Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles

Spinal muscular atrophy genetic epidemiology and the case for premarital genomic screening in Arab populations

BACKGROUND

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a fatal autosomal recessive disorder for which several treatment options, including a gene therapy, have become available. SMA incidence has not been well-characterized in most Arab countries where rates of consanguinity are high. Understanding SMA disease epidemiology has important implications for screening, prevention, and treatment in those populations.

METHODS

We perform SMA diagnostic testing in a clinical multi-national patient cohort (N = 171) referred for hypotonia and/or muscle weakness. In addition, we carry out genetic newborn screening for SMA on 1502 healthy Emirati newborns to estimate the carrier frequency and incidence of the disease in the United Arab Emirates.

RESULTS

Patients referred for SMA genetic testing are mostly Arabs (82%) representing 18 countries. The overall diagnostic yield is 33.9%, which is higher (>50%) for certain nationalities. Most patients (71%) has two SMN2 copies and earlier disease onset. For the first time, we estimate SMA carrier frequency (1.3%) and incidence of the disease (1 in 7122 live births) in the United Arab Emirates. Using birth and marriage rates in two Arab populations (United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia), as well as disease incidence in both countries, we show that, besides preventing new cases, premarital genetic screening could potentially result in around $8 to $324 million annual cost savings, respectively, relative to postnatal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The SMA carrier frequency and incidence we document suggests high potential benefit for universal implementation of premarital genomic screening for a wide range of recessive disorders in Arab populations.

Systematic review of the economic evaluation model of assisted reproductive technology

BACKGROUND

With the increasing demand for fertility services, it is urgent to select the most cost-effective assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment plan and include it in medical insurance. Economic evaluation reports are an important reference for medical insurance negotiation. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the economic evaluation research of ART, analyze the existing shortcomings, and provide a reference for the economic evaluation of ART.

METHODS

PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect databases were searched for relevant articles on the economic evaluation of ART. These articles were screened, and their quality was evaluated based on the Comprehensive Health Economics Evaluation Report Standard (CHEERS 2022), and the data on the basic characteristics, model characteristics and other aspects of the included studies were summarized.

RESULTS

One hundred and two related articles were obtained in the preliminary search, but based on the inclusion criteria, 12 studies were used for the analysis, of which nine used the decision tree model. The model parameters were mainly derived from published literature and included retrospective clinical data of patients. Only two studies included direct non-medical and indirect costs in the cost measurement. Live birth rate was used as an outcome indicator in half of the studies.

CONCLUSION

Suggesting the setting of the threshold range in the field of fertility should be actively discussed, and the monetary value of each live birth is assumed to be in a certain range when the WTP threshold for fertility is uncertain. The range of the parameter sources should be expanded. Direct non-medical and indirect costs should be included in the calculation of costs, and the analysis should be carried out from the perspective of the whole society. In the evaluation of clinical effect, the effectiveness and safety indexes should be selected for a comprehensive evaluation, thereby making the evaluation more comprehensive and reliable. At least subgroup analysis based on age stratification should be considered in the relevant economic evaluation.

Appropriate whole genome amplification and pathogenic loci detection can improve the accuracy of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for deletional α-thalassemia

Objective

To improve the accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in deletional α-thalassemia patients.

Design

Article.

Patients

fifty-two deletional α-thalassemia couples.

Interventions

Whole genome amplification (WGA), Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and PCR mutation loci detection.

Main outcome measures

WGA, Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and PCR mutation loci detection results; Analysis of embryo chromosome copy number variation (CNV).

Results

Multiple Displacement Amplification (MDA) and Multiple Annealing and Looping-Based Amplification Cycles (MALBAC) methods for PGT for deletional α-thalassemia. Blastocyst biopsy samples (n = 253) were obtained from 52 deletional α-thalassemia couples. The results of the comparison of experimental data between groups MALBAC and MDA are as follows: (i) The average allele drop-out (ADO) rate, MALBAC vs. MDA = 2.27% ± 3.57% vs. 0.97% ± 1.4%, P=0.451); (ii) WGA success rate, MALBAC vs. MDA = 98.61% vs. 98.89%, P=0.851; (iii) SNP haplotype success rate, MALBAC vs. MDA = 94.44% vs. 96.68%, P=0.409; (iv) The result of SNP haplotype analysis is consistent with that of Gap-PCR/Sanger sequencing results, MALBAC vs. MDA = 36(36/72, 50%) vs. 151(151/181, 83.43%), P=0; (v) Valid SNP loci, MALBAC vs. MDA = 30 ± 9 vs. 34 ± 10, P=0.02; (vi) The mean CV values, MALBAC vs. MDA = 0.12 ± 0.263 vs. 0.09 ± 0.40, P=0.916; (vii) The average number of raw reads, MALBAC vs. MDA =3244259 ± 999124 vs. 3713146 ± 1028721, P=0; (viii) The coverage of genome (%), MALBAC vs. MDA = 5.02 ± 1.09 vs. 5.55 ± 1.49, P=0.008.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that MDA is superior to MALBAC for PGT of deletional α-thalassemia. Furthermore, SNP haplotype analysis combined with PCR loci detection can improve the accuracy and detection rate of deletional α-thalassemia.

Mosaic embryo transfer versus additional IVF with PGT-A Cycle: a decision model comparing live birth rate and cost

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relative live birth rate and net cost difference between mosaic embryo transfer and an additional cycle of IVF with PGT-A for patients whose only remaining embryos are non-euploid.

METHODS

A decision analytic model was designed with model parameters varying based on discrete age cutoffs (<35, 35-37, 38-39, 40-42, 43-44, >44). Model inputs included probabilities of successful IVF, clinical pregnancy, and live birth as well as costs of IVF with PGT-A, embryo transfer, live birth, amniocentesis, and dilation and curettage. All costs were modeled from the healthcare system perspective and adjusted for inflation to 2023 $USD. Model outcomes were sub-stratified by degree and type of mosaicism.

RESULTS

For patients younger than 43, an additional cycle of IVF with PGT-A resulted in a higher relative live birth rate (<35, +20%; 35-37, +15%; 38-39, +17%; 40-42, +6%; average, +14.5%) compared to mosaic embryo transfer with an average additional cost of $16,633. For patients older than 42, mosaic embryo transfer resulted in a higher live birth rate (43-44, +5%; >44, +3%; average, +4%) while on average costing $9572 less than an additional cycle of IVF with PGT-A.

CONCLUSION

Mosaic embryo transfers are a superior alternative to an additional cycle of IVF with PGT-A for patients older than 42 whose only remaining embryos are non-euploid. Mosaic embryo transfers also should be considered for patients younger than 42 who are unable to pursue additional autologous IVF cycles. Counseling and care should be personalized to individual patients and embryos.

Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance

The use of novel technologies in the selection of embryos during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has the potential to improve the chances of pregnancy and birth of a healthy child. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risks and unintended consequences that may arise from the premature implementation of these technologies. This article discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the use of novel embryo selection technologies in IVF, including the growing uptake of genetic testing and others, and argues that prioritising embryos for transfer using these technologies is acceptable, but discarding embryos based on unproven advances is not. Several historical examples are provided, which demonstrate possible harms, where the overall chance of pregnancy may have been reduced, and some patients may have missed out on biological parenthood altogether. We emphasise the need for caution and a balanced approach to ensure that the benefits of these technologies outweigh any potential harm. We also highlight the primacy of patients' autonomy in reproductive decision-making, especially when information gained by utilising novel technologies is imprecise.

Preimplantation genetic testing for sickle cell disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Objective

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (IVF + PGT-M) in the conception of a nonsickle cell disease (non-SCD) individual compared with standard of care treatment for a naturally conceived, sickle cell disease (SCD)-affected individual.

Design

A Markov simulation model was constructed to evaluate a one-time IVF + PGT-M treatment compared with the lifetime standard of care costs of treatment for an individual potentially born with SCD. Using an annual discount rate of 3% for cost and outcome measures, quality-adjusted life years were constructed from utility weights and life expectancy values and then used as the effectiveness measurement. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated for both treatment arms, and a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year was assumed.

Setting

Tertiary care or university medical center.

Patients

A hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients was analzyed over a lifetime horizon using yearly cycles.

Interventions

In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease use in conception of a non-SCD individual.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcomes of interest were the incremental cost and effectiveness of an IVF+PGT-M conception compared with the SOC treatment of an SCD-affected individual.

Results

In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease was the optimal strategy in 93.17% of the iterations. An incremental savings of $137,594 was demonstrated with a gain of 1.96 QALYs and 3.69 life years over a lifetime. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that SOC treatment never met equivalent cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions

Our model demonstrates that IVF + PGT-M for selection against SCD, compared with lifetime SOC treatment for those affected, is the most cost-effective strategy within the United States healthcare sector.

Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for women with subfertility in China: an economic evaluation using evidence from the CESE-PGS trial

BACKGROUND

There are a large number of infertile couples in China, but its treatment is notoriously expensive and not currently covered by insurance. The utility of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy as an adjunct to in vitro fertilization has been debated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) versus conventional technology in in vitro fertilization (IVF) from the perspective of the healthcare system in China.

METHODS

Following the exact steps in the IVF protocol, a decision tree model was developed, based on the data from the CESE-PGS trial and using cost scenarios for IVF in China. The scenarios were compared for costs per patient and cost-effectiveness. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to confirm the robustness of the findings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs per live birth, Costs per patient, Incremental cost-effectiveness for miscarriage prevention.

RESULTS

The average costs per live birth of PGT-A were estimated as ¥39230.71, which is about 16.8% higher than that of the conventional treatment. Threshold analysis revealed that PGT-A would need to increase the pregnancy rate of 26.24-98.24% or a cost reduction of ¥4649.29 to ¥1350.71 to achieve the same cost-effectiveness. The incremental costs per prevented miscarriage was approximately ¥45600.23. The incremental cost-effectiveness for miscarriage prevention showed that the willingness to pay would be ¥43422.60 for PGT-A to be cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

The present cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrates that embryo selection with PGT‑A is not suitable for routine applications from the perspective of healthcare providers in China, given the cumulative live birth rate and the high costs of PGT‑A.

Effect of trophectoderm biopsy for PGT-A on live birth rate per embryo in good prognosis patients

PURPOSE

To determine if blastocyst trophectoderm biopsy for PGT-A is associated with an increased rate of live birth per embryo in good prognosis IVF patients at a single center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of good prognosis embryo transfer cycles at a single center from 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2019. We evaluated the rate of live birth per embryo with and without PGT-A for transfer of embryos in two groups of good prognosis patients: embryos from donor oocytes and embryos from autologous oocytes with maternal age less than 35 years at oocyte retrieval. Two-sided Fisher's exact tests were used for comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

After transfer of embryos created from donor oocytes the live birth rate per euploid embryo was 70.6% (24/34) compared to 34.3% (35/102) for untested embryos for a rate difference of 36.3% (95% CI 18.4-54.1%, p < 0.01). After transfer of embryos created from autologous oocytes with maternal age less than 35 years at oocyte retrieval the live birth rate per euploid embryo was 70.0% (49/70) compared to 52.5% (53/101) for untested embryos for a rate difference of 17.5% (95% CI 3.0-32.0%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In good prognosis patients at our center the live birth rate per euploid blastocyst was higher than for untested blastocysts.

Genetic counseling decisions in gestational carrier pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancies conceived as contracted gestational carriers are a relatively new phenomenon for reproductive. Since the intended parents control genetic screening decisions, there may be differences in genetic decisions made for gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies as compared to traditional non-gestational carrier IVF pregnancies. Our goal was to investigate the frequency and types of these genetic testing decisions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of GC pregnancies counseled at a private maternal-fetal medicine practice between January 2006 and January 2021. Inclusion criteria were pregnancies that completed counseling with a certified genetic counselor and obtained high-resolution imaging. Controls were non-GC IVF pregnancies seen in the same period matched by parity, estimated delivery date (EDD), and the oocyte age utilized in conception. Statistical analysis included patient demographics, pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT-A) frequency and results, ultrasound imaging results, and the frequency with results of prenatal genetic screening (first or second-trimester serum screens), non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), or diagnostic testing (chorionic venous sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis).

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety one gestational carrier pregnancies were identified and 167 met inclusion criteria. Gestational carrier pregnancies were significantly more likely to pursue PGT-A, PGT-A with NIPT, first-trimester screening, and second-trimester screening. There were no differences in rates of amniocentesis or CVS over controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding genetic counseling and screening options, our series is the first to demonstrate that gestational carrier parents seek additional genetic counseling resources, even with reassuring PGT-A and ultrasound.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies does not increase success rates in fresh oocyte donation cycles: a paired cohort study

PURPOSE

To determine whether in vitro fertilization cycles using fresh oocyte donations benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies.

METHODS

A paired cohort study compared 44 fresh oocyte donation cycles with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). The sibling oocyte study analyzed fertilized oocytes, blastocyst development, and euploidy rate. Only frozen embryo transfers were performed. Pregnancy, implantation, biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth, live birth, and twin pregnancy rates were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

Fresh oocyte donation cycles between PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups were similar in all laboratory and clinical outcomes. A euploidy rate of 74.2% was observed in the PGT-A group. Although a slight trend was observed for implantation rate in the PGT-A group, it was not statistically significant. No difference was observed for live birth between groups.

CONCLUSION

PGT-A associated with fresh oocyte donation cycles does not improve clinical outcomes and can be seen as over-treatment for patients.

Reduction in multiple pregnancy rate in donor oocyte-recipient gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA with single-embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utilization of single-embryo transfer (SET) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in gestational carrier IVF cycles in the USA with donor oocyte and examine the impact on live birth and multiple gestation.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) clinic database of 4776 donor oocyte-recipient IVF cycles in which a GC was used. The cycles were separated into 4 groups by use of PGT and number of embryos transferred as follows: (1) PGT and single-embryo transfer (PGT-SET); (2) PGT and multiple embryo transfer (PGT-MET); (3) no PGT and SET (NoPGT-SET); (4) no PGT and MET (NoPGT-MET). Primary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR).

RESULTS

More than one blastocyst was transferred in 48.7% (2323/4774) of the cycles. When ≥1 blastocyst was transferred, with or without the use of PGT, the MPR was 45.5% and 42.0%, respectively. In comparison, in the PGT-SET and NoPGT-SET groups, the MPR was 1.4% (8/579) and 3.3% (29/883), respectively. Live birth rates increased with the use of PGT-A and with MET.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that SET, with or without PGT, is associated with a significantly reduced MPR in donor oocyte-recipient GC IVF cycles while maintaining high LBR. It also demonstrates that many infertility centers in the USA are not adhering to ASRM embryo transfer guidelines. Our findings highlight an opportunity to increase GC safety, which ultimately may lead to widened access to this increasingly restricted service outside the USA.