Prescribing Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: A Narrative Review

Safety and Feasibility of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy With Calcium-Containing Solutions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Calcium-free (Ca-free) solutions are theoretically the most ideal for regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, the majority of medical centers in China had to make a compromise of using commercially available calcium-containing (Ca-containing) solutions instead of Ca-free ones due to their scarcity. This study was designed to probe into the potential of Ca-containing solution as a secure and efficient substitution for Ca-free solutions.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized single-center trial, 99 patients scheduled for CRRT were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups: continuous veno-venous hemodialysis Ca-free dialysate (CVVHD Ca-free) group, continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration calcium-free dialysate (CVVHDF Ca-free) group, and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration Ca-containing dialysate (CVVHDF Ca-containing) group at cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). The primary endpoint was the incidence of metabolic complications. The secondary endpoints included premature termination of treatment, thrombus of filter, and bubble trap after the process.

RESULTS

The incidence of citrate accumulation (18.2% vs. 12.1% vs. 21.2%) and metabolic alkalosis (12.1% vs. 0% vs. 9.1%) did not significantly differ among three groups (p > 0.05 for both). The incidence of premature termination was comparable among the groups (18.2% vs. 9.1% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.582). The thrombus level of the filter and bubble trap was similar in the three groups (p > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

In RCA-CRRT for CICU population, RCA-CVVHDF with Ca-containing solutions and traditional RCA with Ca-free solutions had a comparable safety and feasibility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2100048238 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

Management of Intermittent Hemodialysis in the Critically Ill Patient

Intermittent hemodialysis remains a cornerstone of extracorporeal KRT in the intensive care unit, either as a first-line therapy for AKI or a second-line therapy when patients transition from a continuous or prolonged intermittent therapy. Intermittent hemodialysis is usually provided 3 days per week in this setting on the basis that no clinical benefits have been demonstrated with more frequent hemodialysis. This should not detract from the importance of continually assessing and refining the hemodialysis prescription (including the need for extra treatments) according to dynamic changes in extracellular volume and other parameters, and ensuring that an adequate dose of hemodialysis is being delivered to the patient. Compared with other KRT modalities, the cardinal challenge encountered during intermittent hemodialysis is hemodynamic instability. This phenomenon occurs when reductions in intravascular volume, as a consequence of ultrafiltration and/or osmotic shifts, outpace compensatory plasma refilling from the extravascular space. Myocardial stunning, triggered by intermittent hemodialysis, and independent of ultrafiltration, may also contribute. The hemodynamic effect of intermittent hemodialysis is likely magnified in patients who are critically ill due to an inability to mount sufficient compensatory physiologic responses in the context of multiorgan dysfunction. Of the many interventions that have undergone testing to mitigate hemodynamic instability related to KRT, the best evidence exists for cooling the dialysate and raising the dialysate sodium concentration. Unfortunately, the evidence supporting routine use of these and other interventions is weak owing to poor study quality and limited sample sizes. Intermittent hemodialysis will continue to be an important and commonly used KRT modality for AKI in patients with critical illness, especially in jurisdictions where resources are limited. There is an urgent need to harmonize the definition of hemodynamic instability related to KRT in clinical trials and robustly test strategies to combat it in this vulnerable patient population.

Continuous KRT: A Contemporary Review

AKI is a common complication of critical illness and is associated with substantial morbidity and risk of death. Continuous KRT comprises a spectrum of dialysis modalities preferably used to provide kidney support to patients with AKI who are hemodynamically unstable and critically ill. The various continuous KRT modalities are distinguished by different mechanisms of solute transport and use of dialysate and/or replacement solutions. Considerable variation exists in the application of continuous KRT due to a lack of standardization in how the treatments are prescribed, delivered, and optimized to improve patient outcomes. In this manuscript, we present an overview of the therapy, recent clinical trials, and outcome studies. We review the indications for continuous KRT and the technical aspects of the treatment, including continuous KRT modality, vascular access, dosing of continuous KRT, anticoagulation, volume management, nutrition, and continuous KRT complications. Finally, we highlight the need for close collaboration of a multidisciplinary team and development of quality assurance programs for the provision of high-quality and effective continuous KRT.

The association between albumin corrected anion gap and ICU mortality in acute kidney injury patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy

The relationship between albumin corrected anion gap (ACAG) and mortality in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients who received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has not been investigated in any previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ACAG at CRRT initiation and all-cause mortality among these patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients diagnosed with AKI and treated with CRRT in the ICU from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV version 1.0 (MIMIC IV) database and Huzhou Central Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. Participants were divided into two groups: the normal ACAG group (12-20 mmol/L) and high ACAG group (> 20 mmol/L). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare the survival rate between the two groups. Restricted cubic spine (RCS) and Cox proportional-hazards models were utilized to analyze the relationship between ACAG at CRRT initiation and ICU all-cause mortality of these patients. A total of 708 patients met the inclusion criteria in the study. The all-cause mortality of these patients during ICU hospitalization was 41.95%. Patients in the high ACAG group exhibited significantly higher ICU all-cause mortality rate than patients in the normal ACAG group (all P < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the normal ACAG group had a higher ICU cumulative survival rate than the high ACAG group (log-rank test, χ₁²= 13.620, χ₂² = 12.460, both P < 0.001). In the multivariate COX regression analyses, patients with higher ACAG (> 20 mmol/L) levels at the time of CRRT initiation in the MIMIC IV database and Huzhou Central Hospital were significantly correlated with ICU all-cause mortality after adjusting multiple potential confounding factors with hazard ratios of 2.852 (95% CI 1.718-4.734) and 2.637(95% CI 1.584-4.389), respectively. In critically AKI patients who undergo CRRT, higher ACAG (> 20 mmol/L) level at the initiation of CRRT was significantly correlated with ICU all-cause mortality. Therefore, clinicians should pay more attention to those patients with a higher ACAG value.