The mini-Bentall approach: Comparison with full sternotomy

Minimally invasive versus conventional methods for aortic root surgery: Choosing the right approach

OBJECTIVE

Partial upper sternotomy is preferred for isolated aortic valve replacement because of its optimal surgical visibility and favorable cosmetic outcomes; however, it is not commonly used for aortic root surgery, and the conventional median sternotomy is still the preferred method for most surgeons. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive approach (partial sternotomy [PS]) and conventional approach (median sternotomy [FS]) for aortic root surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent aortic root surgery at our hospital from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups. After propensity score matching, the conventional group included 156 patients and the minimally invasive group-57 patients.

RESULTS

Bicuspid aortic valves were observed in 63 (40.4%) and 33 (57.9%) patients in the FS and PS groups, respectively. Valve-sparing surgery was performed on 69 (44.2%) and 30 (52.6%) patients in the FS and PS groups, respectively. The minimally invasive approach was beneficial in terms of blood loss during the first 24 h after surgery (p = 0.029) and postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.023). The survival rates and freedom from reoperation or severe aortic regurgitation after the David procedure were comparable between the standard and minimally invasive groups (p = 0.25; p = 0.66) at mid-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A minimally invasive approach for aortic root surgery can be safely performed as the standard approach. Partial upper sternotomy has the advantage of lower blood loss in the early postoperative period and does not negatively affect the results of valve-sparing root replacement.

The safety and feasibility of mini-invasive Bentall surgery via right anterior mini-thoracotomy

Background

The right anterior mini-thoracotomy (RAMT) approach has become a popular technique in cardiac surgery and applied in valve surgery. However, there is very limited evidence on the application of RAMT in the Bentall surgery. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the RAMT approach in Bentall surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 27 patients who underwent Bentall surgery between September 2020 and April 2022 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. Follow-ups were undertaken 1 and 6 months after their operations. The baseline, perioperative, and follow-up results were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

A total of 27 male patients aged 48-61 years were included in the study. The operation time ranged from 4.0 to 5.0 hours, with a median of 4.5 hours. The median aortic cross-clamping time was 122 minutes [interquartile range (IQR): 109-145 minutes], and the median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 156 minutes (IQR: 143-183 minutes). The median intensive care unit stay was 3 days (IQR: 1.75-4.25 days). The ventilation time ranged from 6.5 to 22.0 hours, with a median of 13.0 hours. The median drainage volume in the first 24 hours was 210 mL. In the following-up data, no deaths or severe complications were observed.

Conclusions

The mini-Bentall procedure through an RAMT approach is a feasible and safe approach with few wounds and good clinical results in patients undergoing aortic root replacement.

Surgery of the ascending aorta via a right anterior minithoracotomy: initial surgical experience of a single center

OBJECTIVES

Full median sternotomy (FMS) is the common surgical access for patients undergoing replacement of the ascending aorta (AA) with or without aortic valve replacement (AVR). The right anterior mini-thoracotomy (RAMT) approach has been increasingly adopted for AVR. This approach has been shown to decrease blood loss and hospital length of stay (LOS) compared with FMS. The RAMT approach may also be beneficial in selected patients requiring AA procedures with or without AVR. We present our initial clinical experience of patients who have undergone a RAMT for supracommissural replacement of the tubular AA with or without AVR.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of 10 patients who underwent an elective RAMT for replacement of the tubular AA with or without AVR between November 2019 and January 2022. Clinical outcomes evaluated include 30-day mortality, intensive care and hospital LOS, time to extubation, operative times, as well as postoperative complications such as stroke and bleeding.

RESULTS

Median cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 109 and 148 min, respectively. Median time to extubation was 2.5 h and median intensive care unit and hospital stay were 2 and 10 days, respectively. There were two re-thoracotomies for postoperative bleeding and two cases of sub-xiphoidal pericardial drainage for pericardial effusion. There were no strokes and no in-hospital nor 30-day mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The replacement of the AA with or without concomitant AVR can be performed through a RAMT in carefully selected patients. However, the safety of this approach, as compared to full/partial median sternotomy, remains to be proven.

Beyond Conventional Operations: Embracing the Era of Contemporary Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Over the past two decades, minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has gained a significant place due to the emergence of innovative tools and improvements in surgical techniques, offering comparable efficacy and safety to traditional surgical methods. This review provides an overview of the history of MICS, its current state, and its prospects and highlights its advantages and limitations. Additionally, we highlight the growing trends and potential pathways for the expansion of MICS, underscoring the crucial role of technological advancements in shaping the future of this field. Recognizing the challenges, we strive to pave the way for further breakthroughs in minimally invasive cardiac procedures.

How We Perform a David Procedure With an Upper Hemisternotomy Approach

OBJECTIVE

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure) is the technique of choice in appropriately selected patients with aortic root aneurysms. These procedures are seldom performed in a minimally invasive fashion. We describe our systematic approach to the David procedure using an upper hemisternotomy (UHS). Methods: Our method involves a J-type UHS exiting the right third or fourth intercostal space. Ascending aortic and femoral venous cannulation are performed using the Seldinger technique under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Between August 2005 and August 2014, 27 patients underwent an isolated elective David procedure using a full sternotomy (FS). Sixteen underwent an isolated elective UHS David procedure from May 2015 to February 2019. Perioperative safety outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts. Results: The UHS and FS David cohorts were primarily male (87.5% and 85.2%, respectively) and 51 and 50 years old on average, respectively. Custodiol-histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia (93.8% vs 37.0%, P < 0.001) and Cor-Knot (100% vs 0%, P < 0.001) were used significantly more in the UHS David cohort. There were no significant differences in cardiopulmonary bypass (200 [183-208] vs 212 [183-223] min, P = 0.309) and aortic cross-clamp (169 [155-179] vs 188 [155-199] min, P = 0.128) times in the UHS and FS cohorts. There were no instances of hospital or 30-day mortality in either cohort. Intensive care unit and hospital stays were comparable between the 2 cohorts. Conclusions: The David procedure via UHS is a safe and reproducible technique for aortic root replacement.