Is there still a role for a cleavage-stage embryo transfer?

Is the Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Level on Day 10 After Cleaved Embryo Transfer a Predictor of Perinatal Outcome?: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This study aimed to determine whether human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels at day 10 after day 2 cleaved embryo transfer can predict pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Patients who underwent oocyte retrieval with minimal stimulation or natural cycles and fresh or vitrified-warmed transfer of a single, day 2 cleaved embryo at our clinic between November 2018 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patients were classified into four age groups for oocyte retrieval and into ten groups based on the hCG level on day 10 after embryo transfer; pregnancy complications and delivery and neonatal outcomes were examined. Of the 5,840 cycles, 3,722 (63.7%) and 2,118 (36.3%) were fresh-cleaved and vitrified-warmed embryo transfers, respectively. The mean hCG level was 24.8 mIU/mL and the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per transfer were 29.6% and 23.4%, respectively. Maternal age at the time of oocyte retrieval, husband's age, treatment cycle, embryo type and grade, cell number, and hCG levels were correlated with pregnancy and delivery outcomes in the univariate analysis. Conversely, only maternal age and hCG levels were correlated with the outcomes in the multivariate analysis. hCG levels on day 10 post-transfer are a useful predictor of pregnancy and delivery outcomes after cleaved embryo transfer. Live birth rates vary with maternal age, even when hCG levels are the same, but they do not vary according to the treatment cycle or type of embryo transferred. Low hCG levels may be associated with vasa previa but did not affect delivery outcomes.

Trade-off between double cleavage-stage embryos transfer and single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients with few good quality embryos in antagonist cycles: a retrospective study using a propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the per OPU clinical outcomes for transfer of Day 3 double cleavage-stage embryos (DET) and Day 5 single blastocyst-stage (SBT) in patients with five or fewer good quality embryos on day 3 per occyte pick-up cycle (OPU) in antagonist cycles with consideration of blastocyst formation failure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of 2,116 cases of OPU treated with antagonist protocol in the affiliated Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University between January 2013 and December 2020. DET was performed in 1,811cycles and SBT was performed in 305 cycles. The DET group was matched to the SBT group by propensity score (PS) matching according to multiple maternal baseline covariates. After PS matching, there were 303 ET cycles in each group. The primary outcomes were the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), cumulative multiple pregnancy rate(CMPR)per OPU and the number of ET to achieve live birth per OPU. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of clinical pregnancy(CPR), live birth rate(LBR), multiple pregnancy rate(MPR).

RESULTS

Following PS mating, the CLBR was slightly higher (48.8% versus 40.3% ; P = 0.041) and the CMPR was significantly higher in the DET group compared to SBT group(44.2% versus 7.9%, P < 0.001). The CPR, LBR and MPR per fresh transfer were higher in DET group compared to SBT group(50.2% versus 28.7%; 41.3% versus 21.5%;29.6% versus 0%, P < 0.001). The number of ET to achieve live birth per OPU in SBT group was obiviously more than in DET group(1.48 ± 0.578 versus 1.22 ± 0.557 ,P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

With a marginal difference cumulative live birth rate, the lower live birth rate per fresh transfer and higher number of ET per OPU in the SBT group suggested that it might take longer time to achieve a live birth with single blastocyst strategy. A trade-off decision should be made between efficiency and safety.

Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology

Background

Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time-lapse incubators can also utilise morphokinetic models to rank embryos based on morphokinetic parameters. We sought to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation.

Aims

The aim of the study is to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation.

Settings and Design

This is a retrospective cohort design.

Materials and Methods

Embryos cultured in a time-lapse culture system that had traditional morphologic evaluation, morphokinetic modelling and known live birth outcomes were included in this study. Embryos with unknown competence were excluded, including when two embryos were transferred with a single live birth resulted.

Statistical Analysis Used

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for both the morphologic analysis and the morphokinetic model on culture day 3 and day 5. Using the ROC-determined cutoff that optimised both sensitivity and specificity, a binary outcome for each test was analysed using agreement statistics to determine if one method of embryo evaluation was superior to the other.

Results

Morphological and morphokinetic grading were both predictive of embryo competence on days 3 and 5. However, on day 3, morphologic grading was superior to morphokinetic grading with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (P < 0.001) and 0.58 (P = 0.009), respectively. Contrarily, on day 5, the morphokinetic model had a higher AUC of 0.65 (P = 0.03) compared to the morphologic grading, AUC 0.56 (P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Traditional morphology was noted to be a better diagnostic tool (higher AUC) on culture day 3 while a morphokinetic model was superior on day 5.