Iron Administration, Infection, and Anemia Management in CKD: Untangling the Effects of Intravenous Iron Therapy on Immunity and Infection Risk

A whole-body mechanistic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of intravenous iron

Iron is essential for every cell of the mammalian organism. Iron deficiency is a major public health issue worldwide. Intravenous (IV) iron therapy has been used to treat anemia. However, IV iron therapy is known far away from ideal because the quantitative relationship between the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of IV iron under different iron statuses remains unclear. Patients are known to suffer adverse effects from excessive iron accumulation. Our objective was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of iron in mice and validate its application for predicting iron disposition in rats and humans. Previously published data on iron were collected for constructing the PBPK model of iron in mice, and then extrapolated to rats and humans based on physiologically and chemically specific parameters relevant to each species. The PBPK model characterized the distribution of iron in mice successfully. The model based on extrapolation to rats accurately simulated the ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) PK profiles in rat tissues. Similarly, the observed and simulated serum PK of FCM in humans were in reasonable agreement. This mechanistic whole-body PBPK model is useful for understanding and predicting iron effects on different species. It also establishes a foundation for future research that incorporates iron kinetics and biodistribution, along with related clinical experiments. This approach could lead to the development of effective and personalized iron deficiency anemia treatments.

Risk Factors for Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Dialysis-Dependent CKD: Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Roxadustat Trials in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Thromboembolic events have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This post hoc analysis explored potential factors related to thromboembolic events in dialysis-dependent patients treated with roxadustat in four phase 3 clinical trials in Japan.

METHODS

Thromboembolic events with onset before and after week 12 were evaluated. Baseline risk factors for thromboembolic events were investigated by Cox regression analyses. Nested case-control analyses using conditional logistic models with matched pairs of case-control data explored relationships between thromboembolic events and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

Of the 444 patients, 56 thromboembolic events were observed in 44 patients during ≤ 52 weeks of treatment. The proportion of venous and arterial thromboembolic events gradually increased after week 12. Baseline risk factors included hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (≥ 65 years), shorter dialysis vintage (< 4 months), and history of thromboembolism. The absence of concomitant intravenous or oral iron therapy (including ferric citrate) was associated with thromboembolic events before week 12 (hazard ratio 11.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.36-37.71; vs presence). Case-control analysis revealed that low average transferrin saturation (< 10%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.25; 95% CI 1.52-25.62; vs ≥ 20%), high average transferrin level (≥ 2.5 g/L; unadjusted OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.23-15.39; vs < 2.0 g/L), and high average roxadustat dose (≥ 150 mg; unadjusted OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.07-33.16; vs < 50 mg) over the previous 8 weeks before the event onset were associated with thromboembolic events after week 12. However, adjustment for iron status extinguished the significant relationship between roxadustat dose and events. Multivariate case-control analysis showed that increased transferrin from baseline (≥ 1.0 g/L; adjusted OR 7.85; 95% CI 1.82-33.90; vs < 0.5 g/dL) and decreased mean corpuscular volume (< - 2 fL; adjusted OR 5.55; 95% CI 1.73-17.83; vs ≥ 0 fL) were associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSION

In addition to established risk factors, iron deficiency may be related to thromboembolic events. Graphical Abstract available for this article.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02780726, NCT02952092, NCT02780141, NCT02779764.

Correlation of heavy metals' exposure with the prevalence of coronary heart disease among US adults: findings of the US NHANES from 2003 to 2018

We sought to explore the association between heavy metal exposure and coronary heart disease (CHD) based on data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2003-2018). In the analyses, participants were all aged > 20 and had participated in heavy metal sub-tests with valid CHD status. The Mann-Kendall test was employed to assess the trends in heavy metals' exposure and the trends in CHD prevalence over 16 years. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and a logistics regression (LR) model were used to estimate the association between heavy metals and CHD prevalence. 42,749 participants were included in our analyses, 1802 of whom had a CHD diagnosis. Total arsenic, dimethylarsonic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, barium, cadmium, lead, and antimony in urine, and cadmium, lead, and total mercury in blood all showed a substantial decreasing exposure level tendency over the 16 years (all Pfor trend < 0.05). CHD prevalence varied from 3.53 to 5.23% between 2003 and 2018. The correlation between 15 heavy metals and CHD ranges from - 0.238 to 0.910. There was also a significant positive correlation between total arsenic, monomethylarsonic acid, and thallium in urine and CHD by data release cycles (all P < 0.05). The cesium in urine showed a negative correlation with CHD (P < 0.05). We found that exposure trends of total arsenic, dimethylarsonic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, barium, cadmium, lead, and antimony in urine and blood decreased. CHD prevalence fluctuated, however. Moreover, total arsenic, monomethylarsonic acid, and thallium in urine all showed positive relationships with CHD, while cesium in urine showed a negative relationship with CHD.

Iron deficiency and the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 infection: A retrospective, longitudinal analysis of real-world data

BACKGROUND

Iron plays a key role in human immune responses; however, the influence of iron deficiency on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness is unclear.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine in preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization and death in individuals with or without iron deficiency.

METHODS

This large retrospective, longitudinal cohort study analyzed real-world data from the Maccabi Healthcare Services database (covering 25% of Israeli residents). Eligible adults (aged ≥16 years) received a first BNT162b2 vaccine dose between December 19, 2020, and February 28, 2021, followed by a second dose as per approved vaccine label. Individuals were excluded if they had SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccination, had hemoglobinopathy, received a cancer diagnosis since January 2020, had been treated with immunosuppressants, or were pregnant at the time of vaccination. Vaccine effectiveness was assessed in terms of incidence rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction assay, relative risks of COVID-19-related hospitalization, and mortality in individuals with iron deficiency (ferritin <30 ng/mL or transferrin saturation <20%). The two-dose protection period was Days 7 to 28 after the second vaccination.

RESULTS

Data from 184,171 individuals with (mean [standard deviation; SD] age 46.2 [19.6] years; 81.2% female) versus 1,072,019 without (mean [SD] age 46.9 [18.0] years; 46.2% female) known iron deficiency were analyzed. Vaccine effectiveness in the two-dose protection period was 91.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.7-96.0%) and 92.1% (95% CI 84.2-96.1%) for those with versus without iron deficiency (P = 0.96). Of patients with versus without iron deficiency, hospitalizations occurred in 28 and 19 per 100,000 during the reference period (Days 1-7 after the first dose), and in 19 and 7 per 100,000 during the two-dose protection period, respectively. Mortality rates were comparable between study groups: 2.2 per 100,000 (4/181,012) in the population with iron deficiency and 1.8 per 100,000 (19/1,055,298) in those without known iron deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine is >90% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in the 3 weeks after the second vaccination, irrespective of iron-deficiency status. These findings support the use of the vaccine in populations with iron deficiency.

National trends and projection of chronic kidney disease incidence according to etiology from 1990 to 2030 in Iran: a Bayesian age-period-cohort modeling study

OBJECTIVES

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health problem worldwide. Predicting CKD incidence rates and case numbers at the national and global levels is vital for planning CKD prevention programs.

METHODS

Data on CKD incidence rates and case numbers in Iran from 1990 to 2019 were extracted from the Global Burden of Disease online database. The average annual percentage change was computed to determine the temporal trends in CKD age-standardized incidence rates from 1990 to 2019. A Bayesian age-period-cohort model was used to predict the CKD incidence rate and case numbers through 2030.

RESULTS

Nationally, CKD cases increased from 97,300 in 1990 to 315,500 in 2019. The age-specific CKD incidence rate increased from 168.52 per 100,000 to 382.98 per 100,000 during the same period. Between 2020 and 2030, the number of CKD cases is projected to rise to 423,300. The age-specific CKD incidence rate is projected to increase to 469.04 in 2030 (95% credible interval, 399.20 to 538.87). In all age groups and etiological categories, the CKD incidence rate is forecasted to increase by 2030.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD case numbers and incidence rates are anticipated to increase in Iran through 2030. The high level of CKD incidence in people with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and glomerulonephritis, as well as in older people, suggests a deficiency of attention to these populations in current prevention plans and highlights their importance in future programs for the national control of CKD.

The Biological Processes of Ferroptosis Involved in Pathogenesis of COVID-19 and Core Ferroptoic Genes Related With the Occurrence and Severity of This Disease

Background

A worldwide outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in millions of deaths. Ferroptosis is a form of iron-dependent cell death which is characterized by accumulation of lipid peroxides on cellular membranes, and is related with many physiological and pathophysiological processes of diseases such as cancer, inflammation and infection. However, the role of ferroptosis in COVID-19 has few been studied.

Material and Method

Based on the RNA-seq data of 100 COVID-19 cases and 26 Non-COVID-19 cases from GSE157103, we identified ferroptosis related differentially expressed genes (FRDEGs, adj.P-value < .05) using the "Deseq2" R package. By using the "clusterProfiler" R package, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment. Next, a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of FRDEGs was constructed and top 30 hub genes were selected by cytoHubba in Cytoscape. Subsequently, we established a prediction model for COVID-19 by utilizing univariate logistic regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Based on core FRDEGs, COVID-19 patients were identified as two clusters using the "ConsenesusClusterPlus" R package. Finally, the miRNA-mRNA network was built by Targetscan online database and visualized by Cytoscape software.

Results

A total of 119 FRDEGs were identified and the GO and KEGG enrichment analyses showed the most important biologic processes are oxidative stress response, MAPK and PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. The top 30 hub genes were selected, and finally, 7 core FRDEGs (JUN, MAPK8, VEGFA, CAV1, XBP1, HMOX1, and HSPB1) were found to be associated with the occurrence of COVID-19. Next, the two patterns of COVID-19 patients had constructed and the cluster A patients were likely to be more severe.

Conclusion

Our study suggested that ferroptosis was involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 disease and the functions of core FRDEGs may become a new research aspect of this disease.

Management of Iron Deficiency in Heart Failure: A Review of Evidence

ABSTRACT

Iron deficiency is common in patients with heart failure and has been associated with worse outcomes, including increases in mortality, disease progression, and hospitalizations. As such, several studies have evaluated the role of iron supplementation in mitigating these risks. Evidence for the role of intravenous iron in improving exercise capacity, quality of life, and hospitalizations is promising, although the benefits of oral iron remain less clear. This review will evaluate the literature surrounding iron supplementation in heart failure and provide practical recommendations for its management.

[Management of iron deficiency in chronic kidney disease: Review and proposed algorithm]

Iron deficiency is very common in chronic kidney disease, even before the dialysis stage. It is an independent factor of morbidity and mortality in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. During chronic kidney disease, iron deficiency is defined by a transferrin saturation <20% and/or a serum ferritin <100 μg/L. In France, about half of non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients have absolute iron deficiency (transferrin saturation <20% and serum ferritin <100 μg/L) and/or functional iron deficiency (transferrin saturation <20% and serum ferritin >100 μg/L). Despite this, iron deficiency is usually not investigated. In fact, more than 60% of nephrologists do not assess iron status at least once a year. In addition, iron deficiency is rarely treated: only 12% of patients are prescribed oral or intravenous iron. Early detection and treatment are fundamental and should be systematic. In order to help improve the management of iron deficiency among non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients, we propose an algorithm that takes into account current recommendations and the most recent data from the literature. Initial blood test requires the measurement of hemoglobin concentration, transferrin saturation and serum ferritin. A transferrin saturation <20% establishes the diagnosis of iron deficiency and the serum ferritin level points towards an absolute or functional deficiency. The combination of both values makes it possible to adapt the treatment, particularly in an inflammatory context where oral iron is not effective.

Association of Abnormal Iron Status with the Occurrence and Prognosis of Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis: A Longitudinal Data-Based 10-Year Retrospective Study

This retrospective study investigated the effect of iron status on peritonitis by analyzing longitudinal iron parameters in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Patients who received PD at our center from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2015 were included and followed up until 31 December 2017. According to the joint quartiles of baseline transferrin saturation and ferritin, iron status was categorized as reference iron status (RIS), absolute iron deficiency (AID), functional iron deficiency (FID), and high iron status (HIS). Generalized estimating equations and Cox regression models with time-dependent covariates were used. A total of 1258 PD patients were included; 752 (59.8%) were male, with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 47.4 (±14.9) years. During a median follow-up period of 35.5 (interquartile range, 18.4–60.0) months, 450 (34.3%) patients had 650 episodes of peritonitis. By analyzing longitudinal data, patients with AID were independently positively associated with the occurrence (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.45) and treatment failure of peritonitis (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.85). Patients with HIS were positively associated with the treatment failure of peritonitis (AHR = 2.70). Longitudinal AID and HIS were associated with the episodes and poor prognosis of peritonitis. Active clinical monitoring and correction of iron imbalance in patients with PD are needed.

The Role of Iron in Staphylococcus aureus Infection and Human Disease: A Metal Tug of War at the Host—Microbe Interface

Iron deficiency anemia can be treated with oral or intravenous Fe supplementation. Such supplementation has considerable effects on the human microbiome, and on opportunistic pathogenic micro-organisms. Molecular understanding of the control and regulation of Fe availability at the host-microbe interface is crucial to interpreting the side effects of Fe supplementation. Here, we provide a concise overview of the regulation of Fe by the opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Ferric uptake regulator (Fur) plays a central role in controlling Fe uptake, utilization and storage in order to maintain a required value. The micro-organism has a strong preference for heme iron as an Fe source, which is enabled by the Iron-regulated surface determinant (Isd) system. The strategies it employs to overcome Fe restriction imposed by the host include: hijacking host proteins, replacing metal cofactors, and replacing functions by non-metal dependent enzymes. We propose that integrated omics approaches, which include metalloproteomics, are necessary to provide a comprehensive understanding of the metal tug of war at the host-microbe interface down to the molecular level.

Questions and answers on iron deficiency treatment selection and the use of intravenous iron in routine clinical practice

Iron deficiency is a common cause of morbidity and can arise as a consequence or complication from many diseases. The use of intravenous iron has increased significantly in the last decade, but concerns remain about indications and administration. Modern intravenous iron preparations can facilitate rapid iron repletion in one or two doses, both for absolute iron deficiency and, in the presence of inflammation, functional iron deficiency, where oral iron therapy is ineffective or has not worked. A multidisciplinary team of experts experienced in iron deficiency undertook a consensus review to support healthcare professionals with practical advice on managing iron deficiency in gastrointestinal, renal and cardiac disease, as well as; pregnancy, heavy menstrual bleeding, and surgery. We explain how intravenous iron may work where oral iron has not. We provide context on how and when intravenous iron should be administered, and informed opinion on potential benefits balanced with potential side-effects. We propose how intravenous iron side-effects can be anticipated in terms of what they may be and when they may occur. The aim of this consensus is to provide a practical basis for educating and preparing staff and patients on when and how iron infusions can be administered safely and efficiently. Key messages Iron deficiency treatment selection is driven by several factors, including the presence of inflammation, the time available for iron replenishment, and the anticipated risk of side-effects or intolerance. Intravenous iron preparations are indicated for the treatment of iron deficiency when oral preparations are ineffective or cannot be used, and therefore have applicability in a wide range of clinical contexts, including chronic inflammatory conditions, perioperative settings, and disorders associated with chronic blood loss. Adverse events occurring with intravenous iron can be anticipated according to when they typically occur, which provides a basis for educating and preparing staff and patients on how iron infusions can be administered safely and efficiently.

Iron Deficiency in CKD Without Concomitant Anemia

The physiological role of iron extends well beyond hematopoiesis. Likewise, the pathophysiological effects of iron deficiency (ID) extend beyond anemia. Although inextricably interrelated, ID and anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are distinct clinical entities. For more than 3 decades, however, nephrologists have focused primarily on the correction of anemia. The achievement of target hemoglobin (Hgb) concentrations is prioritized over repletion of iron stores, and iron status is generally a secondary consideration only assessed in those patients with anemia. Historically, the correction of ID independent of anemia has not been a primary focus in the management of CKD. In contrast, ID is a key therapeutic target in the setting of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); correction of ID in this population improves functional status and quality of life and may improve cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. Given the strong interrelationships between HF and CKD, it is reasonable to consider whether iron therapy alone may benefit those with CKD and evidence of ID irrespective of Hgb concentration. In this review, we differentiate anemia from ID by considering both epidemiologic and pathophysiological perspectives and by reviewing the evidence linking correction of ID to outcomes in patients with HF and/or CKD. Furthermore, we discuss existing gaps in evidence and provide proposals for future research and practical considerations for clinicians.

Risk of Infection Associated With Administration of Intravenous Iron: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Intravenous iron is recommended by many clinical guidelines based largely on its effectiveness in reducing anemia. However, the association with important safety outcomes, such as infection, remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the risk of infection associated with intravenous iron compared with oral iron or no iron.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from 1966 to January 31, 2021. Ongoing trials were sought from ClinicalTrials.gov, CENTRAL, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Search Registry Platform.

STUDY SELECTION

Pairs of reviewers identified RCTs that compared intravenous iron with oral iron or no iron across all patient populations, excluding healthy volunteers. Nonrandomized studies published since January 1, 2007, were also included. A total of 312 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane recommendations, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Two reviewers extracted data independently. A random-effects model was used to synthesize data from RCTs. A narrative synthesis was performed to characterize the reporting of infection.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was risk of infection. Secondary outcomes included mortality, hospital length of stay, and changes in hemoglobin and red blood cell transfusion requirements. Measures of association were reported as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences.

RESULTS

A total of 154 RCTs (32 920 participants) were included in the main analysis. Intravenous iron was associated with an increased risk of infection when compared with oral iron or no iron (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.31; I2 = 37%; moderate certainty of evidence). Intravenous iron also was associated with an increase in hemoglobin (mean difference, 0.57 g/dL; 95% CI, 0.50-0.64 g/dL; I2 = 94%) and a reduction in the risk of requiring a red blood cell transfusion (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-0.89; I2 = 15%) when compared with oral iron or no iron. There was no evidence of an effect on mortality or hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this large systematic review and meta-analysis, intravenous iron was associated with an increased risk of infection. Well-designed studies, using standardized definitions of infection, are required to understand the balance between this risk and the potential benefits.

Physiology and Inflammation Driven Pathophysiology of Iron Homeostasis-Mechanistic Insights into Anemia of Inflammation and Its Treatment

Anemia is very common in patients with inflammatory disorders. Its prevalence is associated with severity of the underlying disease, and it negatively affects quality of life and cardio-vascular performance of patients. Anemia of inflammation (AI) is caused by disturbances of iron metabolism resulting in iron retention within macrophages, a reduced erythrocyte half-life, and cytokine mediated inhibition of erythropoietin function and erythroid progenitor cell differentiation. AI is mostly mild to moderate, normochromic and normocytic, and characterized by low circulating iron, but normal and increased levels of the storage protein ferritin and the iron hormone hepcidin. The primary therapeutic approach for AI is treatment of the underlying inflammatory disease which mostly results in normalization of hemoglobin levels over time unless other pathologies such as vitamin deficiencies, true iron deficiency on the basis of bleeding episodes, or renal insufficiency are present. If the underlying disease and/or anemia are not resolved, iron supplementation therapy and/or treatment with erythropoietin stimulating agents may be considered whereas blood transfusions are an emergency treatment for life-threatening anemia. New treatments with hepcidin-modifying strategies and stabilizers of hypoxia inducible factors emerge but their therapeutic efficacy for treatment of AI in ill patients needs to be evaluated in clinical trials.

Severity of anaemia and association with all-cause mortality in patients with medically managed left-sided endocarditis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and severity of anaemia in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis (IE) and association with mortality.

METHODS

In the Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis trial, 400 patients with IE were randomised to conventional or partial oral antibiotic treatment after stabilisation of infection, showing non-inferiority. Haemoglobin (Hgb) levels were measured at randomisation. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality after 6 months and 3 years. Patients who underwent valve surgery were excluded due to competing reasons for anaemia.

RESULTS

Out of 400 patients with IE, 248 (mean age 70.6 years (SD 11.1), 62 women (25.0%)) were medically managed; 37 (14.9%) patients had no anaemia, 139 (56.1%) had mild anaemia (Hgb <8.1 mmol/L in men and Hgb <7.5 mmol/L in women and Hgb ≥6.2 mmol/L) and 72 (29.0%) had moderate to severe anaemia (Hgb <6.2 mmol/L). Mortality rates in patients with no anaemia, mild anaemia and moderate to severe anaemia were 2.7%, 3.6% and 15.3% at 6-month follow-up and 13.5%, 20.1% and 34.7% at 3-year follow-up, respectively. Moderate to severe anaemia was associated with higher mortality after 6 months (HR 4.81, 95% CI 1.78 to 13.0, p=0.002) and after 3 years (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.60, p=0.004) and remained significant after multivariable adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Moderate to severe anaemia was present in 29% of patients with medically treated IE after stabilisation of infection and was independently associated with higher mortality within the following 3 years. Further investigations are warranted to determine whether intensified treatment of anaemia in patients with IE might improve outcome.

Dietary Supplementation of EGF Ameliorates the Negatively Effects of LPS on Early-Weaning Piglets: From Views of Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Microelement Absorption and Possible Mechanisms

Simple Summary

This study aims to investigate how epidermal growth factor (EGF) attenuates the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, microelement absorption of early-weaned pigs. A total of 48 early weaned piglets were randomly distributed to four groups consisting of a 2 × 2 factorial design. The main factors were the level of LPS (H_LPS = high LPS: 100 μg/kg body weight; Z_LPS = low LPS: 0 μg/kg body weight) and EGF (H_EGF = high EGF: 2 mg/kg diet; Z_EGF = low EGF: 0 mg/kg diet). Each group had four replicates and each replicate consisted of three piglets. The results showed that H_LPS level decreased the growth performance and the apparent digestibility of crude fat, while H_EGF level increased the average daily feed intake. The concentration of most microelements in the gastrointestinal tract chyme and feces were increased by H_LPS level and decreased by H_EGF level. The expression levels of most microelement transport-relative genes in the mucosa of gastrointestinal tissues were decreased by H_LPS level and increased by H_EGF level. In conclusion, dietary EGF could attenuate the negative effect of LPS exposure on the apparent digestibility of crude fat and microelement absorption through changing the expression levels of microelement transport-relative genes. EGF can be used as an additive to increase the essential trace elements absorption in the early weaning piglets.

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) plays an important role in nutrients absorption. However, whether it can be an effective additive to improve the growth performance and nutrients absorption in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenged early weaning piglets is still unknown. A 14-days trial was conducted to investigate how EGF attenuates the effect of LPS on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, microelement absorption of early-weaned pigs, and study the underlying mechanism. A total of 48 early weaned piglets, aged 25 days, were randomly distributed to four groups (control, EGF, LPS and EGF + LPS groups) consisting of a 2 × 2 factorial design. The main factors were the level of LPS (H_LPS = high LPS: 100 μg/kg body weight; Z_LPS = low LPS: 0 μg/kg body weight) and EGF (H_EGF = high EGF: 2 mg/kg diet; Z_EGF = low EGF: 0 mg/kg diet). Each group had four replicates and each replicate consisted of three piglets. The results showed that piglets injected with H_LPS level significantly decreased the average daily gain (ADG), and significantly increased the feed conversion ratio (FCR) compared with the piglets injected with Z_LPS level, while piglets fed H_EGF level significantly increased the average daily feed intake (ADFI) compared with the piglets fed Z_EGF level (p < 0.05). Piglets injected with H_LPS level significantly decreased the apparent digestibility of crude fat compared with the piglets injected with Z_LPS level (p < 0.05). Piglets injected with H_LPS level significantly increased the concentration of most microelements in the gastrointestinal tract chyme and feces, and significantly decreased the expression levels of most microelement transport-relative genes in the mucosa of gastrointestinal tissues compared with the piglets injected with Z_LPS level (p < 0.05). Piglets fed H_EGF level significantly decreased the concentration of microelement in the gastrointestinal tract chyme and feces, and significantly increased the expression levels of the microelement transport-relative genes in the mucosa of gastrointestinal tissues compared with the piglets fed Z_EGF level (p < 0.05). In conclusion, dietary EGF could attenuate the negative effect of LPS exposure on the apparent digestibility of crude fat and microelement absorption of early-weaning piglets. EGF and LPS influenced the absorption of essential trace element through changing the expression levels of microelement transport-relative genes in the mucosa of gastrointestinal tissues. In the early weaning piglets, EGF can be used as an additive to increase the essential trace elements absorption.

Anemia Management in Peritoneal Dialysis: Perspectives From the Asia Pacific Region

Anemia is an important complication in patients with chronic kidney disease. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is one of the most common modalities of kidney replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease. PD is particularly prevalent in the Asian Pacific region. Among the different countries and regions, including mainland China, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand, PD accounts for 2.8% to 74.6% of the dialysis population. In addition, 82% to 96% of the PD populations from these countries and regions are receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Asian Pacific countries and regions follow the latest KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines for the initiation of treatment of anemia in PD patients. The types of ESAs commonly used include shorter-acting (epoetin alfa and beta) and longer-acting agents, including darbepoetin alfa or methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta. The most commonly used ESAs in Mainland China, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand are the shorter-acting agents, whereas in Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea, longer-acting ESAs are most common. Oral iron therapy is still the most commonly used iron supplement. The route and dosage of iron administration in PD patients requires more research studies. With the introduction of oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors into clinical use, the landscape of treatment of anemia in the PD population in the Asia Pacific region may change in the coming years.

Attitude changes in prescribing intravenous iron supplementation in different settings at a hospital consortium in Italy

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anaemia is a public health problem. In case oral iron treatment is ineffective, poorly tolerated or contraindicated, the intravenous route becomes the first choice. The aim of the study was to evaluate the shift between ferrous gluconate (FG) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) usage at our hospitals over the years. We also performed a cost comparison between pre and post-FCM availability periods, taking into account the acquisition costs of both intravenous iron and red blood cell units (PRBC).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The amount and costs of FG and FCM released by hospital Pharmacy Services from 2010 to 2019 were analysed, along with the number of transfused PRBC units in the same timeframe.

RESULTS

Overall, the proportion of FCM usage rose from 8.6 % in 2014 to 71.9 % in 2019, as percentage of total intravenous iron released. After exclusion of haemodialysis, where FG is still widely used, the FCM use in the last four years raised from 12.9% to 92.5%. Despite the higher FCM cost, the mean yearly expenditure for intravenous iron plus PRBC units did not differ between pre- and post-FCM eras (2010-2013, € 2,396,876 € versus 2014-2019, € 2,307,875 - p = 0.234), as a result of a net decrease of PRBC usage, namely from 15,083 to 12,654 (-16.1 %), respectively.

DISCUSSION

Intravenous iron has a major role in treating iron deficiency anaemia in several settings. Third generation compounds are paving the way to more updated and safer treatments.

Safety and Effectiveness of an Accelerated Intravenous Iron Administration Protocol in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

The ACC/AHA heart failure (HF) guidelines include a class IIb recommendation for intravenous (IV) iron replacement in patients with iron deficiency and New York Heart Association class II or III to improve functional status and quality of life. Several studies have addressed the use of IV iron formulations such as ferric carboxymaltose or iron sucrose in HF population; however, few studies focused on sodium ferric gluconate complex (SFGC).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and effectiveness of an IV SFGC administration protocol in patients hospitalized with HF.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. We included patients admitted to the HF service from September 2017 to March 2018. The primary outcome was the frequency of adverse reactions. The secondary outcome was the odds of HF readmissions between the 2 groups (IV SFGC vs. control).

RESULTS

Of the 123 patients, 70 received IV iron (SFGC group) and 53 did not receive IV iron (control group). Five (7%) patients of the 70 in the SFGC group experienced adverse events, which included hypotension (n = 2, 2.8%), fever (n = 2, 2.8%) and myalgia (n = 2, 2.8%). Nine (12.8%) and 18 (25.7%) were readmitted within 30 days and 6 months respectively. In the control arm, 5 (9.4%) and 14 (26.4%) were admitted within 30 days and 6 months respectively. The odds of HF readmission at 30 days [OR 1.4 (95% CI: 0.45, 4.5)] and at 6 months [OR 0.96 (95% CI: 0.43, 2.2)] were similar in those who did not receive IV iron compared to those who received IV iron.

CONCLUSIONS

Sodium ferric gluconate complex given at an accelerated dosing schedule appears to provide a more efficient means to prescribe IV iron in the inpatient setting and is safe with a low frequency of hypotension, fevers, and myalgias.

Improving the safety of intravenous iron treatments for patients with chronic kidney disease

Introduction: Iron-deficiency anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common and has prognostic, financial, and quality of life implications. Intravenous (IV) iron is a key intervention for optimal management, however, ongoing safety concerns exist. Area covered: The potential side effects associated with IV iron use are addressed as we review the most recent studies. Hypersensitivity reactions and true anaphylaxis are indeed rare with a greater understanding of the nature of labile iron and 'Fishbane' reactions. Hypophosphatemia appears commoner with certain IV iron preparations, however its significance in CKD requires exploration. The long-standing questions regarding oxidative stress and the potential susceptibility to infections and worsening cardiovascular morbidity are discussed. Iron overload secondary to repeat IV iron infusions is plausible, however, a number of guidelines limit and strictly guide prescription. Expert opinion: The past decade has improved our understanding of IV iron administration safety in patients with CKD. Third generation IV iron compounds have minimized hypersensitivity reactions while allowing high doses to be administered safely and rapidly in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients. However, differences in safety profiles such as hypophosphatemia require further study and therapy should be tailored to the individual. Clinicians should feel confident in using IV iron therapy.

Intravenous iron: do we adequately understand the short- and long-term risks in clinical practice?

Intravenous (IV) iron as a therapeutic agent is often administered but not always fully understood. The benefits of IV iron are well proven in many fields, particularly in nephrology. IV iron is beneficial not only for true iron deficiency but also for iron-restricted anaemia (functional iron deficiency). Yet, the literature on intravenous iron has many inconsistencies regarding its adverse effects. Over the last several years, newer forms of iron have been developed, leading to the more regular use of iron and in larger doses. This review will summarize some of the older and newer literature regarding the differences among iron products, including the mechanisms and frequency of their adverse events (AEs). The pathway and frequency of an underrecognized adverse event (hypophosphataemia) will be discussed. Recent insights on infection risk and iron handling by macrophages are examined. Potential but presently unproven risks of iron overload due to IV iron are discussed. The impact of these on the risk:benefit ratio and dosing of intravenous iron are considered in different clinical settings, including pregnancy and cancer. IV iron is an essential component of the therapy of anaemia and understanding these issues will enable more informed treatment decisions and knowledgeable use of these drugs.