1
|
McEvoy E, Henry S, Karkavandi MA, Donnelly J, Lyon M, Strobel N, Sundbery J, McLachlan H, Forster D, Santos TM, Sherriff S, Marriott R, Chamberlain C. Culturally responsive, trauma-informed, continuity of care(r) toolkits: A scoping review. Women Birth 2024; 37:101834. [PMID: 39488058 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 11/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Models of care that are culturally responsive, trauma-informed and provide continuity of care(r), are important components of care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander parents during the broad perinatal period (pregnancy to 2 years after birth; first 1000 days). Many health services do aim to incorporate these concepts in care provision, but often focus on only one. AIM To identify practical toolkits that guide implementation of culturally responsive care, trauma-informed care, or continuity of care(r) in the perinatal period, and map the key elements. METHODS A scoping review was conducted. Relevant databases and grey literature were searched to identify toolkits that guided implementation of any one of the aforementioned concepts in the perinatal period. Toolkit context, principles, core components and processes were extracted and synthesised. FINDINGS Thirteen toolkits, from both Indigenous and non-Indigenous contexts, met the inclusion criteria. Six related to culturally responsive care, nine to trauma-informed care, and eight to continuity of care(r), with some overlap. Key principles included continuity of carer, collaboration, woman (or family) centred care, safety and holistic care. Individualised care, team work, having a safe service environment and continuity of care/r were highlighted as core components. Key processes related to planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and sustainability. DISCUSSION There are no available resources that support holistic implementation of all three concepts of culturally responsive, trauma-informed continuity of care(r), spanning the first 1000 days, for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families. A synthesised toolkit of key principles, core components and key processes would assist implementation of this. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Problem: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families experience health inequalities and poorer perinatal outcomes due to a legacy of colonisation and ongoing discrimination. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN Culturally responsive care, trauma-informed care and continuity of care(r) are elements of perinatal care shown to improve outcomes and experiences. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS This review synthesises key aspects of culturally responsive, trauma-informed and continuity of care(r) models. It highlights the lack of resources to support services implementing models pertaining to these three concepts across the full First 1000 days, for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen McEvoy
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Storm Henry
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia; Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - Maedeh Aboutalebi Karkavandi
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Jillian Donnelly
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Madeleine Lyon
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Natalie Strobel
- Maladjiny Research Centre, Kurongkurl Katitjin, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia 6027, Australia
| | - Jacqui Sundbery
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Helen McLachlan
- Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Della Forster
- Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia; Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Thiago Melo Santos
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Simone Sherriff
- The Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Rhonda Marriott
- Ngangk Yira Institute for Change, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia
| | - Catherine Chamberlain
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao Y, Wilkes L, Tafe A, Quanchi A, Ruthenberg L, Warriner M, Kildea S. Clinical outcomes and financial estimates for women attending the largest private midwifery service in Australia compared to national data: a retrospective cohort study. Women Birth 2024; 37:101591. [PMID: 38402093 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM Multiple barriers to national scale-out of private midwifery practice in Australia exist. AIM To describe and compare maternal infant health outcomes of the largest private midwifery service in Australia with the national core maternity indicators and estimate the financial impact on collaborating public hospitals. METHODS A retrospective cohort of 2747 maternal health records from 2014 to 2022 were compared to national indicators. Financial calculations estimated the impact on hospitals. FINDINGS Compared to national data, women cared by private midwives were significantly: more likely to be 25-34 years and primiparous; less likely to be Indigenous, have diabetes, hypertension or multiple births. At birth, 5% required discussion with specialists, 25% required consultation and 39% were referred; 86% women had their primary midwife at birth; 12.5% birthed at home and 14.5% at a birth centre. Compared to national data, primiparous women had fewer inductions (22.9% vs 45.8%), caesarean sections (22.6% vs 32.1%), instrumental vaginal births (17.0% vs 25.7%), episiotomies (9.5% vs 23.9%) and more birthed vaginally after caesarean section (75.9% vs 11.9%). Significantly less babies were born with a birthweight <2750 g (0.5% vs 1.2%) and 83.7% babies were exclusively breastfed at six weeks. Collaborating hospitals would receive less DRG funding compared to public patients, require less intrapartum midwifery staff and receive a net benefit, even when bed fees were waived. CONCLUSION Women attending My Midwives had significantly lower intervention rates when compared to national indicators although maternal characteristics could be contributing. Multidisciplinary care was evident. Financial modelling shows positive impacts for hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Gao
- Molly Wardaguga Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia
| | - Liz Wilkes
- Molly Wardaguga Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia; My Midwives, 29 Hill Street, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia
| | - Annabel Tafe
- Molly Wardaguga Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia
| | - Andrea Quanchi
- My Midwives, 29 Hill Street, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia
| | | | | | - Sue Kildea
- Molly Wardaguga Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|