Correlation between bone density measurements on CT or MRI versus DEXA scan: A systematic review

Low bone mineral density: a primer for the spine surgeon

Within spinal surgery, low bone mineral density is associated with several postoperative complications, such as proximal junctional kyphosis, pseudoarthrosis, and screw loosening. Although modalities such as CT and MRI can be utilized to assess bone quality, DEXA scans, the "Gold Standard" for diagnosing osteoporosis, is not routinely included in preoperative workup. With an increasing prevalence of osteoporosis in an aging population, it is critical for spine surgeons to understand the importance of evaluating bone mineral density preoperatively to optimize postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to provide surgeons a summary of the evaluation, treatment, and implications of low bone mineral density in patients who are candidates for spine surgery.

Inter and intra-operator reliability of Lekholm and Zarb classification and proposal of a novel radiomic data-driven clustering for qualitative assessment of edentulous alveolar ridges

OBJECTIVES

The present study was conducted to evaluate the reproducibility of Lekholm and Zarb classification system (L&Z) for bone quality assessment of edentulous alveolar ridges and to investigate the potential of a data-driven approach for bone quality classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six expert clinicians were asked to classify 110 CBCT cross-sections according to L&Z classification (T0). The same evaluation was repeated after one month with the images put in a different order (T1). Intra- and inter-examiner agreement analyses were performed using Cohen's kappa coefficient (CK) and Fleiss' kappa coefficient (FK), respectively. Additionally, radiomic features extraction was performed from 3D edentulous ridge blocks derived from the same 110 CBCTs, and unsupervised clustering using 3 different clustering methods was used to identify patterns in the obtained data.

RESULTS

Intra-examiner agreement between T0 and T1 was weak (CK 0.515). Inter-examiner agreement at both time points was minimal (FK at T0: 0.273; FK at T1: 0.243). The three different unsupervised clustering methods based on radiomic features aggregated the 110 CBCTs in three groups in the same way.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed low agreement among clinicians when using L&Z classification, indicating that the system may not be as reliable as previously thought. The present study suggests the possible application of a reproducible data-driven approach based on radiomics for the classification of edentulous alveolar ridges, with potential implications for improving clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings and to develop more standardized and accurate methods for assessing bone quality of edentulous alveolar ridges.

Side specific differences of Hounsfield-Units in the osteoporotic lumbar spine

Background

Gold standard for determining bone density as a surrogate parameter of bone quality is measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), most commonly performed on the lumbar spine (L1-L4). Computed tomography (CT) data are often available for surgical planning prior to spine procedures, but currently this information is not standardized for bone quality assessment. Besides, measuring the Hounsfield-Units (HU) is also of great importance in the context of biomechanical studies. This in vitro study aims in comparing BMD from DXA and HU based on diagnostic CT scans. In addition, methods are presented to quantify local density variations within bones.

Methods

One hundred and seventy-six vertebrae (L1-L4) from 44 body donors (age 84.0±8.7 years) were studied. DXA measurements were obtained on the complete vertebrae to determine BMD, as well as axial CT scans with a slice thickness of 1 mm. Using Mimics Innovation Suite image processing software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium), two volumes (whole vertebra vs. spongious bone) were formed for each vertebra, which in turn were divided in their left and right sides. From these total of six volumes, the respective mean HU was determined. HU of the whole vertebra and just spongious HU were compared with the BMD of the corresponding vertebrae. Side specific differences were calculated as relative values.

Results

Whole bone and spongious HU correlated significantly (P>0.001; α=0.01) with BMD. A positive linear correlation was found, which was more pronounced for whole bone HU (R=0.72) than for spongious HU (R=0.62). When comparing the left and right sides within each vertebra, the HU was found to be 10% larger on average on one side compared to the opposite side. In some cases, the difference of left and right spongious bone can be up to 170%. There is a tendency for the side comparison to be larger for the spongious HU than for the whole vertebra.

Conclusions

Determination of HU from clinical CT scans is an important tool for assessing bone quality, primarily by including the cortical portion in the calculation of HU. Unlike BMD, HU can be used to distinguish precisely between individual regions. Some of the very large side-specific gradients of the HU indicate an enormous application potential for preoperative patient-specific planning.

Coronal plane in opportunistic screening of osteoporosis using computed tomography: comparison with axial and sagittal planes

OBJECTIVE

To compare the coronal plane with axial and sagittal planes in opportunistic screening of osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients aged ≥ 50 years who underwent both lumbar spine CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within 3 months were included. Osteoporosis was diagnosed based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry results. The CT number was measured at the center of the vertebral body in coronal, axial, and sagittal planes. To compare the coronal plane with axial and sagittal planes in diagnosing osteoporosis, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were compared and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The optimal cutoff values were calculated using Youden's index.

RESULTS

The AUC of the coronal plane (0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.89) was not significantly different from that of the axial plane (0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.87; P = 0.39) and that of the sagittal plane (0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87; P = 0.68). Excellent concordance rates were observed between coronal and axial planes with ICC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96) and between coronal and sagittal planes with ICC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96). The optimal cutoff values for the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes were 110, 112, and 112 HU, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The coronal plane does not significantly differ from axial and sagittal planes in opportunistic screening of osteoporosis. Thus, the coronal plane as well as axial and sagittal planes can be used interchangeably in measuring bone mineral density using CT.