Bicuspid aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty: A first-in-humans pilot trial

Midterm Results of an Algorithmic 3-Pronged Approach to Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated midterm outcomes of a 3-pronged algorithm for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair. Valve-sparing root reimplantation (VSRR) was performed for patients with aortic root dilatation. In those without a root aneurysm, external subannular ring (ESAR) was performed for annuli ≥28 mm and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA) for annuli <28 mm.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 242 patients undergoing primary BAV repair from April 29, 2004, to March 1, 2023, at a single institution. Primary end points were mortality, structural valve degeneration (SVD), which was defined as a composite of more than moderate aortic insufficiency or severe aortic stenosis, and reintervention.

RESULTS

The algorithm was used to treat 201 patients; of these, 130 underwent VSRR, 35 had ESAR, and 36 underwent SCA. Most were men with mean age of 43.8 years (SD, 12.0 years), which was similar between groups. Preoperative aortic insufficiency more than moderate was more common for ESAR compared with VSRR and SCA (74.3% vs 37.7% vs 44.4%, P < .001). At 30 days, mortality was 0.8% (n = 1) for VSRR and 0% for ESAR and SCA. At 6 years, overall Kaplan-Meier survival was 98.9% (95% CI, 97.3%-100%), with no differences between groups (P = .5). The cumulative incidence of SVD was 4.7% (95% CI, 0.1%-9.2%) for VSRR, 6.4% (95% CI, 0%-14.6%) for ESAR, and 0% for SCA (P = .4). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of reintervention with all-cause mortality as a competing risk was 2.2% (95% CI, 0.4%-6.9%), 6.1% (95% CI, 1%-17.9%), and 0% for VSRR, ESAR, and SCA, respectively (P = .506).

CONCLUSIONS

A 3-pronged algorithmic approach to BAV repair results in excellent survival and freedom from reoperation at 6 years.

Aortic Valve Repair Using HAART 300 Geometric Annuloplasty Ring: A Review and Echocardiographic Case Series

Aortic valve repair (AVr) aims to preserve the native aortic leaflets and restore normal valve function. In doing so, AVr is a more technically challenging approach than traditional aortic valve replacement. Some of the complexity of repair techniques can be attributed to the unique structure of the functional aortic annulus (FAA), which, unlike the well-defined mitral annulus, is comprised of virtual and functional components. Though stabilizing the ventriculo-aortic junction (VAJ), a component of the FAA, is considered beneficial for patients with chronic aortic insufficiency (AI), the ideal AVr technique remains a subject of much debate. The existing AVr techniques do not completely stabilize the VAJ which may increase susceptibility to recurrent AI due to VAJ dilation. An emerging new technique showing promise for the treatment of both isolated and complex AI is AVr using HAART 300^TM geometric annuloplasty ring (GAR). The GAR is implanted below the valve leaflets in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), providing stability and creating a neo-annulus. As with other AVr subtypes, this procedure has a learning curve. There are unique surgical and echocardiographic aspects of AVr with GAR, including the appearance of the LVOT, the aortic valve leaflets, and their motion which cardiac anesthesiologists and echocardiographers must be familiar with. In this work, using an eight-patient echocardiographic case series, we provide an overview of this novel AVr technique, including some unique aspects of device sizing, patient selection, expected post-repair echocardiographic features, and a review of outcomes data.

Early results of geometric ring annuloplasty for bicuspid aortic valve repair during aortic aneurysm surgery

Objectives

Geometric ring annuloplasty has shown promise during bicuspid aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency. This study examined early outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve repair associated with proximal aortic aneurysm replacement.

Methods

From September 2017 to November, 2021, 127 patients underwent bicuspid aortic valve repair with concomitant proximal aneurysm reconstruction. Patient age was 50.6 ± 12.7 years (mean ± standard deviation), male gender was 83%, New York Heart Association Class was 2 (1-2) (median [interquartile range]), and preoperative aortic insufficiency grade was 3 (2-4). Ascending aortic diameter was 50 (46-54) mm, and all patients had ascending aortic replacement. Forty patients had sinus diameters greater than 45 mm, prompting remodeling root procedures. A total of 105 patients had Sievers type 1 valves, 3 patients had type 0, and 7 patients had type 2. A total of 118 patients had primarily right/left fusion, 8 patients had right/nonfusion, and 1 patient had left/nonfusion. Leaflet reconstruction used central leaflet plication and cleft closure, with limited ultrasonic decalcification in 31 patients.

Results

Ring size was 23 (21-23) mm, and 26 of 40 root procedures were selective nonfused sinus replacements. Aortic clamp time was 139 (112-170) minutes, and bypass time was 178 (138-217) minutes. Postrepair aortic insufficiency grade was 0 (0-0) (P < .0001), and mean valve gradient was 10 (7-14) mm Hg. No early and 1 late mortality occurred. Four patients required reoperation for bleeding, and 4 patients required pacemakers. At a mean follow-up of 20 months (maximal 93), there were no valve-related complications, 5 late repair failures prompting valve replacement, and 1 death due to Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Conclusions

Geometric ring annuloplasty for bicuspid aortic valve repair with proximal aortic aneurysm reconstruction is safe and associated with good early outcomes. Further experience and follow-up will help inform long-term durability.

Early Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Neoaortic Valve Repair Incorporating Geometric Ring Annuloplasty

OBJECTIVES

During congenital heart surgery, the pulmonary valve and root may be placed into the systemic position, yielding a "neoaortic" valve. With the stress of systemic pressure, the pulmonary roots can dilate, creating aneurysms and/or neoaortic insufficiency (neoAI). This report analyzes the early outcomes of patients undergoing neoaortic valve repair incorporating geometric ring annuloplasty.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients underwent intended repair at six centers and formed the study cohort. Thirteen had previous Ross procedures, five had arterial switch operations, and three Fontan physiology. Average age was 21.7 ± 12.8 years (mean  ±  SD), 80% were male, and 11 (55%) had symptomatic heart failure. Preoperative neoAI Grade was 3.1  ±  1.1, and annular diameter was 30.7  ±  6.5 mm.

RESULTS

Valve repair was accomplished in 20/21, using geometric annuloplasty rings and leaflet plication (n = 13) and/or nodular release (n = 7). Fourteen had neoaortic aneurysm replacement (13 with root remodeling). Two underwent bicuspid valve repair. Six had pulmonary conduit changes, one insertion of an artificial Nodulus Arantius, and one resection of a subaortic membrane. Ring size averaged 21.9  ±  2.3 mm, and aortic clamp time was 171  ±  54 minutes. No operative mortality or major morbidity occurred, and postoperative hospitalization was 4.3  ±  1.4 days. At discharge, neoAI grade was 0.2  ±  0.4 (P < .0001), and valve mean gradient was ≤20 mm Hg. At average 18.0  ±  9.1 months of follow-up, all patients were asymptomatic with stable valve function.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoaortic aneurysms and neoAI are occasionally seen late following Ross, arterial switch, or Fontan procedures. Neoaortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty, leaflet reconstruction, and root remodeling provides a patient-specific approach with favorable early outcomes.

Minimally invasive aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty

OBJECTIVES

As aortic valve repair (AVr) for aortic insufficiency (AI) expands, minimally invasive (Mi) approaches are increasingly being applied. Cardiac surgical techniques can be more difficult through small incisions, and this report analyzes medium-term outcomes for MiAVr facilitated by geometric ring annuloplasty.

METHODS

Since 2013, 58 patients were selected for AVr through upper sternotomy third-interspace incisions. The average age was 58.9 ± 15.4 (mean ± SD) years, 71% were male, and preoperative AI grade was 3.6 ± 0.8. Sixty-two percent (36/58) had a proximal aortic replacement for ascending aortic aneurysms (n = 26) and/or remodeling grafts for aortic root aneurysms (n = 10). Annuloplasty rings were placed subannularly (69% trileaflet; 31% bicuspid), and leaflet procedures were performed in 70%. The average ring diameter was 21.6 ± 1.4 mm, and the average aortic clamp time was 113 ± 35 min.

RESULTS

After repair, AI grade fell to an average of 0.5 ± 0.6 (p < .0001), with a mean valve gradient of 12.5 ± 7.1 mmHg. No operative mortalities or major complications occurred. Three patients required reoperations for bleeding, and two had pacemakers. At an average follow-up of 38 months (maximal 88 months), three late deaths and no valve-related complications were observed. Four patients required reoperative aortic valve replacement over follow-up, and Kaplan-Meier survival and freedom from reoperation both exceeded 80% at 88 months. At the last follow-up, the average AI grade was 0.7 ± 0.7, and the mean valve gradient was 12.7 ± 6.3 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

Geometric ring annuloplasty was safe and seemed to facilitate performing AVr ± proximal aortic replacement through Mi incisions. Hemodynamic improvements were significant, medium-term clinical outcomes were acceptable, and results could improve further with experience.

Leaflet Dimensions as a Guide to Remodeling Annuloplasty During Aortic Valve Repair

OBJECTIVE

In chronic aortic insufficiency (AI), the method and degree of annular downsizing required to achieve durable coaptation in aortic valve repair (AVr) remains poorly defined. This study evaluated the relationship between leaflet size and annular diameter to predict adequate annular sizing in remodeling AVr.

METHODS

Under regulatory supervision, 74 patients with chronic tri-leaflet AI underwent AVr using ring annuloplasty and leaflet reconstruction. Fifty-four (73%) had ascending aortic (n = 25) and/or root (n = 29) aneurysms, and aortic grafts were sized 5 to 7 mm larger than the rings. Intraoperatively, leaflet free-edge length (FEL) was measured with special ball sizers positioned in the coronary sinus, and "normal" annular diameter was predicted from the validated formula: Required "normal" diameter = FEL/1.5. "Normal" annular diameters predicted from FEL were compared with pathologic diameters measured intraoperatively with Hegar dilators, and both were correlated with gender, age, and BSA.

RESULTS

Average age was 62.1 ± 13.3 years (mean ± SD), 73% (54/74) were male, and 96% (71/74) had moderate-to-severe AI. All patients had annular dilatation, with a pathologic diameter 26.6 ± 2.3 mm before repair, and a predicted "normal" diameter of 21.7 ± 1.7 mm (P < 0.001). Both predicted and pathologic annular diameters were larger in men (P < 0.001), but no relationship existed with age. BSA correlated with both predicted and pathologic diameters, although variability was large.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a simple validated method to predict "normal" annular diameter, all patients with chronic AI have some degree of annular dilatation. This finding implies that most AVr should include annuloplasty, with adequate and precise annular reduction based on leaflet size.

Unicuspid Aortic Valve Repair Using Geometric Ring Annuloplasty

BACKGROUND

Unicuspid aortic valves (Sievers type 2 bicuspid) are characterized by major fusion and clefting of the right-left coronary commissure, and minor fusion of the right-noncoronary commissure. Repair has been difficult because of two fusions, variable relative sinus sizes, and peripheral leaflet deficiencies or tears after balloon valvuloplasty.

METHODS

Twenty unicuspid aortic valves patients underwent valve repair in nine institutions. Right-left major fusion and right-noncoronary minor fusion occurred in 17 of 20 (85%). Commissurotomy was performed on the minor fusion, and a bicuspid annuloplasty ring with circular base geometry and two 180-degree subcommissural posts was sutured beneath the annulus, equalizing the annular circumferences of the fused and nonfused cusps. The nonfused leaflet was plicated, and the cleft in the major fusion was closed linearly until leaflet effective heights and lengths became greater than 8 mm and equal, respectively.

RESULTS

Average age (mean ± SD) was 22.3 ± 12.3 years (range, 13 to 58), 12 of 20 (60%) were symptomatic, 10 of 20 (50%) required aortic aneurysm resection. Pre-repair hemodynamic data included mean systolic valve gradient 25.8 ± 12.9 mm Hg, aortic insufficiency grade 2.9 ± 1.2, and annular diameter 24.7 ± 3.3 mm. No mortality or major complications occurred. Post-repair annular (ring) size was 20.5 ± 1.3 mm, mean gradient fell to 16.2 ± 5.9 mm Hg, and aortic insufficiency grade decreased to 0.1 ± 0.3 (P < .001). At an average follow-up of 11 months (range, 1 to 22), all 20 patients were asymptomatic and had returned to full activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic ring annuloplasty reduced annular diameter effectively, recruiting more leaflet to midline coaptation. Minor fusion commissurotomy and annular remodeling to 180-degree commissures converted UAV repair to a simple and reproducible procedure.

Minimally Invasive Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair Using Geometric Ring Annuloplasty

A 51-year-old man with congestive heart failure, Sievers type 1 bicuspid aortic valve, and severe aortic insufficiency had an upper mini-sternotomy. The annulus was sized to 27 mm, and the nonfused cusp to a 21-mm bicuspid ring. Using the geometric annuloplasty ring, two 180° subcommissural ring post sutures, 3 nonfused looping annular sutures, and 4 fused annular sutures were placed. Plication sutures raised noncoronary leaflet to a reference effective height of 10 mm, and fused leaflet cleft was closed linearly to the same effective height and length. Post-repair echocardiography showed good leaflet mobility, no residual leak, and a mean valve gradient of 10 mm Hg.