Simulations of Cytochrome P450 3A4-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions by Simple Two-Compartment Model-Assisted Static Method

Interplay of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase and CYP2C8 for CYP2C8 Mediated Drug Oxidation and Its Impact on Drug-Drug Interaction Produced by Standardized CYP2C8 Inhibitors, Clopidogrel and Gemfibrozil

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Early investigations into drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving cytochrome P450 2C8 (CYP2C8) have highlighted the complexity of interactions between CYP2C8 substrate drugs, including montelukast, desloratadine, pioglitazone, repaglinide, and cerivastatin (the latter two being OATP1B1 substrates), and standardized CYP2C8 inhibitors such as clopidogrel (Clop) and gemfibrozil (Gem). These interactions have proven challenging to predict based solely on simple CYP inhibition. A hypothesis has emerged suggesting that these substrate drugs first distribute to UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) before undergoing oxidation by CYP2C8, resulting in bidirectional elimination. The process of drug distribution to UGT is believed to significantly impact these DDIs. This study aims to explore the intricate interplay between UGT and CYP2C8 in the context of DDIs involving CYP2C8 substrates affected by Clop and Gem.

METHODS

Plasma-level data for the unchanged drug and its metabolite, drawn from the respective literature, formed the basis of our analysis. We evaluated the enzymatic inhibitory activities of DDIs and utilized simulations to estimate plasma levels of the unchanged victim drug and its metabolite in each DDI. This was accomplished by employing a functional relationship that considered the fractional contributions of CYP2C8 and UGT to clearance, perpetrator-specific inhibitory activities against CYP2C8, and drug distribution to UGT.

RESULTS

Our findings emphasize the pivotal role of UGT-mediated distribution in the context of CYP2C8 substrate metabolism, particularly in the complex DDIs induced by Clop and Gem. In these DDIs, Gem exerts inhibitory effects on both UGT and CYP2C8, whereas Clop (specifically its metabolite, Clop-COOH) solely targets CYP2C8. Importantly, the inhibition of CYP2C8 by both Clop and Gem is achieved through a non-competitive mechanism, driven by the actions of their acyl-glucuronides. Clop and Gem exhibit inhibition activities accounting for 85% (pAi,CYP2C8 = 7) and 93% (pAi,CYP2C8 = 15), respectively. In contrast, Gem's inhibition of UGT is relatively modest (50%, pAi,UGT(d) = 2), and it operates through a non-specific, competitive process in drug distribution to UGT. Within this context, our UGT-CYP2C8 interplay model offers an accurate means of predicting the alterations resulting from DDIs, encompassing changes in plasma levels of the unchanged drug and its metabolites, as well as shifts in metabolite formation rates. Our analysis highlights the critical importance of considering the fractional contributions of CYP2C8 and UGT to the victim drug's clearance (fm,CYP2C8; fm,UGT) in DDI prediction. Furthermore, our examination of DDIs involving OATP1B1 substrate drugs underscores that accounting for the hepatic uptake transporters' role in the liver is superfluous in DDI prediction.

CONCLUSION

These findings substantially enhance our comprehension of CYP2C8-mediated oxidation and DDIs, holding crucial implications for drug development and the planning of clinical trials involving these inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interactions: Research Methods and Applications

Because of the high research and development cost of new drugs, the long development process of new drugs, and the high failure rate at later stages, combining past drugs has gradually become a more economical and attractive alternative. However, the ensuing problem of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) urgently need to be solved, and combination has attracted a lot of attention from pharmaceutical researchers. At present, DDI is often evaluated and investigated from two perspectives: pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. However, in some special cases, DDI cannot be accurately evaluated from a single perspective. Therefore, this review describes and compares the current DDI evaluation methods based on two aspects: pharmacokinetic interaction and pharmacodynamic interaction. The methods summarized in this paper mainly include probe drug cocktail methods, liver microsome and hepatocyte models, static models, physiologically based pharmacokinetic models, machine learning models, in vivo comparative efficacy studies, and in vitro static and dynamic tests. This review aims to serve as a useful guide for interested researchers to promote more scientific accuracy and clinical practical use of DDI studies.

[Verification of Pharmacokinetic Approaches in Prior Drug Development]

In this review, 9 compounds with insufficient absorption characteristics, safety or efficacy were selected from among the compounds for which the author was in charge of development between 2000 and 2005, in order to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) approaches used to develop these compounds. Optimization of the PK characteristics of a compound at the early stage of chemical design was found to be the most important factor for successful development. For example, (i) selecting class I or II drugs in the biopharmaceutical classification system, while avoiding efflux transporters, and introducing an appropriate dissociation moiety into a compound to make it soluble lead to sufficient drug absorption; (ii) designing compounds whose production of reactive metabolites, such as acyl glucuronide, does not largely affect total metabolism, yet helps to prevent abnormal PK caused by reactive metabolites. Other factors include (i) selection of a drug efficacy evaluation system based on the correct understanding of the relationship between PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) helps to solve species differences in PD; (ii) the establishment of a nonclinical study based on the identification of the involvement of specific cytochrome P450 molecules in the total metabolic clearance of a drug (f_m,CYPs) helps to solve species differences in PK; and (iii) PK analysis using the tube model for hepatic extraction kinetics, and knowledge of the f_m,CYPs of the victim drug, lead to successful drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction. I hope that this review aids in future drug discovery or development.

Improved Predictions of Drug-Drug Interactions Mediated by Time-Dependent Inhibition of CYP3A

Time-dependent inactivation (TDI) of cytochrome P450s (CYPs) is a leading cause of clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Current methods tend to overpredict DDIs. In this study, a numerical approach was used to model complex CYP3A TDI in human-liver microsomes. The inhibitors evaluated included troleandomycin (TAO), erythromycin (ERY), verapamil (VER), and diltiazem (DTZ) along with the primary metabolites N-demethyl erythromycin (NDE), norverapamil (NV), and N-desmethyl diltiazem (NDD). The complexities incorporated into the models included multiple-binding kinetics, quasi-irreversible inactivation, sequential metabolism, inhibitor depletion, and membrane partitioning. The resulting inactivation parameters were incorporated into static in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) models to predict clinical DDIs. For 77 clinically observed DDIs, with a hepatic-CYP3A-synthesis-rate constant of 0.000 146 min-1, the average fold difference between the observed and predicted DDIs was 3.17 for the standard replot method and 1.45 for the numerical method. Similar results were obtained using a synthesis-rate constant of 0.000 32 min-1. These results suggest that numerical methods can successfully model complex in vitro TDI kinetics and that the resulting DDI predictions are more accurate than those obtained with the standard replot approach.

Usefulness of Two-Compartment Model-Assisted and Static Overall Inhibitory-Activity Method for Prediction of Drug-Drug Interaction

Our study of drug-drug interaction (DDI) started with the clarification of unusually large DDI observed between ramelteon (RAM) and fluvoxamine (FLV). The main cause of this DDI was shown to be the extremely small hepatic availability of RAM (vF_h). Traditional DDI prediction assuming the well-stirred hepatic extraction kinetic ignores the relative increase of vF_h by DDI, while we could solve this problem by use of the tube model. Ultimately, we completed a simple and useful method for prediction of DDI. Currently, DDI prediction becomes more complex and difficult when examining issues such as dynamic changes in perpetrator level, inhibitory metabolites, etc. The regulatory agents recommend DDI prediction by use of some sophisticated methods. However, they seem problematic in requiring plural in vitro data that reduce the flexibility and accuracy of the simulation. In contrast, our method is based on the static and two-compartment models. The two-compartment model has advantages in that it uses common pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters determined from the actual clinical data, guaranteeing the simulation of the reference standard in DDI. Our studies confirmed that dynamic changes in perpetrator level do not make a difference between static and dynamic methods. DDIs perpetrated by FLV and itraconazole were successfully predicted by use of the present method where two DDI predictors [perpetrator-specific inhibitory activities toward CYP isoforms (pA_i, CYPs) and victim-specific fractional CYP-isoform contributions to the clearance (vf_m, CYPs)] are determined successively as shown in the graphical abstract. Accordingly, this approach will accelerate DDI prediction over the traditional methods.