careful consideration when attempting to change a maternity care system and sustain new models of care. Sparse research has been undertaken to explore whether part-time factors could play a role in the growth and sustainability of MCoC in Australia. This integrative review aims to analyze the role of parttime practice arrangements in the sustainability of MCoC models in Australia.

METHODS

Following a systematic search of research databases (CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Proquest) and screening the literature with eligibility criteria including keywords related to midwifery continuity of care, workforce arrangements and full-time equivalent (FTE), eight Australian research articles were identified for evaluation. The articles were appraised for bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and data were analyzed using an integrated convergent narrative synthesis method.

RESULTS

The resulting themes from the synthesis suggest that part-time MCoC roles may support the sustainability of the MCoC workforce without reducing quality of care to women. In various studies, midwives reported that FTE (full-time equivalent) of 0.5 may not meet the job's demands. However, this is likely influenced by local context and caseload size rather than the quantum of each midwife's FTE. The quality of the studies is limited due to the small scale of the studies; however, the qualitative results give a depth of understanding to the strengths and challenges that part-time arrangements in MCoC add to the midwifery workforce.

CONCLUSIONS

This review recommends that part-time arrangements in MCoC models in Australia be evaluated in conjunction with other routinely analyzed workforce data. Further considerations should be made by midwifery managers, leaders, stakeholders, and decision makers responsible for developing and supporting part-time job arrangements in caseload models of care in Australia.

Comparing the views of caseload midwives working with First Nations families in an all-risk, culturally responsive model with midwives working in standard caseload models, using a cross-sectional survey design

PROBLEM

Little is known about midwives' views and wellbeing when working in an all-risk caseload model.

BACKGROUND

Between March 2017 and December 2020 three maternity services in Victoria, Australia implemented culturally responsive caseload models for women having a First Nations baby.

AIM

Explore the views, experiences and wellbeing of midwives working in an all-risk culturally responsive model for First Nations families compared to midwives in standard caseload models in the same services.

METHODS

A survey was sent to all midwives in the culturally responsive (CR) model six-months and two years after commencement (or on exit), and to standard caseload (SC) midwives two years after the culturally responsive model commenced. Measures used included the Midwifery Process Questionnaire and Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI).

FINDINGS

35 caseload midwives (19 CR, 16 SC) participated. Both groups reported positive attitudes towards their professional role, trending towards higher median levels of satisfaction for the culturally responsive midwives. Midwives valued building close relationships with women and providing continuity of care. Around half reported difficulty maintaining work-life balance, however almost all preferred the flexible hours to shift work. All agreed that a reduced caseload is needed for an all-risk model and that supports around the model (e.g. nominated social workers, obstetricians) are important. Mean CBI scores showed no burnout in either group, with small numbers of individuals having burnout in both groups.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Midwives were highly satisfied working in both caseload models, but decreased caseloads and more organisational supports are needed in all-risk models.

What strategies facilitate & support the successful transition of newly qualified midwives into practice: An integrative literature review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to identify strategies that facilitate newly qualified midwives to transition successfully from midwifery student to confident, competent practitioner.

DESIGN

Integrative literature review.

DATA SOURCES

The following databases were accessed: CINAHL complete, Medline complete, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), Scopus and Google Scholar.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic search of key terms across all data sources for the period January 1990 to September 2021 identified 316 papers whose titles/abstracts were screened against our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Thirty-six full texts were screened for eligibility and three papers were identified through ancestral searching. Ten papers were included in our final review.

RESULTS

Mentorship or preceptorship for newly qualified midwives by experienced midwives appears to enhance experiences, either as a standalone strategy, or component of structured programs of transition support. Supernumerary time, designated study days and planned rotations are also valued, particularly when rotating through clinical areas. Smaller teams providing continuity of midwifery care, or organisations that fund mentorship programs appear more able to facilitate support. Mechanisms of online support and learning may also enhance early transition but similarly, require organisational investment to aid success. Whilst most programs were described as helpful none of the studies used validated measures to assess this.

CONCLUSION

Whilst elements of tailored support programs and mentoring/preceptorship from experienced colleagues appear to offer valuable support to transitioning practitioners, it is important to note that the structure of maternity care appears fundamental to the success of many of these strategies. Consequently, maternity care reform which focuses on the adoption of sustainable models of midwifery continuity, alongside urgent investment in midwives, are likely the most promising, over-arching strategies required to support student to midwife transition.

Midwife-centred management: a qualitative study of midwifery group practice management and leadership in Australia

Background

Midwifery group practice (MGP) has consistently demonstrated optimal health and wellbeing outcomes for childbearing women and their babies. In this model, women can form a relationship with a known midwife, improving both maternal and midwife satisfaction. Yet the model is not widely implemented and sustained, resulting in limited opportunities for women to access it. Little attention has been paid to how MGP is managed and led and how this impacts the sustainability of the model. This study clarifies what constitutes optimal management and leadership and how this influences sustainability.

Methods

This qualitative study forms part of a larger mixed methods study investigating the management of MGP in Australia. The interview findings presented in this study are part of phase one, where the findings informed a national survey. Nine interviews and one focus group were conducted with 23 MGP managers, clinical midwife consultants, and operational/strategic managers who led MGPs. Transcripts of the audio-recordings were analysed using inductive, reflexive, thematic analysis.

Results

Three themes were constructed, namely: The manager, the person, describing the ideal personal attributes of the MGP manager; midwifing the midwives, illustrating how the MGP manager supports, manages, and leads the group practice midwives; and gaining acceptance, explaining how the MGP manager can gain acceptance beyond group practice midwives. Participants described the need for MGP managers to display midwife-centred management. This requires the manager to have qualities that mirror what is generally accepted as requirements for good midwifery care namely: core beliefs in feminist values and woman-centred care; trust; inclusiveness; being an advocate; an ability to slow down or take time; an ability to form relationships; and exceptional communication skills. Since emotional labour is a large part of the role, it is also necessary for them to encourage and practice self-care.

Conclusions

Managers need to practice in a way that is midwife-centred and mimics good midwifery care. To offset the emotional burden and improve sustainability, encouraging and promoting self-care practices might be of value.

Burnout among midwives and attitudes toward midwifery: A cross-sectional study from Baden-Württemberg, Germany

INTRODUCTION

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS